Oatman, Stephanie R.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Multi‐omics studies in Alzheimer's disease (AD) revealed many potential disease pathways and therapeutic targets. Despite their promise of precision medicine, these studies lacked Black Americans (BA) and Latin Americans (LA), who are disproportionately affected by AD. METHODS To bridge this gap, Accelerating Medicines Partnership in Alzheimer's Disease (AMP‐AD) expanded brain multi‐omics profiling to multi‐ethnic donors. RESULTS We generated multi‐omics data and curated and harmonized phenotypic data from BA ( n = 306), LA ( n = 326), or BA and LA ( n = 4) brain donors plus non‐Hispanic White ( n = 252) and other ( n = 20) ethnic groups, to establish a foundational dataset enriched for BA and LA participants. This study describes the data available to the research community, including transcriptome from three brain regions, whole genome sequence, and proteome measures. DISCUSSION The inclusion of traditionally underrepresented groups in multi‐omics studies is essential to discovering the full spectrum of precision medicine targets that will be pertinent to all populations affected with AD. Highlights Accelerating Medicines Partnership in Alzheimer's Disease Diversity Initiative led brain tissue profiling in multi‐ethnic populations. Brain multi‐omics data is generated from Black American, Latin American, and non‐Hispanic White donors. RNA, whole genome sequencing and tandem mass tag proteomicsis completed and shared. Multiple brain regions including caudate, temporal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex were profiled.

AbstractBackgroundInter‐cellular communication within the gliovascular unit (GVU) is critical for cerebral blood flow regulation, and maintenance of the blood‐brain‐barrier (BBB) properties. The breakdown of BBB in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is well‐established, but precise underlying molecular changes remain unclear. Additionally, whether GVU molecular alterations observed in AD brains are also detected in blood from living patients is unknown. Further, these GVU molecular perturbations require further investigation in different model systems to identify both human brain‐specific and cross‐species conserved alterations. In this study, we investigated prioritized GVU molecules altered in AD brains for their conservation in blood and cross‐species model systems.MethodsWe performed single nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) of temporal cortex tissue in AD and control brains. We analyzed this data to detect cell‐specific GVU molecular perturbations and their interactions. We investigated molecular interactions between vascular and astrocyte clusters, the major cell types of the GVU of the BBB. To determine whether GVU transcriptional alterations detected in the brain are preserved in the blood, existing blood expression, genetic, and neuroimaging data from two longitudinal antemortem cohorts were analyzed. Using model systems, including mouse, drosophila, and zebrafish, we evaluated the cross‐species conservation of the top GVU alterations detected in AD brains.ResultsBrain snRNAseq revealed transcriptional profiles of 6,541 astrocytes and 2,210 vascular cells. The latter formed three distinct vascular clusters characterized as pericytes, endothelia and perivascular fibroblasts. We identified differentially expressed genes and their enriched pathways within these clusters and observed the highest levels of transcriptional changes within pericytes. Vascular targets that interact with astrocytic ligands have biological functions in cell signaling, angiogenesis, amyloid ß metabolism, and cytoskeletal architecture. We discovered that genetic variants influencing blood expression levels of some of the prioritized GVU genes were associated with neuroimaging burden of cerebrovascular disease in living human cohorts. Our ongoing studies in model systems revealed conservation of some of the top prioritized molecular perturbations across species.ConclusionOur findings prioritized by multiscale, cross‐tissue human data revealed GVU perturbations within interacting pericyte and astrocyte molecules, which are conserved across multiple cross‐species models. These results nominate new molecular targets and mechanistic insights for BBB disruptions in AD.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is neuropathologically characterized by amyloid‐β (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles often quantified by Thal phase and Braak stage, respectively. Aβ also frequently deposits in the cerebrovasculature with severity categorized by a cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) score. These and related measures often show high variability within AD suggesting distinct underlying mechanisms, the identification of which may reveal important biological insights into AD pathophysiology. We hypothesize that, within the AD brain, neuropathology and levels of core AD‐related proteins are influenced by variations in DNA methylation (DNAm). To test this, we performed epigenome‐wide association studies (EWAS) using DNAm clusters from the temporal cortex (TCX) and cerebellum (CER) with AD‐related neuropathologic measures (Braak, Thal, and CAA) and brain biochemical levels of five proteins (apoE, Aβ40, Aβ42, tau, and p‐tau).MethodsDNAm from neuropathologically‐confirmed AD cases available through the Mayo Clinic brain bank was measured by reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) from 471 brain samples, 200 of which had both TCX and CER measures. Neuropathology was scored by an experienced neuropathologist. TCX levels of five AD‐related proteins from three tissue fractions (buffer‐, detergent‐, and in‐soluble) were measured by ELISA (Liu 2020). CpG methylation (CpGm) was binned by a 15‐state chromatin model (Kundaje 2015) and averaged. Averaged CpGm clusters were tested for their association with each endophenotype through multi‐variable linear regression. The influence of CpGm clusters on expression levels of nearby genes was also investigated through multi‐variable regression.ResultsOur innovative binning method demonstrated expected and biologically relevant CpGm patterns. We identified multiple epigenome‐wide significant CpGm clusters unique to each AD‐related endophenotype and brain region. Comparisons between the TCX and CER further revealed brain region‐specific enrichment of distinct CpGm clusters. Significant CpGm clusters were further characterized by their influence on gene expression.ConclusionsAlthough all neuropathologic and biochemical endophenotypes tested are core to AD pathophysiology, our results suggest each has a distinct epigenetic architecture underlying their variability in the AD brain. By discovering brain region‐specific DNAm changes that contribute to each neuropathologic or biochemical outcome, we can identify core components of complex mechanisms that individually and jointly contribute to AD.

AbstractBackgroundGene expression changes have been identified in post‐mortem brain tissue of AD cases when compared with controls, implicating various genes and pathways. Such findings provide important insights into molecular dysregulation associated with this disease and nominate therapeutic targets. Here we investigate brain gene and co‐expression network changes in a cohort of AD cases to identify associations with degree of AD neuropathology including Braak stage (Tau), Thal phase (Amyloid beta) and brain tissue levels of five AD‐related proteins (apoE, Aβ40, Aβ42, tau, and p‐tau).MethodGene expression measures were collected from temporal cortex (TCX) tissue of 477 AD cases, available through the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank, using RNA sequencing (Illumina TruSeq mRNA) performed on the HiSeq4000. Following quality control 456 cases remained for analysis. Braak and Thal were provided by an experienced neuropathologist and TCX levels of five AD‐related proteins from three fractions (buffer‐soluble, detergent‐soluble, and insoluble) were measured by ELISA (Liu et al. 2020). Weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) R package was used to build co‐expression networks. Genes and networks were tested for association with neuropathology and AD‐related protein levels, adjusting for relevant covariates.ResultA total of 57,353 genes were profiled, of which 19,044 were reliably expressed above background levels and formed 20 co‐expression modules. 36 genes were associated with Braak stage, 10 with Thal phase and up to 9,000 with the AD‐related protein fractions. Brain levels of pTau had the greatest number of associations, with an overrepresentation of genes involved in synaptic signalling and immune response gene ontology biological processes. 16 of the coexpression modules associated with at least one trait after Bonferroni correction for number of tests.ConclusionWe have identified a number of genes and networks associated with different aspects of AD neuropathology and associated proteins, further lending support to the involvement of synaptic and immune biology in AD. However it is not clear whether observed changes cause disease or are a consequence of the neurodegenerative process. Comparison of these findings across different proteins and fractions is expected to reveal common and distinct vulnerabilities associated with amyloid and tau, and different stages of protein aggregation.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder neuropathologically characterized by amyloid‐β (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles often measured by Thal phase and Braak stage, respectively. Frequently, Aβ also deposits in the brain vasculature with severity categorized by a cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) score. Assessment of these and related endophenotypes can reveal biological insights into the phenotypic variability in AD. We hypothesize that, amongst AD patients, severity of neuropathology and brain levels of AD‐related proteins are influenced by variation in DNA methylation (DNAm), the identification of which may uncover biological pathways for AD pathogenesis. To test this, we performed epigenome‐wide association studies (EWAS) using DNAm from the temporal cortex (TCX) and cerebellum (CER) with AD‐related neuropathology measures (Braak, Thal, and CAA) and brain levels of five proteins (apoE, Aβ40, Aβ42, tau, and p‐tau).MethodsDNAm from autopsy‐confirmed AD cases available through the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank was measured by reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) from 471 brain samples, 200 of which had both TCX and CER measures. Bisulfite converted reads were sequenced on the Illumina High Seq4000 and quality filtered. Neuropathology scoring was performed by an experienced neuropathologist. TCX levels of five AD‐related proteins from three fractions (buffer‐soluble, detergent‐soluble, and insoluble) were measured by ELISA (Liu et al. 2020). Individual CpG methylation ratios were tested for association with each neuropathological and biochemical measure using the R package CpGassoc.ResultsWe identified multiple epigenome‐wide significant CpGs unique to each AD‐related measure. Comparisons between the TCX and CER revealed region specific CpG associations. The effects of sex, age at death, APOE genotype, and presence of genetic variants for each significant CpG association were also identified.ConclusionsAlthough all neuropathological and biochemical measures tested reflect core AD pathologies, our results demonstrate unique associations of epigenetic factors with these individual phenotypes, suggesting that their variability may be governed by distinct epigenetic processes. Discovery of DNAm changes that underlie specific neuropathological or biochemical outcomes can enhance our understanding of AD pathophysiology and may lead to the identification of novel gene or pathway targets for the different facets of this complex condition.

AbstractBackgroundInter‐cellular communication within the gliovascular unit (GVU) is critical for cerebral blood flow regulation, maintenance of the blood‐brain‐barrier (BBB) properties, and brain energy metabolism. Although numerous cell biology studies demonstrate the role of the GVU for BBB breakdown in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the precise molecular changes contributing to its pathophysiology are unclear.MethodWe performed single nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) of temporal cortex tissue in 24 AD and control brains to understand the transcriptional changes in the cells of GVU. We acquired the snRNAseq profile of 79,751 total brain cells that comprise 6,541 astrocytes and 2,210 vascular cells. The latter formed three distinct vascular clusters characterized as activated pericytes, endothelia and resting pericytes. We identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and their enriched pathways in these clusters and detected the most transcriptional changes within activated pericytes. Using our data and a knowledge‐based predictive algorithm, we discovered and prioritized molecular interactions between vascular and astrocyte clusters, the main cell types of the GVU of the BBB.ResultsVascular targets predicted to interact with astrocytic ligands have biological functions in signalling, angiogenesis, amyloid ß metabolism and cytoskeletal structure. Top astrocytic and vascular interacting molecules include both novel and known AD risk genes such as APOE, APP and ECE1. We validated gene expression changes using qPCR. We are in the process of evaluating these gene expression changes in antemortem blood from AD and control participants.ConclusionOur findings provide valuable information into the transcriptional changes in predicted vascular‐astrocytic partners at the GVU, highlighting insights into the molecular mechanisms of BBB breakdown in AD.

Abstract Not all apolipoprotein E ( APOE ) ε4 carriers who survive to advanced age develop Alzheimer's disease (AD); factors attenuating the risk of ε4 on AD may exist. Guided by the top ε4‐attenuating signals from methylome‐wide association analyses (N = 572, ε4+ and ε4–) of neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques, we conducted a meta‐analysis for pathological AD within the ε4+ subgroups (N = 235) across four independent collections of brains. Cortical RNA‐seq and microglial morphology measurements were used in functional analyses. Three out of the four significant CpG dinucleotides were captured by one principal component (PC1), which interacts with ε4 on AD, and is associated with expression of innate immune genes and activated microglia. In ε4 carriers, reduction in each unit of PC1 attenuated the odds of AD by 58% (odds ratio = 2.39, 95% confidence interval = [1.64,3.46], P = 7.08 × 10 –6 ). An epigenomic factor associated with a reduced proportion of activated microglia (epigenomic factor of activated microglia, EFAM) appears to attenuate the risk of ε4 on AD.