Roboz, Gail J.

AbstractDespite advances in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment, significant unmet medical needs remain. Surrogate end points for overall survival can accelerate the approval of novel therapies. Measurable residual disease (MRD) is a promising surrogate end point candidate, providing a sensitive and quantitative assessment of disease burden. Numerous studies have demonstrated that negative MRD status—across diverse methodologies, assessment timepoints and thresholds, patient subgroups, and clinical settings—independently predicts improved survival. Although MRD can inform therapeutic decisions at the patient level, its formal integration as a primary surrogate end point in regulatory frameworks for clinical trials requires rigorous validation. MRD Partnership and Alliance in AML Clinical Treatment (MPAACT) is a research consortium among industry and academic leaders. MPAACT actively engages with regulatory agencies, health technology assessment bodies, technology vendors, and patient groups to establish a pathway for validating MRD as a surrogate end point in AML clinical trials. For the current article, the authors reviewed the status of MRD assessment, its use in recent clinical trials, current MRD assessment methodologies, standardization, regulatory guidance, statistical approaches, and patient access considerations necessary for MRD to become a surrogate clinical trial end point. The extensive collaboration between MPAACT, global industry, and academic partners—including data sharing and resource integration—underscores the collective commitment to advancing AML therapies. Establishing MRD as a surrogate end point could accelerate the development and approval of innovative treatments, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Abstract Excessively restrictive inclusion and exclusion criteria in clinical trials are one of many barriers to clinical trial enrollment for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDSs). Many organizations are developing efforts to increase clinical trial eligibility; yet, several recent publications focused on patients with MDS suggest that many patients with this disease may be excluded from clinical trials unnecessarily. Clinical trial eligibility should reflect the phase of the study and risks of the agent being studied. Phase 3 trials should be less restrictive than early-phase trials to represent the real-world population as closely as possible. We hypothesize that many clinical trials, particularly phase 3 trials, have unnecessarily restrictive eligibility criteria. This study aims to evaluate the most common eligibility criteria according to phase of trial and to determine whether criteria correspond with drug safety signals. We identified MDS clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from 1 January 2000 to 1 September 2023 and analyzed the eligibility criteria of 191 therapeutic MDS trials. We found that categorical inclusion and exclusion criteria are remarkably similar in representation across trial phases. Additionally, only 13% of trials are concordant with drug safety signals, suggesting that the eligibility criteria are often arbitrary. On behalf of the icMDS (International Consortium for Myelodysplastic Syndromes), an association of international MDS experts, we provide a position statement on restrictive eligibility criteria for MDS clinical trials that should be avoided with the aim of removing barriers to clinical trial enrollment.

Introduction The International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and its revised version (IPSS-R) were developed using datasets from patients (pts) with untreated MDS. The cytogenetic risk groups used in IPSS-R were expanded to 5 groups from the 3 used in IPSS. Among the new groups introduced in IPSS-R is the “very complex” karyotype (VCK) where ≥4 karyotypic abnormalities are seen compared to “complex karyotype (CK)” with only 3 abnormalities. However, the prognostic impact of VCK vs CK, as well as individual cytogenetic abnormalities and TP53 mutation (TP53mut) status within the CK and VCK subgroups in pts with MDS treated with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) has not been well studied. Hence, we analyzed these questions in a large cohort of HMA-treated MDS pts in the icMDS VALIDATE database. Methods The icMDS VALIDATE database contains MDS pts treated with frontline HMA monotherapy or HMA-based combinations from 22 specialized international centers. Pts with unknown HMA type, date of HMA initiation, missing age, missing sex, missing cytogenetic data, bone marrow or peripheral blood blasts ≥20%, or missing survival status were excluded. We performed time-to-event analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared groups by the log-rank test. We measured overall survival (OS) from time of HMA initiation. VALIDATE protocol was exempted, acknowledged, or approved by all centers' IRBs. VALIDATE is supported by an independent grant from Abbvie. Results A total of 1940 pts were included. Median age was 70 (range: 18-99) years and 66% were men. According to IPSS-R cytogenetic risk groups, 1.9% (37) were very good, 43.4% (841) good, 15.5% (301) intermediate, 11.6% (226) poor, and 27.6% (535) very poor. By HMA type, 71% of pts were treated with azacitidine, 14% with decitabine, 6% with HMA and venetoclax, and 9% with another HMA combination. Approximately 28% of pts underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT). The IPSS-R cytogenetic risk groups had different OS (p<0.001)with median OS (mOS; months [mo], 95% CI) as follows: very good (43.4, 34.7-72.5), good (41.7, 36.4-46.8), intermediate (24.5, 23.1-32.4), poor (24.2, 19.2-28.5), and very poor (13.6, 12.5-14.5). The difference remained significant (p=0.001) after censoring at time of alloHSCT with mOS as follows: very good (40.4, 23.2-64.3), good (24.3, 22.2-26.3), intermediate (19.3, 15.1-22.2), poor (12.2, 10.3-14.8), and very poor (9.1, 8.2-19.7). Interestingly, the difference between mOS for intermediate and poor risk cytogenetics became more apparent after censoring at time of alloHSCT. Next, we compared the outcomes of pts with CK and VCK to non-complex karyotype (NCK) MDS. The mOS for pts with VCK MDS (13.6 mo, 12.5-14.5) was worse compared to pts with CK (19.9 mo, 19.9-16.8; p=0.004) and NCK (36.1 mo, 32.7-37.8; p<0.001) MDS. Among the 1458 pts with available molecular data, more pts with VCK (75%, 330) MDS had a concurrent TP53mut compared to pts with CK (40%, 21; p<0.001) and NCK (7%, 64 p<0.001) MDS. Considering only patients with TP53mut MDS, mOS for pts with VCK (12.2, 11.1-13.9) was worse compared with NCK (24.2, 16-1-53.1; p<0.001) but not with CK (19.9, 9.5-NR; p=0.9); the difference between CK and NCK was not significant (p=0.16). Among pts with TP53 wildtype (TP53WT) MDS, VCK (15.0, 13.2-18.2) had a similar mOS to TP53WT CK (18.8, 12.6-41.1; p=0.19) while both groups had worse mOS compared to TP53WT NCK (33.4, 30.1-37.0) (p=0.01). In a survival analysis of 616 pts with MDS with ≥3 cytogenetic abnormalities, -17/del(17p) (12.8 mo; p=0.009), inv(3)/t(3q)/del(3q) (10.9 mo; p=0.006), and del(7q) (12.1mo; p=0.024), though not -7 (12.6mo; p=0.23), were associated with lower mOS compared to the pts with MDS without these abnormalities (14.3mo). Conclusions Using one of the largest databases of HMA-treated MDS pts, we show that IPSS-R cytogenetic risk categories associate with significantly different survivals among HMA-treated MDS pts, even after censoring at time of alloHSCT. Importantly, VCK MDS was associated with worse mOS compared to CK and NCK MDS but not in pts with a concurrent TP53mut. Among pts with MDS with ≥3 chromosomal abnormalities, having -17/del(17p), inv(3)/t(3q)/del(3q), or del(7q) was associated with worse survival.

Introduction: Response assessment is used to evaluate effectiveness of hypomethylating agent (HMA)-based therapy in myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) in clinical practice and trials. Recently, the clinical response criteria (IWG 2023) and the clinical-molecular risk assessment (IPSS-M) in MDS were published. However, it remains unknown whether the IWG 2023 response criteria have an independent impact on overall survival (OS) when adjusting for baseline IPSS-M risk. Additionally, the association of IWG 2023 response criteria with OS in patients (pts) undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) versus those who do not is unknown. Lastly, it is unclear if optimal time-to-transplant impacts OS in MDS pts who achieve a IWG 2023 defined remission with HMA therapy. We examined these questions in a large population of MDS pts within the multi-institutional international consortium for MDS (icMDS) VALIDATE database. Methods: High-risk MDS pts with IPSS ≥1.5 or IPSS-R >3.5 treated with HMA-based therapy were included in the study. Baseline IPSS-M risk was stratified into very low/low/moderate low (VL+L+ML), moderate-high/high (MH+H), and very high (VH). Response to treatment was evaluated using the IWG 2023 criteria and grouped into: composite complete response (cCR) and no cCR. cCR included: complete response (CR), CR equivalent (CRequ), CR bilineage (CRbi), CR unilineage (CRuni), and CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh). We analyzed the differential impact of achieving cCR on HMA-based therapy prior to transplant on OS in pts who either did or did not undergo allo-HCT, while adjusting for their baseline IPSS-M risk in Cox regression analysis. Optimal time-to-transplant was determined based on age and IPSS-M category as described by Tentori et al. (JCO 2024). Pts proceeding to allo-HCT were stratified on whether they underwent transplant within the optimal time-to-transplant timeframe after MDS diagnosis or not. VALIDATE protocol was exempted, acknowledged, or approved by all centers' IRBs. VALIDATE is supported by an independent grant from AbbVie. Results: We analyzed 762 MDS pts. The median age at MDS diagnosis was 68 years (range: 19-95 years) and 64% of pts were male. Distribution of the baseline IPSS-M risk was: VL+L+ML in 110 (14%) pts, MH+H in 347 (46%) pts, VH in 305 (40%) pts. Pts received azacitidine monotherapy, decitabine monotherapy, and HMA-based combination therapy (e.g. HMA + venetoclax) in 52%, 21%, and 28% of cases, respectively. A total of 282/762 (37%) pts achieved cCR as their best response to HMA-based therapy. The median OS for all pts was 18.7 months (95% CI: 16.6-21.3 months). Pts who did not undergo allo-HCT (n=436, 57%) had an improved median OS if they achieved cCR when compared to pts in the no cCR group in all IPSS-M risk groups (VL+L+ML: 23.5 months vs. 10.7 months; MH+H: 20.8 months vs. 11.6 months; VH: 13.8 months vs. 7.5 months). Cox analysis demonstrated an independent effect of cCR on OS in these pts when adjusted for baseline IPSS-M risk (cCR vs. no cCR: HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.48-0.76, p<0.001). In contrast, in pts who subsequently received an allo-HCT (n=326, 43%), achieving cCR with HMA prior to allo-HCT did not provide an additional OS benefit, when adjusted for baseline IPSS-M risk (cCR vs. no cCR: HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.73-1.38, p=0.986). The median time-to-transplant was 6.7 months and 34% of transplanted MDS pts received their allo-HCT during the optimal timeframe. Among pts who achieved cCR with HMA-based therapy prior to allo-HCT, optimal time-to-transplant was associated with significantly improved OS (optimal vs. non-optimal timing: HR 0.55; p=0.033). Conclusion: Baseline IPSS-M risk and allo-HCT had an independent impact on OS, while IWG 2023 defined cCR had an independent effect on OS only in non-transplanted MDS pts. While this retrospective analysis occurred at large academic centers with specific expertise in the management of MDS, our data may have an impact on clinical practice: (i) failure to achieve cCR on HMA therapy prior to transplant should not impact the decision to proceed to allo-HCT, (ii) upfront allo-HCT without prior HMA therapy might also be an option if the clinical situation and availability of donors allow, and (iii) allo-HCT should ideally be performed during the timeframe that is considered optimal as defined by pt age and baseline IPSS-M.

Introduction Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have a poor prognosis and, until recently, lacked therapeutic options. Ivosidenib (IVO) is an oral, targeted, small-molecule inhibitor of mIDH1. In October 2023, IVO was granted FDA approval for the treatment of adult pts with mIDH1 R/R MDS on the basis of results from the pivotal AG120-C-001 MDS substudy (NCT02074839); IVO showed an acceptable safety profile and induced durable remissions, with a high rate (38.9%) of complete remissions (CR) per International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria (DiNardo et al. Blood Adv 2024; bloodadvances.2023012302.). Response criteria evolve to better reflect clinical benefit in specific pt populations and reduce interobserver variability. The updated IWG 2023 criteria for higher-risk MDS lowered the hemoglobin threshold for CR, added response categories for pts with <5% blasts or limited count recovery, and eliminated the marrow CR (mCR) category. Herein we analyze responses, transfusion independence (TI), and survival outcomes of pts treated with IVO according to IWG 2023 criteria. In addition, responses assessed per IWG 2023 and IWG 2006 criteria are compared. Methods Pts with mIDH1 R/R MDS who had received prior SOC therapy were eligible. Oral IVO 500 mg was administered daily on days 1-28 of 28-day cycles. Responses were assessed per IWG 2023 criteria, and a composite CR (CRc) category was included in the analysis, which comprises all CR categories: CR + CR equivalent (CRe) + CR with limited count recovery (CRL) + CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh). Overall response rate (ORR) was defined as CR + mCR + partial remission (PR) per IWG 2006 criteria, and as CRc + PR + hematologic improvement (HI) per IWG 2023 criteria. For TI analysis, non-CRc was defined as HI + PR + no response (NR)/not evaluable + progressive disease. TI was defined as requiring no transfusion for ≥56 days. Results In total, 19 pts were enrolled (median age: 73 yr; prior hypomethylating therapy: 78.9%) and data from 18 efficacy-evaluable pts were analyzed. CR + PR rate (primary endpoint) per IWG 2006 was 38.9%, with all 7 (38.9%) responders having CR. CRc + PR rate per IWG 2023 was 66.7% (n=12), with all responders having CRc, including 5 (27.8%) pts with CR, 3 (16.7%) with CRe, and 4 (22.2%) with CRL (CR unilineage [CRLuni], n=2 [11.1%]; CR bilineage [CRLbi], n=2 [11.1%]); no pt had CRh or PR. ORR was 83.3% per IWG 2006, with 7 (38.9%) pts having CR and 8 (44.4%) mCR; 4 (22.2%) pts with mCR had HI. Per IWG 2023 criteria, the ORR was 72.2%, with 12 (66.7%) pts having CRc and 1 (5.6%) HI with neutrophil response. The 8 mCR per IWG 2006 criteria were reclassified as 1 CR, 4 CRL (2 CRLuni and 2 CRLbi), 1 HI, and 2 NR per IWG 2023. Median time to CRc was 1.58 mo. Median duration of CRc was not reached and Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates at 3, 6, and 12 mo were 90.9%, 81.8%, and 68.2%, respectively. Five (CRc group n=4; non-CRc group n=1) of 7 (71.4%) and 3 (CRc, n=1; non-CRc, n=2) of 4 pts requiring red blood cell (RBC) and platelet transfusion at baseline, respectively, had TI. Median time to any (RBC/platelet) TI was 2.64 and 2.43 mo for pts with CRc and non-CRc, respectively. Moreover, 10 of 12 (83.3%) pts with CRc and 3 of 6 (50%) with non-CRc had or maintained TI during the study. Median duration of TI was not reached and KM estimates at 3 and 6 mo were 90.0% and 65.6%, respectively, for pts with CRc and 100% and 66.7% for non-CRc. Median event-free survival (EFS) was not reached for pts with CRc (n=12) or NR (n=5), and KM estimates at 1 yr were 68.2% and 53.3%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached for pts with CRc and was 16.5 mo for pts with NR. For pts with CRc, OS KM estimates at 1, 3, and 5 yr were 90.9%, 51.1%, and 51.1%, respectively. For pts with NR, OS KM estimates were 75% at 1 yr and not estimable at 3 and 5 yr. For the pt with HI, the EFS estimate at 1 yr was 100% and OS estimates were 100% at 1, 3, and 5 yr. Conclusions IVO resulted in a high ORR (72.2%) according to IWG 2023 criteria, including a 66.7% CRc rate, despite the removal of the mCR category. Of 8 mCR per IWG 2006 criteria, 5 (62.5%) were reclassified as CRc per IWG 2023 criteria. By eliminating mCR and assessing response in a high-risk population with <5% blasts, IWG 2023 criteria accurately capture the clinical benefit of IVO in R/R MDS. While comparison of survival outcomes between IWG 2006 and IWG 2023 is limited by the small sample size, a similar trend with response-dependent EFS and OS outcomes was observed.

TPS6585 Background: Despite improved outcomes with azacitidine (AZA) and venetoclax (VEN) in newly diagnosed (ND) unfit acute myeloid leukemia (AML), only a subset of patients (pts) respond (CR 37%; CR/CRi 66%) and long-term survival remains inadequate (mOS <15m, DiNardo NEJM 2020). The measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative rate was 41% in AZA-VEN treated pts in VIALE-A which was associated with improved survival (Pratz JCO 2022). CD123 is expressed on the majority of AML blasts and leukemic stem cells while minimally expressed on normal hematopoietic stem cells (Kovtun Blood Adv 2018). Pivekimab sunirine (PVEK, IMGN632) is an antibody-drug conjugate comprising a high-affinity CD123 antibody, cleavable linker, and an indolinobenzodiazepine pseudodimer (IGN) payload. The IGN payload alkylates DNA and causes single strand breaks without crosslinking. IGNs are designed to have high potency against tumor cells, while demonstrating less toxicity to normal marrow progenitors than other DNA-targeting payloads. Clinical data from the first 50 pts in the dose expansion cohorts 1 and 2 with ND AML demonstrated a 76% (22/29) MRD negativity rate (by flow cytometry, negativity threshold <0.1%) (Daver ASH 2023), supporting the continued enrollment of the PVEK+AZA+VEN triplet and further evaluation of the regimen’s antileukemia activity and safety in consideration of potential registration-enabling trials. Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, phase 1b/2 study of PVEK administered in a combination with AZA+VEN in pts with ND CD123-positive (CD123+ by flow cytometry or IHC) AML, with no prior treatment with hypomethylating agents (HMA). Pts will receive the recommended phase 2 dose of PVEK 0.045 mg/kg IV as a < 30-minute outpatient infusion on day 7, AZA 75 mg/m2 SC or IV daily on days 1 to 7, and VEN 400 mg PO daily for up to 28 days in a 28-day cycle. During cycle 1, a bone marrow evaluation at or around day 21 is required to inform VEN dose duration. Current eligibility criteria for continued enrollment of AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy include age ≥ 75 years old, or age < 75 years old with ECOG 2-3, or at least one defined comorbidity. The primary study objectives are to assess antileukemia clinical activity (composite CR [complete remission] rate, overall response rate, duration of remission) and MRD-negativity rates. Key secondary objectives are safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. The PVEK+AZA+VEN triplet in pts with ND unfit AML is currently enrolling across sites in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK and USA. Clinical trial information: NCT04086264 .

Abstract Ivosidenib is a first-in-class mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1) inhibitor with efficacy and tolerability in patients with advanced mIDH1 hematologic malignancies, leading to approval in frontline and relapsed/refractory (R/R) mIDH1 acute myeloid leukemia. We report final data from a phase 1 single-arm substudy of once-daily ivosidenib in patients with R/R mIDH1 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) after failure of standard-of-care therapies. Primary objectives were to determine safety, tolerability, and clinical activity. The primary efficacy end point was the complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR) rate. Nineteen patients were enrolled; 18 were included in the efficacy analysis. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 8 (42.1%) patients, including a grade 1 QT interval prolongation in 1 (5.3%) patient and grade 2 differentiation syndrome in 2 (10.5%) patients. Rates of CR + PR and objective response (CR + PR + marrow CR) were 38.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.3-64.3) and 83.3% (95% CI, 58.6-96.4), respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a 68.6% probability of patients in CR achieving a remission duration of ≥5 years, and a median overall survival of 35.7 months. Of note, 71.4% and 75.0% baseline red blood cell (RBC)- and platelet-transfusion-dependent patients, respectively, became transfusion independent (TI; no transfusion for ≥56 days); 81.8% and 100% of baseline RBC and platelet TI patients, respectively, remained TI. One (5.3%) patient proceeded to a hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In conclusion, ivosidenib is clinically active, with durable remissions and a manageable safety profile observed in these patients. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02074839.

Introduction: MDS are primarily diseases of the elderly, with median age at diagnosis of 72 years. Focused data on clinical and molecular characteristics, as well as outcomes, in younger pts under age 60 years are limited. We conducted this multicenter retrospective study to describe pt characteristics, cytogenetic and molecular profiles, treatment modalities, and outcomes in younger pts with MDS, including adolescent and young adults (AYA). Methods: The study included pts diagnosed with MDS between 2002-2023 at 7 academic centers. We compared baseline characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of AYA (18-39 years) and younger adult (YA) pts (40-59 years). Responses were assessed using the modified IWG 2006 response criteria which included complete remission (CR), marrow CR (mCR), and hematologic improvement (HI). Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher's exact (and Chi-square) test were used to compare pt and disease characteristics for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Results: A total of 173 pts were identified (AYA, N=50; YA, N=123). Median age at diagnosis was 50 years (range, 18-59), with 51% females. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Therapy-related MDS (t-MDS) was observed in 40 pts (23%) with the remaining classified as de novo MDS (N=133; 77%). Inherited bone marrow failure syndromes were documented in 15 pts (9%), with Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome (N=4) and Fanconi anemia (N=4) being the most frequent. Using the WHO 2016 classification, the most common subtypes of MDS in both the AYA and YA cohorts were MDS with multilineage dysplasia (38% vs 19%), MDS with excess blasts-2 (MDS-EB) (24% vs 29%), and MDS-EB-1 (16% vs 20%). Similarly, using the WHO 2022 classification, the most common subtypes were MDS with low blasts (50% vs 21%), MDS with increased blasts-2 (MDS-IB-2) (24% vs 24%), and MDS-IB-1 (16% vs 18%). Stratifying pts using the IPSS-R cytogenetic (CG) risk group, the most common CG risk category identified was good CG (34% vs 52%, p=0.012). Poor/very poor CG were present in 34% and 37% of the AYA and YA groups, respectively. STAG2 and NRAS mutations occurred more frequently in the AYA pts compared to the YA group, while the YA cohort was enriched for the following mutations: TP53, DNMT3A, SF3B1, SRSF2, and TET2 (Figure 1). In the AYA population, 18 pts (38%) had very low/low, 10 (21%) intermediate, and 20 pts (42%) had high/very high risk MDS using IPSS-R. In the YA population, 32 pts (26%) had very low/low, 32 (26%) intermediate, and 57 pts (47%) had high/very high risk MDS using IPSS-R. Twenty-seven percent of pts with very low to intermediate-risk MDS using IPSS-R were upstaged to moderate high to very high-risk MDS using IPSS-M. The majority of pts (AYA: 75%; YA: 63%, p=0.5) were transfusion independent at baseline. Single-agent hypomethylating agents were the most frequently used frontline therapy, used in 17 AYA pts (34%) and 58 YA pts (48%), with more AYA pts receiving upfront allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) compared to YA pts (28% vs 5%). After frontline therapy (Table 1), an additional 14 AYA (28%) and 52 YA (42%) pts received Allo-SCT. In pts with IPSS-R intermediate to very high-risk, response rates (HI+CR+mCR+mCR with HI) to frontline therapies were 46% and 54.5% in the AYA and YA groups, respectively. After median follow-up of 24 months [range, 1-218], median OS was numerically longer in the AYA versus YA group (155 vs 53 months, p=0.2). AML transformation occurred in 24% and 20% of the pts in the AYA and YA groups, respectively. Median OS was significantly longer in de novo compared to t-MDS pts (56 vs 27 months, p=0.03). Median OS among Allo-SCT compared to non-SCT pts were not reached vs 155 months ( p=0.9) in the AYA group and 53 vs 54 months ( p=0.4) in the YA group. IPSS-R (very low+low vs intermediate vs high+very high) was able to distinguish differences in OS in the YA (133 vs 53 vs 17 months, p=0.0002) and AYA (155 vs not reached vs 18 months, p=0.006) pts, with the exception of the intermediate-risk group in the AYA cohort. Conclusions: In this study, d e novoMDS was seen in the majority of younger pts with MDS (both AYA and YA). Mutations in STAG2 and NRAS were more common in the AYA pts, while YA pts had MDS more enriched for TP53, DNMT3A, TET2 and splicing mutations. This study is still ongoing with a plan to compare the abovementioned groups to older pts (≥60 years) with MDS.