Goldsweig, Andrew M.

Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) represents a significant component of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality among the young and middle-aged populations of the United States (US). Research Question: To analyze the long-term trends and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on AMI-related mortality among the young and middle-aged populations of the US. Methods: Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) multiple causes of death database were used to analyze death certificates from 1999 to 2023 for AMI-related deaths among the young and middle-aged population (aged 25-64) of the US. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 people and associated annual percent changes (APCs) and average APC (AAPCs) were analyzed using Joinpoint regression analysis. Mortality trends were stratified by sex, race/ethnicity, and census region. Results: From 1999 to 2023, there were 970,454 AMI-related deaths among U.S. adults aged 25-64 years. The annual number of AMI-related deaths decreased from 44,040 in 1999 to 31,522 in 2023. The overall AAMR per 100,000 decreased from 31.02 deaths (95% CI, 30.73 to 31.31) in 1999 to 15.29 (95% CI, 15.11 to 15.46) in 2023 (AAPC -2.92%, 95% CI -3.22 to -2.75). The AAMR per 100,000 declined at a faster rate from 31.02 in 1999 to 19.57 in 2010 (1999-2010, APC -4.26), followed by a slower rate from 19.57 in 2010 to 16.67 in 2019 (2010-2019, APC -1.41), The declining trend was disrupted by a transient increase during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a peak AAMR of 19.73 (95% CI, 19.53 to 19.93) in 2021 (2019-2021, APC 8.52). The declining trend resumed from 2021 to 2023, with AAMR decreasing to the lowest levels of 15.29 in 2023 (2021-2023, APC -12.58). Heterogeneity across demographic and regional groups has narrowed during these 25 years. However, they are still prevalent, with men ( figure 1 ), non-Hispanic (NH) Black or African American, NH American Indian or Alaska Native ( figure 2 ), and the residents of the Southern United States ( figure 3 ) having higher mortality rates. Conclusion: Over the past 25 years, AMI-related mortality has declined in the young and middle-aged population of the US, although rates spiked during the COVID-19 pandemic before resuming their decline in 2022. While disparities among demographic and regional groups have narrowed, they still exist, necessitating comprehensive efforts to improve cardiovascular health outcomes.

Background Older adults undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) face unique challenges due to complex anatomy and comorbidities. Intravascular imaging [including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT)] has been shown to improve PCI outcomes, but its benefits in older adults are less well established. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare intravascular imaging with angiography alone to guide PCI in older adults. Methods Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus were searched for RCTs comparing intravascular imaging (IVUS or OCT) vs. angiography alone in adults aged ≥65 years. The outcome of interest was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at the longest follow-up, as defined by each trial. Subgroup analyses were performed based on intravascular imaging modality, age group, and lesion complexity. Data were pooled using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins’ I ² statistic. Results Nine RCTs ( n = 7164, intravascular imaging = 3703, angiography alone = 3461) met the inclusion criteria. Intravascular imaging significantly reduced MACE compared with angiography alone [relative risk (RR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56–0.77; P < 0.001; I ² = 0%]. IVUS demonstrated superiority over angiography alone (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.43–0.72; P < 0.001; I ² = 0%), while OCT demonstrated only a trend toward MACE reduction (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.62–1.02). Subgroup analyses indicated consistent benefits with intravascular imaging for adults aged ≥65 and ≥70 years, respectively, and among those with complex coronary lesions (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53–0.79; P < 0.001). Conclusion Intravascular imaging guidance, especially IVUS, reduces MACE in older adults undergoing PCI compared with angiography alone.

Background Treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) accounts for 10% of percutaneous coronary interventions in the USA. Paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) are an alternative to uncoated balloons (UCBs) for ISR. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central for studies comparing PCB with UCB in treating ISR. Outcomes included late lumen loss, binary restenosis, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Results Eight trials including 1410 patients [PCB in 865 (61%), follow-up 6 months to 10 years) were identified. Angiographic outcomes of late lumen loss [mean difference: −0.50 mm; 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.66 to −0.33; P < 0.01] and binary restenosis [relative risk (RR): 0.22; 95% CI: 0.13–0.40; P < 0.01] at 6–8 months were lower with PCB. TLR at 6 months (RR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.06–0.40; P < 0.001) and 1 year (RR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.31–0.66; P < 0.001), MACE at 6 months (RR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.16–0.38; P < 0.001), MACE at 3–5 years (RR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.37–0.80; P = 0.002), and TLR at 3–5 years (RR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.29–0.90; P = 0.021) were lower with PCB. Meta-regression revealed that ISR lesions in the left anterior descending artery were associated with lower rates of binary restenosis while the opposite was observed for left circumflex lesions. Conclusion Revascularization of coronary ISR with PCB is associated with reduced late lumen loss, binary restenosis, TLR, CCE, and MACE. PCB may be a preferred strategy for coronary ISR.

Background: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) using venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a promising strategy for refractory cardiac arrest. However, the role of left ventricular (LV) unloading during ECPR remains uncertain. Methods: We queried the United States National Inpatient Sample (2016-2021) to identify adult patients with out-of-hospital (OHCA) and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) who received ECPR. Patients were stratified based on the use of either VA-ECMO only or VA-ECMO with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or VA-ECMO with Impella (ECPELLA) for ventricular unloading. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare in-hospital outcomes between the groups. Results: Among 6,915 patients receiving ECPR, VA-ECMO alone was used in 5,145 (74.4%), VA-ECMO-IABP in 809 (11.7%), and ECPELLA in 961 (13.9%). The LV unloading groups more frequently presented with ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (61.1% and 72.4% vs. 43.9%, both p<0.01), while the VA-ECMO only group more often presented with pulseless electrical activity/asystole (56.1% vs. 38.9% and 27.6%, both p<0.01). In IHCA patients, ECPELLA was associated with 50% lower odds of in-hospital mortality compared to VA-ECMO alone (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.50, 95% CI 0.31-0.81, p<0.01). No significant difference was found in OHCA patients. VA-ECMO-IABP was not associated with a mortality benefit vs. VA-ECMO alone in either OHCA or IHCA (Figure 1). Cardiovascular complications were significantly higher in both LV unloading groups compared to the VA-ECMO only group in OHCA subgroup (90% and 95% vs. 73.3%, both p<0.01) while IHCA subgroup only showed higher significant rates in ECPELLA compared to VA-ECMO alone (89.3% vs. 81%, p=0.04) (Figure 2). After adjustment for potential confounders, VA-ECMO-IABP (aOR 2.79, 95% CI 1.02-7.60, p=0.04) and ECPELLA (aOR 6.92, 95% CI 2.09-22.94, p<0.01) were associated with significantly higher odds of cardiovascular complications compared to VA-ECMO alone among OHCA patients, but not among IHCA patient. There were no statistically significant differences in neurologic, renal, and hematologic complications between the three groups in either OHCA or IHCA patients (Figure 3). Conclusion: In this nationwide study, LV unloading with ECPELLA was associated with improved survival in IHCA patients but not in OHCA patients compared to VA-ECMO alone. The addition of IABP to VA-ECMO was not associated with a mortality benefit.

Background: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The relationships of race/ethnicity and sex to outcomes and treatment patterns among patients with IHCA remain poorly understood. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2020 to identify adult patients with IHCA and compare in-hospital outcomes stratified by race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic) and sex. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included rates of in-hospital procedures. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders. Results: Among 207,770 patients with IHCA, 26.6% had ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) and 73.4% had pulseless electrical activity (PEA)/asystole. In the VT/VF subgroup, Black males (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.21-1.66), Black females (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.05-1.50), and Hispanic females (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.01-1.66) had higher odds of mortality compared to White males (Figure 1). In the PEA/asystole subgroup, Black males (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11-1.39) and Hispanic males (aOR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.40) had higher odds of mortality, while White females had lower odds (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.94) compared to White males (Figure 2). Black patients were less likely to receive percutaneous coronary intervention (aOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.43-0.66 for males; aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.42-0.69 for females) and coronary artery bypass grafting (aOR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.82 for males; aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27-0.81 for females) compared to White males in VT/VF arrests. Additionally, Black males had the highest adjusted odds of renal replacement therapy in VT/VF arrests (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.21-1.80), while Hispanic males had the highest adjusted odds in PEA/asystole arrests (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.27-1.74) compared to White males. The remaining outcomes of interest in both VT/VF and PEA/asystole arrests are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2 respectively. Conclusion: Significant racial/ethnic and sex disparities exist in outcomes and treatment patterns among patients with IHCA, with differences observed in both VT/VF and PEA/asystole subgroups. Targeted efforts and further studies are needed to better understand and address these disparities and improve outcomes in these severely ill patients.

Background In‐hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The relationships between race and ethnicity and sex on outcomes and treatment patterns among patients with IHCA remain poorly understood. Methods and Results We conducted a retrospective study using the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2020 to identify adult patients with IHCA and examine the associations between in‐hospital outcomes and race and ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic) and sex. The primary outcome was in‐hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included rates of in‐hospital procedures. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for potential confounders. Among 207 770 patients with IHCA, 26.6% had ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation and 73.4% had pulseless electrical activity/asystole. For ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation arrest, Black men (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.42 [95% CI, 1.21–1.66]), Black women (aOR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.05–1.50]), and Hispanic women (aOR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.01–1.66]) had higher odds of mortality compared with White men (corresponding adjusted risk ratios [aRRs], 1.10 [CI, 1.06–1.14], 1.06 [95% CI, 1.02–1.11], and 1.08 [95% CI, 1.01–1.14], respectively). In the pulseless electrical activity/asystole arrest subgroup, Black men (aOR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.11–1.39]) and Hispanic men (aOR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.07–1.40]) had higher odds of mortality (corresponding aRRs, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02–1.06] and 1.04 [95% CI, 1.01–1.06], respectively). Black patients with IHCA were less likely to receive percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, and mechanical circulatory support compared with White men. Conclusions Significant racial and ethnic and sex disparities exist in outcomes and treatment patterns among patients with IHCA. Targeted efforts and further studies are needed to better understand and address these disparities and improve outcomes.

Abstract Background Atrial high-rate episodes (AHRE) are commonly detected in individuals with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Outcomes of atrial high-rate episodes remain unclear in those without a prior history of atrial fibrillation. Purpose This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes of atrial high-rate episodes in patients who have no prior history of atrial fibrillation. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched through February 2024 for studies evaluating clinical outcomes in individuals with cardiac implantable electronic devices who experienced atrial high-rate episodes, compared to those who did not. Individuals who had a prior history of atrial fibrillation were excluded. Outcomes assessed were clinical atrial fibrillation, thromboembolic events, and all-cause mortality. A fixed-effects model was used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A subgroup analysis of thromboembolic events was conducted based on the duration of atrial high-rate episodes. Results A total of 9 studies met inclusion criteria with a combined enrollment of 7440 patients. Compared to those who did not experience atrial high-rate episodes, those who did had significantly increased risks of clinical atrial fibrillation (RR 3.33; 95% CI 1.99 - 5.57; P &lt; 0.0001) and thromboembolic events (RR 2.21; 95% CI 1.72 -2.85; P &lt; 0.0001). The risk of all-cause mortality was similar between both groups (RR 1.19; 95% CI 0.95 – 1.49; P = 0.13). Subgroup analysis revealed an increased risk of thromboembolic events among atrial high-rate episodes ≥ 24 hours (RR 12.34; 95% CI 2.70 – 56.36) while atrial high-rate episodes lasting &lt; 24 hours were insignificantly associated with thromboembolic events (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.12 – 5.58). Conclusions Our study indicates a heightened risk of clinical atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic events among patients with atrial high-rate episodes, with no observed increase in mortality risk. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the duration of atrial high-rate episodes influences the risk of thromboembolism. Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Abstract Background The role of anticoagulation in patients with atrial high-rate episodes (AHRE), who have no prior history of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, is being extensively studied. Purpose Given the increased thrombo-embolic risk in patients who have atrial high-rate episodes, our aim was to evaluate whether anticoagulation leads to enhanced clinical outcomes compared to no anticoagulation (1). Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, through February 2024, for studies evaluating outcomes in patients with atrial high-rate episodes managed with oral anticoagulation (OAC) compared to those not managed with oral anticoagulation. Outcomes assessed were ischemic stroke, thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality. A fixed-effects model was used to calculate pooled risk risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results A total of 4 studies comprising 6788 patients were included. Anticoagulation was associated with a significant reduction in the risks of ischemic stroke (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.49 - 0.90; P = 0.0084) and thromboembolic events (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.55 - 0.89; P = 0.0037). Compared to atrial high-rate episodes not managed with anticoagulation, there was a significantly increased risk of major bleeding with anticoagulation (RR 1.57; 95% CI 1.23 - 2.00; P = 0.0002), while the risk of all-cause mortality was similar (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.95 - 1.21; P = 0.2437). Conclusion Our study suggests that anticoagulation in patients with atrial high-rate episodes decreases the risks of ischemic stroke and thromboembolic events, while increasing the risk of major bleeding, compared patients not managed with anticoagulation. Our study does not show a mortality benefit with the use of anticoagulation in patients with atrial high-rate episodes. Further studies are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation in atrial high-rate episodes.Forest Plots of Outcomes Assessed

Abstract Background Data on racial/ethnic and sex disparities in the utilization and outcomes of tricuspid valve surgery (TVS) in the United States are scarce. Purpose We aimed to evaluate the impact of race/ethnicity and sex on the utilization and outcomes of TVS. Methods We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2020 to identify hospitalizations for tricuspid valve surgery. Racial/ethnic and sex disparities in tricuspid valve surgery outcomes were determined using logistic regression models. Results Between 2016 and 2020, 19,395 hospitalizations for tricuspid valve surgery were identified. The utilization rates (defined as the number of tricuspid valve surgery performed per 100,000 US hospitalizations) were lower in Black and Hispanic patients compared with White patients for surgical tricuspid valve repair (331 versus 493 versus 634, p&lt;0.01) and surgical tricuspid valve replacement (312 versus 601 versus 728, p&lt;0.01). Similarly, the utilization rates were lower for women compared with men for surgical tricuspid valve repair (1,021 versus 1,364, p&lt;0.01) and surgical tricuspid valve replacement (930 versus 1,316, p&lt;0.01). Compared to White men undergoing tricuspid valve surgery, all women had lower odds of acute kidney injury (aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.78) and higher odds of blood transfusion (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.07-1.59), and Black men had higher odds of blood transfusion (aOR 1.59, 95% CI 1.08-2.35). In-hospital mortality and other surgical complications were similar between all groups (all p&gt;0.05). Conclusions Significant racial/ethnic and sex disparities exist in the utilization of tricuspid valve surgery in the United States. Further studies are needed to understand the reasons for these disparities and to identify effective strategies for their mitigation.