Tan, Winston

5053 Background: Genomic aberrations associated with resistance/response to AA/P are not known. In a prospective study we assessed whole-exome/RNA-seq based aberrations in CRPC metastatic biopsies for identifying molecular markers associated with primary resistance and response duration. Methods: Sequencing of metastatic biopsies was performed for analyzing molecular aberrations that predict primary resistance (defined as progression at 12-weeks of therapy (non-responders) using PSA, RECIST, bone scan criteria per PCWG2). Gene network analysis was performed in genes mutated more frequently in non-responders and in genes differentially expressed between non-responders and responders using a “risk ratio” (RR) of ≥2. Cox regression models with multiple gene network pathways were used for determining association with time to treatment change (TTTC). Results: Of 92 enrolled pts 82 had complete whole-exome, RNA-seq & 12-week outcome data available for analysis. At 12-weeks 33/82 had progressed. Using a RR of ≥2, 113 genes were more frequently mutated in non-responders & 292 in responders. In non-responders, gene network analysis revealed frequent mutations in Wnt/β-catenin pathway genes; frequent deletion of negative regulators of Wnt pathway ( DKK4, SFRP2, LRP6). Gene expression analyses revealed significantly reduced expression levels of Wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibitors and increased expression levels of cell cycle proliferation (CCP) genes in non-responders. Median study follow up was 32 months during which time 58/82 pts progressed and switched treatments. Median TTTC was 10.1 months (IQR:4.4-24.1). In multivariate analysis CCP scores of ≥50 predicted shorter TTTC (HR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.17-3.80; p = 0.01). Conclusions: In metastases Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation is associated with primary AA/P resistance and increased CCP with acquired drug resistance. These findings offer molecular based predictive biomarkers in CRPC stage treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT#01953640.

90 Background: Preliminary data suggest that yoga is one of the most popular complementary and alternative therapies and most likely to improve quality of life. In spite of the methodologic limits,studies suggest an improvement in a range of symptoms of patients with cancer among those who did yoga. The absence of side effects and the excellent cost-benefit ratio make it a very interesting symptom management tool. Methods: We advertised to our cancer patients the availability of a free yoga class twice a week. (August 2016-present). This was run by one trained instructor. All patients with different cancers were allowed to participate including caregivers. A post session survey was done at one time point to evaluate the benefits of the class. Results: Usually between 8-15 individuals attend the class. In one session a written survey was conducted, 13 patients/caregiver agreed to fill up the survey. 9 were patients (breast , sarcoma, lymphoma, brain tumor melanoma and spine tumor) and 5 were caregivers.4 never had any prior yoga class before, the reasons for attending the class included stress relief, improve balance, help pain, support spouse, suggestion by MD and exercise. Among those who answered the question 7 were new to yoga 0-3 month, they mainly did restorative and gentle yoga. The perceived benefits among attendees included being more relaxed, calm down, peaceful, increase strength, more mindful and better health. 8/13 perceived that it did improve quality of life very much, 3/13 quite a bit 1 a little. All were very satisfied with the yoga sessions. Conclusions: In an undifferentiated group of cancer patients, yoga classes participants have positive perceived benefits in majority of the individuals who did restorative/gentle yoga. This led to symptom control and also had significant participant satisfaction.

Key PointsCoexisting psychiatric comorbidities are associated with greater increased health care utilization and cost of care in patients with MM. Clinical complications of MM are seen more frequently in patients with coexisting psychiatric conditions.

Abstract Purpose: p95HER2 is a truncated form of HER2 that confers resistance to trastuzumab in vitro, but clinical results have been conflicting to date. Given that p95HER2 levels correlate with total HER2 expression levels, which confer better outcomes, we sought to evaluate the p95HER2/HER2 ratio in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0337 and N98-32-52 trials. Experimental Design: The HERmark assay and VeraTag technology (Monogram Biosciences) were used to measure total HER2 and p95HER2 expression levels in 91 patient samples. Results: In the multivariate model, increasing total HER2 level was significantly associated with longer (OS; HR, 0.33; P = 0.002) and decreasing p95HER2 level was significantly associated with longer OS (HR, 4.2; P = 0.01). Total HER2 expression level was significantly associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) (HR, 0.57; P = 0.04), whereas p95HER2 level was not (HR, 1.7; P = 0.25). However, there was a positive association between p95HER2 and total HER2 expression levels (R2 = 0.48; P < 0.001). Consistent with our hypothesis, the ratio of p95HER2/HER2 was significantly associated with worsening PFS (HR, 1.7; P = 0.04) and OS (HR, 2.8; P = 0.002). Patients with the highest tertile of p95HER2/HER2 values had significantly less favorable PFS (HR, 1.8; P = 0.06) and OS (HR, 2.3; P = 0.02). Conclusions: A high p95HER2/HER2 ratio identified patients with metastatic breast cancer with poor outcomes on trastuzumab-based therapies. Further investigation of the p95HER2/HER2 ratio as a potential prognostic or predictive biomarker for HER2-targeted therapy is warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 24(13); 3053–8. ©2018 AACR.

356 Background: Approval of multiple therapeutic agents for castrate resistant prostate cancer (CPRPC) has improved survival and also quality of life. However, how to optimize sequencing is still an ongoing challenge for most clinicians. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients treated with FDA approved regimens for castrate resistant prostate cancer from 2002 to 2017 at Mayo Clinical Florida was completed. Data on progression free survival of the various treatment sequences including abiraterone, docetaxel, and enzalutamide were reviewed. Results: One hundred patients were included in the study. Those on clinical trial were excluded. All patients were on LHRH agonist /antagonist and were continued while on the subsequent treatments. The first line therapy progression free survival (PFS) was 245 days with abiraterone acetate (AA), 307 days with enzalutamide (E) and docetaxel 285 days, respectively. The second line therapy PFS was 201 days with AA and 166 days with E. When AA was given after E PFS was 97 days and when E was given after AA the PFS was 68 days. E given after docetaxel resulted in a PFS of 390 days for one patient. Conclusions: In this chart review, enzalutamide had the longest PFS when used as the first line therapy and the PFS was improved when used as a second line after docetaxel. This retrospective review suggests therapy sequencing may be optimized to increase progressive free survival in patients with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer.

249 Background: Serum CGA has been identified as a candidate prognostic biomarker for mCRPC. In a two cohort study, we compared the prognostic value of serum CGA with a validated CTC assay. Methods: In the discovery cohort (DC), blood samples were collected from 256 men with mCRPC. In an independent validation cohort (VC), 92 men with mCRPC were enrolled in a biospecimen collection study. In both cohorts, men receiving proton pump inhibitors and those with non-castrate levels of testosterone ( > 50ng/dl) were excluded. Serum CGA was measured in a homogeneous automated immunofluorescent assay using time-resolved amplified cryptate emission. In the VC, CTC enumeration was performed using the FDA cleared CELLSEARCH CTC test prior to treatment with abiraterone acetate/ prednisone. Cox proportional hazard regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed for associations with elevated CGA (above reference range), unfavorable (≥ 5) CTCs, and overall survival (OS). Results: In the DC, 200 men were eligible for analysis. The median age was 72 years (yrs), 81/200 pts had a Gleason score (GS) ≥ 8, 34/200 had an elevated CGA. At a median follow up of 2.2 yrs, 156/200 were deceased. In the subset of men with GS ≥ 8, elevated CGA was associated with shorter OS [hazard ratio (HR) 2.19, p = 0.017]. In the VC, 71 men were eligible for analysis. The median age was 71 yrs, 36/71 tumors were GS ≥ 8, 31/71 pts had an elevated CGA, 26/66 had unfavorable CTCs (≥ 5). At a median follow up of 1.8 yrs, 31/71 were deceased. Elevated CGA (HR 1.91, p = 0.043) and unfavorable CTC counts (HR 2.97, p = 0.0012) were adversely associated with OS. In the high GS group, both CTCs and CGA had the same area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72. Pts with elevated CTC and CGA had the poorest OS (HR 3.76, p = 0.008). Conclusions: Elevated serum CGA was negatively associated with OS in men with mCRPC. Serum CGA represents a prognostic biomarker that may complement CTC enumeration. Clinical trial information: NCT#01953640.

Background Docetaxel has recently been found to improve survival in patients with metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). Chemotherapy as a first-line option leaves room for improvement, while second-line options are multiple and somewhat controversial. Methods Clinically relevant articles focusing on chemotherapy drugs for metastatic prostate cancer and their mechanism of action and efficacy were reviewed from January 2004 through April 2006. Results Docetaxel is the standard of care for AIPC. However, for doublets with docetaxel or second-line chemotherapy, multiple studies have shown interesting and promising results with calcitriol, thalidomide, bevacizumab, satraplatin, vaccines, ixabepilone, and atrasentan. Conclusions Docetaxel should be considered for first-line treatment of metastatic AIPC. Due to its progression-free survival of only 6 months, more effective drugs and drug combinations need to be developed to treat patients with AIPC. Combination treatments with docetaxel and other new agents are promising, but adequately powered phase III trials need to be conducted with survival as the principal endpoint for these promising drug combinations.