Shah, Jay P.

AbstractPurposeThe primary purpose of this study was to investigate the intra‐tester and inter‐tester reliability of the dial test using a handheld digital inclinometer. Additionally, we examined the responsiveness of the test, and side‐to‐side differences for meaningful comparison.Materials/methodsTwenty‐four healthy subjects (22.5 ± 2.8 years) participated in the study. The dial test was performed on both knees at 30° and 90° of knee flexion with the subject supine. While maintaining a neutral position of the ankle, an inclinometer was positioned parallel to the medial border of the foot to quantify external rotation of the tibia. Two examiners performed the dial test in a blinded manner. The minimal detectable change across repeated measures and side‐to‐side difference was calculated.ResultsIntra‐tester reliability for examiner 1 (E1) was 0.83 at 30° knee flexion and 0.89 at 90° knee flexion. Reliability values for examiner 2 (E2) were 0.86 at 30° and 0.87 at 90° knee flexion. Inter‐tester reliability was 0.74 at 30° and 0.83 at 90°. The minimal detectable change (MDC) for E1 at 30° was ±9.4° and ±7.4° at 90°. For E2, the MDC value was ±9.1° at 30° and ±8.3° at 90°. Ninety‐five percent limits of agreement for side‐to‐side difference was 16.1° and 11.3° ° for E1 at 30° and 90° and for E2 13.9° at 30° and 14.1° at 90°.ConclusionsThis instrumented dial test using a handheld digital inclinometer to measure external rotation can be performed with acceptable reliability in the clinical setting. A difference of 10° between two measurements on the same knee suggests that a meaningful change has occurred. For right to left comparison, differences greater than 15° suggest clinical significance.Level of evidenceIII.

AbstractPurposeThe purpose of this study was (1) to describe a staged protocol for management of the dislocated knee and (2) to describe clinical and functional outcomes for patients who received initial spanning external fixation as part of this protocol.MethodNine knees in 9 patients, consisting of 6 males and 3 females, mean age 30.4 (range 19–44) years with diagnosis or presumption of knee dislocation were treated with a protocol of stabilization with external fixator. Mean follow‐up was 24 (range 13–42) months. Indications for spanning external fixation included significant vascular injury, gross instability on examination with failure to maintain joint reduction, open knee dislocation, inability to tolerate mobilization in a brace. The standard protocol involved vascular examination including ankle‐brachial index, ligamentous examination (under anesthesia when applicable), stabilization with temporary joint spanning external fixator, thromboprophylaxis, reconstructive knee surgery, and standard rehabilitation.ResultsMean range of motion (ROM) was 97.4° (range 80°–150°, SD 20.75, median 127.5). Median IKDC score was 80 (range 30–95), and mean Lysholm score was 76.7 (range 46–95). Heterotopic ossification (HO) was noted in 4 knees (44%).ConclusionThe treatment algorithm utilized in this series for management of the dislocated knee demonstrated satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes. This staged protocol provides a management option for those patients who may be best served with initial spanning joint external fixation. Larger prospective studies are needed to fully understand the merit of staged protocols in this setting.

Background Osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the knee in adult patients frequently require surgical intervention. However, the ideal method of osteochondral fragment fixation remains uncertain. Purpose This study was undertaken to determine the clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes of bioabsorbable fixation for unstable osteochondritis dissecans lesions involving the femoral condyles of the knee in skeletally mature patients. Study Design Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods Skeletally mature patients with an unstable osteochondritis dissecans lesion of the femoral condyle (Ewing and Voto stages II-IV) treated with bioabsorbable internal fixation and minimum 1-year follow-up were included in this retrospective study cohort. Pre- and postoperative radiographs were reviewed and postoperative Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were documented. Results A total of 21 knees in 21 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria, and 3 patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining 18 patients were evaluated at a mean of 59 months after surgery (range, 12-154 months). The 14 male and 4 female patients had a mean age of 19 years at the time of surgery (range, 14-39 years). Ewing and Voto classification included 8 stage II lesions, 9 stage III lesions, and 1 stage IV lesion. Fragment fixation methods included bioabsorbable nails (11), pins (3), darts (2), screws (1), and combined screws and darts (1). Mean postoperative Lysholm and IKDC scores were 85 and 82, respectively. Fragment union occurred in 12 knees (67%); the remaining 6 knees (33%) required removal of the loose fragment. Of the 11 patients treated with bioabsorbable nails, 2 (18%) required reoperation for nail back-out. Conclusion The authors recommend caution when using bioabsorbable fixation for osteochondritis dissecans lesions in skeletally mature patients because of the low rate of clinical healing and high complication rate. Failure with unthreaded fixation devices may be caused by inadequate compression and not necessarily be related to bioabsorbability.

Background Treatment of the multiligament-injured knee remains controversial. Purpose To compare clinical and functional outcomes of a consecutive series of multiligament-injured knees that underwent repair of the fibular collateral ligament (FCL) and posterolateral corner (PLC), followed by delayed cruciate ligament reconstructions, with those that had single-stage multiligament reconstruction. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods Patients with multiligament knee injury treated by a single surgeon were identified in our prospective database. Between February 2004 and May 2005, patients underwent repair of medial- and lateral-sided injuries, followed by delayed cruciate ligament reconstructions. Between May 2005 and February 2007, patients underwent single-stage multiligament knee reconstruction. All patients followed a standard rehabilitation protocol. Inclusion criteria were minimum 2-year follow-up and multiligament knee injury including the FCL/PLC. International Knee Documentation Committee subjective and Lysholm scores and objective clinical data were documented. Results We identified 45 knees (42 patients); 17 knees (14 patients) were excluded, leaving 28 knees (28 patients) in the study. The repair/staged group (10 knees in 10 patients) had a mean follow-up of 34 months (range, 24-49 months). The reconstruction group (18 knees in 18 patients) had a mean follow-up of 28 months (range, 24-41 months). Four of the 10 FCL/PLC repairs (40%) and 1 of the 18 FCL/PLC reconstructions (6%) failed (P = .04). After revision reconstructions, there were no statistically significant differences between mean International Knee Documentation Committee subjective scores (79 vs. 77, P = .92) and mean Lysholm scores (85 vs 88, P = .92). Regression analysis showed no effect on failure based on age, sex, injury mechanism, time to surgery, interval between stages, total number of ligaments injured, or location of tear. Conclusion Our series demonstrated a statistically significant higher rate of failure for repair compared with reconstruction of the FCL/PLC. Reconstruction of the FCL/PLC structures is a more reliable option than repair alone in the setting of a multiligament knee injury.

Background Golf provides an opportunity for relatively low-impact exercise for nearly all age groups and is considered a recommended activity for patients after total knee arthroplasty. Hypothesis We hypothesized that total knee arthroplasty would afford patients increased ability to participate in and enjoy golf, allowing a large percentage of these patients to walk the golf course. Study Design Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods Surveys were sent to 151 golfers who had undergone primary total knee arthroplasty from 1995 to 2000. The detailed survey included 33 questions specific to the patients’ golf performance, enjoyment of golf, frequency of participation, timing of return to play, presence of pain, use of a cart, and related golf-specific issues. Results We received and evaluated 93 responses (62%). Fifty-seven percent reported they had returned to golf within 6 months after total knee arthroplasty. Eighty-one percent of respondents reported golfing as frequently, or more frequently, than before knee replacement. Notably, golfers reported less pain while golfing after total knee arthroplasty than before (13% vs 83%; P < .0001), and 94% of respondents reported currently enjoying golf as much as or more than before surgery. Twenty-eight percent of respondents stated that they walked the course, rather than using a motorized golf cart, before surgery, while only 14% walked the course after surgery ( P = .02). Conclusion In this population of golfers, total knee arthroplasty reliably relieved pain that had been previously experienced while golfing, and increased or maintained this group’s enjoyment of playing golf. However, 86% of these patients reported using a cart while golfing. Further patient education is needed regarding the potential health benefits of walking during golf after total knee arthroplasty.

AbstractWhile it is generally accepted that most partial and isolated medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries can be treated non‐operatively, ideal treatment of the MCL in multi‐ligament knee injuries remains controversial. High failure rates with repair of the posterolateral corner in the multi‐ligament injured knee have been recently reported, favoring reconstruction instead. The same maybe true for MCL injuries, however evidence‐based treatment recommendations are lacking in the current orthopedic literature. The purpose of this study was to perform an evidence‐based systematic review of the operative management (repair and/or reconstruction) of the MCL in the setting of multi‐ligament knee injuries. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and the Cochrane databases for all relevant articles published in English from 1978 to 2008 on the outcomes of surgical management (repair and/or reconstruction) of the MCL in the setting of combined ligament injuries was performed. Inclusion criteria included articles published in (1) English, (2) on human subjects, (3) between the years of 1978 and 2008, (4) had minimum 12‐month follow‐up, with a mean of at least 24 months, (5) on surgical management of MCL injuries, (6) associated with multi‐ligament injuries (three or more ligaments) and/or knee dislocation, and (7) reported objective outcome data on the respective patient cohorts. Exclusion criteria consisted of technique papers, case reports, studies that included fractures associated with MCL injury and those that included pediatric patients. The review identified eight relevant studies. Five articles focused on MCL repair, while three articles focused on MCL reconstruction. No prospective studies compared MCL repair or reconstruction with non‐operative treatment or directly compared MCL reconstruction with MCL repair. Currently there is a paucity of objective data on the outcomes regarding surgical management of MCL tears in the combined ligament injured knee. This systematic review demonstrated satisfactory results in both repair and reconstruction groups. Future objective outcome‐based studies as well as comparative studies are needed to further evaluate the optimal treatment modality before evidence‐based recommendations can be made. Therefore, individual treatment decisions for each patient should be based on the characteristics and nature of the injury.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the functional and clinical outcomes of a consecutive series of patients who underwent fibular collateral ligament (FCL) and posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction by use of a single Achilles tendon allograft construct. Methods Patients were identified through prospective sports medicine databases at 2 academic institutions. Only patients who had undergone FCL and PLC reconstruction (as opposed to repair) were included. All patients followed a standard postoperative rehabilitation protocol. Various patterns of combined ligament injuries were included and divided into 2 groups (2 ligament v multiligament). Functional and clinical outcomes were assessed by clinical examination, Lysholm scores, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective scores. Statistical analysis was performed by use of Wilcoxon paired rank‐sum tests and multivariate regression. Results We identified 16 knees in 16 patients, with a minimum of 2 years' follow‐up. There were 13 men and 3 women. The mean age was 30 years (range, 19 to 61 years). The mean length of clinical follow‐up was 30 months (range, 24 to 75 months). The mean International Knee Documentation Committee subjective scores were 80 points and 80 points ( P = .79) in the 2‐ligament and multiligament groups, respectively, and the mean Lysholm scores were 90 points and 89 points ( P = .96), respectively. Age ( P = .41), gender ( P = .84), and interval between injury and surgery ( P = .72) did not affect the clinical and functional outcomes between the 2 groups. Arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation developed in 1 patient. Residual varus laxity (1+) was noted in 4 patients, none of whom displayed functional instability. No patient has required revision reconstruction to date. Conclusions We describe a novel technique that takes into account the main static PLC stabilizers (FCL, popliteofibular ligament, and posterolateral capsule) that has not been previously reported. Our series showed no significant differences in clinical and functional outcomes between 2‐ligament and multiligament PLC‐based reconstructions. However, given the heterogeneity and small sample size of our study group, it is difficult to draw qualitative conclusions. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.