Eleid, Mackram F.

Background— The introduction of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) led to renewed interest in balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV). We sought to assess contemporary trends in BAV utilization and their outcomes. Methods and Results— The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients who underwent BAV between 2004 and 2013. In-hospital morbidity and mortality, and predictors of death after BAV were assessed. Outcomes of propensity-matched groups of patients undergoing elective BAV or TAVR were evaluated. BAV utilization increased from 707 cases in 2004 to 3715 cases in 2013 (national estimates). Procedural and in-hospital mortality were 1.4% and 8.5%, respectively. Vascular complications occurred in 7.0% of cases, blood transfusion in 17.5%, clinical stroke in 1.8%, and pacemaker implantation in 3.0%. The strongest predictors of in-hospital death were cardiogenic shock (odds ratio, 6.01; 95% confidence interval, 4.19–8.61; P <0.001), need for left ventricular assist device (odds ratio, 3.48; 95% confidence interval, 2.25–5.36; P <0.001), coagulopathy (odds ratio, 2.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.51–3.18; P <0.001), and low institutional volume of BAV (odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–2.37; P =0.03). In propensity-matched patients undergoing elective BAV or TAVR, rates of in-hospital mortality (2.9% versus 3.5%; P =0.60), clinical stroke (1.6% versus 3.1%; P =0.10), and vascular complications (8.2% versus 10.9%; P =0.14) were similar. However, BAV was associated with lower rates of pacemaker implantation (2.9% versus 8.0%; P <0.001) and blood transfusion (12.8% versus 22.9%; P <0.001). Conclusions— In a contemporary national registry, BAV is associated with significant morbidity and mortality that are similar to TAVR. With the substantial increase in BAV utilization and the continuous improvement in TAVR outcomes, these data have important implications to aid clinicians in the selection of appropriate BAV candidates.

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to demonstrate the physiologic effects of percutaneous mitral paravalvular leak (PVL) closure through pre‐ and post‐closure left and right heart catheterization.BackgroundMitral PVL represents a significant source of morbidity and mortality following mitral valve repair and replacement. Although percutaneous PVL closure is an effective treatment with improvements in symptoms and mortality, data regarding the acute hemodynamic effects of such closure are lacking.MethodsConsecutive patients with clinically significant heart failure and/or hemolysis attributed to mitral PVL underwent percutaneous mitral PVL closure with pre‐ and post‐procedural right and left heart catheterization. Hemodynamic measurements of cardiovascular function obtained in this manner were compared and stratified according to pre‐ and post‐procedural echocardiographic severity of PVL.ResultsTwenty‐four patients (age 68 ± 9.4 years, 75% male) underwent percutaneous mitral PVL closure. Significant improvements were found in left atrial pressure (LAP) (mean LAP lowered from 21 ± 4 to 19 ± 3 mm Hg, P = 0.005), pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) (mean PAP lowered from 36 ± 11 to 33 ± 9, P = 0.04), and cardiac index (increased from 2.8 ± 0.8 to 3.0 ± 0.7 L/min/m2, P = 0.01). Left atrial v‐wave reduction of 20% was associated with ≤ mild residual PVL by transesophageal echocardiography (P = 0.09).ConclusionsPercutaneous mitral PVL closure is associated with significant reductions in LAP and PAP and an increase in cardiac index. These hemodynamic effects underlie the clinical benefits of PVL closure and may be a useful tool for intraprocedural guidance. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Background— Data on the clinical use of left atrial (LA) hemodynamic monitoring during MitraClip procedure are limited. This study evaluated the association between intraprocedural changes in LA pressure after MitraClip and improvement in exercise capacity as documented by 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Methods and Results— Study population included 50 patients who underwent MitraClip at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN), between June 2014 and July 2016 and completed both baseline and 30-day follow-up 6MWT. Primary outcome for the current analysis was defined as 6MWT improvement above the median. Mean age of the study population was 79±10 years, and 34 (68%) were men. Baseline preprocedural 6MWT distance was 308 m (interquartile range [IQR], 234–394 m). Acute, intraprocedural change in LA pressure after MitraClip was 3 mm Hg (IQR, 1–6 mm Hg), and change in V wave was 11 mm Hg (IQR, 6–19 mm Hg). Median 6MWT improvement was 25 m (IQR, 19–47 m). Univariate analysis showed that patients with ≤ mild postprocedural mitral regurgitation were 4-fold more likely to experience an improvement in 6MWT ( P =0.02). Multivariate model demonstrated that each 5 mm Hg decrease in V wave was associated with 49% increased likelihood for improvement in 6-minute walk ( P =0.04). Similar model with V-wave change as a dichotomous variable showed that patients with a V-wave decrease of ≥11 mm Hg were 3.8× more likely to improve their 6MWT ( P =0.05). Conclusions— Acute changes in LA pressure after MitraClip procedure are associated with clinical improvement as measured by 6MWT. Continuous LA pressure monitoring may be a useful tool for procedural guidance during transcatheter mitral repair.

BackgroundPercutaneous paravalvular leak (PVL) closure is an alternative treatment option for severely symptomatic, high‐surgical risk patients with PVL. Some patients require multiple percutaneous PVL closure procedures. However, the procedural characteristics and success rate of re‐do PVL closure have not been well studied.AimsThe aim of this study is to investigate the indications, procedural characteristics, technical success rate, and 30‐day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients who underwent re‐do PVL closure.MethodsConsecutive patients who underwent percutaneous paramitral or paraaortic leak closure at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota from 2004 through 2015 were studied. Clinical and procedural characteristics of patients who underwent re‐do PVL closure were compared to age‐ and sex‐matched patients who underwent their first percutaneous PVL closure. Procedure success and 30‐day MACE were compared in both the groups.ResultsAmong 223 identified percutaneous PVL closures, 16 (7%) were re‐do procedures. Patients who underwent re‐do PVL closure were predominantly men (87.5%) with a mean age of 68 ± 15 years and an estimated mean Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) 30‐day mortality of 4.6 ± 2.8. Half of the re‐do PVL closures were performed on mechanical valves and 62.5% were performed on paramitral defects. Indications for re‐do PVL closure were: (1) emergence of new significant paravalvular defects in 50%, (2) incomplete index defect closure in 43.75%, and (3) index procedural complication in 6.25% of the cases. Procedural success was 75% in re‐do procedures vs. 85.4% in age‐ and sex‐matched control group (P = 0.45). Thirty‐day MACE was 12.5% in the re‐do group compared to 4.2% in the age‐ and‐sex matched patients who underwent PVL closure for the first time (P = 0.35).ConclusionRe‐do percutaneous PVL closure is feasible with favorable procedural success rate and low 30‐day MACE. Development of new paravalvular defects is the most common indication for re‐do PVL closure, highlighting the importance of careful longitudinal monitoring and follow‐up. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Background: There is limited understanding of the role of cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for assessment of patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD). Methods: In this report we describe the diagnostic utility of CCTA in three young women presenting with signs and symptoms of myocardial ischemia who were eventually diagnosed with SCAD. Results: None of the women had traditional atherosclerotic risk factors. SCAD was not initially identified on CCTA in any of the three women, but was visualized during retrospective analysis in two patients after invasive coronary angiography. In two patients follow-up CCTA imaging was used successfully for subsequent management. Conclusions: In patients presenting with signs or symptoms of acute coronary syndrome, SCAD may be missed or not detectable on CCTA. A negative CCTA should not exclude a diagnosis of SCAD, and invasive coronary angiography should be considered for further evaluation.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a transformational and rapidly evolving treatment for patients with aortic stenosis who require valve replacement. Novel technological advancements have made this percutaneous minimally invasive therapy a first-line treatment for many patients at extreme risk for conventional cardiac surgery. New devices and improvements in existing devices have reduced procedural complications, and scientific trials are investigating the role of TAVR in lower-risk aortic stenosis populations, in patients with aortic regurgitation, and in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease. Finally, there is intense interest in identifying patients in whom the risk-benefit ratio of TAVR is not favorable and should not be performed.

Background Sex‐related differences in morbidity and survival in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) adults are fundamentally unknown. Contemporary studies portend excellent survival for BAV patients identified at early echocardiographic‐clinical stages. Whether BAV adults incur a survival disadvantage throughout subsequent echocardiographic‐clinical stages remains undetermined. Methods and Results Analysis was done of 3 different cohorts of consecutive patients with echocardiographic diagnosis of BAV identified retrospectively: (1) a community cohort of 416 patients with first BAV diagnosis (age 35±21 years, follow‐up 16±7 years), (2) a tertiary clinical referral cohort of 2824 BAV adults (age 51±16 years, follow‐up 9±6 years), and (3) a surgical referral cohort of 2242 BAV adults referred for aortic valve replacement (AVR) (age 62±14 years, follow‐up 6±5 years). For the community cohort, 20‐year risks of aortic regurgitation (AR), AVR, and infective endocarditis were higher in men (all P ≤0.04); for a total BAV‐related morbidity risk of 52±4% vs 35±6% in women ( P =0.01). The cohort's 25‐year survival was identical to that in the general population ( P =0.98). AR independently predicted mortality in women ( P =0.001). Baseline AR was more common in men ( P ≤0.02) in the tertiary cohort, with 20‐year survival lower than that in the general population ( P <0.0001); age‐adjusted relative death risk was 1.16 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05‐1.29) for men versus 1.67 (95% CI 1.38‐2.03) for women ( P =0.001). AR independently predicted mortality in women ( P =0.01). Baseline AR and infective endocarditis were higher in men (both ≤0.001) for the surgical referral cohort, with 15‐year survival lower than that in the general population ( P <0.0001); age‐adjusted relative death risk was 1.34 (95% CI 1.22‐1.47) for men versus 1.63 (95% CI 1.40‐1.89) for women ( P =0.026). AR and NYHA class independently predicted mortality in women (both P ≤0.04). Conclusions Within evolving echocardiographic‐clinical stages, the long‐term survival of adults with BAV is not benign, as both men and women incur excess mortality. Although BAV‐related morbidity is higher in men in the community, and AR and infective endocarditis are more prevalent in men, women exhibit a significantly higher relative risk of death in tertiary and surgical referral cohorts, which is independently associated with AR.

ObjectivesThis study sought to assess the learning curve for TMVR for treatment of primary mitral regurgitation (MR).BackgroundData are lacking regarding the technical experience required to achieve optimal clinical outcomes with transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) using the edge‐to‐edge MitraClip technique.MethodsWe examined the sequential experience of the first 75 patients (age 80 ± 9 years; 77% male) who underwent TMVR at our institution. A sequence number of each patient was assigned as a continuous variable and in tertiles for analysis.ResultsTMVR with MitraClip was successful in 97% with an average procedural time of 106 ± 39 minutes. The 30‐day rate of major adverse cardiovascular events was 7%. With increased case experience, there were decreases in procedural time, fluoroscopy time, length of hospital stay, and major adverse cardiovascular events. Procedural success, residual mitral regurgitation and NYHA functional classification at 30‐day follow‐up remained unchanged throughout the experience.ConclusionsThe learning curve for TMVR with MitraClip for treatment of primary MR is characterized by a sequential reduction in procedure time, fluoroscopy time, procedural complications, and hospital length of stay at a tertiary academic medical center. Thirty‐day procedural results are favorable and similar during the initial learning period.