Csizmar, Clifford M.

Abstract Introduction: Somatic mutations in splicing factors (SF) - SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1, and ZRSR2 – represent one of the most common drivers of premalignant clonal hematopoesis. While SF mutations are potent drivers of clonal expansion (Fabre et al., Nature 2022), multiple SF mutations are rarely observed in the same individual (negative epistasis). Prior studies have identified rare cases of concurrent SF mutations (<4%) and described specific hotspot combinations that escape negative epistasis (Taylor et al., Blood 2020). We conducted this study to further characterize the frequency and clonal relationship between concurrent SF mutations using a larger patient cohort. Methods: After IRB approval, we assessed 3,369 myeloid next generation sequencing (NGS) results that identified somatic variants in SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1, or ZRSR2, in 2,500 adult patients from 08/2015 to 07/2025. Patient demographics, ICD-9/10 codes, and complete blood counts with differentials were obtained, retaining only those datapoints assigned 30 days before or after NGS testing. To allow comparison of clone size between autosomal and the X-linked SF ZRSR2, VAFs were multiplied by two to estimate the cancer cell fraction (CCF), except for ZRSR2 mutations in males. For patients harboring concurrent SF mutations, we categorized them as co-dominant if the difference in respective CCFs was < 10% of the greater CCF. Specific SF variants were categorized into common hotspots (n=13), except for ZRSR2 variants, which do not occur in defined hotspots. Fisher's exact testing was used to assess the enrichment of SF hotspot variants in patients with concurrent SF mutations, as well as combinations of SF variants in patients with co-dominant SF mutations. Results: We identified 2,331 patients with at least 1 pathogenic SF mutation, of which 6.7% (n=156) had > 1 SF mutation (multi-SF MT). The total cohort comprised cases of AML (n=549, 24%), MDS (n=977, 42%), MDS/MPN (n=233, 10%), MPN (n=228,10%), and uncategorized ICD codes (“Other”, n=326), of which the largest category was clonal cytopenia(s). Notably, the prevalence of multi-SF cases was higher than previously described and our cohort included 5 patients with 3 SF mutations and 1 with 4 SF mutations. Of the multi-SF MT patients, we identified 42 (27%) with co-dominant CCFs among their respective SF mutations. Thirty-three multi-SF MT patients had multiple NGS sampling timepoints (median 2, range 2-4) spanning a median of 0.97 years (range 0.06-5.69 years); we found that 17 of these 33 demonstrated correlative SF CCFs over multiple timepoints, suggesting their SF mutations occurred in the same clone (“co-clonal”). Of these 17 patients, 82% had co-dominant CCFs at the single-timepoint level, whereas none of the 16 non-co-clonal demonstrated co-dominance. Thus, we used SF co-dominance as a surrogate for cases likely to be co-clonal. ZRSR2 (p=8.8x10-29), U2AF1Q157 (p=9.4x10-9), SF3B1K666 (p=1.4x10-4) and infrequent SF3B1 (“SF3B1-Other”, p=.0029) mutations were overrepresented in the multi-SF MT cohort compared to patients with a single SF mutation. Within the multi-SF MT cohort, 3 SF mutation combinations showed overrepresentation in codominant cases – SRSF2P95R/H/L+ ZRSR2 (p=0.014), SRSF2P95R/H/L+ SF3B1K666 (p=0.044), and U2AF1S34 + U2AF1Q157 (p=0.024), although not significant after multiple hypothesis correction. Dual ZRSR2 mutations were the most common combination seen in the multi-SF MT cohort but were underrepresented in codominant cases (p=0.025). Although there was no disease subtype uniquely associated with total or co-dominant multi-SF MT cases, occurrence of multiple SF mutations was more common in males (8% vs. 3% in females), an effect driven by ZRSR2 mutations. Hemoglobin and WBC were lower in multi-SF MT cases, with the lower hemoglobin strongly driven by the codominant multi-SF MT cases (median 8.3 g/dL vs 9.4 g/dL, p=0.00046). Conclusions: These findings suggest that SF mutation co-occurrence in myeloid neoplasms is more prevalent than previously estimated (~7%). Furthermore, we identified 6 individuals harboring > 2 SF mutations, which has not been previously described. We validate specific SF variant pairs that appear to exist in the same clone and are working to confirm the clonal architecture and characterize global splicing aberration in selected cases with single-cell studies to fully uncover the mechanism by which negative epistasis is overcome.

Abstract RAS pathway (RASp) mutations induce proliferative features, and promote transformation in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). However, the unique clonal landscape and hierarchy of distinct RASp mutations remain unexplored. To characterize the landscape, architecture, and implications of unique RASp mutations in CMML, we evaluated a cohort of 814 patients with CMML. We identified 461 RASp mutations among 342 patients (42%). N/KRAS and CBL mutations were the most common, frequently involved the P-loop or RING domains, respectively, and frequently appeared as dominant events (63% and 65%, respectively). BRAF, NF1, and PTPN11 mutations spanned throughout the gene structure, and frequently appeared as subclonal events (75%, 64%, and 59%, respectively). CBL mutations frequently occurred in codominance with SRSF2 and multihit TET2, and were enriched for KIT mutations. PTPN11 mutations more frequently co-occurred with SETBP1 and DNMT3A mutations, and were infrequently codominant with TET2 or ASXL1. RASp mutations predicted for shorter overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.07; P = .0075) and leukemia-free survival (LFS; HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.26-2.20; P = .0011), influenced outcomes of myelodysplastic and TET2 mutant CMML, and cooperated with IDH2 and RUNX1 mutations to induce shorter LFS. These data set the bases for refined genomic classifications of CMML, and underscore the need to develop RAS-directed therapies for patients with CMML.

e18508 Background: BPDCN is a rare and aggressive hematologic malignancy. Despite the advent of targeted therapies, median overall survival (mOS) remains <1 year (y) in the absence of stem cell transplant (SCT). This study evaluates clinical and molecular predictors of outcomes in a large cohort of BPDCN patients at a tertiary center. Methods: BPDCN patients seen at Mayo Clinic (AZ, FL, MN) between 2000-2024 were identified retrospectively. Analyses considered parameters at diagnosis. Next generation sequencing (NGS) was performed using a 47-gene assay. Standard statistical methods were used; calculations used R. Results: Among 69 patients, the median age was 70y (range 19-94) with male predominance (83%). At presentation, skin (80%), bone marrow (73%), lymph nodes (52%), spleen (27%), and CNS (12%) were involved; 26% had a concurrent hematologic malignancy. Among 20 cases with NGS, the median number of mutations was 3 (range 0-5), most frequently TET2 (n=16), ASXL1 (n=13), SRSF2 (n=7), and NRAS (n=5). Frontline therapy (Table) yielded a complete response (CR) rate of 63% and overall response rate of 76%. CR rates were similar among regimens, but patients who received an ALL (hyper-CVAD based) regimen (8/13) or tagraxofusp (6/9) were more likely to be bridged to SCT (6/29, p<0.01). After median follow up of 38 months (mo), mOS for all was 15 (95% CI 12-21) mo; 44 (64%) were deceased at last follow up. Among 62 evaluable patients, 20 (32%, median age 60 vs 74y, p<0.01) underwent SCT which improved survival (mOS 51 vs 10 mo, 3y OS 52% vs 5%, p<0.01); mOS was not different between allogeneic (n=17) and autologous (n=3) SCT (54 vs 38 mo, p=0.45). When censored for SCT, the 1y OS for patients receiving an ALL regimen, tagraxofusp, or other regimen was 82%, 67%, and 47%, respectively (p=0.15). In univariate analysis, age ≥50y, lymph node involvement, bone marrow involvement, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, leukocytes (WBC) >11 x10 9 /L, abnormal karyotype, and HCT were significantly associated with OS. In multivariate analysis, WBC >11 x10 9 /L (HR 3.7, p<0.03), abnormal karyotype (HR 5.4, p<0.01), and SCT (HR 0.23, p<0.01) remained significant. Separately, SRSF2 mutation was associated with inferior OS (15 vs 51 mo, p=0.02), but significance was lost when adjusted for age, abnormal karyotype, and SCT. Conclusions: Newly-diagnosed BPDCN patients treated with an ALL regimen or tagraxofusp followed by SCT had longer OS compared to those treated with all other regimens. WBC >11 x10 9 /L and abnormal karyotype were independent predictors of inferior survival whereas SCT was beneficial. Regimen N Age (y) ANNOVA CR Chi Sq HCT Chi Sq 1y OS mOS (mo) Log-rank Tagraxofusp 9 68 (40-70) <0.001 7 (78%) 0.548 6 (67%) 0.018 88% 20.8 0.121 ALL 13 43 (20-72) 8 (67%) 8 (62%) 74% 50.7 Hyper-CVAD 11 43 (20-72) 6 (60%) 6 (60%) 67% 35.8 AML 18 70 (48-80) 13 (76%) 5 (28%) 58% 14.2 Intensive 8 66 (48-77) 7 (88%) 3 (38%) 57% 12.4 HMA+Venetoclax 8 69 (65-80) 6 (75%) 2 (25%) 50% 14.0 Lymphoma 8 74 (49-85) 3 (43%) 1 (13%) 50% 14.0 CHOP 6 74 (49-85) 3 (50%) 1 (17%) 50% 17.7 Other 3 66 (63-73) 1 (33%) 0 (0%) 33% 12.0

6579 Background: Treatment strategies in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) are not standardized and include hydroxyurea (HU) and hypomethylating agents (HMA). In a phase 3 study comparing HU and decitabine, in proliferative CMML, response rates were higher for decitabine (56% vs 31%; p<0.01) but overall survival was similar (p=0.67) between the two groups (Itzykson, R. JCO, 2023. 41:1888). In the current retrospective study, we examined the survival impact of different treatment strategies among 457 Mayo Clinic patients with CMML. Methods: The current study was conducted under institutional review board approved minimum risk protocols allowing retrospective patient data collection and analysis. Diagnostic criteria were according to the International Consensus Classification (Arber et al. Blood 2022. 140:1200). All statistical analyses were conducted using JMP 17 software. For survival analysis, patients were censored at time of allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT). Results: A total of 457 patients were considered (median age 72 years; 68% males). 209 patients received CMML-directed therapy: HU (N=102), HMA (N=78; azacitidine 32 and decitabine 46). Responses were adjudicated separately for leukocytosis and anemia; normalization of leukocyte count was achieved in 21% vs. 16 % (p<0.01) for HU vs. HMA and overall response in anemia in 1% vs. 9% (p=0.02), respectively. Overall survival did not appear to be impacted by different treatment strategies at any stage of CMML; (i) treated vs. untreated (p=0.3), (ii) HU vs. HMA for first-line therapy (p=0.3), and (iii) HU/HMAs vs. other drugs as first-line therapy (p=0.1). Blast transformation-free survival (BTFS) was also similar between HU vs. HMA as well as HU/HMA vs. other drugs. In univariate analysis, BTFS was inferior in patients receiving CMML-directed therapy (p<0.01); the particular association (HR 2; 95% CI 1.2-3.3) retained its significance in multivariable analysis that also included other risk factors for BTFS: bone marrow blast ≥10% (HR 4.3), circulating blast ≥2% (HR 2.7), WBC ≥13 x 10 9 /L (HR 1.8), and ASXL1 mutation (HR 1.7). Conclusions: In the current retrospective study that included a large number of patients with CMML, chemotherapy with HU or HMA did not appear to affect overall survival but might have increased the risk of blast transformation. The study also suggests superiority of HU for the treatment of leukocytosis and HMA for anemia. Predictors of blast transformation-free survival (BTFS) in 457 patients diagnosed with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). BTFS Univariable analysis p-value (HR) Multivariable analysis p-value (HR) CMML-directed therapy <0.01 (2.9; 1.8-4.7) <0.01 (2; 1.2-3.3) Bone marrow blasts ≥10% <0.01 (12.4) 0.01 (4.3) Circulating blasts ≥2% <0.01 (5.2) <0.01 (2.7) WBC ≥13 x 10 9 /L <0.01 (2.9) 0.02 (1.8) ASXL1 mut <0.01 (2.1) 0.02 (1.7)

We sought to develop a survival model in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) that is primarily based on clinical variables and examine additional impact from mutations and karyotype. 457 molecularly-annotated patients were considered. Multivariable analysis identified circulating Blasts ≥2% (1 point), Leukocytes ≥13 x 109/L (1 point), and severe (2 points) or moderate (1 point) Anemia as preferred risk variables in developing a clinical risk Stratification Tool for overall survival (OS), acronymized to "BLAST": low-risk (0 points; median 63 months); intermediate-risk (1 point; median 28 months; HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.6-3.0), and high-risk (2-4 points; median 13 months; 5.4, 4.1-7.3); the corresponding 3/5 year OS rates were 68%/53%, 43%/18%, and 12%/1%. BLAST model performance (AUC 0.77/0.85 at 3/5-years) was shown to be comparable to that of the molecular CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CMML-mol; AUC 0.73/0.75) and the international prognostic scoring system-molecular (IPSS-M; AUC 0.73/0.74). Multivariable analysis of mutations and karyotype identified PHF6MUT and TET2MUT as being "favorable" and DNMT3AMUT, U2AF1MUT, BCORMUT, SETBP1MUT, ASXL1MUT, NRASMUT, PTPN11MUT, RUNX1MUT, TP53MUT, and adverse karyotype, "unfavorable". Molecular information was subsequently encoded in a combined clinical-molecular risk model (BLAST-mol; AUC 0.80/0.86 at 3/5-years) that included the aforementioned BLAST clinical risk variables and a 3-tiered molecular risk score. BLAST and BLAST-mol were subsequently validated by two separate external cohorts. Independent risk factors for blast transformation included DNMT3AMUT, ASXL1MUT, PHF6WT, leukocytes ≥13 x 109/L, and ≥2% circulating or ≥10% bone marrow blasts. The current study proposes an easy to implement, globally applicable, and molecularly adaptive risk model for CMML.

Abstract DAC combinations serve as frontline therapies for AML. DAC forms DNA-DNMT1 crosslinks and activates the ATR-CHK1-WEE1 DDR. Combinations of DNA-protein crosslinking agents with ATR, CHK1, or WEE1 inhibitors (i) have shown efficacy in solid tumors. This study evaluates the cytotoxic synergy of DAC plus ATRi, CHK1i, or WEE1i in AML. Public datasets were queried for mRNA expression and dependency. Commercial cell lines (U937, KG1a, Molm13, MV-4-11) were genomically validated. Molm13 TP53-/- clones were generated via CRISPR. Cells were cultured in complete RPMI. To treat, cells were cultured for 48 h in RPMI with drugs or diluent (0.2% v/v DMSO). Protein expression was evaluated by Western blotting (WB). Apoptosis was assayed by flow cytometry with annexin V or propidium iodide. Primary AML samples were obtained at study centers after informed consent. Isolated mononuclear cells (Ficoll) were used in colony forming unit (CFU) assays with DMSO or drug for 12-16 days. Synergy was determined by median-effect (CalcuSyn) where a combination index &lt;1 is synergistic and &gt;1 antagonistic. DNMT1 expression (TCGA) was highest in AML vs all other tumor types (p&lt;0.001). In CRISPR screens (DepMap), AML cell lines were increasingly dependent on DNMT1, ATR, CHK1, and WEE1 (ANOVA p&lt;0.001). WB of AML cell lines treated with DAC (25 - 200 nM) for 24 h showed phosphorylations of H2AX and CHK1 S296/S345 that were most pronounced in TP53MT lines. In apoptosis assays, ATRi, CHK1i, and WEE1i were synergistic with clinical concentrations of DAC (Table 1). In isogenic Molm13 lines, TP53 loss conferred DAC resistance that was overcome with combination treatment. Selective CHK1i were generally more synergistic than CHK1/2i, consistent with a CHK1 DDR. CFU assays of primary AML samples also showed synergy between DAC and ATRi, CHK1i, and especially WEE1i. Table 1. Synergy between decitabine and replication checkpoint inhibitors in preclinical models of AML. Cell line data are derived from subdiploid apoptosis assays. U937 data were replicated using annexin V. Prexasertib showed no activity in KG1a cells (suggesting drug efflux) requiring the use of the alternate CHK1 inhibitor, rabusertib. Abbreviations: ATR, ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related; CHK1/2, checkpoint kinase 1 and/or 2; CI, combination index; Conc, concentration; DNMT1, DNA methylatransferase 1; IQR, interquartile range; MT, mutated; ND, not determined; SD, standard deviation; WT, wild type. Drug Target Conc. (nM) Molm13 (TP53WT) Molm13 (TP53-/-) U937 (TP53G187fs*/-) KG1a (TP53V225fs*/-) Primary AML (TP53WT orTP53MT) Units Decitabine DNMT1 6.25 – 200 25 ± 11 350 ± 260 310 ± 180 6.1 ± 1.6 ND EC50, nM (mean, SD) Ceralasertib ATR 250 – 500 0.93 (0.66 – 1.24) 0.90 (0.84 – 0.96) 0.15 (0.08 – 0.21) 0.74 (0.63 – 1.02) 0.66 (0.43 – 2.43) CI with decitabine (median, IQR) Camonsertib ATR 10 – 100 0.27 (0.19 – 0.59) 0.24 (0.22 – 0.34) 0.34 (0.21 – 0.39) ND ND Prexasertib CHK1/2 1.0 – 6.0 0.89 (0.82 – 1.06) 0.78 (0.68 – 0.90) 0.95 (0.93 – 1.08) ND 0.88 (0.29 – 1.28) MK-8776 CHK1 250 – 1, 000 0.57 (0.48 – 0.80) 0.76 (0.73 – 1.19) 0.89 (0.57 – 1.39) ND ND Rabusertib CHK1 600 – 1, 000 ND ND ND 0.51 (0.48 – 0.56) ND Adavosertib WEE1 100 – 400 0.70 (0.63 – 1.11) 0.99 (0.78 – 1.14) 0.67 (0.60 – 0.74) 0.67 (0.37 – 0.93) 0.65 (0.43 – 0.88) DAC synergizes with ATRi, CHK1i, and WEE1i in AML. Future work will test these combinations in vivo and incorporate BH3 mimetics. Citation Format: Clifford M. Csizmar, Antoine N. Saliba, Olivia K. Rossman, Kevin L. Peterson, X. Wei Meng, B. Douglas Smith, Gabriel Ghiaur, Jonathan A. Webster, Mrinal M. Patnaik, Aref Al-Kali, Scott H. Kaufmann. Decitabine (DAC) induces a DNA damage response (DDR) and synergizes with replication checkpoint inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 1170.

Despite notable progress in managing B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) over recent decades, particularly in pediatric cohorts where the 5-year overall survival (OS) reaches 90%, outcomes for the 10–15% with relapsed and refractory disease remain unfavorable. This disparity is further accentuated in adults, where individuals over the age of 40 years undergoing aggressive multiagent chemotherapy continue to have lower survival rates. While the adoption of pediatric-inspired treatment protocols has enhanced complete remission (CR) rates among younger adults, 20–30% of these patients experience relapse, resulting in a subsequent 5-year OS rate of 40–50%. For relapsed B-ALL in adults, there is no universally accepted standard salvage therapy, and the median OS is short. The cornerstone of B-ALL treatment continues to be the utilization of combined cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens to maximize early and durable disease control. In this manuscript, we go beyond the multiagent chemotherapy medications developed prior to the 1980s and focus on the incorporation of antibody-based therapy for B-ALL with an eye on existing and upcoming approved indications for blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, other monoclonal antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell products in frontline and relapsed/refractory settings. In addition, we discuss emerging investigational therapies that harness the therapeutic vulnerabilities of the disease through targeting apoptosis, modifying epigenetics, and inhibiting the mTOR pathway.

Background: The majority of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) harbor somatic mutations with the most frequent being TET2 (56%), SRSF2 (42%), and ASXL1 (41%) (Leukemia 2020;34:1407). The prognostic relevance of mutations in CMML has been studied extensively with consistent observations suggesting favorable survival impact from TET2 and unfavorable from DNMT3A, ASXL1, NRAS, and SETBP1 mutations. Among the latter, DNMT3A mutation stands out as being the strongest predictor of inferior overall (OS) and leukemia-free (LFS) survival (AJH 2017;92:56). The current study was inspired by observations from exploratory analyses of a large Mayo Clinic CMML cohort. Methods: The current retrospective study was conducted under an institutional review board approved minimum risk protocol that allowed retrospective collection and analysis of data from patient records (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Scottsdale, AZ; and Jacksonville, FL). Mutations were screened by multi-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS). Diagnostic criteria were according to the International Consensus Classification (Blood 2022; 140:1200). Conventional statistical methods were employed for comparisons of groups and survival analysis (JMP Pro 17.0.0 software SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Results: Exploratory analysis of a well-characterized cohort of 398 Mayo Clinic patients with CMML suggested an unusually long median survival of 96 months for 7 patients harboring PHF6 mutation vs. 27 months for those without the mutation. A subsequent institutional database search focusing on PHF6-mutated CMML identified 20 more cases, expanding the total number of study patients to 418, including 27 PHF6-mutated cases. PHF6 mutations clustered with (co-mutation frequency) TET2 (93%) and less likely to be co-mutated with TP53 (0%), PTPTN11 (0%) and SF3B1 (0%) mutations. PHF6-mutated patients often presented with thrombocytopenia (platelet count &lt;100 x 10(9)/L; 85% vs. 51% in PHF6 wild-type cases; p&lt;0.01). Median time from initial presentation with thrombocytopenia to CMML diagnosis was 4 years (0-14 years). In order to isolate the prognostic impact of PHF6 mutation without associated DNMT3A mutation and independent of TET2 mutation, we considered 4 mutational categories: i) DNMT3A-mutated (N=19; 2 co-expressed PHF6 and 7 TET2 mutations), ii) PHF6-mutated with wild-type DNMT3A (N=25; 23 co-expressed TET2 mutation), iii) TET2-mutated without DNMT3A or PHF6 co-expression (N=169), and iv) wild-type for DNMT3A, TET2, and PHF6 (N=205). Compared to the other groups, PHF6-mutated patients with wild-type DNMT3A were less likely to display leukocytosis (p&lt;0.01) or red cell transfusion need at presentation (p&lt;0.01). At a median follow-up of 18 months, 302 deaths, 78 leukemic transformations, and 44 allogenic stem cell transplants were documented. Univariate analysis for OS disclosed superiority in favor of PHF6-mutated patients with wild-type DNMT3A (median OS 90 months) vs. the other three groups with median OS ranging from 10 months for DNMT3A-mutated patients (HR 20.7, 95% CI 8.1-52.7; p&lt;0.01) to 40 months for TET2-mutated cases with wild-type DNMT3A (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.7-7.6; p&lt;0.01). Results were similar for multivariable analysis of LFS, where, remarkably, none (0%) of the 25 PHF6-mutated patients with wild-type DNMT3A experienced leukemic transformation vs. 15-30% risk of leukemic transformation in the other three groups (p&lt;0.01). Multivariable analysis for both OS and LFS, which included other risk factors such as red cell transfusion need, leukocytosis (leukocyte count ≥13 x 109/L) and karyotype, confirmed the independent and favorable impact of PHF6 mutation/wild-type DNMT3A (p&lt;0.01 in both instances). Finally, all-inclusive multivariable analysis of karyotype and mutations, in DNMT3A wild-type patients, confirmed the highly favorable and independent prognostic impact of PHF6 mutation (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.37). Conclusion: The current study proposes a 2-gene genomic signature (PHF6 mutated and DNMT3A wild-type) to identify a unique subset of CMML patients who often present with thrombocytopenia and whose clinical course is characterized by a very low risk of leukemic transformation, resulting in superior overall survival. Additional studies are warranted to validate these findings and include the information in contemporary risk models.

Introduction Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is associated with a 15-30% risk for blast transformation (BT) over 3-5 years. Post-BT survival remains dismal with a median overall survival (mOS) of ~6 months (mo), even with intensive therapies. Although genetic drivers are identified in &gt;40% of BT-CMML cases (Carr, 2021), mechanisms of BT remain to be elucidated. This multicenter study examines risk factors for BT in CMML and predictors of post-BT survival. Methods CMML patients at Mayo Clinic (n = 400, 47%) and MD Anderson Cancer Center (n = 449, 53%) were included with IRB approval. Analyses used clinical and molecular data at diagnosis or first referral in chronic phase (CP) and again at BT. Categorical variables were compared by Chi squared and continuous by Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Multivariate analyses used Cox proportional hazards models with binarization via receiver operator curves. Kaplan-Meier analyses were censored at hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). P &lt; 0.05 was considered significant. Calculations used BlueSky (v10.3.1) or Prism (v10.2.3). Results Of 849 CMML patients (median age 71 years, 32% female, 90% white) included in the study, 133 (16%) underwent BT. In comparison to CP-CMML without BT, those with BT were more likely (p &lt; 0.05) to have had higher WBC counts (15.1 vs 11.4 x109/L), higher absolute monocyte counts (2.9 vs 2.2 x109/L), lower platelet counts (84 vs 102 x109/L), have circulating immature myeloid cells (52% vs 37%), and be classified as myeloproliferative (MP)-CMML (58% vs 44%) or CMML-2 (33% vs 17%) at diagnosis/first referral in CP. More mutations were detected in BT-CMML than in CP-CMML (mean 3.2 vs 2.8, p = 0.002). Mutations in RAS (NRAS, KRAS, BRAF, CBL, PTPN11; 51% vs 40%, p = 0.02) and signaling (CSF3R, FLT3, JAK2, SH2B3; 15% vs 7%, p = 0.004) pathway genes were more frequent in BT-CMML. Conversely, there were fewer BT-CMML patients with the favorable ASXL1WT/TET2MT genotype compared to CP-CMML (22% vs 33%, p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis identified MP-CMML (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, p = 0.04), CMML-2 (HR 2.4, p &lt; 0.001), and the presence of ≥4 somatic gene mutations (HR 1.8, p = 0.002) as risk factors for BT whereas the ASXL1WT/TET2MTgenotype was protective (HR 0.45, p = 0.002). The ASXL1WT/TET2MT genotype was also protective in the MP-CMML (HR 0.49, p = 0.04) and RAS-mutated (HR 0.35, p = 0.005) subgroups. Amongst BT-CMML cases, the median time to BT was 10 mo from diagnosis/referral. Compared to their CP assessment, patients in an overlapping Mayo Clinic BT-CMML cohort (n = 156, median age 69 years, 35% female) were more likely to have NPM1 (24% vs 3%, p &lt; 0.001) and IDH2 (14% vs 1%, p = 0.01) mutations at BT. Amongst cases with paired molecular evaluations (n = 44), 7 (16%) acquired new mutations, including FLT3-ITD (n = 2) and NPM1 (n = 2). Conversely, 6 (14%) lost mutations, including TET2 (n = 3), SRSF2 (n = 2), CBL, NRAS, or PTPN11 (n = 1 each). There were no differences in variant allele fractions in driver genes present at CP and BT. Abnormal karyotypes were more prevalent at BT than in CP (60% vs 34%, p &lt; 0.001), and 26 (25%) patients with a normal karyotype in CP acquired structural (65%) and/or numerical (69%) changes at BT, including 6 (23%) that acquired a complex karyotype. Acute myeloid leukemia defining translocations were seen in 4 (4%) cases: 2 with t(8;21) and 1 each with inv(3) and t(10;11)(KMT2A::TET1). After considering mutation and karyotype changes, only bone marrow blasts ≥30% (HR 1.7, p = 0.04) were independently prognostic for OS after BT (mOS 4 mo). Compared to supportive care (n = 50, mOS 1.3 mo), OS was improved by hypomethylating agents (HMA, n = 14, mOS 16 mo, HR 0.3, p &lt; 0.001) or induction chemotherapy (n = 56, mOS 8 mo, HR 0.3, p &lt; 0.001), but not by HMA + venetoclax (n = 11, mOS 6 mo, HR 0.7, p = 0.4). Allogeneic HCT (n = 28) improved mOS to 46 vs 3 mo (p &lt; 0.001). Amongst 4 patients with paired whole genome sequencing before and after BT, 3 had increased copy number alterations (including 2 with loss of heterozygosity, 2 with gains, and 3 with deletions) while the 4th acquired novel likely pathogenic somatic mutations (MUC4, BAX, WNK2). Conclusions Survival in CMML after BT remains exceptionally poor. In this multicenter cohort, MP-CMML, CMML-2, and the presence of ≥4 somatic gene mutations were identified as risk factors for BT, with the ASXL1WT/TET2MT genotype being protective. Following BT, bone marrow blast burden ≥30% was an independent adverse predictor of survival.