Boeve, Bradley F.

AbstractBackgroundThe ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) study is designed to characterize both sporadic and familial FTLD (f‐FTLD) through annual detailed clinical, neuropsychological, biomarker, and neuroimaging assessments to capture disease onset and trajectory in preparation for therapeutic trails in FTLD. Transitions from asymptomatic to mild disease, or from mild to overt, may reveal critical windows for intervention.Method169 f‐FTLD participants carrying mutations in the main FTLD‐associated genes (79 C9orf72; 37 GRN; 53 MAPT) with at least two clinical assessments were included for analysis of phenoconversion from asymptomatic or mild disease. [CDRÒ + NACC FTLD global scores (Miyagawa et al, 2020) were used to define baseline status at first visit: “asymptomatic” = 0 and “mild” = 0.5. Conversion was defined as “partial” (asymptomatic to mild), “definite” (asymptomatic to overt [CDRÒ + NACC FTLD > = 1) and “mild to overt” (0.5 to > = 1).ResultDefinite conversion occurred most often in MAPT mutation carriers, with 5/43 asymptomatic carriers transitioning through mild to overt across multiple visits. Definite conversion was also seen in 2/65 C9orf72 expansion carriers and 1/30 GRN mutation carriers. All definite converters were assessed as mild (CDRÒ + NACC FTLD = 0.5) for at least one intermediate visit; definite conversion was observed from 2‐4 years from initial assessment. Partial conversions also occurred in all three genetic groups (MAPT: 6; C9orf72: 5; GRN: 5). Further conversion is expected to be observed in these participants in additional follow‐up visits. C9orf72 expansion carriers were less likely to progress from a baseline of mild to overt (3/14) than GRN carriers (4/6) or MAPT (7/10).ConclusionLongitudinal assessment through natural history studies can capture early phenoconversion in carriers of FTLD‐associated genetic mutations; corresponding imaging, cognitive, and biomarker profiles captured may provide insights into disease mechanisms and trajectories.

AbstractBackgroundThe ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) research consortium is actively enrolling participants across 23 North American centers to characterize sporadic and familial frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and prepare for disease‐modifying clinical trials. The ability to identify, otherwise unknown, relatives among these participants is critical to rigorously build family structures for downstream clinical and genetic research studies.MethodsGenome‐wide SNP genotyping data from ALLFTD participants was used to perform lineage analyses using PLINK. Briefly, QC was performed to remove individuals with low call rate and filter autosomal SNPs for missingness, allele frequency, and deviation from Hardy‐Weinberg equilibrium, before pruning SNPs for linkage disequilibrium. Identity‐by‐descent (IBD) estimates were then calculated for determining relatedness, followed by family‐network identification and pedigree reconstruction using PRIMUS.ResultsAbout 46% of ALLFTD participants that were genotyped and passed QC (n = 1,453) had reported a family history, while 50% (n = 721) did not and were considered sporadic. We identified a total of 460 participants that had at least one relative who was second degree or closer (PI_HAT>0.1875) based on IBD sharing, resulting in 150 family networks. This included 9 participants who self‐identified as sporadic, demonstrating the utility of direct genetic characterization to determine familiality in FTD. Most of the predicted families were associated with disease causing variants in the 3 major FTD‐causing genes: 66 families with known C9orf72 repeat expansion carriers, 35 with MAPT (including 11 families with the variant historically known as p.P301L) and 30 with GRN pathogenic variant carriers, as well as 2 families with carriers of both a C9orf72 expansion and a GRN pathogenic variant. We also identified 5 families with carriers of pathogenic variants in other familial dementia genes (2 TARDBP, 2 VCP and 1 PSEN1), as well as 12 families with yet unknown genetic etiology.ConclusionsThis dataset sets up a crucial resource to increase statistical accuracy and power in downstream association studies using the clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging and biomarker data currently being generated by the ALLFTD consortium. It will also facilitate genetic studies aimed at novel gene discovery, and identification of haplotypes and genetic modifiers associated with the 3 major FTD causal genes.

Abstract Introduction Sleep markers can assess prodromal risk for neurodegenerative disorders (NDD). In a recent study conducted by the Mayo Clinic, most isolated REM sleep behavior disorder patients preferred knowing about their risk for parkinsonism or dementia. In their email survey, patients indicated a strong preference for disclosure of prognostic NDD risk in order to spur family discussions and plan for the future. For this pilot study, the Mayo questions were modified in order to investigate the perspectives and preferences of community-based adults about potentially being at-risk of a NDD and how it might impact their lives. Methods A brief survey was administered to Rotary Club attendees prior to a presentation on sleep and neurodegenerative disease. Each question offered five responses: strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, or strongly agree. Personal identifiers were not obtained. Thirty-four surveys were completed from approximately equal numbers of older men and women with estimated ages above 50 years. Personal information were not obtained (e.g., age and sex). Results When asked whether it was important to know their NDD risk given the fact that there are no known methods to prevent or cure the disease, most (83%) strongly agreed or agreed, while only 18% preferred not to know their NDD risk. The majority felt they would be more pessimistic about their future if identified as being at risk of NDD the (62% strongly agreed/agreed). Most believed their priorities and plans for living life would change (68% strongly agreed/agreed). Further, the vast majority felt that knowing NDD risk would help them plan for the future (89% strongly agreed/agreed), including planning for health resources and support (88% strongly agreed/agreed). Conclusion Eighty-three percent of those surveyed reported they would benefit from knowing if they were at risk of NDD, even though the majority would feel more pessimistic about their future. The vast majority (89%) responded that knowing their NDD risk would help them plan for the future. These results suggest that most community adults might be receptive to future sleep screening for NDD with results. Investigations are underway to confirm these findings in a broader community-based study. Support (if any) NIA-R44AG050326

Abstract Introduction Introduction: Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is strongly associated with progressive phenoconversion to an overt synucleinopathy (e.g., parkinsonism). Neurotrauma [i.e., traumatic brain injury (TBI) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)], increases the odds of RBD diagnosis by ~2.5-fold and is associated with an increased later diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease (PD), a service-connected illness in Veterans. Thus, RBD and neurotrauma are both independently associated with parkinsonism; however, it is unclear how neurotrauma influences neurological symptoms and exam findings in patients with RBD. Methods Methods: Participants ≥18 years of age with overnight polysomnogram-confirmed RBD were enrolled between 8/2018 to 4/2021 as part of the North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy (NAPS) Consortium. Standardized assessments for RBD, TBI, and PTSD history, as well as cognitive, motor, sensory and autonomic function were completed. This sub-study applied a cross-sectional, case-control (1:4 ratio) analysis comparing cases (n=24; RBD+TBI+PTSD) to controls (n=96; RBD) matched for age (±2 years), sex, and years of education (±2 years). Results Results: Participants with neurotrauma reported an earlier age of RBD symptom onset and more severe RBD phenotype, more severe anxiety and depression, greater frequency of hypertension, and significantly worse cognitive, motor, and autonomic function compared to participants without neurotrauma. Conclusion Conclusion: This cross-sectional, matched case:control study showed that individuals with comorbid neurotrauma and RBD have significantly worse neurological outcomes related to common features of early parkinsonism. Although confirmatory longitudinal studies are still ongoing, these results may be a sign of further/faster progression of synucleinopathy in those with comorbid neurotrauma and RBD. Support (if any) Support: NIH R34 AG056639, NIH U19 AG071754, VA RRD 1K2 RX002947, Parkinsons Center of Oregon

Abstract Introduction In a recent study, most patients diagnosed with isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) preferred their physician discussed their risk for developing a future neurodegenerative disorder (NDD) such as parkinsonism or dementia (PD). In the Mayo Clinic email survey, 75% would lose trust in their physician if PD-risk was not discussed following an iRBD diagnosis. For this survey, questions were designed to investigate preferences for how sleep physicians might communicate to community-based adults about risk of a NDD. Methods A survey was administered to Rotary Club attendees prior to a sleep and neurodegenerative disease presentation, with options for responses being either strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, or strongly agree. Thirty-four surveys were obtained from approximately equal numbers of men and women with estimated ages above 50 years. Personal information were not obtained (i.e., sex and age). Results The vast majority of respondents wanted their physician to ask their preference prior to sharing NDD risk (86% strongly agreed or agreed), while virtually all would lose trust in their physician if he/she did not discuss their NDD risk (97% strongly agreed/agreed). If identified with NDD risk, responders would seek out information about medications and adaptive therapies that could delay onset (97% strongly agreed/agreed), while only about half currently had a good understanding of lifestyle patterns that might help delay onset (47% strongly agreed/agreed and 47% disagreed/strongly disagreed). Not knowing when memory problems might begin would cause most responders to feel anxious (85% strongly agreed/agreed). Conclusion Those surveyed wanted their physician to ask their preference prior to sharing NDD risk, but virtually all would lose trust in their health care provider if the information was known but not shared. There appears to be a role for physicians in educating those who may be at NDD risk about interventions that could delay onset of NDD, given approximately half have a limited understanding of lifestyle patterns that could help delay onset. Further, routine follow-up for changes in prodromal NDD biomarker severity might help to reduce anxiety in the 85% of those concerned about when memory problems might begin. Support (if any) NIA-R44AG050326

AbstractIntroductionRemote smartphone assessments of cognition, speech/language, and motor functioning in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) could enable decentralized clinical trials and improve access to research. We studied the feasibility and acceptability of remote smartphone data collection in FTD research using the ALLFTD Mobile App (ALLFTD‐mApp).MethodsA diagnostically mixed sample of 214 participants with FTD or from familial FTD kindreds (asymptomatic: CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0 [N = 101]; prodromal: 0.5 [N = 49]; symptomatic ≥1 [N = 51]; not measured [N = 13]) were asked to complete ALLFTD‐mApp tests on their smartphone three times within 12 days. They completed smartphone familiarity and participation experience surveys.ResultsIt was feasible for participants to complete the ALLFTD‐mApp on their own smartphones. Participants reported high smartphone familiarity, completed ∼ 70% of tasks, and considered the time commitment acceptable (98% of respondents). Greater disease severity was associated with poorer performance across several tests.DiscussionThese findings suggest that the ALLFTD‐mApp study protocol is feasible and acceptable for remote FTD research.HIGHLIGHTS The ALLFTD Mobile App is a smartphone‐based platform for remote, self‐administered data collection. The ALLFTD Mobile App consists of a comprehensive battery of surveys and tests of executive functioning, memory, speech and language, and motor abilities. Remote digital data collection using the ALLFTD Mobile App was feasible in a multicenter research consortium that studies FTD. Data was collected in healthy controls and participants with a range of diagnoses, particularly FTD spectrum disorders. Remote digital data collection was well accepted by participants with a variety of diagnoses.