Porter, Alyx B.

Opsoclonus myoclonus syndrome (OMS) is a rare immune-mediated paraneoplastic or para/-post-infectious syndrome characterized by “dancing” eye movements, myoclonus, and ataxia. Neuropsychiatric symptoms have also been reported. Without treatment, OMS may progress to further neurological impairment and even death. Autoimmune attack of CNS structures in OMS is most commonly mediated by anti-Ri (also known as ANNA2) IgG antibodies, with additional findings implicating antibodies targeting various neurotransmitter receptors. Prompt immunotherapy and neoplasm treatment may result in improvement. We report a novel association of Contactin-Associated Protein-Like 2 (Caspr2) antibodies occurring in association with paraneoplastic OMS. While breast cancer and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are more commonly associated with OMS among adults, we characterize a novel association between Caspr2 antibody in a patient with mixed non-small cell and small cell lung carcinoma.

It is widely recognized that subspecialized multidisciplinary care improves neuro-oncology outcomes. Optimizing patient outcomes relies on the expertise of the treating physicians, neuroradiology and neuropathology, and supportive services familiar with common neurologic syndromes that occur after brain tumor diagnosis and treatment. Despite an increasing number of providers, patient access to specialized multidisciplinary care and clinical trials remains limited. Barriers to equitable health care exist across the United States, with marginalized communities being impacted disproportionately. Such disparity causes increased morbidity and mortality for patients from backgrounds with various elements of diversity. Limited attention to this inequity has resulted in an incomplete understanding of the spectrum of experiences that patients with neuro-oncologic diseases encounter. Clinical trials represent the highest standard and quality of care in medicine, but inclusion of under-represented and underserved groups consistently lags behind counterpart participants from majority racial and ethnic groups. Through provider education as it pertains to issues from bias and health literacy to increasing clinical trial enrollment and offering opportunities through telemedicine, opportunities for improving access to high-quality neuro-oncologic care are explored.

AbstractBackgroundIt remains unknown how the COVID-19 pandemic has changed neuro-oncology clinical practice, training, and research efforts.MethodsWe performed an international survey of practitioners, scientists, and trainees from 21 neuro-oncology organizations across 6 continents, April 24–May 17, 2020. We assessed clinical practice and research environments, institutional preparedness and support, and perceived impact on patients.ResultsOf 582 respondents, 258 (45%) were US-based and 314 (55%) international. Ninety-four percent of participants reported changes in their clinical practice. Ninety-five percent of respondents converted at least some practice to telemedicine. Ten percent of practitioners felt the need to see patients in person, specifically because of billing concerns and pressure from their institutions. Sixty-seven percent of practitioners suspended enrollment for at least one clinical trial, including 62% suspending phase III trial enrollments. More than 50% believed neuro-oncology patients were at increased risk for COVID-19. Seventy-one percent of clinicians feared for their own personal safety or that of their families, specifically because of their clinical duties; 20% had inadequate personal protective equipment. While 69% reported increased stress, 44% received no psychosocial support from their institutions. Thirty-seven percent had salary reductions and 63% of researchers temporarily closed their laboratories. However, the pandemic created positive changes in perceived patient satisfaction, communication quality, and technology use to deliver care and mediate interactions with other practitioners.ConclusionsThe pandemic has changed treatment schedules and limited investigational treatment options. Institutional lack of support created clinician and researcher anxiety. Communication with patients was satisfactory. We make recommendations to guide clinical and scientific infrastructure moving forward and address the personal challenges of providers and researchers.

Abstract OBJECTIVE Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults, with males more commonly affected than females(1.6:1). Despite advancements in treatments, prognosis is dismal with a median overall survival of 15 months. Our aim was to investigate sex as a variable in GBM patient survival after receiving incremental levels of standard-of-care treatment regimens – different extents of surgical resection and different numbers of cycles of adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy. METHODS Drawing from our extensive multi-institutional brain tumor repository, we investigated GBM subjects with overall survival (OS), extent of resection (EOR), number of temozolomide (TMZ) cycles, and sex data (n=620, males: n=387, females: n=233). Cox proportional hazard ratios were computed to investigate the multivariable predictive value of the patient variables with OS. Patients were then divided into groups based on their sex, EOR (either biopsy, subtotal resection (STR) or gross total resection (GTR)), and TMZ cycles (I: < 6 cycles, II: 7-11 cycles and III: >12 cycles). RESULTS We observed that STR was beneficial for females (HR=0.52; CI=0.33-0.83; p-value=0.013), while for males the benefit was not detected (HR=0.73; CI=0.46-1.15; p-value=0.173) for STR but was detectable for GTR (HR=0.58, CI=0.37-0.90; p-value=0.014). Females receiving 7-11 cycles of TMZ showed a survival benefit (HR=0.52; CI=0.12-0.53; p-value=0.048) while males in the same group did not (HR=0.74; CI=0.46-1.19; p-value=0.21), in comparison to those in group I of TMZ cycles. No sex differences were identified in patients receiving < =6 cycles or >=12 cycles. CONCLUSION Together, our results contribute to the growing literature that sex differences exist in GBM patients, even in response to standard-of-care therapies. This should be accounted for when designing clinical trials for GBM so that we may advance our pursuit to deliver personalized medicine.

Abstract To assess the impact of the pandemic on the field, we performed an international web-based survey of practitioners, scientists, and trainees from 21 neuro-oncology organizations across 6 continents from April 24 through May 17. Of 582 respondents, 258 (45%) were in the US, and 314 (55%) were international. 80.4% were affiliated with academic institutions. 94% respondents reported changes in clinical practice; 95% reported conversion to telemedicine for at least some appointments. However, almost 10% practitioners felt the need to see patients in person specifically because of billing concerns and perceived institutional pressure. Over 50% believed neuro-oncology patients were at increased risk of contracting COVID-19. 67% practitioners suspended enrollment for at least one clinical trial: 53% suspended phase II and 62% suspended phase III trial enrollment. 71% clinicians feared for their or their families’ safety, specifically because of their clinical duties. 20% percent said they did not have enough PPE to work safely; about the same percentage were unhappy with their institutions’ response to the pandemic. 43% believed the pandemic would negatively affect their academic career, and 52% fellowship program directors were worried about losing funding for their training programs. While 69% respondents reported increased stress, 44% were offered no psychosocial support. 37% had their salary reduced. 36% researchers had to temporarily close their laboratories. In contrast, the pandemic created positive changes in perceived patient and family satisfaction, quality of communication, and use of technology to deliver care and interactions with other practitioners. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic has altered standard treatment schedules and limited investigational treatment options for patients. In some cases, clinicians felt institutional pressure to continue conducting billable in-person visits when telemedicine visits would have sufficed. A lack of institutional support created anxiety among clinicians and researchers. We make specific recommendations to guide clinical and scientific infrastructure moving forward.

Objective: To evaluate the incidence of and characterize the presentation of neuropsychiatric symptoms and/or Parkinsonism as a presentation of central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) in either its primary CNSL form or when it spreads to the brain in systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (secondary CNSL). Patients and Methods: With Institutional Review Board approval we identified patients who had been treated at Mayo Clinic from 1998 to 2018 and were recorded to have a combination of ICD 9/10 codes for CNSL and various psychiatric diagnoses. Results: A total of 20 of the 232 patients (9%) were noted to have neuropsychiatric symptoms preceding diagnosis. The average age at diagnosis was 62, with even split for sex. The majority (85%) of patients had primary CNSL. The average duration of symptoms before the diagnosis was 4.8 months. Confusion (80%), depression (40%), apathy (30%), anxiety (30%), and agitation (30%) were the most common symptoms identified. The majority (65%) of patients had subcortical lesions followed by the frontal lobe (50%). Parkinsonism was identified in 5 of the 20 patients with 4 demonstrating resolution of symptoms with treatment of the lymphoma. Conclusions: Neuropsychiatric symptoms are a rare but notable symptom before the presentation of CNSL. There is an increasing awareness of neurological illness presenting as pure psychiatric disturbance, prompting the need to exclude organic and treatable diseases, particularly in elderly patients. Acknowledgment and diagnosis are important for an appropriate management as there is a significant impact on patient and caregiver quality of life.

Abstract Background Accurate assessments of patient response to therapy are a critical component of personalized medicine. In glioblastoma (GBM), the most aggressive form of brain cancer, tumor growth dynamics are heterogenous across patients, complicating assessment of treatment response. This study aimed to analyze days gained (DG), a burgeoning model-based dynamic metric, for response assessment in patients with recurrent GBM who received bevacizumab-based therapies. Methods DG response scores were calculated using volumetric tumor segmentations for patients receiving bevacizumab with and without concurrent cytotoxic therapy (N = 62). Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were implemented to examine DG prognostic relationship to overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the onset of treatment for recurrent GBM. Results In patients receiving concurrent bevacizumab and cytotoxic therapy, Kaplan–Meier analysis showed significant differences in OS and PFS at DG cutoffs consistent with previously identified values from newly diagnosed GBM using T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (T1Gd). DG scores for bevacizumab monotherapy patients only approached significance for PFS. Cox regression showed that increases of 25 DG on T1Gd imaging were significantly associated with a 12.5% reduction in OS hazard for concurrent therapy patients and a 4.4% reduction in PFS hazard for bevacizumab monotherapy patients. Conclusion DG has significant meaning in recurrent therapy as a metric of treatment response, even in the context of anti-angiogenic therapies. This provides further evidence supporting the use of DG as an adjunct response metric that quantitatively connects treatment response and clinical outcomes.

12007 Background: Up to 96% of patients with high grade glioma (HGG) report moderate to severe fatigue. Armodafinil, the R-enantiomer of modafinil, is a psychostimulant with low potential for abuse that has shown potential for improving severe fatigue in HGG patients. Methods: In this phase III double blinded placebo-controlled study, adults with HGG and moderate to severe fatigue, > 4 weeks after completing radiotherapy, were randomized to receive armodafinil daily (150 mg or 250 mg) or placebo for a total of 8 weeks. The primary outcome was efficacy in treating severe fatigue. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of tolerability, neurocognitive function, and quality of life. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks. Results: A total of 328 patients were enrolled between 6/3/13-3/1/19. There were 103 (150 mg arm), 97 (250 mg arm) and 97 (placebo arm) evaluable patients with primary endpoint data available. The median age was 60 years (20-85) with a median Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) worst fatigue score of 8 (6-10). 60.3% were male, 80.5% received concomitant chemotherapy, and 39.7% were on corticosteroids. The global fatigue score at end of weeks 4 and 8 were lower than at baseline (p<0.0001) and in the 250 mg arm than placebo (p=0.0356) and was higher for corticosteroid users than non-users (p=0.0002). There was no statistically significant difference for clinically meaningful improvement in BFI usual fatigue score from baseline to end of week 8 between the three arms (p=0.9601). Patients reported an improvement in concentration at week 4 from baseline on the 150 mg arm(P=0.0311). There was no statistically significant difference on neurocognitive tests from baseline to end of week 4 (p>0.05) or week 8 (p>0.05) between arms. More patients reported insomnia on the 250 mg arm (p=0.0083). Conclusions: There is no meaningful benefit of the use of armodafinil to reduce moderate to severe fatigue in patients with HGG. In certain cases there may be benefit of armodafinil 150 mg to aid concentration without the risk of insomnia.Support: UG1CA189823;U10CA180868 (NRG). Clinical trial information: NCT01781468 .

Abstract Purpose: Despite therapeutic advancements, biological markers that predict the natural history of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) are lacking and age and performance status are the only consistently identified independent prognostic variables. BCL6 rearrangements and deletion of the tumor suppressor gene R-PTP-κ (PTPRK) at 6q22 are thought to be common genetic abnormalities in PCNSL but their prognostic significance is unknown. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence and survival impact of del(6)(q22), BCL6, immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH), and MYC gene rearrangements and prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in PCNSL affecting immunocompetent patients. Patients and methods: Seventy-six specimens from 76 HIV-negative, immunocompetent patients with PCNSL newly diagnosed and treated at Mayo Clinic between 1985 and 2006 were studied. Interphase fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) was performed using two-color break apart probes (BAP) for BCL6 and MYC, a two-color dual-fusion probe for IGH-BCL6, and a two-color probe for del(6)(q22) on thin sections of paraffin-embedded tumor samples. Two-color IGH BAP FISH probes were also used to confirm IGH rearrangements in cases showing extra IGH signals without fusion using the IGH-BCL6 probe. In situ hybridization was performed using probes that recognize EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) on paraffin-embedded tumor samples. Survival data were analyzed for patients diagnosed after 1997 (n=53), corresponding to the change to high dose methotrexate as the standard of care. Survival was calculated from the date of tissue diagnosis to date of death or last contact. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to compare survival across groups. Two-tailed p-values &lt;0.05 were considered statistically significant. Clinical information for the 1985–2006 and 1997–2006 groups was comparable, including median age (67 years (y) vs 68 y), age range (26–87 y for both groups), percentage of deaths (67 vs 64) and median follow up for survivors (588 d vs 395 d). Results: Thirty-four (45%) cases showed del(6)(q22), 6 of which alsocontained a BCL6 rearrangement. Seventeen (22%) cases had a BCL6 rearrangement. Translocations involving IGH and an unknown partner gene (n=2) and MYC and an unknown partner gene (n=2) were also identified. All cases were EBER negative. Of the 53 patients diagnosed after 1997, 23 lacked del(6)(q22) or BCL6 rearrangement and had a median overall survival (MS) of 731 days (d). The 17 patients with an isolated del(6)(q22) had a MS of 90 d and the 13 patients with a BCL6 rearrangement had a MS of 442 d (p=0.0016). Conclusions: Del(6)(q22) and BCL6 rearrangements are common in PCNSL (45% and 22% of cases, respectively) and are associated with decreased survival, particularly del(6)(q22) seemingly independent of patient age and treatment time trends. IGH translocations were less frequent than in systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (13% vs 51%), suggesting a distinct pathogenesis. MYC translocations and EBV infection are rare in PCNSL affecting immunocompetent patients.