Back to Authors

Phelan, Catherine M.

A5105366728 | I3019308854

Mayo Clinic

Moffitt Cancer Center

Citations 48

Abstract 2835: Mitochondrial genetic variants influence ovarian cancer risk

Cancer Research | February 25, 2011 | Volume: 70 | Issue: 8_Supplement | Pages: 2835-2835

10.1158/1538-7445.am10-2835

Abstract Mitochondria have been implicated in carcinogenesis because of their central role in apoptosis, free radical production, and cellular energy metabolism. Although studies have identified somatic mitochondrial DNA mutations in ovarian cancers, little attention has been directed to the possible role of germline mitochondrial variants in mitochondrial dysfunction and subsequent ovarian cancer development. Through an ongoing epithelial ovarian cancer genome-wide association study of 1,856 invasive cases (59% with serous carcinomas) and 1,912 controls (frequency-matched on age, race, and study site), we genotyped 138 SNPs tagging variation in the maternally-inherited mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) to evaluate the hypothesis that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in mtDNA are associated with ovarian cancer risk. All subjects were non-Hispanic, non-Jewish Caucasians, and were genotyped with the Illumina 610-quad Beadchip. Samples and SNPs with call rates less than 95% were excluded. Subjects with ambiguous gender, unresolved identical genotypes, and less than 80% European ancestry were excluded. For each SNP, logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) between carriers of the minor versus major maternally-inherited allele and case status. Subgroup analysis was conducted to estimate allele-specific risks between serous-only cases and controls. Haplotype analysis was performed for regions containing statistically significant SNPs (p<0.05). Two rare SNPs, C16329T in the displacement loop gene (MT-D-loop) (OR: 6.72, 95%CI: 1.5-29.8, p=0.004; minor allele frequency (MAF)=0.001) and C15905T in the tRNA threonine gene (MT-TT) (OR: 1.60, 95%CI: 1.1-2.3, p=0.009; MAF=0.027), were associated with increased ovarian cancer risk; whereas T6777C in the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene (MT-CO1) (OR: 0.68, 95%CI: 0.51-0.91, p=0.009; MAF=0.063) was associated with decreased risk. All three SNPs remained statistically significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons within the mitochondrial SNPs using permutation testing. C16329T and T6777C were also significantly associated among cases with serous histology, with ORs (95% CIs) of 6.13 (1.2-29.6) and 0.61 (0.43-0.87), respectively. Haplotype analysis for each of the three regions investigated revealed significant haplotype-disease associations; however, findings suggest that the respective associations were driven by the most significant SNP(s) listed above. This is the first large-scale epidemiologic study to provide evidence that SNPs in mitochondrial genes may be novel risk factors for ovarian cancer. Future investigation of additional mitochondrial variants (i.e. nuclear-encoded mitochondrial proteins) is necessary to more comprehensively investigate this association. Furthermore, replication of the most promising SNPs in a larger population is warranted to validate these findings. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2835.
Abstract 897: Association of inherited variants in HGF and ovarian cancer survival time

Cancer Research | February 25, 2011 | Volume: 70 | Issue: 8_Supplement | Pages: 897-897

10.1158/1538-7445.am10-897

Abstract Using data from patients with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, we sought to examine whether overall survival was associated with common inherited variation in candidate genes and genomic regions including those involved in angiogenesis, mitosis, and regions of interest from genome-wide association and expression studies. We conducted a two-stage analysis based on Mayo Clinic patients with replication of peak results in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Ovarian cancer patients (N=312) seen at the Mayo Clinic diagnosed from 1999 to 2006 with median follow-up of 3.7 years (range, 0.1 − 9.5 years) and 172 observed deaths were analyzed at 993 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 179 genes. For all patients and for serous patients only (N=192 with 129 observed deaths), Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each SNP, adjusted for other prognostic factors. Twenty-nine SNPs in ten genes revealed p < 0.01 among all cases or among serous cases only, including 21 independent SNP at r2=0.9; analyses within four genes (HGF, PLG, PRKACB, and DCTN5) yielded p < 0.001. The strongest result was in HGF at rs1800793 (all cases: HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3 − 2.2, p-trend 1.9 E-5; serous cases: HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2 − 2.2, p-trend 1.8 E-3). A correlated SNP rs2214825 also showed association (r2=0.76; all cases: HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1 − 1.8, p-trend 3.3 E-3; serous cases: HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 − 1.9, p-trend 0.03), and PCA gene-level tests of the HGF locus were also significantly associated with survival (all cases, p=3.7 E-4; serous cases, p=0.01). Among all cases, differential survival was also associated with DCTN5 rs12447304 (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.6; p=7.1 E-4), and among serous cases, with PLG rs783173 (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2 − 2.0, p = 8.1 E-4) and PRKACB rs1402694 (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3 − 2.2, p=3.2 E-4). We then examined SNPs in the most suggestive gene, HGF, using data from TCGA which had genotyped four overlapping HGF SNPs in 350 invasive cases (188 deaths). Covariate-adjusted TCGA analysis at rs2214825 revealed consistent results (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.2, p=1.4 E-4) as did analyses of three other HGF SNPs (HR range 1.3 to 1.5, p range 3.4 E-3 to 0.049); correlation between SNP genotypes and HGF expression was also observed (p=1.4 E-3, rs2214825, probe 210997_at). While this is the first report of SNPs in HGF, it has long been known that the HGF signaling pathway, activated by HGF ligation of c-MET, plays a key role ovarian cancer cell growth, migration, and invasion. c-MET is overexpressed in 40%-60% of ovarian tumors, and high overexpression is associated with lower overall survival. In addition, HGF has been shown to enhance the response of ovarian cancer cells to low doses of paclitaxel and cisplatin by activating the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, leading to cancer cell death. These results now suggest that inherited differences in HGF among women with invasive disease may play a role in survival, holding potential clues for tailored avenues of treatment. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 897.
Abstract 4724: A novel region on 8q24.21 is associated with ovarian cancer susceptibility

Cancer Research | February 25, 2011 | Volume: 70 | Issue: 8_Supplement | Pages: 4724-4724

10.1158/1538-7445.am10-4724

Abstract Recent GWAS have identified and confirmed associations between several SNPs in the gene desert located on chromosome 8q24 with risk of cancers of the breast, prostate, glioma, bladder and colorectum. Evidence supporting an association with ovarian cancer is limited and inconsistent. Here we evaluate preliminary results in the 8q24 region from stage I of an ongoing invasive epithelial ovarian cancer GWAS among 1864 cases (1096 serous cases) and 1912 controls. All subjects were self-reported non-Hispanic non-Jewish Caucasian, and were genotyped with the Illumina 610quad Chip. Samples and SNPs with call rates less than 95% were excluded (9.6% and 9.9%, respectively) as well as 128 subjects with ambiguous gender, unresolved identical genotypes and less than 80% European ancestry were also excluded. Our most significant hit in the region was rs6651252 located at 8q24.21 with p = 0.000125 for all ovarian cancer, and 1.02*10−5 for serous cases only. This region is located approximately 849 kb downstream of the previous 8q24.21 findings on other cancers, and was not in linkage disequilibrium with any of the haplotype blocks reported previously. We further examined the block structure of this region with eight genotyped SNPs located within 129.61 to 129.64 MB (rs10088218, rs1516973, rs1516975, rs16903097, rs10098821, rs6651252, rs1561928, and rs1561927) and performed haplotype analysis to evaluate the association with ovarian cancer risk. One haplotype (AAGCAGGG, estimated frequency=0.11) was significantly associated with decreased ovarian cancer risk with an odds ratio of 0.67 (all cases, 95% CI: 0.78-0.91, p=0.0026, empirical p= 0.0020). This region contains no known genes, but it is located upstream and overlaps with a known copy number variation (CNV) reported by Redon et al. (2006). Previous published literature on array CGH and CNV results from TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) also indicate that the 8q24.21 region is associated with frequent gains/amplification in ovarian tumors. Combined analysis of SNPs and CNV identified in this region is underway to elucidate the joint effect of these two types of genetic variation on ovarian cancer risk. Our result indicates a novel locus on 8q24.21 is associated with epithelial ovarian cancer susceptibility. Haplotype analysis reveals one specific haplotype that is associated with decreased ovarian cancer risk compared to the most common haplotype. Given previous 8q24 findings from other cancers and evidence from publicly available resources, fine-mapping and resequencing of this region is warranted. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4724.
Abstract 4718: Inherited variants in relapse-associated genes and risk of ovarian cancer

Cancer Research | February 25, 2011 | Volume: 70 | Issue: 8_Supplement | Pages: 4718-4718

10.1158/1538-7445.am10-4718

Abstract Background: We previously identified a panel of genes associated with outcome of ovarian cancer. The purpose of the current study was to assess whether variants in these genes correlated with ovarian cancer risk. Methods and Findings: Women with and without invasive ovarian cancer (749 cases, 1,041 controls) were genotyped at 136 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within 13 candidate genes. Risk was estimated for each SNP and for overall variation within each gene. At the gene-level, variation within MSL1 (male-specific lethal-1 homolog) was associated with risk of serous cancer (p=0.03); haplotypes within PRPF31 (PRP31 pre-mRNA processing factor 31 homolog) were associated with risk of invasive disease (p=0.03). MSL1 rs7211770 was associated with decreased risk of serous disease (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66-0.98; p=0.03). SNPs in MFSD7, BTN3A3, ZNF200, PTPRS, and CCND1A were inversely associated with risk (p<0.05), and there was increased risk at HEXIM1 rs1053578 (p=0.04, OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.02-1.91). Conclusions: Tumor studies can reveal novel genes worthy of follow-up for cancer susceptibility. Here, we found that inherited markers in the gene encoding MSL1, part of a complex that modifies the histone H4, may decrease risk of invasive serous ovarian cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4718.
Abstract 2854: Genetic variation in stromal genes decorin and lumican and susceptibility to serous ovarian cancer

Cancer Research | February 25, 2011 | Volume: 70 | Issue: 8_Supplement | Pages: 2854-2854

10.1158/1538-7445.am10-2854

Abstract Introduction: Alterations in components of the stromal tissue that underlie the epithelium can initiate, promote or inhibit epithelial tumorigenesis. Decorin (DCN) and lumican (LUM) are stromal genes with reduced expression in serous ovarian cancer. We hypothesized that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in these genes may influence susceptibility to serous ovarian cancer. Methods: To test this hypothesis, we compared genotype frequencies of 11 tagSNPs in DCN and LUM between 397 Caucasian cases with primary serous ovarian cancer and 920 Caucasian controls in two studies conducted at Mayo Clinic and Duke University (discovery set). Associations were evaluated further in a third Caucasian population of 436 cases and 1,098 controls in Australia (replication set). TagSNPs were selected from unrelated Caucasian samples within HapMap based on the following criteria: (i) minor allele frequency ≥ 0.05, (ii) pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) of r2 ≥ 0.8, and (iii) location within, and 5kb upstream and downstream of, each gene region. Genotyping was performed using the Illumina GoldenGate™ assay and associations between SNPs and serous cancer were evaluated using unconditional logistic regression to estimate per allele odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Untyped genotypes for DCN rs13312816 in the discovery set, and for DCN rs3138165 and LUM rs17018765 in the replication set, were imputed using the MACH software. Results: In the discovery set, we observed inverse associations between DCN rs3138165 (OR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-1.0), DCN rs13312816 (OR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-1.0), DCN rs516115 (OR=0.8; 95%CI=0.7-1.0) and LUM rs17018765 (OR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-1.0) and risk of serous ovarian cancers (all Ptrend=0.06). Associations were confirmed in the replication set for DCN rs3138165 (OR=0.6; 95%CI=0.4-0.9; Ptrend=0.009), DCN rs13312816 (OR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-0.9; Ptrend=0.01) and LUM rs17018765 (OR=0.6; 95%CI=0.4-0.9; Ptrend=0.008), but not for DCN rs516115 (Ptrend=0.20). To increase statistical power, data from the discovery and replication sets were combined (833 cases and 2,013 controls) following confirmation of no statistical heterogeneity in the ORs between study sites. In the combined sample, associations were strengthened for DCN rs3138165 (OR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-0.9; Ptrend=0.002), DCN rs13312816 (OR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-0.9; Ptrend=0.002), DCN rs516115 (OR=0.9; 95%CI=0.8-1.0; Ptrend=0.03) and LUM rs17018765 (OR=0.6; 95%CI=0.5-0.8; Ptrend=0.001). All four SNPs were in the same LD block on chromosome 12, suggesting that serous ovarian cancer susceptibility may be driven by a single, correlated variant in the region. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that genetic variation in DCN and LUM may influence susceptibility to serous ovarian cancer and contribute to the mounting evidence that supports the role of the stroma in epithelial ovarian cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2854.
Polymorphism in the GALNT1 Gene and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Non-Hispanic White Women: The Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | February 8, 2010 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 600-604

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-09-0861 | PMID 20142253

Abstract Aberrant glycosylation is a well-described hallmark of cancer. In a previous ovarian cancer case control study that examined polymorphisms in 26 glycosylation-associated genes, we found strong statistical evidence (P = 0.00017) that women who inherited two copies of a single-nucleotide polymorphism in the UDP-N-acetylgalactosamine:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase, GALNT1, had decreased ovarian cancer risk. The current study attempted to replicate this observation. The GALNT1 single-nucleotide polymorphism rs17647532 was genotyped in 6,965 cases and 8,377 controls from 14 studies forming the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. The fixed effects estimate per rs17647532 allele was null (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.07). When a recessive model was fit, the results were unchanged. Test for hetero geneity of the odds ratios revealed consistency across the 14 replication sites but significant differences compared with the original study population (P = 0.03). This study underscores the need for replication of putative findings in genetic association studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(2); 600–4
Candidate Gene Analysis Using Imputed Genotypes: Cell Cycle Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Ovarian Cancer Risk

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | March 9, 2009 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 935-944

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-08-0860 | PMID 19258477

Abstract Polymorphisms in genes critical to cell cycle control are outstanding candidates for association with ovarian cancer risk; numerous genes have been interrogated by multiple research groups using differing tagging single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sets. To maximize information gleaned from existing genotype data, we conducted a combined analysis of five independent studies of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Up to 2,120 cases and 3,382 controls were genotyped in the course of two collaborations at a variety of SNPs in 11 cell cycle genes (CDKN2C, CDKN1A, CCND3, CCND1, CCND2, CDKN1B, CDK2, CDK4, RB1, CDKN2D, and CCNE1) and one gene region (CDKN2A-CDKN2B). Because of the semi-overlapping nature of the 123 assayed tagging SNPs, we performed multiple imputation based on fastPHASE using data from White non-Hispanic study participants and participants in the international HapMap Consortium and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences SNPs Program. Logistic regression assuming a log-additive model was done on combined and imputed data. We observed strengthened signals in imputation-based analyses at several SNPs, particularly CDKN2A-CDKN2B rs3731239; CCND1 rs602652, rs3212879, rs649392, and rs3212891; CDK2 rs2069391, rs2069414, and rs17528736; and CCNE1 rs3218036. These results exemplify the utility of imputation in candidate gene studies and lend evidence to a role of cell cycle genes in ovarian cancer etiology, suggest a reduced set of SNPs to target in additional cases and controls. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(3):935–44)
Performance of Amplified DNA in an Illumina GoldenGate BeadArray Assay

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | July 15, 2008 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1781-1789

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-07-2849 | PMID 18628432

Abstract Whole genome amplification (WGA) offers a means to enrich DNA quantities for epidemiologic studies. We used an ovarian cancer study of 1,536 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 2,368 samples to assess performance of multiple displacement amplification (MDA) WGA using an Illumina GoldenGate BeadArray. Initial screening revealed successful genotyping for 93.4% of WGA samples and 99.3% of genomic samples, and 93.2% of SNPs for WGA samples and 96.3% of SNPs for genomic samples. SNP failure was predicted by Illumina-provided designability rank, %GC (P ≤ 0.002), and for WGA only, distance to telomere and Illumina-provided SNP score (P ≤ 0.002). Distance to telomere and %GC were highly correlated; adjustment for %GC removed the association between distance to telomere and SNP failure. Although universally high, per-SNP call rates were related to designability rank, SNP score, %GC, minor allele frequency, distance to telomere (P ≤ 0.01), and, for WGA only, Illumina-provided validation class (P < 0.001). We found excellent concordance generally (>99.0%) among 124 WGA:genomic replicates, 15 WGA replicates, 88 replicate aliquots of the same WGA preparation, and 25 genomic replicates. Where there was discordance, it was across WGA:genomic replicates but limited to only a few samples among other replicates suggesting the introduction of error. Designability rank and SNP score correlated with WGA:genomic concordance (P < 0.001). In summary, use of MDA WGA DNA is feasible; however, caution is warranted regarding SNP selection and analysis. We recommend that biological SNP characteristics, notably distance to telomere and GC content (<50% GC recommended), as well as Illumina-provided metrics be considered in the creation of GoldenGate assays using MDA WGA DNA. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(7):1781–9)