Shaikh, Aisha

Objective: To describe a case of acquired Fanconi syndrome after treatment with capecitabine, irinotecan, and bevacizumab. Case Summary: A 77-year-old female with metastatic colon cancer presented with vomiting and diarrhea. The patient had been diagnosed with stage IIIC (T3, N2, M0) colon cancer 18 months earlier and was initially treated with FOLFOX6 (regimen of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin) after her hemicolectomy. She was switched to a capecitabine/oxaliplatin regimen after 4 cycles due to central access problems. She did well until 10 months after her cancer diagnosis, when metastasis was discovered. She was started on reduced doses of capecitabine, irinotecan, and bevacizumab. After her eleventh cycle, she presented to the hospital with the above symptoms. Laboratory test results showed hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, hypophosphatemia, and hypouricemia. The patient had not been started on any new medications other than chemotherapy for over 1 year. The electrolyte derangements were new, since the patient had laboratory values checked every 3 weeks. Despite daily intravenous replacements, the electrolyte abnormalities persisted. Laboratory evaluations demonstrated the presence of euglycemic glucosuria and a high fractional excretion of phosphorus in the setting of hypophosphatemia. Fanconi syndrome was confirmed by demonstration of aminoaciduria. Discussion: Fanconi syndrome is a disorder characterized by proximal tubular dysfunction resulting in electrolyte wasting. In the acquired form, medications and multiple myeloma are the most common causes. Based on the Naranjo probability scale, a drug was the probable cause of Fanconi syndrome in our patient. However, because multiple drugs were involved, it was not possible to determine which one was the culprit. Conclusions: This is the first case of Fanconi syndrome reported after the administration of capecitabine, irinotecan, and bevacizumab. More studies are needed to confirm this association.

Abstract Background: The accurate and precise measurement of urinary albumin is critical, since even minor increases are diagnostically sensitive indicators of renal disease, cardiovascular events, and risk for death. To gain insights into potential measurement biases, we systematically compared urine albumin measurements performed by LC-MS, a clinically available immunoturbidimetric assay, and size-exclusion HPLC. Methods: We obtained unused clinical urine samples from 150 patients who were stratified by degrees of albuminuria (<20 mg/L, 20–250 mg/L, >250 mg/L) as determined by the immunoturbidimetric assay used in our clinical laboratory (Roche Hitachi 912). Urine albumin was then remeasured via LC-MS and HPLC (Accumin™) assays. Results: The immunoturbidimetric assay, calibrated using manufacturer-supplied serum-derived calibrators (Diasorin), underestimated albumin compared with LC-MS. After calibration with purified HSA, this immunoturbidimetric assay correlated well with LC-MS. HPLC overestimated albumin compared with both LC-MS and immunoturbidimetry. The current LC-MS and HPLC assays both performed poorly at concentrations <20 mg/L. Conclusions: Efforts are needed to establish gold-standard traceable calibrators for clinical assays. LC-MS is a specific method to quantify albumin in native urine when concentrations exceed 20 mg/L, and therefore could be employed for standardization among assays.