Sullivan, David

ABSTRACT Anti‐Spike monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) progressively lost efficacy during the COVID‐19 pandemic due to the emergence and predominance of resistant SARS‐CoV‐2 variants. By contrast, high‐titre COVID‐19 convalescent plasma (CCP) collected from vaccinated donors recently recovered from infection provides a polyclonal source of antibodies that remains effective in clearing SARS‐CoV‐2 in immunosuppressed patients, unable to mount an adequate immune response against the virus. We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine the effect of CCP in immunocompromised patients persistently positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 viraemia following mAb therapy, and to evaluate possible biological factors associated with a favourable outcome. Electronic databases were searched for studies published from January 2020 to January 2026. All studies including eligible cases were considered in the systematic review. Unpublished cases were also collected from investigators of the selected studies. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD420251142891). Forty‐seven cases (30 cases from 12 published studies and 17 unpublished cases) were included. In 33 out of 47 patients (70.2%) with a mAb‐resistant infection, SARS‐CoV‐2 clearance occurred following CCP transfusion, with a mean of 2.7 CCP units administered. In logistic regression, total CCP volume transfused was positively associated with SARS‐CoV‐2 clearance. In conclusion, CCP transfusion was associated with SARS‐CoV‐2 clearance in persistently positive immunocompromised patients following failure of anti‐Spike mAb therapy.

SUMMARY COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) was the first specific therapy deployed for treating SARS-CoV-2 infection. CCP was successfully deployed in both resource-poor and resource-rich countries, establishing that convalescent plasma (CP) is a feasible option for combating the next pandemic. CCP reduced mortality and progression to hospitalization when used early in the disease with high-titer units. This knowledge was gained from a worldwide effort that included more than 50 countries. However, the deployment of CCP was haphazard and varied among countries. Clinical studies suffered from a lack of standardization regarding study design, CCP antibody dosing, timing of administration, and participant disease severity. Unfortunately, the hard-won knowledge from the serum therapy era in the early 20th century, which indicated that effective antibody therapy requires early use in the disease with a sufficient antibody dose, was largely forgotten. Many studies tested CCP late in the disease or without sufficient antibody titer and thus reported negative findings. Trial heterogeneity made it difficult to combine the results of studies. However, despite tremendous heterogeneity in study design and participant populations, meta-analysis revealed strong signals of efficacy when given early with high antiviral-specific antibody levels. When the next pandemic occurs, humanity is likely to resort to CP again. To avoid another chaotic rollout, planning for CP use should begin well before that emergency arrives and must involve both physician education on the principles of antibody therapy and clinical trial designs that test its efficacy in optimal conditions, which include early use with sufficient antibody doses.

In the Spring of 2020, the United States of America (USA) deployed COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) to treat hospitalized patients. Over 500,000 patients were treated with CCP during the first year of the pandemic. In this study, we estimated the number of actual inpatient lives saved by CCP treatment in the United States of America based on CCP weekly use, weekly national mortality data, and CCP mortality reduction data from meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and real-world data. We also estimate the potential number of lives saved if CCP had been deployed for 100% of hospitalized patients or used in 15 to 75% of outpatients. Depending on the assumptions modeled in stratified analyses, we estimated that CCP saved between 16,476 and 66,296 lives. The CCP ideal use might have saved as many as 234,869 lives and prevented 1,136,133 hospitalizations. CCP deployment was a successful strategy for ameliorating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA. This experience has important implications for convalescent plasma use in future infectious disease emergencies.

BACKGROUND COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) virus-specific antibody levels that translate into recipient posttransfusion antibody levels sufficient to prevent disease progression are not defined. METHODS This secondary analysis correlated donor and recipient antibody levels to hospitalization risk among unvaccinated, seronegative CCP recipients within the outpatient, double-blind, randomized clinical trial that compared CCP to control plasma. The majority of COVID-19 CCP arm hospitalizations (15/17, 88%) occurred in this unvaccinated, seronegative subgroup. A functional cutoff to delineate recipient high versus low posttransfusion antibody levels was established by 2 methods: (i) analyzing virus neutralization–equivalent anti–Spike receptor-binding domain immunoglobulin G (anti-S-RBD IgG) responses in donors or (ii) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS SARS-CoV-2 anti–S-RBD IgG antibody was volume diluted 21.3-fold into posttransfusion seronegative recipients from matched donor units. Virus-specific antibody delivered was approximately 1.2 mg. The high-antibody recipients transfused early (symptom onset within 5 days) had no hospitalizations. A CCP-recipient analysis for antibody thresholds correlated to reduced hospitalizations found a statistical significant association between early transfusion and high antibodies versus all other CCP recipients (or control plasma), with antibody cutoffs established by both methods-donor-based virus neutralization cutoffs in posttransfusion recipients (0/85 [0%] versus 15/276 [5.6%]; P = 0.03) or ROC-based cutoff (0/94 [0%] versus 15/267 [5.4%]; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION In unvaccinated, seronegative CCP recipients, early transfusion of plasma units in the upper 30% of study donors’ antibody levels reduced outpatient hospitalizations. High antibody level plasma units, given early, should be reserved for therapeutic use. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04373460. FUNDING Department of Defense (W911QY2090012); Defense Health Agency; Bloomberg Philanthropies; the State of Maryland; NIH (3R01AI152078-01S1, U24TR001609-S3, 1K23HL151826NIH); the Mental Wellness Foundation; the Moriah Fund; Octapharma; the Healthnetwork Foundation; the Shear Family Foundation; the NorthShore Research Institute; and the Rice Foundation.

AbstractInfluenzavirus is among the most relevant candidates for a next pandemic. We review here the phylogeny of former influenza pandemics, and discuss candidate lineages. After briefly reviewing the other existing antiviral options, we discuss in detail the evidences supporting the efficacy of passive immunotherapies against influenzavirus, with a focus on convalescent plasma.

Plasma collected from people recovered from COVID-19 (COVID-19 convalescent plasma, CCP) was the first antibody-based therapy employed to fight the pandemic. CCP was, however, often employed in combination with other drugs, such as the antiviral remdesivir and glucocorticoids. The possible effect of such interaction has never been investigated systematically. To assess the safety and efficacy of CCP combined with other agents for treatment of patients hospitalized for COVID-19, a systematic literature search using appropriate Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms was performed through PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane central, medRxiv and bioRxiv. The main outcomes considered were mortality and safety of CCP combined with other treatments versus CCP alone. This review was carried out in accordance with Cochrane methodology including risk of bias assessment and grading of the quality of evidence. Measure of treatment effect was the risk ratio (RR) together with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 11 studies (8 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 3 observational) were included in the systematic review, 4 studies with CCP combined with remdesivir and 6 studies with CCP combined with corticosteroids, all involving hospitalized patients. One RCT reported information on both remdesivir and steroids use with CCP. The use of CCP combined with remdesivir was associated with a significantly reduced risk of death (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.56–0.97; p = 0.03; moderate certainty of evidence), while the use of steroids with CCP did not modify the mortality risk (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.34–1.51; p = 0.38; very low certainty of evidence). Not enough safety data were retrieved form the systematic literature analysis. The current evidence from the literature suggests a potential beneficial effect on mortality of combined CCP plus remdesivir compared to CCP alone in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. No significant clinical interaction was found between CCP and steroids.

ABSTRACT Early COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) transfusion to outpatients with COVID-19 decreases progression to hospitalization, but the mechanism of how CCP reduces severity is unknown. Among 882 COVID-19 participants transfused with CCP or control plasma in a randomized controlled trial, 21 cytokines and chemokines were measured using electrochemiluminescence assays. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to evaluate the difference between early (transfused within 5 days of symptom onset) CCP vs early control plasma and late (transfused 6–9 days after symptom onset) CCP vs late control plasma at each visit. Linear mixed-effect models were used to assess the difference in the slope of cytokine change. Median cytokine and chemokine levels were similar between the early CCP and early control groups pre-transfusion. At the day 14 visit, only the median IL-6 ( P = 0.014) and IL-16 ( P = 0.036) levels were lower in the early CCP group compared to the early control group, but these differences were not statistically significant after correcting for multiple comparisons (requiring P < 0.0024). IL-6 levels decreased significantly faster in the early CCP group from screening to the day 14 visit compared to the early control group ( P < 0.001). No difference was observed in the slope of cytokine change from screening to day 90 between early CCP and early control groups. Late control and late CCP arms showed similar cytokine and chemokine levels through study follow-up. One mechanism by which early CCP transfusion reduces hospitalization may be by decreasing IL-6 levels, as the reduction is associated with better recovery from COVID-19. IMPORTANCE This study examined the role that cytokines may have played in the beneficial outcomes found when outpatient individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 were transfused with COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) early in their infection. We found that the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 decreased significantly faster in patients treated early with CCP. Participants with COVID-19 treated with CCP later in the infection did not have the same effect. This decrease in IL-6 levels after early CCP treatment suggests a possible role of inflammation in COVID-19 progression. The evidence of IL-6 involvement brings insight into the possible mechanisms involved in CCP treatment mitigating SARS-CoV-2 severity.

Abstract Background Post-COVID conditions (PCC) are common, and risk factors include older age and female sex. While high interleukin (IL)-6 and C-reactive protein are associated with more severe disease, it is unclear whether other cytokines are associated with PCC. This study was performed to identify factors associated with PCC development. Methods The Convalescent Plasma to Limit SARS-CoV-2 Associated Complications (CSSC-004) trial was a double-blind, multi-center, randomized, controlled trial comparing the use of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) to control plasma for the prevention of hospitalization among COVID-19 outpatients. Among 882 individuals participating in the trial with available biospecimens and symptom data, the association between early COVID-19 treatment, cytokine levels and PCC was evaluated. Cytokine and chemokine levels were assessed at baseline, day 14 and day 90 using a multiplexed sandwich immuosassay. Presence of any PCC symptom was assessed at day 90. Associations between COVID-19 treatment, cytokine levels and PCC were examined using multivariate logistic regression models. Results Baseline characteristics were similar by trial treatment group (Figure 1). At day 90, 292 (33.1%) participants had PCC. The most common symptoms were fatigue (14.5%), anosmia (14.5%), and ageusia (10.0%). Levels of most cytokines decreased over time (Figure 2). Six pro-inflammatory cytokines especially IL-6 were elevated at baseline among those with PCC (Figure 3). In multivariable analysis, female sex (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=2.70[1.93-3.81]), age 50 or greater (AOR=1.32[1.17-1.50]), and elevated baseline IL-6 (AOR=1.59[1.02-2.47]) were associated with development of PCC, whereas race, obesity, vaccine status and diabetes were not. Those who received early CCP treatment (&lt;5 days after symptom onset) compared to late CCP treatment had statistically significant lower odds of PCC (AOR=0.60 [0.38-0.95]). Conclusion This study showed high prevalence of PCC symptoms at day 90, particularly among those with higher baseline levels of IL-6 or who did not receive early CCP treatment. The potential utility of IL-6 modulation as a therapeutic intervention among individuals as higher risk for PCC should be studied. Disclosures Kelly Gebo, MD, MPH, Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Spark HealthCare: Advisor/Consultant Sonya L. Heath, MD, Pfizer: Data Monitoring Committee/DSMB Shmuel Shoham, MD, adagio: Advisor/Consultant|Adamis: Advisor/Consultant|ansun: Grant/Research Support|Avir Pharma: Honoraria|cidara: Grant/Research Support|F2G: Grant/Research Support|Immunome: Advisor/Consultant|Karius: Honoraria|Scynexis: Advisor/Consultant|zeteo: Grant/Research Support Judith S. Currier, M.D., MSc, Merck and Company: Advisor/Consultant|Merck and Company: Honoraria Moises A. Huaman, MD, MSc, AN2 Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Gilead Sciences Inc: Grant/Research Support|Insmed Inc: Grant/Research Support Jay S. Raval, MD, Sanofi Genzyme: Advisor/Consultant Arturo Casadevall, MD, PhD, Ortho Diagnostics: Speakers Bureau|Sabtherapeutics: Advisor/Consultant