Yin, Meng

Background and Aims: Screening for diseases can have psychological impacts, such as anxiety, and requires acceptability from the population to be effective. This study examined the perspectives on the benefits and harms of screening for metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) among the general population to optimize screening practices. Approach and Results: A survey was sent to participants enrolled between 2020 and 2024 in a prospective MASLD screening study in Olmsted County, MN. The survey assessed participants' perceived anxiety, stigma, quality of life, preferred screening methods, financial concerns, and lifestyle impacts following screening and diagnosis. Of the 461 participants, 342 (74%) completed the survey. Overall, 14% of participants reported screening-related anxiety, and 14% were concerned about disclosing a potential MASLD diagnosis to others. Among those without a MASLD diagnosis, 99% felt reassured about their liver health, 48% reported an improved quality of life, and 25% made lifestyle changes pertaining to their diet, alcohol use, and physical activity. Of the 77 participants diagnosed with MASLD, 52% experienced some anxiety about their new diagnosis; however, 95% and 97% considered it important to receive an early MASLD diagnosis to mitigate the risk for cirrhosis and cardiovascular disease, respectively. Notably, 79% of diagnosed participants found the diagnosis beneficial in adopting healthier habits, with 30% achieving a >10% weight loss after screening. Conclusion: This population-based survey demonstrates that the perceived benefits of proactive MASLD screening, such as increased awareness, lifestyle changes, and early diagnosis, outweigh the harms. These findings highlight the importance of early screening through patient-centered protocols to improve health outcomes.

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the test–retest repeatability of a rapid, free‐breathing two‐dimensional (2D) MR elastography (MRE) technique and to assess the reliability of the liver‐stiffness measurements compared with conventional breath‐hold MREs. Methods Fifteen and 115 participants were enrolled in the technical repeatability and measurement equivalence assessment cohorts, respectively. All participants underwent rapid free‐breathing and conventional breath‐hold 2D MRE (twice in repeatability cohort) on 1.5T scanners. Both methods have four phase offsets over one harmonic motion cycle at 60 Hz; one and 10 cycles were collected and processed in breath‐hold and free‐breathing MREs, respectively. The liver stiffness measurements of free‐breathing (LS F ) and breath‐hold MRE (LS B ) were calculated from manually drawn regions of interest. The repeatability coefficients and Spearman correlation were used to assess technical repeatability and measurement agreement between LS F and LS B . Univariable and multivariable linear regressions were performed to identify potential influencing factors, including age, sex, body mass index, and fat fraction, in the measurement agreement between LS B and LS F . Results The repeatability coefficient of free‐breathing 2D MRE is comparable to breath‐hold MRE (LS F : 20.8%, LS B : 20.4%). LS F showed a strong agreement and significant correlation with LS B (LS F = 1.01 × LS B , ρ = 0.94, p < 0.001). The measurement agreement between LS F and LS B was only significantly affected by sex ( p = 0.047) after adjusting for confounding factors of age, body mass index, and fat fraction. Conclusions The nongated, free‐breathing, multislice 2D MRE technique can provide reliable liver stiffness measurements compared with conventional breath‐hold 2D MRE. It could provide a comfortable alternative method with reliable liver stiffness measurements for patients who have difficulty in suspending respiration.

BackgroundMultiparametric MRI may cause overdiagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI‐RADS v2.1).ObjectivesTo investigate the diagnostic performance of stiffness as a standalone and complementary marker to PI‐RADS v2.1 for diagnosing csPCa.Study TypeProspective.SubjectsOne hundred forty‐seven participants with pathologically confirmed prostate lesions (≥1 cm), including 71 with csPCa.Field Strength/SequenceT1‐weighted fast spin‐echo, T2‐weighted fast spin‐echo, single‐shot echo‐planar diffusion‐weighted imaging, fast 3D gradient‐echo T1‐weighted dynamic contrast‐enhanced imaging, and 3D single‐shot spin‐echo based echo‐planar MR elastography at 3.0 T.AssessmentThe PI‐RADS v2.1 score was assessed by three radiologists independently. Lesion shear stiffness (SS) values at 60 Hz and 90 Hz were measured. A modified PI‐RADS integrating stiffness with PI‐RADS v2.1 was developed. Diagnostic performance for csPCa was compared between stiffness, PI‐RADS v2.1 and the modified PI‐RADS.Statistical TestSpearman's correlation, Fleiss κ and intraclass correlation, Pearson correlation, one‐way analysis of variance, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and the Delong test. Significance level was P < 0.05.ResultsIn the peripheral zone, csPCa (N = 35) had significantly higher SS than non‐csPCa at 60 Hz (3.22 ± 0.66 kPa vs. 2.56 ± 0.56 kPa) and at 90 Hz (5.64 ± 1.30 kPa vs. 4.48 ± 0.84 kPa). PI‐RADS v2.1 showed 100% sensitivity, 58% specificity, and 0.79 AUC for detecting csPCa. SS achieved 97% sensitivity, 52% specificity, and 0.80 AUC at 60 Hz, while SS had 63% sensitivity, 87% specificity, and 0.78 AUC at 90 Hz. The modified PI‐RADS, combing SS at 60 Hz with PI‐RADS v2.1, resulted in a significantly increased AUC (0.86) compared to that of PI‐RADS v2.1, with a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 75%.Data ConclusionStiffness can help identifying csPCa in the peripheral zone. Combining stiffness with the PI‐RADS v2.1 improved the diagnostic accuracy and specificity for csPCa.Evidence Level1Technical EfficacyStage 2

BackgroundMR elastography (MRE) at 60 Hz is widely used for staging liver fibrosis. MRE with lower frequencies may provide inflammation biomarkers.PurposeTo establish a practical simultaneous dual‐frequency liver MRE protocol at both 30 Hz and 60 Hz during a single examination and validate the occurrence of second harmonic waves at 30 Hz.Study TypeRetrospective.SubjectsOne hundred six patients (48 females, age: 50.0 ± 13.4 years) were divided as follows: Cohort One (15 patients with chronic liver disease [CLD] and 25 healthy volunteers) with simultaneous dual‐frequency MRE. Cohort Two (66 patients with CLD) with second harmonic MRE.Field Strength/Sequence3‐T, single‐ or dual‐frequency MRE at 30 Hz and 60 Hz.AssessmentLiver stiffness (LS) in both cohorts was evaluated with manually placed volumetric ROIs by two independent analyzers. Image quality was assessed by three independent readers on a 4‐point scale (0–3: none/failed, fair, moderate, excellent) based on the depth of wave propagation with 1/3 incremental penetration. The success rate was derived from the percentage of nonzero quality scores.Statistical TestsMeasurement agreement, bias, and repeatability of LS were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Bland–Altman plots, and repeatability coefficient (RC). Mann–Whitney U tests were used to evaluate the differences in image quality between different methods. A P‐value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsSuccess rate was 97.5% in Cohort One and 91% success rate for the second harmonic MRE in Cohort Two. The second harmonic and conventional MRE showed excellent agreement in LS (all ICCs >0.90). The quality scores for the second harmonic wave images were lower than those from the conventional MRE (Z = −4.523).Data ConclusionCompared with conventional and second harmonic methods, simultaneous dual‐frequency had better image quality, high success rate and the advantage of intrinsic co‐registration, while the second harmonic method can be an alternative if custom waveform is not available.Evidence Level3Technical EfficacyStage 1

SummaryBackground and AimsMagnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and vibration‐controlled transient elastography (VCTE) have the potential to assess disease progression; however, repeatability data in people with cirrhosis are lacking. We aimed to assess the effect of disease severity on measurement variability and contribute to the evidentiary basis for the qualification of repeating liver stiffness measurements (LSM) in practice and research.MethodsThis prospective study included 49 adult participants (58.3% female) with cirrhosis who underwent same‐day repeat LSM examinations. The primary outcome was the same‐day, same‐operator repeatability coefficient% (RC%) and the within‐case coefficient of variation (wCV) for each modality. Secondary outcomes include the intra‐class correlation coefficient (ICC). The relationship between measurement variability (interquartile for VCTE, standard deviation for MRE) and disease severity (mean liver stiffness) was evaluated by linear regression with the coefficient of determination R2 reported.ResultsSame‐day repeat MRE and VCTE exams were prospectively conducted in 33 and 45 participants, respectively. The RC% appeared 82% higher for VCTE versus MRE (38% vs. 21%), with consistent findings in head‐to‐head analyses. The wCV for VCTE and MRE was 14% and 8% respectively, indicating VCTE has 75% higher within‐subject measurement variation than MRE. ICC was excellent for LSM by VCTE (0.92) and MRE (0.96). Measurement variability increased with mean liver stiffness for VCTE (R2 = 0.78) and MRE (R2 = 0.93).ConclusionBoth VCTE and MRE demonstrated increased measurement variability with disease severity. However, MRE outperformed VCTE in terms of technical repeatability in patients with cirrhosis. These repeatability estimates may improve the qualification of NITs in practice.

AbstractMagnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is an accurate noninvasive diagnostic tool for assessing the stiffness of parenchymal organs, including the spleen. However, this measurement may be biased due to postprandial changes in splenic stiffness. The aim of the current study was to evaluate postprandial changes in spleen stiffness assessed by MRE in a large sample of healthy volunteers. This was a prospective institutional research ethics board‐approved study. Healthy volunteers with no history of liver disease were recruited for an MRE test and blood draw from December 2018 to July 2019. Each participant underwent spleen MRE after at least 4 h of fasting and again 30 min after a 1000 kcal meal. Also, 14 randomly selected volunteers underwent additional MRE examinations at 1.5 and 2.5 h after food intake. The MRE data were acquired at 60 Hz using a 1.5‐T MRI scanner. The spleen stiffness was assessed using a weighted mean of stiffness values from regions of interest manually drawn on three to five spleen slices. Spearman's rank correlation, Wilcoxon signed‐rank, Friedman, and Mann–Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis. A total of 100 volunteers met the inclusion criteria and were eventually enrolled in this study (age 23 ± 2 years; 65 women). The mean spleen stiffness for the whole group increased by 7.9% (p < 0.001) from the mean ± SD value of 5.09 ± 0.63 (95% CI: 4.96–5.21) kPa in the fasting state to 5.47 ± 0.66 (95% CI 5.34–5.60) kPa 30 min after the meal and then gradually decreased. However, even 2 h 30 min after the meal, the spleen stiffness was higher than in the fasting state. This difference was statistically significant at p less than 0.001. It was concluded that meal intake results in a statistically significant elevation of spleen stiffness that persists for 2.5 h. This finding supports the recommendation for routine fasting for more than 2.5 h prior to assessing MRE‐based spleen stiffness.

Purpose: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) has been established as the most accurate noninvasive technique for diagnosing liver fibrosis. Recent publications have suggested that the measurement of splenic stiffness is useful in setting where portal hypertension may be present. The goal of the current study was to compile normative data for MRE-assessed stiffness measurements of the spleen in young adults. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 healthy young Caucasian volunteers (65 females and 35 males) in the age range of 20 to 32 years were enrolled in this study. The participants reported no history of chronic spleen and liver disease, normal alcohol consumption, and a normal diet. The MRE data were acquired by using a 1.5 T whole-body scanner and a 2D GRE pulse sequence with 60 Hz excitation. Spleen stiffness was calculated as a weighted mean of stiffness values in the regions of interest manually drawn by the radiologist on three to five spleen slices. Results: Mean spleen stiffness was 5.09 ± 0.65 kPa for the whole group. Male volunteers had slightly higher splenic stiffness compared to females: 5.28 ± 0.78 vs. 4.98 ± 0.51 kPa, however, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.12). Spleen stiffness did not correlate with spleen fat content and liver stiffness but a statistically significant correlation with spleen volume was found. Conclusions: The findings of this study provide normative values for 2D MRE-based measurement of spleen stiffness in young adults, a basis for assessing the value of this biomarker in young patients with portal system pathologies.