Furutani, Keith M.

Abstract The Mayo Clinic Florida Integrated Oncology Building will be the home of the first spot-scanning only carbon/proton hybrid therapy system by Hitachi, Ltd. It will provide proton beams up to kinetic energies of 230 MeV and carbon beams up to 430 MeV n −1 for clinical deployment. To provide adequate radiation protection, the Geant4 (v10.6) Monte Carlo toolkit was utilized to quantify the ambient dose equivalent at a 10 mm depth ( H *(10)) for photons and neutrons. To perform accurate calculations of the ambient dose equivalent, three-dimensional computer-aided design files of the entire planned facility were imported into Geant4, as well as certain particle system components such as the bending magnets, fast Faraday cup, and gantry. Particle fluence was scored using 60 cm diameter spheres, which were strategically placed throughout areas of interests. Analytical calculations were performed as first-pass design checks. Major shielding slabs were optimized using Geant4 simulations iteratively, with more than 20 alternative designs evaluated within Geant4. The 430 MeV n −1 carbon beams played the most significant role in concrete thickness Requirements. The primary wall thickness for the carbon fixed beam room is 4 meters. The presence of the proton gantry structure in the simulation caused the ambient dose equivalent to increase by around 67% at the maze entrance, but a decrease in the high energy beam transport corridor. All shielding primary and secondary goals for clinical operations were met per state regulation and national guidelines.

The computation of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is a fundamental step in the planning of cancer radiotherapy treatments with accelerated ions. Numerical parameters derived analyzing the dose response of the chosen cell line after irradiation to photons (i.e., α and β, namely the linear and quadratic terms of the linear-quadratic model of cell survival) are generally used as input to biophysical models to predict the ion RBE. The α/β ratio for the photon exposure is generally regarded as an indicator of cell radiosensitivity. However, previous studies suggest that α/β might not be a sufficient parameter to model the RBE of relatively high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation such as carbon ions. For a fixed α/β, the effect of the absolute values of α and β on the computed RBE is underexplored. Furthermore, since α and β are anticorrelated during the fit of the photon-exposed in vitro survival data, different linear-quadratic fits could produce different sets of α and β, thus affecting the RBE calculations. This article reports the combined effect of the α/β ratio and the absolute values α and β on the RBE computed with the Mayo Clinic Florida microdosimetric kinetic model (MCF MKM) for 12C ions of different LET. Furthermore, we introduce a theory-based strategy to potentially mitigate the anticorrelation between α and β during the fit of the photon dose-response biological data.

The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) calculations used during the planning of ion therapy treatments are generally based on the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) and the local effect model (LEM). The Mayo Clinic Florida MKM (MCF MKM) was recently developed to overcome the limitations of previous MKMs in reproducing the biological data and to eliminate the need for ion-exposed in vitro data as input for the model calculations. Since we are considering to implement the MCF MKM in clinic, this article presents (a) an extensive benchmark of the MCF MKM predictions against corresponding in vitro clonogenic survival data for 4 rodent and 10 cell lines exposed to ions from 1H to 238U, and (b) a systematic comparison with published results of the latest version of the LEM (LEM IV). Additionally, we introduce a novel approach to derive an approximate value of the MCF MKM model parameters by knowing only the animal species and the mean number of chromosomes. The overall good agreement between MCF MKM predictions and in vitro data suggests the MCF MKM can be reliably used for the RBE calculations. In most cases, a reasonable agreement was found between the MCF MKM and the LEM IV.

Abstract Objective. To investigate synchrotron-based proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) beam delivery time (BDT) using novel continuous scanning mode. Approach. A BDT calculation model was developed for the Hitachi particle therapy system. The model was validated against the measured BDT of 36 representative clinical proton PBS plans with discrete spot scanning (DSS) in the current Hitachi proton therapy system. BDTs were calculated with the next generation using Mayo Clinic Florida system operating parameters for conventional DSS, and novel dose driven continuous scanning (DDCS). BDTs of DDCS with and without Break Spots were investigated. Main results. For DDCS without Break Spots, the use of Stop Ratio to control the transit dose largely reduced the beam intensity and consequently, severely prolonged the BDT. DDCS with Break Spots was able to maintain a sufficiently high beam intensity while controlling transit dose. In DDCS with Break Spots, tradeoffs were made between beam intensity and number of Break Spots. Therefore, BDT decreased with increased beam intensity but reached a plateau for beam intensity larger than 10 MU s −1 . Averaging over all clinical plans, BDT was reduced by 10% for DDCS with Break Spots compared to DSS. Significance. DDCS with Break Spots reduced BDT. DDCS has the potential to further reduce BDT under the ideal scenario which requests both stable beam intensity extraction and accurately modelling the transit dose. Further investigation is warranted.

Abstract Objective . To investigate similarities and differences in the formalism, processing, and the results of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) calculations with a biological weighting function (BWF), the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) and subsequent modifications (non-Poisson MKM, modified MKM). This includes: (a) the extension of the V79-RBE 10% BWF to model the RBE for other clonogenic survival levels; (b) a novel implementation of MKMs as weighting functions; (c) a benchmark against Chinese Hamster lung fibroblast (V79) in vitro data; (d) a study on the effect of pre- or post- processing the average biophysical quantities used for the RBE calculations; (e) a possible modification of the modified MKM parameters to improve the model accuracy at high linear energy transfer (LET). Methodology . Lineal energy spectra were simulated for two spherical targets (diameter = 0.464 or 1.0 μ m) using PHITS for 1 H, 4 He, 12 C, 20 Ne, 40 Ar, 56 Fe and 132 Xe ions. The results of the in silico calculations were compared with published in vitro data. Main results . All models appear to underestimate the RBE α of hydrogen ions. All MKMs generally overestimate the RBE 50% , RBE 10% and RBE 1% for ions with an LET greater than ∼200 keV μ m −1 . This overestimation is greater for small surviving fractions and is likely due to the assumption of a radiation-independent quadratic term of clonogenic survival ( ß ). The overall RBE trends seem to be best described by the novel ‘post-processing average’ implementation of the non-Poisson MKM. In case of calculations with the non-Poisson MKM, pre- or post- processing the average biophysical quantities affects the computed RBE values significantly. Significance . This study presents a systematic analysis of the formalism and results of widely used microdosimetric models of clonogenic survival for ions relevant for cancer particle therapy and space radiation protection. Points for improvements were highlighted and will contribute to the development of upgraded biophysical models.

Abstract Background: Partial breast irradiation (PBI) is an established option for selected patients with early stage breast cancer. The optimal technique, target volume and dose/fractionation for PBI has yet to be defined. The most studied regimen in North America (38.5 Gy in 10 fractions twice daily) has been associated with cosmetic deterioration. We hypothesized that condensing treatment and reducing the total administered dose could improve the therapeutic ratio in luminal breast cancer and DCIS based on emerging evidence that breast cancer is more sensitive than surrounding normal tissues to high dose fractions. Herein, we report cosmetic, tolerability, disease control, and patient reported outcomes of a novel ultra-accelerated PBI regimen. Methods: We conducted a single arm, three cohort trial of photon, proton, and brachytherapy PBI. Technique was selected at physician and patient discretion. Eligible women were age ≥ 50 years with estrogen receptor positive (ER+), sentinel lymph node negative invasive or in-situ breast cancer measuring ≤ 2.5 cm. The regimen was designed to have comparable biologically equivalent effect as 40 Gy in 15 fractions, assuming an α/β ratio of 3.5. Intracavitary brachytherapy target volume was lumpectomy cavity plus 1 cm and prescribed 21 Gy in 3 fractions. Photon and proton target volumes were post-operative tumor bed plus 1 cm and a 3 mm setup uncertainty margin, prescribed 21.9 Gy (RBE) in 3 fractions, and delivered with image guidance. The primary outcome was the percentage difference in patients with adverse cosmesis (defined as fair or poor cosmesis) at 3 years compared to baseline pre-PBI, as assessed by trained nurses using the 4-point Harvard breast cosmesis scale. Patients also completed quality of life surveys and self-reported cosmesis using the 4-point scale. Locoregional and distant recurrence-free survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events were assessed using CTCAE, v 4.0. Results: Between 2015 and 2017, 163 patients were treated: photons in 58, protons in 48, and brachytherapy in 57. Median patient age was 66 years. 129 (79%) patients had invasive breast cancer (all ER+) and 34 (21%) had DCIS (83% ER+). Median tumor size was 1.1 cm. Grade was 2-3 in 102 (63%). The median mean heart/ipsilateral lung doses were photons 0.1/1.6 Gy, protons <0.001/0.1 Gy, and brachytherapy 0.5/0.9 Gy. Median follow-up was 4.1 years (IQR 3.9-5.0). The proportion of patients with adverse cosmesis (by RN assessment) was 14.3% at baseline and 3.8% at 3 years, with four patients (1 photon, 1 proton, 2 brachytherapy) experiencing cosmetic deterioration at 3 years from baseline. The proportion with adverse cosmesis by self-report at 3 years was 2.4%, with three patients (1 photon, 1 proton, 1 brachytherapy) reporting cosmetic deterioration. Four patients developed locoregional recurrence (1 photons, 2 protons, 1 brachytherapy); three were local only and one was local and distant. 4-year locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis-free survival were 97.9% and 97.4%, respectively. There were 2 treatment related ≥ grade 2 late events (grade 2 fibrosis and grade 2 seroma, both brachytherapy associated), and no evidence of deterioration in patient-reported pain, fatigue, breast related or overall quality of life, as assessed by the patient reported outcomes version of the CTCAE, 10-point linear analog scales, and the breast cancer treatment outcomes scale. Conclusions: Ultra-accelerated 3-fraction PBI exquisitely spared normal tissues and was associated with favorable cosmetic outcomes, disease control, and excellent long-term tolerability. This ‘precision-radiotherapy’ approach may optimize the therapeutic ratio over more aggressive radiotherapy options as well as radiotherapy omission, particularly in patients with long life expectancies. Citation Format: Robert Mutter, Tina Hieken, Todd DeWees, Arslan Afzal, Stephanie Kenison, Laura Vallow, Christopher Deufel, Nicholas Remmes, Kathryn Ruddy, Judy Boughey, Keith Furutani, Amy Degnim, James Jakub, Tamara Vern-Gross, Dean Shumway, William Wong, Samir Patel, Lisa McGee, Minetta Liu, Carlos Vargas, Daniel Visscher, Bradley Stish, Deanna Pafundi, Mark Waddle, Michael Golafshar, Michele Halyard, Kimberly Corbin, Sean Park. Ultra-accelerated photon, proton, and brachytherapy partial breast irradiation: Primary results of the Mayo 3-fraction trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-03.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) involves the delivery of a highly conformal ablative dose of radiation to both benign and malignant targets. This has traditionally been accomplished in a single fraction; however, fractionated approaches involving five or fewer treatments have been delivered for larger lesions, as well as lesions in close proximity to radiosensitive structures. The clinical utilization of SRS has overwhelmingly involved photon-based sources via dedicated radiosurgery platforms (e.g., Gamma Knife® and Cyberknife®) or specialized linear accelerators. While photon-based methods have been shown to be highly effective, advancements are sought for improved dose precision, treatment duration, and radiobiologic effect, among others, particularly in the setting of repeat irradiation. Particle-based techniques (e.g., protons and carbon ions) may improve many of these shortcomings. Specifically, the presence of a Bragg Peak with particle therapy at target depth allows for marked minimization of distal dose delivery, thus mitigating the risk of toxicity to organs at risk. Carbon ions also exhibit a higher linear energy transfer than photons and protons, allowing for greater relative biological effectiveness. While the data are limited, utilization of proton radiosurgery in the setting of brain metastases has been shown to demonstrate 1-year local control rates >90%, which are comparable to that of photon-based radiosurgery. Prospective studies are needed to further validate the safety and efficacy of this treatment modality. We aim to provide a comprehensive overview of clinical evidence in the use of particle therapy-based radiosurgery.

Abstract The treatment of cancer with proton radiation therapy was first suggested in 1946 followed by the first treatments in the 1950s. As of 2020, almost 200 000 patients have been treated with proton beams worldwide and the number of operating proton therapy (PT) facilities will soon reach one hundred. PT has long moved from research institutions into hospital-based facilities that are increasingly being utilized with workflows similar to conventional radiation therapy. While PT has become mainstream and has established itself as a treatment option for many cancers, it is still an area of active research for various reasons: the advanced dose shaping capabilities of PT cause susceptibility to uncertainties, the high degrees of freedom in dose delivery offer room for further improvements, the limited experience and understanding of optimizing pencil beam scanning, and the biological effect difference compared to photon radiation. In addition to these challenges and opportunities currently being investigated, there is an economic aspect because PT treatments are, on average, still more expensive compared to conventional photon based treatment options. This roadmap highlights the current state and future direction in PT categorized into four different themes, ‘improving efficiency’, ‘improving planning and delivery’, ‘improving imaging’, and ‘improving patient selection’.

14597 Background: Permanent seed implant (PSI) brachytherapy is a common treatment modality for low-risk prostate cancer. Post implant dosimetry (PID) is utilized to asses the quality of the implant. Significant prostate swelling occurs as a result of the implant procedure, and this swelling subsides over time. PID completed on Day 0 after the implant procedure captures the prostate swelling from the procedure. Conversely, PID completed one month later does not have this swelling. PID can therefore show great variation, depending on the timing of the analysis. It is hypothesized that PID completed on Day 0 demonstrates lower dosimetric parameters than PID completed one month later. Methods: Thirteen low risk prostate cancer patients, (Stage ≤ T2, PSA < 13.9, Gleason Score ≤7) were implanted with 125Iodine seeds, with a prescription dose of 145Gy to the prostate plus a 5mm margin. Computed Tomography (CT) PID was completed for each patient on day 0 and on average 33 days following the implant. The prostate was contoured on each axial CT image and the data was analyzed using commercially available PSI planning software. The dose which encompassed 90% of the prostate volume (D90) was calculated for day 0 and day 33 PID. Results: On average, the prostate volume contoured was larger on day 0 PID (Avg. 44.9 cc; range 19–97 cc) compared to day 33 PID (Avg. 38.9 cc; range 18–59 cc) (P = 0.068). The D90 values however, were significantly higher on day 33 PID (Avg.163.7 Gy; range 125–212 Gy) than on day 0 PID (Avg.149 Gy; range 112–166 Gy) (P = 0.003). This D90 relationship was even demonstrated paradoxically in two patients whose contoured prostate volume was larger on the day 33 PID as compared to the day 0 PID. Conclusions: Timing does matter in the analysis of post implant dosimetry for PSI brachytherapy. The D90 values were significantly greater on day 33 PID compared to Day 0 PID while the contoured prostate volumes were not. Future studies which use PID planning to evaluate implant quality should specify the timing of the PID, as this would facilitate cross study comparison. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) formed Task Group 221 (TG‐221) to discuss a generalized commissioning process, quality management considerations, and clinical physics practice standards for ocular plaque brachytherapy. The purpose of this report is also, in part, to aid the clinician to implement recommendations of the AAPM TG‐129 report, which placed emphasis on dosimetric considerations for ocular brachytherapy applicators used in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS). This report is intended to assist medical physicists in establishing a new ocular brachytherapy program and, for existing programs, in reviewing and updating clinical practices. The report scope includes photon‐ and beta‐emitting sources and source:applicator combinations. Dosimetric studies for photon and beta sources are reviewed to summarize the salient issues and provide references for additional study. The components of an ocular plaque brachytherapy quality management program are discussed, including radiation safety considerations, source calibration methodology, applicator commissioning, imaging quality assurance tests for treatment planning, treatment planning strategies, and treatment planning system commissioning. Finally, specific guidelines for commissioning an ocular plaque brachytherapy program, clinical physics practice standards in ocular plaque brachytherapy, and other areas reflecting the need for specialized treatment planning systems, measurement phantoms, and detectors (among other topics) to support the clinical practice of ocular brachytherapy are presented. Expected future advances and developments for ocular brachytherapy are discussed.