Citations 23

Neuroembryology of the Acupuncture Principal Meridians: Part 1. The Extremities

Medical Acupuncture | February 1, 2017 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 10-19

10.1089/acu.2016.1210

Neuroanatomic and Clinical Correspondences: Acupuncture and Vagus Nerve Stimulation

The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine | December 20, 2013 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 233-240

10.1089/acm.2012.1022 | PMID 24359451

Acupuncture for Hot Flashes: Combining Traditional and Neurophysiologic Considerations for Effective Treatment

Medical Acupuncture | November 14, 2012 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 215-220

10.1089/acu.2012.0920

Accuracy in the Use of Traditional Cun Measurement Techniques for Localizing Classical Acupoints in the Upper Extremity: An Experimental Study

Medical Acupuncture | September 13, 2010 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 191-195

10.1089/acu.2010.0759

Abstract Background: The locations of most of the 361 classical acupuncture points are determined in clinical practice by measuring their traditionally described positions using the cun system. Some data suggest the routinely taught methods of cun measurement may lead to inaccurate acupoint localizations. Objectives: To determine the accuracy of the traditional cun measuring techniques in localizing acupoints LU 4 and TE 8 compared with tape measure determination of their optimal locations, and to assess if the ability to accurately localize these points correlates with the length of acupuncture experience. Design, Setting, and Participants: Nonrandomized, experimental study conducted with 20 physician-acupuncturists on 2 adult volunteers at a medical acupuncture conference in Fall 2009. Eleven acupuncturists independently marked the location of LU 4, and 9 acupuncturists marked the location of TE 8 by traditional cun measuring techniques on the 2 volunteers, utilizing a novel point-marking method that blinded each acupuncturist from the others' point location findings. The optimal locations for the 2 acupoints were determined by direct measurement using a tape measure. Main Outcome Measures: Distances in millimeters of the clinicians' acupuncture point localizations from the optimal point positions. Results: For LU 4, the mean inaccuracy in locating this point using traditional measurement methods was 22.3 mm (range, 5-44 mm; SD = 10.9 mm). For TE 8, the mean inaccuracy was 8.4 mm (range, 1-21 mm; SD = 5.4 mm). Years of acupuncture experience (≤10 vs >10) did not affect the accuracy of clinicians' point localizations. Conclusions: Traditional cun methods routinely used to locate acupuncture points can produce enough inaccuracy in point localization that incorrect nearby acupoints could be needled inadvertently, irrespective of the amount of clinical experience of the acupuncturist. False-negative acupuncture intervention results (i.e., no beneficial clinical effect) in clinical trials could result.
The Languages of Healing: Linked by a Common Thread

The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine | July 31, 2010 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 907-913

10.1089/acm.2009.0527 | PMID 20673081

Clinical Equivalence of Laser Needle to Metal Acupuncture Needle in Treating Musculoskeletal Pain: A Pilot Study

Medical Acupuncture | March 4, 2010 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 11-17

10.1089/acu.2009.0724

Myofascial Meridians as Anatomical Evidence of Acupuncture Channels

Medical Acupuncture | May 21, 2009 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 91-97

10.1089/acu.2009.0631

Treatment of Urinary Incontinence Due to Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury With Acupuncture and Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation: Two Cases and Literature Review

Medical Acupuncture | February 26, 2009 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 21-26

10.1089/acu.2009.0630

Medical Acupuncture in the 21st Century: Future Challenges

Medical Acupuncture | February 26, 2009 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 3-4

10.1089/acu.2009-0652

The 2001 STRICTA Recommendations for Reporting Acupuncture Research: A Review with Implications for Improving Controlled Clinical Trial Design

The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine | February 1, 2009 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 147-151

10.1089/acm.2008.0141 | PMID 19183071