Background— Whether mechanical dyssynchrony indices predict reverse remodeling (RR) or clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains controversial. This prospective study evaluated whether echocardiographic dyssynchrony indices predict RR or clinical response after CRT. Methods and Results— Of 184 patients with heart failure with anticipated CRT who were prospectively enrolled, 131 with wide QRS and left ventricular ejection fraction <35% had 6-month follow-up after CRT implantation. Fourteen dyssynchrony indices (feasibility) by M-mode (94%), tissue velocity (96%), tissue Doppler strain (92%), 2D speckle strain (65% to 86%), 3D echocardiography (79%), and timing intervals (98%) were evaluated. RR (end-systolic volume reduction ≥15%) occurred in 55% and more frequently in patients without (71%) than in patients with (42%) ischemic cardiomyopathy ( P =0.002). Overall, only M-mode, tissue Doppler strain, and total isovolumic time had a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) greater than the line of no information, but none of these were strongly predictive of RR (AUC, 0.63 to 0.71). In nonischemic cardiomyopathy, no dyssynchrony index predicted RR. In ischemic cardiomyopathy, M-mode (AUC, 0.67), tissue Doppler strain (AUC, 0.79), and isovolumic time (AUC, 0.76) -derived indices predicted RR ( P <0.05 for all), although the incremental value was modest. No indices predicted clinical response assessed by Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, 6-minute walk distance, and peak oxygen consumption. Conclusions— These findings are consistent with the Predictors of Response to CRT study and do not support use of these dyssynchrony indices to guide use of CRT.
Strain Dyssynchrony Index Correlates With Improvement in Left Ventricular Volume After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Better Than Tissue Velocity Dyssynchrony Indexes
Background— Various dyssynchrony indexes derived from tissue velocity and strain imaging have been proposed to predict the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We sought to compare the effect of CRT on dyssynchrony indexes derived by tissue velocity and strain and to determine which baseline intraventricular dyssynchrony parameters correlate with improvement in left ventricular volume after CRT. Methods and Results— Echocardiography with tissue Doppler imaging was performed in 45 patients with systolic heart failure at baseline, 1 day after CRT, and a median of 6 months after CRT. We calculated septal–lateral delay and anteroseptal–posterior delay and standard deviation of time to peak systolic velocity in the 12 basal and mid-left ventricular segments (Tv-SD). The standard deviation for time to peak strain in the 12 basal and mid-left ventricular segments (Tε-SD) was calculated as a strain-derived dyssynchrony index. None of the tissue velocity–derived dyssynchrony indexes improved after CRT (septal–lateral delay, P =0.39; anteroseptal–posterior delay, P =0.46; Tv-SD, P =0.30), whereas Tε-SD decreased significantly after CRT ( P <0.001). Improvement in Tε-SD 1 day after CRT correlated with the reduction in end-systolic volume at follow-up ( r =0.66; P <0.001). Baseline Tε-SD demonstrated significant correlation with the reduction of end-systolic volume at follow-up ( r =0.57; P <0.001); however, baseline tissue velocity–derived dyssynchrony indexes failed to predict the effect of CRT. Conclusions— The strain-derived dyssynchrony index is a better measurement than the tissue velocity dyssynchrony index for monitoring changes in mechanical dyssynchrony after CRT and for predicting reduction in left ventricular volume after CRT.
Comparison of Echocardiographic Dyssynchrony Assessment by Tissue Velocity and Strain Imaging in Subjects With or Without Systolic Dysfunction and With or Without Left Bundle-Branch Block
Background— Several echocardiographic dyssynchrony indexes have been proposed to identify responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy using tissue velocity and strain. The present study aimed to compare tissue velocity–derived and strain-derived dyssynchrony indexes in patients with or without systolic dysfunction and left bundle-branch block. Methods and Results— Tissue Doppler imaging was performed in 120 subjects divided into 4 groups: group 1 (n=40), normal subjects; group 2 (n=20), normal left ventricular ejection fraction and left bundle-branch block; group 3 (n=20), left ventricular ejection fraction <35% and normal conduction; and group 4 (n=40), left ventricular ejection fraction <35% and left bundle-branch block. Dyssynchrony indexes based on time to peak tissue velocity (septal-lateral delay, anteroseptal-posterior delay, and SD in time to peak systolic velocity in the 12 left ventricular segments) and strain (SD of time to peak strain in 12 segments) were measured. The SD in time to peak systolic velocity in the 12 left ventricular segments was greater in group 4 (54 ms; 25th and 75th percentiles, 46 to 64 ms) than group 1 (44 ms; 25th and 75th percentiles, 28 to 53 ms; P =0.006), but there was a considerable overlap of all tissue velocity–derived indexes among 4 groups, with 40% to 68% of group 1 having values proposed for predicting the responders of cardiac resynchronization therapy. The SD of time to peak strain in 12 segments distinguished these groups with much less overlap ( P <0.01 for all pairwise comparisons). Conclusions— A substantial proportion of normal subjects have tissue velocity–derived dyssynchrony indexes higher than the cutoff value proposed for predicting beneficial effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Strain-derived timing index appears to be more specific for dyssynchrony in patients with systolic dysfunction and left bundle-branch block. Identifying an optimal tissue velocity– or strain-derived dyssynchrony index requires a large prospective clinical trial.