LaPlant, Betsy

Abstract Backgrounds B cell receptor (BCR) signals and microenvironment protection have been recognized to have key influences on CLL survival and activation. Akt activation is down-stream of the BCR signaling cascade and is critical in the mediation of the bi-directional interactions between CLL B-cells and bone marrow stroma. MK2206 is an allosteric Akt inhibitor previously tested for safety in solid tumor patients. Our preclinical data has demonstrated the synergy of MK2206 with bendamustine (B) to induce CLL apoptosis in vitro. MK2206 also abolished the signal activation and cytokine production induced by BCR ligation in CLL leukemic cells (Ding, ASH 2012). Therefore, we conducted a phase 1 trial testing the safety and efficacy of MK2206 in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) for patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. Methods A phase 1 dose-escalation study was designed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) as well as the safety and efficacy of 3 dose levels (90 mg or 135 mg or 200 mg weekly) of the oral Akt inhibitor MK2206 in combination with bendamustine (70 mg/m2 daily for 2 days in each cycle) and rituximab (cycle 1: 375 mg/m2, cycle 2-6: 500 mg/m2) therapy in relapse/refractory CLL patients. To test the targeting efficacy of MK2206 on Akt and downstream signals, we designed a one-week “run-in” of single agent MK2206 before the initiation of BR during cycle 1. MK2206 was then given along with BR on day 1 of cycles 2-6. Tumor response was evaluated 2 months after the 6th/last cycle of therapy based on IWCLL 2008 criteria. Correlative laboratory studies included assessment of Akt signaling and the plasma cytokine levels (multiplex beads assay (Invitrogen)) at baseline and after one week of first dose of single agent MK2206. Results Nine patients (median age 68) were enrolled in the phase I portion of this trial. All 9 patients had unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region genes (IGHV) and 4 had del(11q). Six had received prior chemoimmunotherapy (CIT: FCR or PCR or PCO) and 5 had high risk disease defined as early progression within 26 months of the last CIT. Three had received alemtuzumab containing regimen. We have observed potent lymphocyte mobilization in all evaluated patients (n=7) after one-dose of MK2206 during week 1 (mean increase ALC: 35%) as well as reductions of plasma CCL3, CCL4 and CCL2 in the majority of the patients. A single dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (febrile neutropenia and hemolytic anemia) was observed at dose level 1 (90 mg weekly) among 6 patients treated at this dose. Two patients with dose-limiting toxicities at dose level 2 (135 mg weekly) were observed where one patient had a rash and one patient had dehydration and febrile neutropenia among three patients treated at this dose. Accordingly, the 90 mg once weekly dose was determined to be the MTD for phase 2 trial testing. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events observed to date were neutropenia (44%) including febrile neutropenia (22%), rash (22%), diarrhea (22%), nausea and vomiting (11%), dehydration (11%), hemolytic anemia (11%) and thrombocytopenia (11%). The frequency of cytopenias was similar to the published German experience with BR (50% grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities compared to 44% in N1087) in relapsed CLL patients (Fischer, JCO 2011). The median number of cycles received was 6 (range 1-6). Using an intent to treat analysis, two patients achieved complete response (CR, n= 2, 22%), one patient achieved nodular partial response (nPR, n=1, 11%) and five patients achieved a partial response (PR, n=5, 56%). The overall response rate (ORR) is 89%. Conclusion The Akt inhibitor MK2206 in combination with BR is well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. Single dose of MK2206 inhibits Akt phosphorylation, mobilizes leukemic cells and decreases plasma cytokines involved in BCR signals. The preliminary efficacy of this combination demonstrated promising results with a 89% ORR and 22% CR albeit in the small phase 1 cohort. These results compare favorably to BR alone (9% CR and 59% ORR) in relapsed/refractory CLL patients. Phase 2 testing of this combination is now underway. Acknowledgment This work was supported by the funding from NCI grant K23CA160345 (WD), NCI grant CA95241 (NEK) and Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (CA025224 and CA33601). Disclosures: Off Label Use: MK2206, used in a phase 1 trial of relapsed CLL disease. Shanafelt:Genentech: Research Funding; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Polyphenon E International: Research Funding. Zent:Novartis: Research Funding; GlaxSmithKline: Research Funding; Biothera: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Genentech : Research Funding. Reeder:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: Overall survival (OS) remains the definitive primary efficacy endpoint to evaluate previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapies, but it requires prolonged follow-up. An earlier endpoint assessed post-treatment would expedite clinical trial conduct and accelerate patient access to effective new therapies. Our objective was to formally evaluate event-free survival (EFS) as a surrogate endpoint for OS in untreated AML. Methods: Individual patient data were analyzed from 2,475 patients (pts) from 4 multicenter, randomized controlled phase III trials of active treatment in previously untreated AML using anthracycline and cytarabine induction chemotherapy as the concurrent control (CALGB 10201, n=506, enrollment period 2003-2006, age 60-88 years (y); CALGB 10603, n=717, enrollment period 2008-2015, age 18-60 y, FLT3-mutated pts only; SWOG 0106, n=595, enrollment period 2004-2009, age 18-60 y; ECOG-ACRIN 1900, n=657, enrollment period 2002-2008, age 17-60 y). Individual patient-level surrogacy examines the association between the individual patients' EFS and OS time after adjusting for treatment effect, and was assessed using the copula bivariate survival model (Kendall's tau). Trial-level surrogacy measures how precisely the treatment effect on OS can be predicted on the basis of observed treatment effect on EFS, and was evaluated using both linear regression (R2WLS) weighted by trial size and Copula bivariate (R2Copula) models. Pre-specified criteria for surrogacy required either R2WLS or R2Copula ≥0.80, neither below 0.7, with either lower bound 95% Confidence Interval (CI) >0.60. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using different EFS definitions (Table 1). Results: With a median follow-up of 50.2 months for the 896 patients still alive, the median OS and EFS across all four trials were 20.9 months (95% CI: 19.0-22.7) and 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.5-6.4), respectively. Trial-level surrogacy for EFS was strong (R2WLS=0.79; R2Copula=0.89), indicating a high correlation of treatment effect between EFS and OS. At the individual patient-level, however, EFS showed weak association with OS (tau= 0.52), compared to the strength of trial-level surrogacy. The discrepancy between patient-level EFS and OS was greatest among patients who did not achieve a CR, followed by those who achieved a CR but relapsed (Figure 1). Sensitivity analysis on alternative EFS definitions showed that the trial-level surrogacy was similar, but individual patient-level surrogacy varied across different EFS definitions (Table 1). This is consistent with what we previously reported (ASH 2016): EFS estimates differed considerably based on the definition of induction failure (IF) in a single arm setting, but this had minimal impact on the estimation of the treatment effect using EFS in randomized trials. In addition, when considering only relapse and death as events (definition 4), both individual patient- and trial-level correlations were high. Conclusions: Correlation between EFS and OS was impacted by patients not achieving CR during induction. Despite the lack of patient-level correlation, a strong correlation between hazard ratios for treatment effects was observed between EFS and OS on the trial level. Hence, it remains debatable whether EFS represents a clinical benefit in itself for patient with untreated AML considering the strong correlation in treatment effects. Further validation is needed due to the small number of trials included and the heterogeneity across trials. Acknowledgment: We gratefully acknowledge the important contributions of the late Dr. Stephen H. Petersdorf, SWOG S0106 Study Chair. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U10CA180794, U10CA180820, U10CA180888; Clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00085124 (10201), NCT00651261 (10603), NCT01253070 (11001), NCT00085709 (SWOG S0106), and NCT00049517 (ECOG-ACRIN E1900) Disclosures Uy: Curis: Consultancy; GlycoMimetics: Consultancy. Larson:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BristolMyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 636 Cellular vaccine may offer additional benefit as consolidative therapy after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM). We have reported previously from two phase II studies the survival of MM patients who received APC8020 (autologous antigen presenting cell vaccine) after ASCT (Lacy, AJH '09, (84): 799; Lin, ASH annual meeting 2010, abstract 1958). To determine if there was an outcome advantage for additional consolidative vaccine therapy after ASCT, we performed this matched case control analysis comparing the survival of patients who received ASCT only (control) at Mayo Clinic to those who received APC8020 after ASCT in the same time period. Forty-three study patients accrued between July 1998 and March 2002 were eligible for matching. To reduce bias from disease risks and transplant-related mortality, control patients were required to be alive and progression free six months after transplant and have a M-spike value of < 2g/dL at 4 mos (1st study) or 9 mos (2nd study) after transplant, similar to post-ASCT patients who were enrolled in the two APC8020 studies. A total of 111 control patients were eligible for matching. Control patients were matched to study patients by age (+/− 5 yrs), ISS (International Staging System) stage, and plasma cell labeling index (PLCI, either >= 3 or < 3). A matched control was not identified for one study patient. Of the remaining 42 study patients, all had at least one matched control patient. Thirty-two patients had 2 matched controls. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in time to progression between the study and control patients (HR 1.54, 95% CI 0.92 – 2.58, p = 0.1). However the overall survival is significantly improved among the study patients (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30 – 0.99, p = 0.05). This analysis is the only known report of long-term follow-up of the largest group of MM patients treated with APC8020 vaccine. While many current prognostic tests were not available at the time of the initial vaccine studies, the control patients in this analysis were matched by known disease risks that are still in use today. The survival advantage in study patients remained statistically significant compared to matched controls. Interestingly, the time to progression is unchanged between study and control patients. This is similar to other reports of vaccine therapy such as in sipuleucel-T (Provenge™) in prostate cancer where an overall survival benefit is seen without change in progression-free survival. A larger, randomized phase III study is needed to confirm the encouraging survival benefit of this treatment modality in MM. Further insight into the mechanisms of action of APC8020 is needed to improve our understanding of the role of this therapy in the context of current practice of MM maintenance therapies. Disclosures: Sims: Dendreon Corporation: Employment.

Abstract Abstract 3095 Background: Although HDM is the standard conditioning for pts with MM undergoing ASCT, it is not sufficient for cure. In an effort to improve upon this standard, we added escalating doses of Y-90 Zevalin (a murine IgG1 kappa monoclonal antibody Ibritumomab conjugated to Y-90) to HDM in a standard 3+3 phase I trial design. Y-90 is a beta-emitting radioisotope with a path length of 5 mm allowing it to target CD20+ cells and bystander cells within 5 mm. Methods: Eligibility included being a candidate for ASCT. Consenting patients (pts) received: day -22, rituximab 250 mg/m2 with In2B8 for scanning; day -14, rituximab 250 mg/m2 with escalating doses of Y90-Zevalin; day -2 and -1, melphalan 100 mg/m2/day; day 0, at least 2 × 10(6) CD34/kg stem cells; and GM-CSF until ANC engraftment. The 6 dose levels (DL) were (in Gy): 10; 12; 14; 16; 18; and 20. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as: sustained pulmonary or liver toxicity (grade3; 96 hours duration or VOD that does not resove by day 30); delayed engraftment (ANC < 500 at day 21 or platelet transfusion dependence at day 35); and non-hematologic grade (gr) 4 toxicity excluding gastrointestinal or constitutional. Responses were according to IMWG criteria. Accrual was between May 2005 and June 2011. Data was frozen as of August 2, 2011. Results: Thirty pts have been accrued: DL1, 3; DL2, 3; DL3, 3; DL4, 6, DL5, 6; DL6, 6. The median age of patients was 59 (range 32, 73), and 70% were male. 60% had ASCT as primary therapy. The other patients were transplanted in chemosensitive relapse (n=3), chemoresistant relapse (n=7), and untested relapse (n=2). Median time from diagnosis to protocol therapy was 10.4 months (range 3.5, 94.3). Five pts had prior radiation therapy, and 11 had prior ASCT. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Zevalin with fixed dose melphalan 200 mg/m2 was DL 5 (18 Gy) which amounted to 168 mCi (124, 182) administered. No DLTs were observed at DL 1, 2, 3, or 5. There was 1 DLT at DL 4, comprising hepatic failure (gr 5) CMV viremia (gr 3), and delayed engraftment, in a 73 yo patient with chemoresistant relapsed disease, and 2 DLTs at DL 6. These DL 6 DLTs included: 1) fatal bowel necrosis (day 12 post ASCT) in a 67 yo patient with relapsed refractory MM and history of CAD, ischemic colitis, DM; and 2) fatal biopsy proven venoocclusive disease (gr 5), which began day 91 post ASCT in a 62 yo patient with primary refractory MM, peri-mobilization S. aureus bacteremia with septic embolic, and line associated venous thrombosis. Overall, gr 3 or higher AEs were observed in 100% of pts. Non-heme gr 4 AEs were seen in: DL1, 1; DL2, 2; DL3, 0; DL4, 1; DL5, 0; DL6, 4. Median time to ANC >=500 and plts>=50 was 11 (range 8, 17) and 15 days (range 11, 89). Confirmed response rates from immediately pre-protocol to best confirmed response were: CR, 5; VGPR, 5; continued VGPR, 4, and continued PR, 7. If one includes best confirmed response from baseline for those patients using transplant as primary consolidation, 4 PRs are upstaged to VGPRs. Median follow-up for all pts is 24.5 months (0.8, 64.8), and 10 pts have died. The median PFS for pts proceeding to early and delayed ASCT was 30.4 months (95%CI 4.1-NR) and 10.3 months (95%CI 2.8–21.7), respectively. The median OS for pts proceeding to early and delayed ASCT was not attained and 11.4 months (95%CI 2.8-NA), respectively. Conclusions: For patients with multiple myeloma, the MTD of Zevalin with fixed high-dose melphalan is 18 Gy. The combination of a VGPR plus continued VGPR rate of 60%, a median PFS of 13.1 months, and a 73% 1 year OS rate make this a regimen worthy of further study. Disclosures: Kumar: Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Abstract 2992 Background: Patients with myeloma receiving initial therapy with lenalidomide-based regimens can have difficulty collecting adequate stem cells for an autologous transplant. Stem cell collection in these patients can be significantly enhanced by addition of the CXCR-4 antagonist plerixafor to the mobilization regimen. Plerixafor is typically given subcutaneously (SQ), with collection approximately 11 hours after injection to obtain maximum yield. Intravenous administration can potentially allow more rapid and predictable mobilization compared to the SQ route. We designed this trial to prospectively assess the efficacy of intravenous plerixafor administration in patients undergoing lenalidomide therapy. Patients and methods: Patients who were receiving initial therapy with a lenalidomide-based regimen and were undergoing stem cell collection within 12 months of their myeloma diagnosis were enrolled. Patients received GCSF at 10 μg/kg/day for 4 days followed by addition of plerixafor at 0.24 mg/kg/dose starting on day 5. Plerixafor was administered intravenously early morning (6–7 am) followed by apheresis beginning 4–5 hours later. Plerixafor was administered for a maximum of 4 days; but patients could continue apheresis beyond the 4th day at treating physician discretion. The aims of the study were to determine the proportion of patients reaching a stem cell yield of at least 3 million CD34 cells/kg by second day of apheresis, the safety and tolerability of intravenously administered plerixafor, and the overall rate of failure to mobilize (defined as less than 2.5 million CD34 cells/kg in 4 collections). Results: Thirty-seven patients were accrued between December 2009 – April 2011, and 36 were eligible for analysis. The median age was 61 years (range; 28–73); 61% were male. The median time from start of initial therapy to enrollment was 4.6 months (range; 2.6 to 11.1) and the median cycles of lenalidomide were 4 (range; 3–11). Thirty-four (94%) of the patients achieved at least 3 million CD34 cells/kg within 2 days of apheresis. The median CD34 cells/kg after 1 day of collection was 3.9 million (range; 0.7 to 9.2) and after two days of collection was 7.02 million (range: 1.1–16.5). Two patients failed the mobilization (<2.5 million CD34 cells/kg). There were no grade 3 or 4 non-hematological adverse events and one patient experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The most common grade 1 or 2 adverse events seen were gastrointestinal, namely nausea, diarrhea and abdominal pain or bloating. Grade 1 dizziness was reported in 8 patients. Overall, the infusion was well tolerated. Conclusion: Intravenously administered plerixafor is an effective strategy for mobilization in this patient group with low rate of failure to mobilize. It is well tolerated with toxicity comparable to the SQ administration. It also offers flexibility in patient scheduling with a convenient schedule for early morning infusion followed by apheresis later in the day. Disclosures: Kumar: Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Use of the investigational agent MLN9708 for the treatment of previously untreated multiple myeloma. Lacy:Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Background Pomalidomide (POM) is the newest Immunomodulatory agent (IMiDs) that has shown clinical efficacy in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) refractory to lenalidomide (LEN) and thalidomide (THAL). Studies of MM cell microenvironment suggest that tumor subclones compete for dominance during changes in drug therapy. It was previously observed that a minor clonal population increased in prominence of MM cells after 1 year of treatment with LEN. We examined whether the patients having THAL or LEN as the most recent prior-line therapy affects response to POM. Methods We studied 208 patients enrolled in a phase II trial of POM / dexamethasone between November 2007 and March 2012 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. We reviewed the immediate prior-line therapy before enrollment in our trial. Comparison of treatment duration of POM and response rates were conducted between patients who had either THAL or LEN as latest prior-line therapy, and patients who were treated with non-IMiDs immediate before enrollment in POM trial. Treatment duration of POM was estimated using Kaplan Meier method and the survival curves were compared using log-rank test. We used univariate Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the prognostic impact of different variables. Results The median age of patients was 63 (range from 32 to 88). 68 % were males. 80 patients (38.5%) had THAL or LEN immediate prior to POM. Median prior-line therapies were 3. Patients who received THAL or LEN immediately prior to POM had a lower response rate than those who had non-IMiDs as latest therapy (29% vs 44%, p 0.04) and shorter median duration of POM treatment (5.7 months vs 7.3 months, p 0.02). In 190 (91%) patients who were previously treated with LEN and THAL at any time, median time between the end of LEN or THAL treatment and the initiation of POM was higher for POM responders than non-responders (10 months vs 3 months, p 0.0008). Patients responded to POM had a shorter duration of prior LEN or THAL treatment compared to non-responders (9 months vs 15 months, p 0.001). Conclusion THAL or LEN as an immediate prior-line therapy to POM is associated with a lower response rate and shorter effective treatment duration. Longer interval between prior immunomodulatory compounds and POM, and shorter exposure to previous immunomodulatory compounds are associated with better POM treatment response. Disclosures: Gertz: Celgene: Honoraria. Kumar:Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Lacy:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 2942 Background: Pomalidomide (pom) is a distinct immunomodulatory (IMid) drug with high response rates in relapsed MM, including patients previously treated with thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide. However, its duration of response and long term outcome is unknown. We evaluated the long term outcomes of the first Mayo Clinic cohort of pts treated with Pom. Methods: Pts with relapsed/refractory myeloma with 1–3 prior therapies were enrolled. Pom 2 mg/d was given orally continuously on 28 day cycle with weekly dexamethasone 40 mg. All pts received DVT prophylaxis with aspirin, heparin or warfarin. Results: 60 pts with relapsed MM were enrolled from Nov 2007-Aug 2008. Median age was 65.5; 36 were male. Median time from diagnosis was 45.6 mo (9.–-192.5). Nineteen (32%) were high-risk according to mSMART (msmart.org), and 78% were ISS Stage 2/3. Prior therapies included transplant (65%), bortezomib (33%), thalidomide (47%), lenalidomide (35%) [previous IMiD 60%] and radiation (38%). Toxicities at least possibly attributed to Pom included G3/4 anemia (5/0%), leukopenia (17/3%) and thrombocytopenia (3/0%). G3/4/5 non-hematological toxicities occurred in 30 (50%) and included fatigue (18/0/0%), pneumonia (8/2/2%), hyperglycemia (5/0/0%) and constipation (5/0/0%). Only one pt had grade 3 neuropathy. Treatment adjustment for occurred in 30 pts (50%) for pom (mostly for neutropenia) and 35 pts (58%) for dex. A median of 11.5 cycles were administered. With median follow up of 30.1 months (mo), overall response was seen in 39 (65%) [4 sCR, 5 CR, 16 VGPR, 14 PR]. Median time to first reponse (≥PR) was 1.7 mo (0.8–14.8). Median duration of response (in responders of ≥PR) was 21.3 mo. Median PFS was 13 mo and the 2 year OS rate was 76%. Standard risk pts had median PFS of 18.4 mo and 2 year OS rate was 85%; high risk pts had median PFS of 9.2 mo and 2 year OS rate was 57%. (Figure 1) Conclusions: Pom/dex is highly effective and well tolerated in relapsed MM, with a response rate of 65% even in pts with multiple prior therapies, including other IMiDs, bortezomib and transplant. The response is also durable, with median duration in excess of 21 months. Pom/dex provides long term benefit with median PFS 13 months and 2 year OS rate of 76%. Disclosures: Kumar: Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stewart:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Fonseca:Consulting :Genzyme, Medtronic, BMS, Amgen, Otsuka, Celgene, Intellikine, Lilly Research Support: Cylene, Onyz, Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lacy:Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 2836 Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) are an effective but non-curative treatment of CLL. Although the mechanisms of action of mAb in vivo are not fully defined, complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) appears to play an important role. We have previously shown that addition of ofatumumab (OFA) significantly increases alemtuzumab (ALM) CDC in vitro and identified a subpopulation of CLL cells that are intrinsically resistant to activated complement. We propose that resistance to CDC could be an important cause of mAb treatment failure in CLL patients. To test the hypothesis that CLL cells treated in vivo with OFA would be resistant to subsequent OFA retreatment in vitro, we studied CLL cells and serum from 10 previously untreated patients with progressive CLL treated with pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and ofatumumab (PCO). Methods. Patients received 300 mg of OFA followed by 2 mg/m2 of pentostatin and 600 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide on day 1 of therapy. Samples were taken prior to treatment (S1), immediately after the OFA infusion and prior to chemotherapy (S2), and post-chemotherapy before the second dose of OFA on day 2 (S3). Mononuclear blood cells isolated from EDTA anticoagulated blood by Ficoll-Paque centrifugation were purified to achieve a concentration of > 90% CLL. CDC was assayed at a concentration of 2 × 106/ml CLL cells with 10 mg/ml of ALM (Genzyme), OFA (G.S.K.) or rituximab (RTX)(Genentech) in AIM V medium (Invitrogen, CA) and 10% normal human serum (10%NHS)(Sigma, MO) as a source of complement for 1 hour at 37°C. Absolute viable cell counts were measured by flow cytometry using counting beads (Trucount, BD, CA) and propidium iodide staining (Sigma, MO) with a FACSCalibur (BD, CA) and CellQuest Pro software (BD, CA). Percent CDC was calculated relative to counts for CLL cells treated with only 10%NHS. Binding of mAb and C3b to CLL cells was measured by flow cytometry with mouse anti-human Fc antibody FITC-HB43 and anti-C3b antibody FITC-7C12. C5 deficient serum (C5-serum)(Sigma, MO) was used to examine mAb and C3b binding without CDC. Results were expressed as delta mean fluorescent intensity (dMFI) relative to cells treated without mAb in 10%NHS or C5-serum as appropriate. Complement (CH50) was measured based on lysis of opsonized sheep red cells using standard methods. OFA concentrations in serum samples were determined by measuring the level of binding to Daudi cells compared to standards as previously described. Results: S1 CLL cells were significantly more susceptible to in vitro OFA CDC (median 30%) than S2 and S3 cells (both 0%, p=0.002)(Fig. 1). In contrast, high levels of CDC (median 86 – 88%) were induced in vitro by ALM in all these samples and prior in vivo exposure to OFA did not affect susceptibility to ALM CDC in vitro (p>0.1). CLL cells from S2&S3 had low levels of OFA binding both prior to and post in vitro exposure to OFA (median dMFI 2 and 3 respectively) which was significantly less than OFA binding for S1 (median dMFI 38 p=0.002) likely reflecting in vivo trogocytosis of bound OFA and CD20, as previously described for RTX. In vitro ALM binding was higher than OFA (median dMFI>150) in all specimens. C3b binding was low in S2&S3 both before and after in vitro OFA exposure (median dMFI 3 and 4 respectively) with significantly higher levels in S1 (median dMFI 94, p=0.002). C3b binding was higher in all CLL cells treated with ALM (median dMFI>358). OFA treatment resulted in marked decreases in serum complement levels in S2 (median 86%, range 65–98%) and S3 (median 78% range 61–88%) compared to S1. The median serum OFA concentration was 18.5 μg/ml (range 7.3–50.4) in S2 and 19.8 μg/ml (range 0–32.3) in S3. Conclusions: Circulating CLL cells from patients treated with OFA are resistant to in vitro OFA CDC primarily because of low levels of expression of CD20. The reduction in complement titers could limit in vivo CDC but we found no evidence that low levels of OFA were important. Cells surviving OFA in vivo do retain sensitivity to ALM CDC. Our data support the previous description of trogocytosis in CLL patients treated with RTX and suggest that lower doses of these mAb, that promote far lower levels of trogocytosis, could be more effective in sustaining CDC. In addition, our study provides pre-clinical data to support a clinical trial of combination therapy with OFA and ALM for CLL. Acknowledgment: This study was supported by funding from GlaxoSmithKline and the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma SPORE (CA097274). Disclosures: Taylor: Genmab: Consultancy; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding. Zent:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: Patients with newly diagnosed, advanced-stage, follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHL) commonly receive rituximab as initial therapy. While antibody dependent cytotoxicity (ADCC) is felt to be the predominant mechanism of action for rituximab, the immunologic effects of rituximab are largely unknown. We have previously shown that genetic polymorphisms in IL-8, IL-2, IL-12 and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RN) have prognostic significance in follicular lymphoma. The goal of this study was to measure changes in the abovementioned and other serum cytokine levels in patients receiving single agent rituximab as initial therapy for follicular NHL and to identify cytokines that are associated with an increased risk of disease relapse. Methods: Patients with untreated follicular grade 1 NHL, and measurable stage III/IV disease were treated with rituximab 375 mg/m2 intravenous weekly for 4 doses and were then followed for response and time to progression (TTP); no maintenance therapy was provided. Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in this clinical trial between July 1999 and May 2001. As previously reported, the overall response rate in the 36 eligible patients was 72%, with 36% complete remissions. Now, with a median follow up of 5.1 years, the median TTP is 2.2 years (95% CI, 1.2–3.3 years) and the 5-year overall survival is 77% (95% CI: 64–92%). We measured the serum levels of a variety of inflammatory cytokines by ELISA at baseline and 1 month after completing treatment. Serum specimens were available in 30 patients. Thirty two cytokines or receptors including IL-1β, IL-1RN, IL-2, IL-2R, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 p40/p70, IL-13, IL-15, IL-17, TNF-α, IFN-α, IFN-γ, GM-CSF, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, IP-10, MIG, Eotaxin, RANTES, MCP-1, VEGF, GCSF, EGF, FGF-basic, HGF, BLyS and APRIL were analyzed. Results: A significant increase was seen in the serum levels of BLyS (p=0.0001) after rituximab therapy, while IL-12 (p=0.0002), IL-1RN (p=0.0001), IL-2R (p=0.0001), IL-1β (p=0.02), IL-7 (p=0.02), IL-10 (p=0.02), and MIG (p=0.05) all significantly decreased. All other cytokines/receptors remained unchanged. Higher pretreatment serum levels of IL-2R (p=0.008) and IL-12 (p=0.001) correlated with a shorter TTP. Furthermore, elevated serum IL-2R levels pretreatment correlated with a lack of response to rituximab (p=0.03). Differences in overall survival could not be determined due to the fact that only 8 patients enrolled in the study have died. Because serum IL-2R levels correlated with response and TTP, we measured the cell surface expression of IL-2R in the tumor by flow cytometry. IL-2R was detected on a subpopulation of CD4+ T-cells in all specimens tested (n=14), and on malignant B-cells in 5 cases (36%). Conclusions: Pretreatment serum levels of IL-2R and IL-12 are important prognostic factors for response to therapy or TTP in follicular lymphoma patients treated with rituximab. Furthermore, serum levels of BLyS, IL-1RN, IL-7, IL-10, IL-1β and MIG also change after rituximab treatment. Targeting these cytokines may therefore provide additional clinical benefit to patients treated with rituximab.

Abstract Abstract 587 Background: The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signal transduction pathway controls cell proliferation and survival. Everolimus is an oral agent targeting raptor mTOR (mTORC1). The trial's goal was to determine the anti-tumor activity and safety of single-agent everolimus in patients with relapsed/refractory Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM). Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had measurable disease (IgM monoclonal protein >1000 mg/dL with >10% marrow involvement or nodal masses >2 cm), a platelet count ≥75,000 × 106/L, a neutrophil count ≥1,000 × 106/L, and a creatinine and bilirubin ≤2x laboratory upper limit of normal. Patients received everolimus 10 mg PO daily and were evaluated monthly. Tumor response was assessed after cycles 2 and 6 and then every 3 cycles until progression. Results: 50 pts were treated. The median age was 63 years (range, 43-85). The overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) was 70% (95% CI: 55-82%), with a PR of 42% and 28% MR. The median duration of response and median progression-free survival (PFS) has not been reached. The estimated PFS at 6 and 12 months is 75% (95%CI: 64-89%) and 62% (95%CI: 48-80%), respectively. Grade 3 or higher related toxicities were observed in 56% of patients. The most common were hematological toxicities with cytopenias. Pulmonary toxicity occurred in 10% of patients. Dose reductions due to toxicity occurred in 52% of patients. Conclusions: Everolimus has high single-agent activity with an overall response rate of 70% and manageable toxicity in patients with relapsed WM, and offers a potential new therapeutic strategy for this patient group. Disclosures: Ghobrial: Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Gertz:celgene: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Keryx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Treon:Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Witzig:Novartis: Research Funding.