LaPlant, Betsy

8043 Background: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signal pathway controls cell proliferation and survival. The trial's goal was to determine the anti-tumor activity and safety of single-agent everolimus (TORC1 inhibitor) in patients with relapsed/refractory Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM). Methods: Eligible patients had measurable disease (IgM monoclonal protein >1000 mg/dL with >10% marrow involvement or nodal masses >2 cm), a platelet count ≥75,000 x 106/L, a neutrophil count ≥1,000 x 106/L. Patients received everolimus 10 mg PO daily. Tumor response was assessed after cycles 2 and 6 and then every 3 cycles until progression. Results: 60 pts were treated. The median age was 64 years (range, 43-85). The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 1-11). All but two patients (97%) had received prior rituximab based therapy and 64% of patients had received prior alkylator based therapies. The overall response rate (complete response CR+ partial response PR+ minimal response MR) was 73% (95% CI: 60-84%), with a PR of 50% and 23% MR. The median time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for the entire study population is 28 months (mos), (95% CI: 18-not reached (NR)), 22 mos (95% CI: 12 0-NR), and 55 mos (95% CI: 55-NR), respectively. The estimated PFS at 12 and 24 months is 62% (95%CI: 51-75%), and 48% (95%CI: 37-63%), respectively. The 30 patients who achieved a PR responded after a median of 2 months (range, 1-26) of treatment. The median duration of response (DR) for these patients has not yet been reached and 19 of these patients remain in response after a median follow up of 31 months (range, 3-54). All but two patients had a decrease in their serum IgM. Grade 3 or higher related toxicities were observed in 67% of patients. The most common were hematological toxicities with cytopenias. Pulmonary toxicity occurred in 5% of patients. Dose reductions due to toxicity occurred in 63% of patients. Conclusions: Everolimus has high single-agent activity with an overall response rate of 73% and manageable toxicity in patients with relapsed WM, and offers a potential new therapeutic strategy for this patient population.

8013 Background: Obatoclax mesylate (GX15-070MS) is a BH3 mimetic that inhibits Bcl-2 protein family members including MCL-1, a dominant target in myeloma (MM). Obatoclax (OBX) inhibited viability of 14 MM cell lines (mean IC50 215 nM) and primary MM samples while exhibiting pre clinical synergy with bortezomib (BTZ). Sensitivity correlated with basal levels of Mcl-1 and Bcl-XL, but not Bcl2, Bim, Bax or Bak expression. Methods: We report a phase I trial of OBX in combination with BTZ. Eligibility required measureable disease, > 1 prior MM therapy, ≤10 cycles of prior BTZ and did not progress on prior BTZ therapy, creatinine ≤2 ULN. Starting dose level 1 was OBX 14 mg/m2 24-hour continuous iv. infusion days 1, 8, 15 of a 21-day cycle. BTZ given at 1.3mg/m2 iv. days 1, 4, 8 and 11. After protocol amendment OBX level 1 dosing was 30 mg/m2, level 2 was 40 mg/m2 IV both by continuous 3 hour infusion days 1, 8 and 15 on a 21 day schedule. Pre med. with famotidine was required. Results: Eleven patients were accrued, median age 62 (range: 46-77), median time from diagnosis was 4.7 years. Median of 2.5 cycles (range: 1-10). Median follow-up for patients still alive is 11.6 months (range: 0.9-35.5). At dose level 1, there were 2 DLTs. After amendment 8 patients were accrued (3 hour infusion): 4 at amended dose level 1 and 4 at dose level 2. All patients are now off treatment. 10 patients are evaluable for response: 2 patients at original dose level 1 (2 PR), 3 patients at dose level 1 (2 PR, 1 MR), no patients at dose level 2 responded: overall PR of 40%, clinical benefit response in 50% (95% CI: 19-81%). 6 patients had disease progression and 2 patients died. 4 DLTs were seen: at original dose level 1 grade 4 thrombocytopenia and delay of therapy > 15 days. At dose level 2, 1 patient had grade 3 somnolence, a 2nd patient grade 3 euphoria and grade 4 thrombocytopenia. No DLTs were seen at amended dose level 1. Common adverse events of any grade included GI, hematologic and neurologic e.g. euphoria, decreased level of consciousness, psychosis, speech. Conclusions: In summary MTD is OBX 30mg/m2 by 3 hour iv infusion once weekly, BTZ 1.3 mg/m2 days 1,4,8, and 11. Major toxicities were central neurologic and hematologic. This P2C consortium study was supported by NCI N01-CM62205.

6570 Background: Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR) can block growth and trigger apoptosis in neoplastic cells. AZD2171 (cediranib) is a highly potent, orally bioavailable, VEGFR-1/2 inhibitor. We conducted a phase II study of the efficacy of AZD2171 for the treatment of MDS. Methods: Adults with MDS (IPSS Int-2 or High) were eligible if they exhibited adequate organ function and ECOG 0-2. The primary endpoint was proportion of responses according to the IWG criteria assessed at one and every 3 months. Prior investigation of cediranib at 45 mg daily in patients with acute leukemia demonstrated toxicity concerns and therefore, the starting dose of this study was lowered to 30 mg daily. Results: A total of 16 pts with MDS (median age 73 years) were enrolled at a 30 mg starting dose, and all were evaluable. Median baseline marrow blasts were 12.0 % (range 2-18); 3 pts (18.8 %) had low, 6 (37.5 %) intermediate, and 7 (43.8 %) had high risk cytogenetics. Prior therapy included azacitidine (n=7), decitabine (n=2), cytarabine (n=2), erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) (n=2), lenalidomide (n=1), or none (n=6). Patients were treated for a median of two 28-day cycles (range 1 to 11). There were no confirmed responses. Patients with baseline blasts > 5% showed no significant reduction in the blast count at 4 and 12 weeks. Median OS was 4.7 mo (95% CI: 2.6 – 11.6). Median TTP was 3.8 mo (95% CI: 1.7 – 10.8). Grade 4 hematological adverse events at least possibly related to cediranib were neutropenia (n=2) and thrombocytopenia (n=4). Grade 3 hematological adverse events at least possibly related to study treatment included: neutropenia (n=3), thrombocytopenia (n=2), and anemia (n=2). Grade 3 non-hematological adverse events included fatigue (n=4), dyspnea (n=3), dehydration (n=2), diarrhea (n=2), nausea (n=2), asthenia (n=1), and hypertension (n=1). Hypertension and proteinuria was uncommon with the 30 mg/day dose. Conclusions: With no confirmed response from 16 patients, cediranib was determined to be ineffective at a dose of 30 mg daily in our patient population. Supported by NCI N01-CM62205, NCI P30-CA014520 and the UW Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center.

10019 Background: Colon cancers with microsatellite instability (MSI) display resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and in vitro resistance can be reversed by restoring DNA mismatch repair proficiency. 5-FU inhibits the thymidylate synthase (TS) enzyme and TS may predict clinical outcome after 5-FU-based chemotherapy. To define molecular predictors of prognosis, we analyzed TS, p53, chromosome 17p allelic imbalance (AI), and patient survival stratified by MSI status. Methods: Primary colon carcinomas from patients enrolled in five 5-FU-based adjuvant therapy trials were analyzed for MSI and 17p AI using 11 microsatellite markers (MSI-H: ≥ 30% of the loci demonstrating instability). For 17p AI, markers included D17S261 and TP53 at or near the p53 locus. Expression of DNA mismatch repair (hMLH1, PharMingen; hMSH2; Oncogene), TS (TS106, Zymed), and p53 (D07, Novacastra) proteins were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Correlations between markers and associations with overall survival (OS) were determined. Patients were censored at 5 years for DFS and at 8 years post study randomization for overall survival (OS) data. Results: Of 320 Dukes’ stage B2 and C cancers studied, 60 of 320 (19%) were MSI-H. TS expression variables (intensity, extent, weighted score) were similar in MSI-H and MSI stable/low frequency (MSS/MSI-L) cancers; similar results were found using DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) proteins. MSI-H tumors had lower stage (p= 0.0007), fewer metastatic lymph nodes (p= 0.004), and improved OS (vs. MSS/MSI-L tumors; p= 0.01). Loss of dMMR proteins was also associated with better OS (p= 0.006). None of the TS variables were prognostic for OS. Histologic grade (p= 0.0008) and nodal status (p= 0.0002) were associated with OS in contrast to 17p LOH or p53. Only MSI status or dMMR, histologic grade, and tumor stage were independent markers for OS. Conclusions: MSI-H tumors show earlier stage at presentation and better stage-adjusted survival rates. MSI status and TS expression were unrelated and TS was not prognostic, suggesting that TS levels cannot explain therapeutic resistance to 5-FU reported in MSI-H colon cancers. [Table: see text]

17511 Background: There is no published data regarding BMI changes in survivors of adult lymphoma. Methods: In October of 2004, we mailed a 23-page survey to 95 randomly selected patients from a population of 2,485 of patients from the Mayo Tumor Registry who had survived lymphoma from 5 to 20 years. 56 completed the survey for a 68% participation rate. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using clinical height and weight in the medical record at the time of diagnosis and self-reported weight in the survey response. Physical activity was self-reported. Based on their pattern of response, patients were categorized into a stage of change of current exercise (precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, or maintenance). Mood disturbance (depression, anxiety, and distress) and quality of life (QOL) were self-reported using the CES-D, POMS, STAI, FACT-G, and LASA questionnaires. Scores were transformed to a scale of 0–100 (higher score meaning higher functioning) to allow comparisons with a difference of 10 points considered significant. Results: The median age at completion of the questionnaire was 62 years (range: 25–85). The median time since diagnosis was 11 years (range: 6–20). Regular fitness, defined as a stage of change for exercise of action or maintenance, was reported by 48% of the respondents. The median BMI at diagnosis was 25.6 and the median at time of questionnaire was 27.0, which is a statistically significant change. Change in BMI, BMI at diagnosis, and BMI at time of questionnaire had no correlation with level of physical activity. Obese patients had a mean score of 72 points on the LASA, which was significantly lower than normal and underweight patients (mean 86) and overweight patients (mean 84). Conclusions: A small, but significant increase in body mass index was noted in long-term lymphoma survivors from the time of diagnosis to long-term follow-up. Patients who were obese at time of diagnosis may have lower quality of life down-the-road, as measured by the LASA years following treatment. This data represents the first information about body mass index in survivors of adult lymphoma. Further larger studies are needed to confirm these preliminary data and to evaluate other aspects of health behavior in long-term survivors of lymphoma. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

8055 Background: mTOR inhibition with intravenous temsirolimus (Wyeth Pharmaceuticals) has been associated with responses in mantle cell lymphoma (J Clin Oncol 23;5347, 2005) as well as other lymphomas (Blood 108 (11) 2483; 2006). This phase II study tested the oral mTOR inhibitor everolimus (RAD001, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) in three simultaneous two-stage phase II lymphoma studies - aggressive (group 1), indolent (group 2), or uncommon (group 3). The goals were to learn the toxicity profile and to assess the anti-tumor response. Planned interim analysis for groups 1 and 3 have been completed and are the subject of this report. Methods: Patients (pts) received 10 mg PO daily for each 28 day cycle (up to 12) and restaged after 2, 6, and 12 cycles. The primary endpoint is the confirmed response rate, including CR, CRu or PR. 12 pts were enrolled in stage 1 of each study. At least 1 success in 12 is required to proceed to stage 2, to a total of 37 pts. Overall, the treatment will be considered promising if 4 or more successes are observed in all 37 pts in each group. Results: The median age of the 12 pts in group 1 was 68.5 yrs (range: 53–80), with a median of 3 (range, 1–15) prior therapies. Four pts had a prior stem cell transplant (SCT). Pts completed a median of 7 (range, 1–12) cycles of therapy. 6 confirmed responses have been achieved (1 CR, 5 PR), meeting the overall criteria for promising results in this study. Common grade 3 adverse events (AEs) include thrombocytopenia (3 pts) and anemia (2 pts). For group 3, the median age was 49 yrs (range, 27–78), with a median of 7 (range, 1–13) prior therapies and 6 pts had a prior SCT. Pts have completed a median of 6.5 cycles (range, 1–11). 5 confirmed responses have been achieved (5 PR), meeting the criteria for this regimen to be considered promising. Of these 5 patients, 3 had HD, 1 T-cell NHL, and 1 had macroglobulinemia. Common grade 3 AEs include anemia (3 pts) and thrombocytopenia (2 pts). No grade 4 AEs were reported. Conclusions: Oral everolimus has activity in a spectrum of lymphomas with acceptable toxicity. The responses observed in both group 1 and group 3 met the criteria to continue accrual. These results provide the rationale for additional studies with this novel class of agents and to integrate mTOR inhibitors into salvage treatment regimens. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

1048 Background: Previous trials with p plus gem show significant antitumor activity in MBC. Nab-p has lower toxicity compared to p with similar therapeutic effects. This study assessed proportion of confirmed tumor responses and toxicity profile of this combination. Methods: Single stage phase II study enrolled patients (pts) with measurable MBC eligible for 1st line chemotherapy (chemo). Pts treated (tx) with nab-p 125 mg/m2 followed by gem 1,000 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 of 21 day cycle. Dose modifications allowed for both drugs. Primary endpoint was proportion of confirmed responses; complete response (CR), partial response (PR) by RESIST criteria on two consecutive evaluations at least 6 weeks apart. 41 evaluable pts required to test the null hypothesis that the confirmed response rate was at most 40% against the alternative of at least 60%. Results: 50 pts enrolled 11/05 to 5/06. Median age 56 (29–86). 40 pts (80%) visceral disease, 34 (68%) ER positive, 28 (56%) PR positive, 1 (2%) HER2 positive, 1 (2%) prior trastuzumab treatment (tx). 25 (50%) had prior adjuvant chemo, including 15 (30%) prior taxane. Median follow-up 7 mos (3–12). Median of 6 cycles of tx completed (1–15). 41 pts discontinued tx, due to progression (41%), pt refusal (27%), adverse events (17%), alternate tx (7%). Confirmed response rate 48% (95% CI: 34–63%): 4 CR, 20 PR. Median duration of response 6.6 mos (95% CI: 5.7, not reached), median progression-free survival (PFS) 7.9 mos (95% CI: 5.3–9.3). Rate of overall survival (OS) at 6 mos 91% (95% CI: 84–100%), 6 month PFS 58% (95% CI: 45–74%). Median OS not reached. 30 pts required dose delays on total of 52 cycles, mostly due to hematologic AEs. 9 pts (19%) had grade (gr) 4 adverse event (AE), 32 (67%) had maximum gr 3 AE. Most common gr 3/4 AEs: neutropenia (52%), fatigue (26%), anemia (14%), dyspnea (14%), thrombocytopenia (12%). Four pts had gr 3 neuropathy. Conclusions: Nab-paclitaxel in combination with gem has clear activity in patients with MBC. Manageable hematologic, but no other significant toxicities. Study ongoing to correlate efficacy with caveolin-1 levels with results expected Spring 2007. Follow up study of this combination with an anti-angiogenesis agent is in development. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

579 Background: N9831 and other clinical trials have demonstrated the additive survival benefit of trastuzumab (H) therapy with chemotherapy for patients with resected HER-2 positive breast cancer. Cardiac toxicity (CTox) is increased by this strategy. Prediction of or early detection of CTox is important. Methods: 95 patients provided informed consent. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), C-reactive protein (CRP), troponin T (TnT) and I (TnI), TNF-alpha, IL-1b, and IL-6 were to be drawn at baseline, after initiation of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC), after initiation of paclitaxel (T), and after the initiation of H (may have been given concurrently with T). 67 patients with at least a baseline sample, a post-treatment sample, and a baseline and subsequent evaluation of LVEF were studied. No patient in this group had a grade 3 decline in LVEF. Only 3 of these patients did not receive H. Values above the 99th percentile were considered abnormal for troponin. 40 ng/ml was considered elevated for BNP. Results: Values of CRP, TNF-alpha, IL- 6 and IL1b changed in very few patients and without a discernible pattern. For further evaluation of BNP, TnI, and TnT, 2 definitions of CTox were tested: 1. a >10% drop in LVEF from baseline (n=27) and 2. a drop in LVEF of 10–15% to less than the institutional lower limit of normal (LLN) OR a >15% decline in LVEF (n=14). No pre-treatment marker appeared to predict a > 10% decline in LVEF (definition 1). For patients fulfilling definition 2, pre-treatment BNP > 40 was seen in 21% of patients vs 8% of normals (nls) (p= 0.18) and an abnormal TnI (>0.04) was seen in 21% vs 6% of nls (p=0.10). Only doubling of BNP appeared promising as a serial marker of CTox using definition 2 (27% vs 7% for nls (p = 0.09). Conclusions: Baseline BNP and TnI and serial measures of BNP may be promising for further investigation for the prediction and detection of treatment-related CTox. Due to limitations of the study including the small numbers of patients analyzed, the difficulty in defining CTox, and the variation in the timing of sample procurement and assessment, these data are considered exploratory. Supported by CA-25224, CA-2115, CA 38926, CA31946. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Background: The current commonly used regimens in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) utilize steroids (dexamethasone or prednisone) in various combinations: bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd), bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTd), daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) and daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone (DVMP). However, steroid therapy may be associated with various adverse effects, including, but not limited to mood changes, insomnia, hypertension, hyperglycemia, osteoporosis, adrenal suppression, muscle weakness, and increased risk of opportunistic infections. A recent trial demonstrated improved tolerability of a regimen (Rd-R) involving an abbreviated course of dexamethasone, without compromising the efficacy in patients with intermediate-fit NDMM (Lorocca A., et al., ASH 2018). We designed a phase 2 clinical trial to examine the safety and efficacy of daratumumab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody in combination with an all-oral regimen of ixazomib, a proteasome inhibitor, lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory drug, and modified dose dexamethasone (IRd). Patients and Methods: NDMM patients with measurable disease and adequate organ function were enrolled, irrespective of their transplant eligibility. The primary objective was to determine the rate of complete response (CR) to daratumumab-IRd. Treatment consisted of daratumumab, 16 mg/kg, weekly for two cycles, every other week during cycles 3-6 and then every 4 weeks, ixazomib, 4 mg days 1, 8, 15, lenalidomide, 25 mg days 1-21, and dexamethasone upto 40 mg intravenously weekly for no more than two cycles, followed by use only as a prophylactic premedication for daratumumab-associated infusion reactions. Myeloma risk stratification was assessed by cytoplasmic immunoglobulin fluorescence in-situ hybridization (cIg FISH) analysis. Results: Overall, 40 patients were accrued, with data available on all patients for analysis at the cutoff date of July 19, 2019. The median age at enrollment was 64.5 (33-81) years; 37.5% were female. Eight (20%) patients were high risk by FISH. The median number of cycles was 6 (2-11) and the median follow up was 6.1 (2-11.7) months. Among 40 patients who had received at least 2 cycles of therapy, responses were attained rapidly; at the end of cycle 2, 88% patients achieved at least a partial response and 33% at least a very good partial response (VGPR) that improved to 52% at the end of 4 cycles among 29 patients who had completed at least 4 cycles. The overall best confirmed response rate among all 40 patients (Figure 1) was 95%, including 10% stringent CR, 5% CR and 23% near CR (13% VGPR excluding nCR). Stem cell collection was completed in 17 patients so far, all of whom required filgrastim and plerixafor. The median CD34+ cell count was 7.7 (range 2.9-11.6) million/kg . All patients were alive and 39 (97.5%) patients were progression-free at last follow up. Four (10%) patients proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation off study, per patient and/or investigator discretion (1 in CR, 2 in PR, 1 with progressive disease). Overall, 224 cycles have been administered across the study, with dose reduction/ hold required in a subset of patients; ixazomib (10%), lenalidomide (20%), daratumumab (0%) and dexamethasone (13%); the most frequent reasons for dose adjustment were skin rash and hematologic toxicities. A grade 3 or higher adverse event, at least possibly attributed to the study drugs, was observed in 40% of patients; hematologic in 30% (lymphopenia 25%, neutropenia 15%, thrombocytopenia 5% and anemia 2.5%) and non-hematologic in 18% of patients (hyperglycemia 8%, diarrhea 5%, infections 5%, ileus 2.5%, maculopapular rash 2.5%, and fatigue 2.5%). Updated results with additional 6 months of follow up and minimal residual disease assessment related data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: Our early results suggest that the combination of daratumumab, ixazomib, lenalidomide and modified dose dexamethasone is well-tolerated, with excellent activity, and does not adversely impact stem-cell mobilization in patients with NDMM. Disclosures Kapoor: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Cellectar: Consultancy. Gertz:Spectrum: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Prothena: Honoraria; Alnylam: Honoraria; Ionis: Honoraria. Dingli:alexion: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding. Leung:Takeda: Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aduro: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Akcea: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding. Lacy:Celgene: Research Funding. Kumar:Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Daratumumab in combination with Ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone for the management of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Background: The DIAL study is testing the efficacy of dual immunomodulation in patients with advanced aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Sponsored by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP), the trial combines the use of a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor (nivolumab) with an agonist of the CD27 receptor (varlilumab) in a randomized phase 2 design. CD27, a co-stimulatory receptor, regulates T cell activation in the context of T cell receptor (TCR) engagement through interaction with CD70. T cell exhaustion plays a major role in immune evasion in B-NHL. Varlilumab is an agonistic IgG1 monoclonal antibody that recognizes CD27 leading to prevention or reversal of exhaustion in pre-clinical models. Varlilumab also demonstrates direct anti-tumoral activity in xenograft models of human lymphoma cell lines via antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Phase 1 data supports the safety and tolerability of single-agent varlilumab in advanced hematologic malignancies (NCT01460134). We hypothesize that CD27 activation synergizes with PD-1 inhibition resulting in a superior anti-lymphoma effect compared to PD-1 blockade alone. The study will also evaluate the effect of these agents on tumor and immune cells using immunohistochemistry (IHC), mass cytometry (CyTOF), multiplex ELISA, imaging mass cytometry (IMC), and whole exome sequencing. Methods: The trial is enrolling patients with advanced aggressive B-NHL. Standard inclusion criteria and prior treatment with at least 2 lines of standard therapy are required. Prior autologous stem cell transplant and/or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is allowed. Patients with active CNS disease are excluded. Eligible patients are randomized to treatment with single-agent nivolumab (group 1) or dual immunotherapy with nivolumab and varlilumab. Group 1 is allowed to cross-over at the time of progression. Nivolumab will be administered intravenously (IV) every 2 weeks (240 mg) for 4 months followed by monthly dosing thereafter (480 mg). Varlilumab will be given IV every 4 weeks (3 mg/kg). Response assessment will be done by PET-CT scan every 12 weeks. Primary outcome is overall response rate (ORR) according to the LYRIC criteria. The trial will enroll 48 patients per arm, allowing 80% power to detect at least 20% increase in ORR in the experimental arm (group 2) assuming a 25% ORR in the control arm (group 1). The trial is registered (NCT03038672) and open to participation to members of the Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN) and Early Drug Development Opportunity Program (EDDOP). Figure Disclosures Tun: BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Mundi-pharma: Research Funding; DTRM Biopharma: Research Funding. Bartlett:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Autolus: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Kline:Merck: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding. Awan:Janssen: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Lazaryan:Kadmon: Consultancy. Ansell:Affimed: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Regeneron: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Trillium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Trillium: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding. Diefenbach:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Denovo: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding.