VandeVrede, Lawren

AbstractBackgroundFrontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders (FTD) display complex neuropathological substrates and poor clinicopathological correlations, which hinders therapy development. Plasma P‐tau217 is an emerging tool to screen for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology and may have diagnostic value in FTD.MethodPlasma P‐tau217 was measured cross‐sectionally by electrochemiluminescence in FTD patients referred to ALLFTD from ARTFL (n = 628, 45.7% female, median age 66 ± 12 years). P‐tau217 differences by baseline phenotype, disease severity and genotype were determined with non‐parametric tests and general linear models. Associations between P‐tau217 and measures of disease severity and neuropsychological performance were determined with linear regressions corrected for age, sex, phenotype and APOE.ResultThe sample included 33% behavioral variant FTD, 23.6% primary progressive aphasia (PPA), 28.5% atypical parkinsonism, 1.6% amnestic dementia (AmDem), 2.8% FTD/motoneuron disease, 3% mild cognitive/behavioral impairment and 7.5% healthy controls. Only 1.6% carried FTD‐causing mutations. P‐tau217 was not related to age (r = 0.034, 95%CI ‐0.03 – 0.12, p = 0.4). Compared to controls (0.18 ± 0.07 pg/mL), P‐tau217 was elevated only in AmDem (0.58 ± 0.9 pg/mL, p = 0.001) and logopenic PPA (lvPPA, 0.71 ± 0.62 pg/mL p < 0.001). P‐tau217 ≥ 0.42 pg/mL effectively discriminated AmDem and lvPPA from all other phenotypes (AUC 0.87, 95%CI 0.77 – 0.96, p = 0.001, 77% sensitivity, 92% specificity). AmDem (60%) and lvPPA (91.7%) had the highest prevalence of high (≥ 0.42 pg/mL) P‐tau217, and the highest prevalence of APOE4 (AmDem 40%, lvPPA 63.6%). APOE4 carriers (0.23 ± 0.22 pg/mL) had higher P‐tau217, than non‐carriers (0.19 ± 0.09 pg/mL), regardless of phenotype (APOE effect p = .002, APOE x phenotype, p = 0.44). P‐tau217 was associated with worse clinical severity, mood, memory and executive function, but not with worse motor symptoms or social cognition.ConclusionWhen FTD is suspected, high plasma P‐tau217 is strongly associated with amnestic dementia and logopenic PPA phenotypes. Pending completion of ongoing neuropathological, CSF and molecular neuroimaging analyses, the data support the use of plasma P‐tau217 to identify atypical AD as a cause or AD as a co‐pathology contributing to FTD clinical presentation.

AbstractBackgroundBlood neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a robust predictor of phenoconversion in familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration (fFTLD). The comparative value of CSF NfL and other CSF markers of degeneration in fFTLD remains unexplored.MethodFLTD‐causing mutation carriers were recruited through ALLFTD (n = 113, 56.6% female, mean age 48.1 ± 13 years; 29 C9orf72, 16 GRN, 34 MAPT, 34 mutation non‐carriers) and prospectively evaluated for 3 years. Baseline CSF was analyzed for NfL, phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain (p‐NfH), tau, phosphorylated tau181 (p‐tau) and neurogranin using fit‐for‐purpose immunoassays. Mixed effect linear models, with random slopes, corrected for age, sex, genotype and total intracranial volume related CSF biomarkers to longitudinal clinical variables.ResultNfL (β = 0.64, p < 0.001), p‐NfH (β = 0.68, p < 0.001) and tau (β = 0.46, p < 0.001) correlated with age. There were no differences in biomarker concentrations by phenotype or severity, except for higher NfL and p‐NfH in full phenotype, compared to prodromal disease and asymptomatic carriers. Low neurogranin (β = ‐0.39, p < 0.001), low p‐tau (β = ‐0.33, p < 0.001) and high NfL (β = 0.42, p < 0.001) correlated with worse baseline disease severity measured by the CDR® Dementia Staging Instrument plus behavior and language domains from the National Alzheimer’s Disease Coordinating Center FTLD module sum of boxes (CDR®+NACC‐FTLDsb), and with other measures of global cognition, instrumental and daily function, and frontal and temporal brain volumes. Regardless of genotype, the predicted annualized rate of CDR®+NACC‐FTLDsb score worsenings per higher baseline CSF biomarker Log pg/mL were tau: 3.0 ± 0.2, NfL: 2.8 ± 0.2 and p‐NfH: 2.8 ± 0.2. High tau, NfL and p‐NfH also predicted worsening in other measures of global cognition and instrumental and daily function. Neurogranin and p‐tau did not predict clinical decline.ConclusionCSF tau, p‐tau, neurogranin, NfL and p‐NfH reflect important aspects of disease severity in fFTLD. In contrast to Alzheimer’s disease, low p‐tau and neurogranin are inversely related to clinical severity, which suggests a distinctive pathophysiological process and has implications for therapeutic development. CSF NfL, p‐NfH and tau have strong prognostic value in fFTLD.

AbstractBackgroundUp to 30% of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cases are due to known pathogenic mutations (f‐FTD). Little is known about the factors that predict who will choose to learn their results. Upcoming clinical trials in f‐FTD may require disclosure prior to enrollment, even before symptom onset, and thus characterizing this sample is important. Furthermore, understanding the mood impacts of genetic disclosure may guide genetic counseling practice.MethodF‐FTD participants (n=568) from families with a known pathogenic mutation (MAPT, C9orf72, GRN) were enrolled through the ARTFL/LEFFTDS Longitudinal FTD Study (ALLFTD) and provided the opportunity for disclosure. Independent‐sample t‐tests compared demographic and psychosocial factors between participants who did and did not receive their results. In participants who were asymptomatic at baseline and follow up (n=199,177 with follow‐up), linear mixed effects modeling was used to investigate pre‐ to post‐disclosure changes in the 15‐item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).ResultOf participants from families with a known pathogenic genetic mutation, 47% received genetic disclosure. Of the asymptomatic subset (n=386), 36% know their mutation status. Of these asymptomatic learners, 46% received disclosure through the study, and the remainder learned their genetic status prior to study enrollment. None of the analyzed demographic or psychosocial factors (i.e., sex, age, education, having children) differed between learners and non‐learners (p’s > 0.05). In the longitudinal analysis of asymptomatic participants, learners showed a pre‐ to post‐increase of 0.31 GDS points/year (95%CI: ‐0.08, 0.69, p = 0.12), whereas non‐learners showed a slight decline (‐0.15 points/year, 95%CI: ‐0.36, 0.06, p = 0.16). This difference between slopes was statistically significant (0.46, 95%CI: 0.02, 0.89, p=0.04) but represents a small clinical effect. In asymptomatic learners, slopes did not differ based on mutation status (0.28, 95%CI: ‐0.66, 1.20, p=0.55). Conclusions were based on the estimates and full range of confidence intervals.ConclusionThe majority of asymptomatic research participants do not know their genetic status, which will be a consideration for clinical trials that require disclosure. No considered demographic factors were strongly associated with the decision to receive disclosure. The findings suggest that disclosure in asymptomatic participants has minimal impact on depressive symptoms regardless of genetic results.

AbstractBackgroundHeterozygous progranulin (GRN) mutations are an important cause of familial Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (f‐FTLD) associated with TDP‐43 pathology. The cellular role of progranulin remains unclear, but alterations in lipid metabolism and lysosomal function have been suggested. Better understanding the pathophysiology of progranulin deficiency is critical as several clinical trials are underway in this population, and fluid biomarkers are urgently needed to assess pharmacodynamic effects. Therefore, we conducted an unbiased metabolomic analysis in GRN mutation carriers and family member controls, and identified at least two classes of lipids altered in symptomatic GRN carriers.MethodsMatched plasma and CSF samples were obtained from GRN mutation carriers (46 plasma, 36 CSF) and age‐matched blood relatives (36 plasma, 18 CSF). Untargeted metabolite detection was conducted via LC‐MS/MS in both plasma (1389 compounds) and CSF (508 compounds) by Metabolon. To identify important compounds in differentiating these groups, we conducted an unbiased analysis between family controls, asymptomatic carriers, and symptomatic carriers using univariate one‐way ANOVA with post‐hoc Fisher’s LSD corrected for false discovery rate (FDR) and partial least squares ‐ discriminant analysis (PLS‐DA, Metaboanalyst). For compounds identified by this unbiased approach, correlation with measures of disease severity was analyzed via linear regression, controlling for age and gender.ResultsIn plasma, 22 compounds were identified as significant in discriminating between groups via ANOVA (FDR<0.05), and 17/22 were also identified by PLS‐DA (VIP>2.4). Of these, 21/22 compounds were lipids; 11 were sphingomyelins. Comparatively, in the relatively lipid‐poor CSF samples, 6/15 compounds identified by PLS‐DA (VIP>2.0) were phosphatidylcholines. Pathway impact analysis revealed a large impact from the GRN mutation on sphingolipids in plasma and glycerophospholipids in CSF. In secondary analyses, sphingomyelins were elevated in plasma from symptomatic carriers, while phosphatidylcholines were decreased in CSF. Secondary analyses showed these compounds were correlated with clinical measures of disease severity, including MoCA and CDR+NACC‐FTLD.ConclusionIncreased plasma concentration of sphingomyelin and decreased CSF phosphatidylcholines are both associated with worse clinical status in FTLD‐GRN. These findings suggest that impaired lipid metabolism could play a pathogenic role in FTLD‐GRN. Targeted lipidomic measures in plasma and CSF may potentially reveal useful clinical trial biomarkers.

AbstractBackgroundImmune dysregulation may influence disease pathogenesis in familial frontotemporal dementia (fFTD), but the utility of peripheral biomarkers of inflammation remains unclear in this cohort. We sought to investigate candidate plasma biomarkers of immune function within a large cohort of fFTD kindreds from the ARTFL and LEFFTDS Consortia.MethodsWe examined plasma samples from 148 non‐carrier healthy controls and 256 asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals carrying autosomal dominant fFTD‐associated mutations (n=73 MAPT, n=120 C9ORF72, and n=63 GRN). ELISA was used to measure three plasma biomarkers of inflammation (YKL‐40, TNF‐α,IL‐6). We used Mann–Whitney U tests to compare concentrations amongst controls and subgroups of fFTD differing in disease severity, defined by the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale plus National Alzheimer’s Disease Coordinating Center Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Behavior and Language Domains (CDR® plus NACC FTLD) global score (asymptomatic=0, early symptomatic=0.5, late symptomatic ≥1). We also used linear mixed models to assess the utility of baseline inflammatory biomarkers in predicting the subsequent annual rate of decline in functional clinical severity (CDR® plus NACC FTLD sum of boxes) and psychomotor speed (Trails A).ResultsPlasma YKL‐40 concentrations were elevated in late symptomatic fFTD (59.3ng/ml [50.1]) relative to controls (32.9ng/ml [24.0]) (p=0.0003) and asymptomatic mutation carriers (30.9ng/ml [25.4], p=0.0001). Plasma TNF‐α concentrations were relatively low in asymptomatic mutation carriers (1.96pg/ml [0.56]) compared to early symptomatic fFTD (2.35pg/ml [0.83], p= 0.009). Amongst mutation carriers (including 140 with follow up clinical data), higher baseline plasma IL‐6 and YKL‐40 concentrations were associated with greater increase in functional clinical severity and declines in psychomotor speed, respectively.ConclusionPlasma biomarkers of inflammation increase with disease severity in fFTD and predict worse clinical trajectories. While the role of inflammation remains unclear in familial FTD, plasma markers of inflammation appear to reflect the processes influencing disease trajectory in patients carrying mutations associated with familial frontotemporal dementia.