A Randomized Phase III Trial of Lenalidomide Plus High-Dose Dexamethasone Versus Lenalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (E4A03): A Trial Coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
Abstract Background: Lenalidomide has shown efficacy in patients with relapsed myeloma in phase II and III clinical trials, and is currently being investigated as initial therapy for the disease. We report results of a phase III trial comparing lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone (Dex) versus lenalidomide plus low-dose Dex as first line therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Methods: Pts with newly diagnosed, untreated, symptomatic MM were eligible. Pts in both arms received lenalidomide 25 mg/day PO on days 1–21 every 28 days. In addition, patients in the high-dose Dex arm (Arm A) received Dex 40 mg on days 1–4, 9–12, and 17–20 PO every 28 days, while pts in the low-dose Dex arm (Arm B) received Dex 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 PO every 28 days. The primary endpoint was best response at 4 months on intent to treat basis. At 4 months pts could go off study for stem cell transplant or elect to continue therapy until progression. Response was defined as a decrease in serum and urine monoclonal (M) protein by 50% or higher. If the serum M protein was unmeasurable, a 90% or higher decrease in urine M protein was required. Responses need to be confirmed at least 4 weeks apart. Patients with disease progression or not responding to lenalidomide within 4 months switched to thalidomide with the same dose of dexamethasone they were receiving (Arms C and D, respectively). An independent Data Monitoring Committee approved release of these results. Results: 445 pts were enrolled: 223 randomized to Arm A and 222 to Arm B. Median age was 65 yrs. Serious adverse event data based on expedited reporting (AdEERS) is available on all pts (see table). Common adverse events of Grade 3 or higher were thromboembolism (18.4% in arm A vs 5.4% in Arm B), infection/pneumonia (18.8% vs 9.0%) and hyperglycemia (5.8% vs 1.8%). Incidence of any grade 4 or higher toxicity was 22.0% in Arm A vs 12.6% in Arm B. Response data is being analyzed. Conclusions: Lenalidomide plus two different schedules of Dex was investigated in this phase III trial. Preliminary results suggest that toxicity rates are higher in the high-dose Dex arm. The differences in the response rates between the two arms will dictate future trials and clinical practice. Major Toxicties (AdEERS) Toxicity Arm A (n=223) Arm B (n=222) Cardiac ischemia (Grade >=3) 2.7% 0.5% Hyperglycemia (Grade >=3) 5.8% 1.8% Infection/Pneumonitis (Grade >=3) 18.8% 9.0% Neuropathy (Grade >=3) 0.9% 0.9% Thromboembolism (Grade >=3) 18.4% 5.4% Any non-Hem toxicity (Grade >=3) 53.4% 36.0% Any toxicity (Grade >=4) 22.0% 12.6% Death (Grade 5) 4.5% 1.4%
6q Deletion in Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Is the Most Common Cytogenetic Abnormality and Is Associated with Aggressive Disease with a Trend towards Worse Survival.
Abstract Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is an effective alternative for the analysis of cytogenetic abnormalities of low proliferative entities such as Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) but, to date, no studies have been carried out to explore the potential impact of molecular cytogenetics on disease evolution. Deletion of the long arm of chromosome 6 (6q-) is the most frequent cytogenetic abnormality in WM. In this study we have analyzed the incidence of this aberration (using both conventional cytogenetics and FISH analysis) in 102 WM patients, and we have correlated it with disease characteristics. Deletion of 6q21 was detected in 6% of patients by conventional cytogenetics, while FISH studies increased this incidence up to 39%. Moreover, in those patients analyzed by cIgM-FISH, the incidence of 6q- was higher (54%). Interestingly, 6q- patients displayed features associated with adverse prognosis (higher levels of ESR, CRP and beta-2 microglobulin), and a greater tendency to display anemia and hypoalbuminemia. Other differentiating variables without reaching statistical significance were a tendency of displaying a higher bone marrow lymphoplasmacytoid infiltration and the amount of monoclonal component in 6q- patients (table). In addition, patients with 6q- displayed shorter survival from time of diagnose (log-rank; p=0.09). In summary, our results show that 6q deletion in WM patients is currently the most frequently found cytogenetic abnormality. Patients with this deletion also shows a trend towards an aggressive disease and poorer outcome in WM. Further studies should focus on possible tumor suppressor genes in the minimal area of deletion at 6q and to determine their role in disease progression. table del6q present del6q absent p-value n 40 (39%) 62 (61%) β2M ≥4mg/dL 48% 16% 0.005 CRP ≥3.5 mg/dL 47% 11% 0.006 Albumin <4mg/dL 86% 55% 0.006 ESR ≥100 mm/h 73% 44% 0.02 Hb <11 g/dL 63% 40% 0.02 serum IgM >20 g/L 86% 73% 0.10 BM infiltration >40% 44% 31% 0.20
Clinical Significance of the Tumor Suppressor p53 Codon 72 Polymorphic Variants in Multiple Myeloma.
Abstract Background: The p53 tumor suppressor gene has a common sequence polymorphism that results in either proline or arginine at amino-acid position 72. The Pro72 and Arg72 variants have been reported to differ in its functional activity. The Arg72 variant induces apoptosis more efficiently than Pro72 variant by its greater ability to localize to the mitochondria and increase the release of cytochrome c into the cytoplasm. In addition, recent studies have demonstrated that Arg72 variant was a better suppressor of cellular transformation, an activity believed to rely on the pro-apoptotic function of p53. Moreover, the Pro72 variant has been associated with a higher incidence of tumors. Aim: To evaluate the effect of the polymorphic variants of codon 72 and clinical outcome in patients with plasma cell malignancies. Patients and Methods: We analyzed 79 patients with plasma cell malignancies seen at Mayo Clinic between 2000 and 2003. Genomic DNA was extracted from CD138+ sorted plasma cell from bone marrow aspirates. PCR amplification of codon 72 and posterior sequencing was used for the analysis. Results: A total of 79 patients were analyzed. Thirty-four patients (34%) were heterozygous for p53, 57 (59%) homozygous for Arginine and 6 (6%) homozygous for Proline. The distribution among disorders was as follow, 52 patients had MM, 14 patients with SMM and 13 with MGUS. Among patient with MM 25% were Pro/Arg heterozygous, 71 % were Arg/Arg homozygous and 3.8% Pro/Pro homozygous. Survival data among MM patients and genotype were analyzed to Kaplan- Meier method. No significant differences were found among patients who carried homozygous (72R) or heterozygous genotype and overall survival. We exclude the analysis in MGUS and SMM for a low number of patients available. Conclusions: These findings indicate that codon 72 arginine p53 may not be associated with a prolonged survival in patients with Multiple Myeloma, but further study is needed to assess whether this polymorphism is associated with progression of MGUS to MM, age of onset, clinical manifestations, response to treatment etc.
Lenalidomide Plus Dexamethasone (Rev/Dex) in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma: Response to Therapy, Time to Progression, and Survival.
Abstract Background: We reported a high response rate with the combination of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Rev/Dex) as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Blood2005;106:4050–3). We now present new data on time to progression (TTP), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) from this phase II trial, and also include updated response data. Patients and Methods: 34 patients (23 male and 11 female) were enrolled. Lenalidomide was given orally 25 mg daily on days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle. Dexamethasone was given orally at a dose of 40 mg daily on days 1–4, 9–12, 17–20 of each cycle. Patients were allowed to go off treatment after 4 cycles of therapy to pursue autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT), but treatment beyond four cycles was permitted at the physician’s discretion. For patients continuing therapy beyond 4 months, the dose of dexamethasone was reduced to 40 mg on days 1–4 of each cycle. Response was assessed by modified EBMT/International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria. All patients received aspirin (81 mg or 325 mg daily) as prophylaxis against DVT. Results: The median age was 64 years (range, 32–78). All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Median follow up is 21 months. Thirteen patients proceeded to SCT following initial therapy with Rev/Dex and were censored at that time point for purposes of calculation of response, TTP and PFS. Patients who discontinued therapy to proceed to SCT received a median of 4 cycles of therapy (range, 4–13), while those staying on Rev/Dex (n=21) received a median of 19 cycles of therapy (range, 2–30). Thirty-one of 34 patients (91%) achieved an objective response to therapy; including 6 patients (18%) achieving a complete response (CR) and 13 patients (38%) achieving very good partial response for a CR+VGPR rate of 56%. The CR+VGPR rate among the 21 patients staying on Rev/Dex as primary therapy without SCT was 67% (CR 24%, VGPR 43%). Median TTP, PFS, and OS have not been reached (Figure). By Kaplan-Meier method, the estimated 2 year progression rate was 18%. The 2-year PFS rate and OS rate were 74% and 91%, respectively. Fifty-five percent of patients experienced grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity at any point during therapy, most commonly fatigue (21%), neutropenia (21%), anxiety (6%), pneumonitis (6%), muscle weakness (6%), and rash (6%). Two patients died on study: one attributed to infection unrelated to therapy, the patient had stopped all therapy for over a month before the fatal infection occurred; the other death was due to infection felt possibly related to therapy. One patient developed a pulmonary embolism (grade 4 toxicity), but recovered with therapy; no other patient developed deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Conclusion: Rev/Dex is highly active and well tolerated in the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with a high CR+VGPR rate of 56% for the trial, and 67% among the subset of patients receiving this regimen as primary therapy. Responses are durable with a low progression rate at 2 years.
Plasma Cells from Secondary Plasma Cell Leukemia Display Different Cytogenetics Pattern When Compared with Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia.
Abstract Background: Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare plasma cell (PC) dyscrasia which may be designated as primary (PPCL) or de novo PCL when recognized at the time of diagnosis and secondary (SPCL) when there is leukemic transformation of a previously recognized multiple myeloma (MM). PCL has been reported to exhibit distinct clinical and immunophenotypic features that distinguish it from MM, but little is known about the specific genetics of this disease. To better understand the genetic features of the clonal PC from PPCL and SCPL we assessed in these patients the molecular and cytogenetic abnormalities most commonly found in MM. Patients and Methods: In our study we analyzed 3 groups of patients; 18 with PPCL, 23 with SPCL and a control group of 345 newly diagnosed MM previously published. Diagnostic criteria for PCL followed the presence of >2 x103/L PC in PB (Kyle et al. Arch Intern Med1974; 133–813–8). Cytogenetic abnormalities were assessed by the c-Ig FISH method; mutational analysis was performed using Conformational-sensitive gel electrophoresis (CSGE). Methylation was analyzed by methyl specific PCR (MSP) after bisulfite genomic DNA modification. Results: Translocation of immunoglobulin heavy chain with Cyclin D1 (t (11; 14)) was present in 76.9% (10 of 13) of PPCL, 71% (5 of 7) of SPCL, in contrast to 15.8% (53 of 336) of MM cases. Translocations’ involving the FGFR3-MMSET genes (4p16.3 locus) and c-MAF (16q32) genes were not observed among 10 patients studied with PPCL, but were present in 12.7 % each in SPCL. The t (4;14)(p16;q32) was present in 12.7% cases of MM and the t(14;16)(q32;q23) was present in 4.6 % of MM cases. Deletion of 17p13.1 (p53 locus) was found in 10% (37 of 345) of MM cases, 53.8% (7 of 13) for PPCL and 42.8% (3 of 7) for SPCL. Deletion of 13q was present in 54.2% (176 of 325) of MM, 76.9 % (10 of 13) of PPCL and 57.1% of SPCL. Ras mutations were found in 15% (2/13) of PPCL, located in codon 1 and 2 of the K-ras gene. In addition, 23% for SPCL presented mutations in the N-ras gene. Two mutations were located in codon 2 of N-ras and 1 patients in showed a mutation in codon 1 of K-ras gene. Ras mutations were present in 27% of MM cases. Mutations for p53 gene were present in 30.7% (4/13) of PPCL, 17% (3/17) for SPCL and 5% for MM. Methylation specific PCR for p16 gene was found in 23% (3/13) of PPCL, 29% of SPCL and 33.9% (149/439) of MM. Hypermethylation of p14 was not detected in PPCL but a 23 % was found in SPCL. Conclusions: In this study we demonstrate that PCs from PPCL more frequently carry the t (11; 14). Comparing SPCL and MM, PC’s from de novo PPCL do not show t (4; 14) or (16; 14). Deletion of 13q was more prevalent among patients with PPCL. Ras mutations appear to be as frequent in MM as in PPCL and SPCL. Mutations in p53 appeared to be more prevalent in PPCL than in SPCL and MM. Hypermethylation of p16 does not differ while hypermethylation of p14 is more frequent in SPCL than PPCL. These characteristics may lead to a different onset or disease evolution of PPCL compared to MM and secondary plasma cell leukemia and this may be important for diagnostic and treatment.
Cancer/Testis Antigen Profiling in Multiple Myeloma Define a Cohort of Patients with Poor Prognosis Regardless of Genetic Subtypes.
Abstract Cancer/testis antigens (CTAs), comprising the MAGE, CTAG, SSX and GAGE families, are expressed in different tumor types and restricted in normal tissues to germ cells of the testis. Many CTAs contain epitopes recognized by cytotoxic T cells and are potential targets for active immunotherapy. In MM, different CTAs have been shown to be expressed in cell lines and patient cells, and are associated with more proliferative and advance stage tumors. However, correlation with survival has never been reported. We undertook a global survey of CTA expression using gene expression profiling of CD138-enriched plasma-cell (PC) RNA in 15 normal, 101 MM, 22 MGUS and 24 SMM samples using the Affymetrix U133A chip (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). 22 CTA genes were differentially expressed across the samples and unsupervised clustering using these genes clearly identifies a group of patients with high CTA expression. Most CTAs have significantly higher expression in MM as compared to SMM and especially MGUS, which has similar expression as normal PCs. As these antigens are not expressed in normal PCs, an upper limit of normal expression (ULN) was derived based on mean+3SD of expression in normal PCs for each CTA. A strict cut-off of normalized expression value greater than 2xULN was used to assign positive expression for each CTA genes. Using this method, the most commonly expressed CTAs are MAGE-A3 (73% of MM), MAGE-C1 (45%), MAGE-A6 (35%), SSX-1 (21%), GAGE-5 (18%) and NY-ESO-1 (14%). We then assigned patients with expression of more than 2 of these genes as having a CTA signature and correlated with clinical parameters. 45 patents (41 MM and 4 SMM) have the CTA signature. These patients have a significantly higher PCLI (median 0.2 v 0.7, p=0.0003). In fact, there is a significant correlation between the number of positive CTAs and PCLI (r=0.59, p<0.0001). Interestingly, there is no association between patients with a CTA signature and any of the recurrent genetic abnormalities (IgH translocations, chromosome 13 deletion and TC classes), yet MM patients with this signature have a significantly shorter survival (median 459 days vs not reached, log-rank p=0.017). A prognostic hierarchy exists amongst these CTAs. Only MAGE-A6, MAGE-A12, SSX-1 and SSX-5 expression has significant prognostic implications with the SSX family conferring the worse prognosis. Using a restricted panel of 3 CTAs (SSX-1, -5 and MAGE-A12), about 28% of MM patients expressing one or more of these genes can be identified with poor survival (median less than 1 year) that is independent of genetic subtypes. The genes differentially expressed between patients with and without the CTA signature are mainly involved in cell cycle regulation. Since the expression of this large set of CTAs appears to be under epigenetic control, we speculate that the same epigenetic processes that lead to dysregulation of the cell cycle also cause ectopic expression of CTA genes. As CTA expression is rare in MGUS, epigenetic processes may therefore also mediate transformation from MGUS to MM. These poor prognosis patients represent good candidates for novel therapies targeting the epigenetic machinery.
Gene Expression Profiling Identifies 4 Sub-Classes with Distinct Clinical Associations in Hyperdiploid Myeloma.
Abstract Hyperdiploid myeloma (H-MM) affects about 50% of MM. These patients exhibit significant karyotypic and clinical heterogeneity. In this study, we addressed possible biological heterogeneity within H-MM by gene expression profiling of CD138-enriched plasma-cell RNA from 53 H-MM patients using the Affymetrix U133A chip (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Analysis was performed using GeneSpring 7 (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering performed using the top 100 most variable genes (generated by ANOVA) identifies 4 putative patient clusters. These clusters were reproduced using principal component analysis. Cluster 1 was characterized by high expression of a large group of cancer testis antigens and mitosis/proliferation related genes (TOP2A, NEK, ASPM, CENPA). Cluster 2 was characterized by high expression of genes involved in IL-6 and HGF signaling (MET, IL6R, SOCS3, SPINT1). Cluster 3 was characterized by high expression of genes involved in TNF/NF-KB signaling and anti-apoptosis (NFKB2, CFLAR, BIRC3, TNFAIP3, RRAS2). Cluster 4 was characterized by high expression of genes involve in angiogenesis (protocadherin, EDNRB). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering using the same set of genes in an independent cohort of H-MM patients (n=60) yielded the same 4 patient clusters over-expressing similar genes. The gene expression profile of these clusters were not driven by differences in trisomies (only about 25% of genes that define the clusters were located on the commonly trisomic chromosomes). Association between the 4 clusters and clinical parameters such as survival, chromosome 13 deletion (Δ13), presence of IgH translocations, PCLI, RAS mutation and p16 methylation was analyzed. Cluster 1 tumors were more proliferative (median PCLI 3.8, p<0.05). Cluster 2 was associated with presence of Δ13 (56%, p<0.05) although none of the genes that defined this cluster falls on chromosome 13. p16 methylation was also less common in cluster 2 (13%, p=0.06). Cluster 3 was associated with low PCLI (median 0.2, P<0.05). Most of the patients with p16 methylation also belonged to this cluster (67%, p=0.06). There was a complete absence of Δ13 in Cluster 4. Patients in the 4 clusters also had significantly different survival (log-rank p=0.002.). The difference in survival was independent of Δ13 since Δ13 has no impact on survival in this patient cohort. The molecular profiles of these subclasses may explain some of these associations. CTA expression is associated with proliferative tumors with poor prognosis. IL-6 is an important survival factor and HGF signaling has been associated with poor survival in MM which may explain the relative poor prognosis of this group. Cluster 3 may have better survival as it is associated with an anti-apoptotic signature rather than proliferative signature. In summary, gene expression profiling identified 4 sub-classes within H-MM (validated on an independent dataset and using different clustering techniques) with distinct clinical and biological associations. The gene signature associated with each sub-classes provide a molecular basis for the different clinical behaviour and further insights into deregulated pathways in H-MM.
Functional Analysis of p53 in the JMW Myeloma Cell Line.
Abstract Background: The inactivation of p53 by deletion of 17p13 is observed in 10% of multiple myeloma patients and is associated with shorter survival. In this study we were interested in assessing p53 function in the JMW myeloma cell line established from a patient with aggressive disease and circulating plasma cells. We characterized the plasma cells derived from the patient with the disease from the initial stage of procurement ofpatient tumor cells to permanence as a cell line. Results: At diagnosis, 95% of the cells had monosomy 17 and 4% of the cells had a FISH pattern consistent with interstitial deletion of p53 (17p13). However, we observed clonal evolution in that at 3 months from diagnosis, 70% of the patient cells exhibited a deletion of the p53 locus while 28% of the cells had a monosomy 17. This may be attributed to favored clonal expansion of the cells with the deletion of p53 (17p13). To resolve this issue we performed further interphase and metaphase FISH and found an unbalanced complex translocation resulting in LOH of 13q and 17p (der13 t(13;17)(q?;p?). In addition, we screened the remaining p53 gene for mutations by conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis (CSGE). PCR fragments showing abnormal CSGE-banding patterns (in exons 5 and 8) were further characterized by DNA sequence analysis and we identified a G to A splice site mutation generating an alternate splice site 21 bp into exon 5. This mutation results in a mutant protein lacking amino acids 126–132 in the DNA binding domain of p53. We observed no differences in the expression level of p53 mRNA as determined by RT-PCR analysis. We determined the effect of the deletion on p53 protein expression and function. We examined the effect of DNA damage induced by UV radiation on p53 protein levels in JMW cells, using the myeloma cell line H929 (expressing wildtype p53) as a positive control for expression. The JMW cells were exposed to UV radiation (20 J/m2) and the cells were harvested for western blot analysis 5 hours after UV damage. An increase in the level of p53 protein was observed in JMW as well as the H929 cells following UV treatment. We then investigated the activation of p53 downstream targets. The CDK inhibitor p21WAF1/CIP1 is a well-characterized p53 target that mediates G1 cell cycle arrest. Thus, we examined the levels of p21 protein following UV treatment of JMW and H929 cells. Strikingly, JMW cells lacked p21 expression in untreated cells as well as UV exposed cells suggesting that the characterized deletion in the DNA binding domain is an inactivating mutation. Conclusion: Abrogation of p53 function was observed in the JMW cells. Further analysis of the p53 pathway in JMW and other myeloma cell lines will provide an in depth understanding of the role of p53 in disease progression. The study of the p53 pathway in myeloma is highly relevant, as we have shown it to be associated with relapsing and aggressive disease, particularly with extramedullary myeloma. Our studies suggest that malignant plasma cells have the ability to survive outside of the bone marrow microenvironment but a p53 dependent checkpoint results in cell death. In clones with p53 defects the cells survive and result in extramedullary disease, including plasma cell leukemia.
A Phase II Study of PS-341 for Patients with High Risk, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E2A02).
Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable disease with a anticipated overall survival (OS) ranging from months to decades. Modest improvements in OS have been made with high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT), but to date prognostic factors have a greater impact on OS than do individual therapies. Patients with adverse risk factors such as elevated beta-2 microglobulin (B2M), plasma cell labeling index, deletions of the long arm of chromosome 13 by metaphase cytogenetics (del 13q) require innovative new treatment strategies. Bortezomib has significant activity in patients with both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory MM, but its specific role in patients with adverse features has not yet been defined. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed “high-risk” myeloma (B2M ≥ 5.5., PCLI ≥ 1, or del 13q) and adequate organ and functional status were eligible. Patients were treated with bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 day 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 21 days for 8 cycles as induction. After induction, patients were scheduled to receive bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 every other week indefinitely. Elective peripheral stem cell mobilization (growth factor alone) was allowed after 4 cycles of bortezomib. Patients relapsing on maintenance schedule were to have the full induction schedule resumed. Responses were by the EBMT criteria but a very good partial response category was included. The primary end-point was the response rate in these high-risk patients (90% power to detect a response rate of 50% or higher). The study decision rule requires that 16 or more responses, among 39 eligible patients, are seen in order to declare this treatment effective. Results: Between March 15, 2004 and March 10, 2005, 44 patients enrolled on study. Among the 43 eligible patients, median age was 63; 51% were male. All patients had high risk disease: del 13q (6/41); plasma cell labeling index ≥1% (16/34); and B2M≥5.5 (34/43). Preliminary response data are available for 18 of the 44 cases enrolled, of which 7 had partial response, 1 had minimal response, 1 had no response, 2 had progressive disease, and 5 were unevaluable. Among those patients completing induction therapy and with response information, the median number of cycles of therapy administered is 5, range (0,8). The most common non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or higher included hyponatremia (9 patients) and diarrhea (6 patients). Mild sensory peripheral neuropathy was common: grade 1, 16 patients; grade 2, 2 patients. Only 1 patient had grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. One patient died after receiving 2 doses bortezomib due to heart block and asystole. Two patients had a grade 4, 25 patients had grade 3, and 13 had grade 1 or 2 as the worst grade non-hematologic adverse event. Based on data received by August 1, 2005, 18 patients have gone off study: AEs (2); death (1); progressive disease (9); and other reasons (6). Updated results on the full study population along with FISH data for IgH translocations and deletions of 13q and 17p will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Preliminary results suggest that upfront bortezomib has activity in patients with high-risk MM, but further follow-up is required.
Genomic Analysis of High Hyperdiploid Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Hyperdiploid Multiple Myeloma Suggests Differential Gene Dosage Effect on Expression and Provide Clues to Preferential Selection of Recurrently Trisomic Chromosomes.
Abstract Hyperdiploid (>48 chromosomes) multiple myeloma (H-MM) and high hyperdiploid (>50 chromosomes) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (H-ALL) are characterized by aneuploidy and multiple recurrent trisomies (chromosome 3,5,7,9,11,15,19 for H-MM and chromosomes X,4,6,10,14,17,18,21 for H-ALL). Little is known about the oncogenic events, consequences of the trisomies and reasons for the different recurrent trisomies. In an attempt to answer these questions, we undertook a combined gene expression and network/pathway analysis approach. Gene expression data was generated using the Affymetrix U133A chip (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, Ca) for 53 H-MM and 37 non-hyperdiploid MM (NH-MM) cases using CD138-enriched plasma-cell RNA. Gene expression data using the same chip for ALL was obtained from previous published data (Ross ME et al Blood2004; 104: 3679–3687). Analysis was performed using Genespring 7 (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). By comparing the median expression of all genes on each chromosome between H-MM/H-ALL and their non-hyperdiploid counterparts (NH-MM and NH-ALL) for the 23 chromosomes (excluding Y), one can clearly identify the commonly trisomic chromosomes in H-ALL and H-MM. However, the relationship of gene expression was highly variable for H-MM and NH-MM as compared to H-ALL and NH-ALL which tended to have expression ratios close to 1 for the non-trisomic chromosomes. Sixty-nine percent of the differentially expressed genes generated by ANOVA analysis (p<0.001) in H-ALL were on the commonly trisomic chromosomes and were upregulated whereas the corresponding figure in H-MM is 40%. These similarities and differences probably reflect both an overall gene dosage effect and the different complexities of the karyotypes of H-MM and H-ALL compared to NH-MM and NH-ALL respectively (MM karyotypes are more complex, hence difference between H and NH-MM is greater and less confined to the trisomic chromosomes). We next performed network analysis using a curated web-based software (MetaCore, GeneGo Inc, St Joseph, MI) using the 2 sets of differentially expressed genes. Majority of genes differentially expressed in H-MM are involved in mRNA translation/protein synthesis whereas the genes differentially expressed in H-ALL were mainly involved in signal transduction. Therefore the transcriptional program that characterize the difference between H and NH-MM/ALL seem to recapitulate normal cellular function: protein synthesis in the mature secretory plasma cells and signal transduction in response to cytokines in a differentiating early-B cell. However, due to the concurrent deregulation of many genes on these trisomic chromosomes, these and other cellular programs are deregulated resulting in malignant transformation. We also intersected the 2 lists of differentially expressed genes to find genes that are up- or downregulated in both H-MM and H-ALL relative to the NH tumors. Thirteen genes including interferon response genes (TNFSF10, MX1, ZNF185) and transcription factors like RUNX1 were upregulated, whereas 13 genes including a cancer testis antigen gene (MAGED4) were downregulated in both H-MM and H-ALL. These genes may point to common oncogenic mechanisms.