Parikh, Niki

Abstract Introduction Intralesional Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH; Xiaflex; Endo Pharmaceuticals, Dublin, Ireland) is the only FDA-approved intralesional therapy to treat bothersome penile curvature in men with Peyronie’s Disease (PD). Clinicians who administer CCH must be certified through a risk evaluation and management strategy (REMS) program. However, provider availability is highly dependent on geography and many patients must travel great distances to undergo evaluation and treatment with CCH by an experienced injector. Objective The goal of the current study is to describe the landscape of certified CCH injectors with respect to location and clinical background/training. Methods Patients are currently able to use an online “locate a specialist” tool through Endo Pharmaceuticals to identify clinicians in their local geographic area who are certified to administer CCH. Using this tool, a list of all providers who offer CCH injections was compiled throughout the continental United States. Pertinent information that was gathered included geographic location, type of provider or level of training [Medical Doctor (MD), Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO), Physician Assistant (PA), Nurse Practitioner (NP), and Registered Nurse (RN)], and gender of providers. This information was compared to state population data (United State Census Bureau) to determine per capita coverage. Results A total of 1947 Xiaflex providers were identified: 1749 Doctors of Medicine (MD; 90%), 115 Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO; 6%), 60 Physician Assistants (PA; 3%), 21 Nurse Practitioners (NP; 1%), and 1 Registered Nurse (RN; 0.05%). Out of the 1947 providers, only 95 (4.9%) were women. Most women administering Xiaflex were MDs (73%), followed by PAs (12%), NP and DOs (7%), and RN (1%). Xiaflex providers were available in all states except for Hawaii and Alaska. Providers were distributed throughout the United States with the average provider per capita ratio of 230,240. Wyoming, Washington D.C., Rhode Island, and Georgia had the best provider per capita at <10,000 while New Mexico had the worst provider per capita ratio at 2,117,522. Conclusions Our results show significant variation in certified CCH injector availability for patients across the United States. < 5% of all certified clinicians are female and 4% were advanced practice providers. Further work is needed to characterize and remedy gender disparities amongst providers, and ensure greater access for patients who desire an FDA-approved non-surgical treatment for their PD-associated curvature. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction The transgender population has largely been marginalized by society, causing inequities in health care delivery. The dearth of provider knowledge on transgender health issues further exacerbates these disparities. Objective A survey of the transgender population was conducted to help call attention to the often-overlooked aspect of care: fertility preservation prior to hormone therapy or gender affirmation surgery. Methods A survey of 65 transgender individuals was conducted, with participants recruited through Reddit transgender groups and local transgender associations, to assess their knowledge regarding fertility preservation and their experience with healthcare providers. Results were compiled and analysis was performed. Results Out of the 65 individuals who responded to the survey, approximately 88% were between the ages of 18 and 39. Seventy-four percent were assigned male gender at birth and 26% female. Sixty-two percent of individuals identified as female, 20% as male, and 18% as gender non-conforming. Only 35% of individuals had ever been cared for in a multidisciplinary transgender clinic. Interestingly, while 100% of surveyed individuals were aware that fertility would be irreversibly lost after hormonal or surgical affirmation surgery and 43% believed this to be an important issue, only 46% had any health care providers discuss fertility preservation options with them. Conclusions Hormonal therapy and gender affirming procedures affect the long-term reproductive potential of transgender individuals. While oncofertility is a prominent area of discussion, transgender care is still lagging. With an increase in medical and surgical therapy in younger individuals, health care providers must discuss fertility preservation options prior to affirmation therapy. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction Women in healthcare are faced with unique challenges that may increase the risk of infertility including irregular work hours, occupational hazards due to radiation or chemicals, and advanced maternal age. Objective We therefore sought to investigate live birth rates of female healthcare workers presenting with infertility compared to their non-healthcare counterparts. Methods After obtaining IRB approval, a retrospective review of hospital employees and partners presenting for a fertility evaluation between 2013-2019 was conducted. Patient age, BMI, history of previous live birth, occupation, use of assisted reproductive technology and female fertility factor were recorded. Couples with at least 12 months of follow up from initial presentation as well as a documented semen analysis were included in the study. Normal semen parameters were defined by the World Health Organization 2010 criteria. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with increased likelihood of live birth. Results Of the 934 female partners identified, 445 were healthcare workers and 489 non-healthcare workers. Female age, BMI, smoking status, and history of previous live birth were not statistically significant between groups. No differences in male partner age, BMI, semen parameters and presence of male factor were noted. As an overall group, female age, male age, and abnormal concentration were noted to impact live birth rates (p<0.016). Live birth rates were higher in female health care workers compared to non-healthcare workers, 76.1 vs. 69.6%, respectively, p=0.042. The cohort was then further analyzed to determine if there was a difference in between females holding a Doctor of Medicine (MD) and other medical occupations (91 MDs vs 357 other occupations). Live birth rates, pregnancy complications, and preterm labor were not statistically significant, however MDs were found to have higher rates of use of assisted reproductive technologies (IUI or IVF) and were more likely to be older at time of evaluation (p=0.0015). After controlling for age at delivery, female physicians were still more likely to utilize ARTs, but this was no longer statistically significant (p=0.0806). Conclusions In this cohort of hospital employees, female healthcare workers had a higher live birth rate despite no differences in age, BMI, female factor infertility, use of assisted reproductive technology, or male partner factors. However, when the subgroup of female hospital employees was further analyzed, MDs were noted to have higher use of assisted reproductive technologies and older age. This indicates increased difficulty achieving pregnancy, likely a reflection of advanced maternal age. Further research is needed to identify subgroups within the healthcare population that may be at greater risk for infertility. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction Physicians may be subjected to grueling work hours, sleep deprivation, and a stressful work environment during their prime reproductive years. While attention to fertility among female physicians has garnered interest in recent years, little is known about the fertility of their male colleagues. Objective In this study we sought to compare semen parameters of male physicians presenting for a fertility evaluation compared to their non-physician counterparts. Methods Upon IRB approval, a retrospective review of all hospital employed individuals (or their partners) who underwent a semen analysis between 2013-2019 was performed. Post-vasectomy semen analysis patients were excluded. Baseline patient demographics including age, comorbidities, occupation, and BMI were recorded. Normal semen parameters were defined by the World Health Organization 2010 criteria. A comparison analysis of semen analysis parameters, baseline characteristics, and comorbidities was conducted with a significant p-value defined as <0.05. Results Of the 169 physicians and 438 non-physicians identified, physicians were more likely to have a lower BMI (median 25.8 vs. 28.0, p<0.0001) when compared to their non-physician counterparts. Physicians were less likely to have ADHD, depression, obstructive sleep apnea, malignancy, alcohol abuse, and history of smoking (p<0.05). Physicians had better semen parameters including pH, concentration, motility, volume, and morphology (p<0.05), with a greater sperm concentration (68.4 vs. 52.2 million/mL, p<0.0001) and higher total motile sperm count (125 vs. 86.4 million, p<0.0001) compared to non-physicians. However, male physicians were more likely to be older at time of semen analysis (33.8 versus 32.7 years, p<0.05), more likely to utilize assisted reproductive technology (IVF and IUI, p=0.0277), have older female partners (p=0.0053), and have older female partners at time of delivery (p=0.0124). Conclusions In this study we report, for the first time, semen parameters of physicians compared to non-physicians. Physicians had a significantly higher total motile sperm count and sperm concentration; however, they were older at time of semen analysis, more likely to utilize ART, and more likely to have older female partners. While physicians may be healthier, this may indicate increased difficulty achieving pregnancy. Patient care is directly impacted by the health and safety provided to their physicians. As the paradigm in the medical field shifts from caring only for our patients to caring for ourselves, fertility amongst male physicians warrants further investigation. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction The transgender population has long been marginalized by society. Societal stigmata, fear to seek care, and dearth of provider knowledge regarding transgender health issues has caused disparities to widen. Objective The purpose of this case study is to call to attention the often-overlooked aspect of pediatric transgender care: the importance of fertility preservation prior to instituting gender-affirming therapy. Methods Twenty-one genetically XY females, followed by their multidisciplinary transgender care teams, were interested in starting hormone therapy due to impending onset and/or progression of puberty. Fortunately for these patients, their physicians were aware of fertility struggles after undergoing hormone therapy. Results Sperm cryopreservation via open gonadal biopsy, testicular tissue cryopreservation (TTC), and semen sample (when age/maturity-appropriate) were discussed. Though requiring surgery, biopsy/TTC relieves patients of the psychological impact of semen sample production. With IRB approval, 20 patients (median age 12 years, range 10-16 years) underwent TTC (Figure 1). One patient (age 16 years) opted for semen sample. All patients had success with spermatogonial stem cells cryopreserved for future patient use. Conclusions Gender affirming procedures and hormone therapy affect the long-term reproductive potential of transgender individuals. While cost concerns and insurance coverage regarding oncofertility is a prominent area of discussion, the transgender community is often excluded. With more individuals beginning medical and surgical therapy at a younger age, fertility preservation discussions are essential but often overlooked, depriving these individuals the joy of becoming a biological parent. As health care providers, addressing psychological, emotional, physical, and spiritual needs of patients is crucial, and fertility is a key aspect of this care. TTC can be safely done in pediatric populations, though research is necessary to expand beyond current experimental stage of tissue-development. Disclosure No

Abstract To determine effects of sexual health curriculum (SHC) in medical school on future urology specialty and subspecialty selection, residents, fellows, and practicing urologists completed a 15-question survey regarding their exposure to SHC during medical school, topics covered, and the influence of mentors in career choice. 95 respondents, primarily post-graduate year 4 and 5 (46%), completed the survey. Approximately 50% recalled dedicated SHC during medical school with 46% planning to pursue fellowship training in sexual medicine/reconstruction. Topics commonly covered included reproductive anatomy/physiology and sexual history-taking, while respondents rarely recalled topics such as sexual aids/toys and pornography. Only 25% felt SHC provided an adequate fund of knowledge to address patient’s sexual health concerns, and only 14% believed SHC influenced their decision to pursue urology. Individuals pursuing fellowship were more likely to have an attending mentor, a mentor with expertise in sexual dysfunction, and considered their mentor as important or very important in their decision to subspecialize (p<0.05). Most urology trainees do not have strong exposure to SHC during medical school and cite mentorship as more important in the decision to pursue subspecialty training. These data support the need for a standardized formal SHC and continued exposure to sexual health experts during training.

ABSTRACT Introduction Women in healthcare are faced with unique challenges that may increase their risk of infertility including irregular work hours, occupational hazards due to radiation or chemicals, and advanced maternal age. Objective We sought to investigate live birth rates of female healthcare workers presenting with infertility compared to their non-healthcare counterparts. Methods After obtaining IRB approval, a retrospective review of all hospital employees (and their partners) presenting for a fertility evaluation between 2013-2019 was conducted. Patient age, BMI, history of previous live birth, occupation, use of assisted reproductive technology and female fertility factor were recorded. Couples with at least 12 months of follow up from initial presentation as well as a documented semen analysis were included in the study. Normal semen parameters were defined by the World Health Organization 2010 criteria. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with increased likelihood of live birth. Results Of the 934 female partners identified, 445 were healthcare workers and 489 non-healthcare workers. Female age, female BMI, smoking status, and history of previous live birth were not statistically significant between groups. No differences in male partner age, male BMI, semen parameters and presence of male factor were noted. Live birth rate was greater in female health care workers compared to non-healthcare workers, 76.1 vs. 69.6%, respectively, p=0.042. Conclusions In this cohort of hospital employees, female healthcare workers had a higher live birth rate despite no differences in age, BMI, rate of female factor infertility, use of assisted reproductive technology, or male partner factors. While no differences in fertility were noted for female health care workers in this study, further research is needed to identify subgroups within the healthcare population that may be at greater risk for infertility. Disclosure No