Agboton, Christian

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut selective, monoclonal anti-α4β7 integrin antibody approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD) and is available in subcutaneous (SC) formulation. This analysis assessed the long-term safety outcomes of specific interest to the SC formulation of VDZ. Methods Patients (pts) who participated in VISIBLE 1 or VISIBLE 2 were eligible to enrol in VISIBLE OLE (NCT02620046). In VISIBLE 1, pts with UC were treated with placebo, VDZ SC or VDZ intravenous (IV). In VISIBLE 2, pts with CD were treated with placebo or VDZ SC. In VISIBLE OLE, pts received VDZ SC 108mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or weekly. Pts received training on SC administration, and most injections were conducted at home by pt or caregiver. Safety of VDZ SC included assessing anti-VDZ antibody (AVA) status and injection site reaction (ISR) adverse events. Blood specimens for AVA assessment were collected 30 minutes before dosing every 16 weeks, at the final dose and the final safety visit 18 weeks after last dose. Data were assessed by treatment pts received during VISIBLE 1 and 2. Results Overall, 288 pts with UC and 458 pts with CD enrolled in VISIBLE OLE. A mean of 91.1 and 74.2 SC injections were completed by pts with UC and CD, respectively, during the OLE. Among pts with UC, the positive AVA rate was higher in pts previously treated with placebo (17.3%) than those treated with VDZ SC (3.4%) or IV (2.6%) (Table 1). The positive AVA rate was also higher among pts with CD previously treated with placebo (11.4%) than with VDZ SC (1.8%). A total of 14/288 pts (4.9%) with UC reported ISRs (Table 2), most of which were mild and none were serious. Two pts developed moderate ISRs; neither required dose modification and both were resolved. Overall, 19/458 pts (4.1%) with CD reported ISRs (Table 2). The majority of ISRs were mild, 2 were moderate and none were severe, and none required dose modification. No direct correlation between AVA status and ISRs was identified, with 11/14 pts (78.6%) with UC and 17/19 pts (89.5%) with CD who reported ISRs being AVA negative. All 5 pts who were AVA positive and reported an ISR had previously received placebo. The highest rate of ISRs were in pts who received placebo in VISIBLE 1 (13.5%). Conclusion No new long-term safety events were identified with the VDZ SC route of administration compared to IV, except for ISRs. A higher proportion of patients who had previously been treated with placebo than those treated with VDZ during VISIBLE 1 and 2 were AVA positive during VISIBLE OLE, supporting a benefit of continued therapy with VDZ SC after IV induction, rather than cessation of treatment for a period of time.

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut selective, monoclonal anti-α4β7 integrin antibody approved for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD). The subcutaneous (SC) formulation of VDZ was evaluated during the Phase 3 VISIBLE 1 and 2 studies. We report the long-term efficacy among patients (pts) with UC or CD treated with VDZ SC in the VISIBLE open-label extension (OLE) study. Methods Pts with UC or CD in VISIBLE 1/2 could enrol in VISIBLE OLE (NCT02620046). Pts in VISIBLE 1/2 who completed 52 weeks(W) of treatment with VDZ or placebo (randomised completers) and pts without clinical response at W6 who responded at W14 (non-randomised responders) received VDZ SC 108mg every 2W (Q2W) in the OLE. Pts with worsening disease were escalated to QW dosing. Clinical remission (partial Mayo score ≤2, no subscore >1 in UC; HBI score ≤4 in CD) up to W168 was assessed (pts with missing data or escalated to QW dosing were imputed as non-response, irrespective of clinical status). The number of pts who regained clinical response when escalated to QW dosing was also assessed. Results were summarized by prior VISIBLE 1/2 treatment groups. Results Data from 231 pts with UC and 344 pts with CD were included. In pts with UC, baseline OLE clinical remission rates were 55.0%, 91.3% and 77.1% among randomised completers (N=124) previously treated with placebo, VDZ SC and VDZ IV in VISIBLE 1, respectively. At W168, 40.0%, 56.5% and 62.9%, respectively, were in clinical remission on Q2W dosing. In non-randomised responders with UC (N=107), 57.0% were in clinical remission at baseline and 29.9% at W168 (Figure). In pts with CD, baseline OLE clinical remission rates were 60.3% and 62.0% among randomised completers (N=226) previously treated with placebo and VDZ SC in VISIBLE 2. At W168, 32.4% and 37.3% were in clinical remission on Q2W dosing. In non-randomised responders with CD (N=118), 57.6% were in clinical remission at baseline and 27.1% at W168 (Figure). In pts with UC escalated to QW dosing, 22.2% and 38.1% achieved clinical remission and response at W8 after transitioning to QW. Among pts with CD escalated to QW dosing, 38.6% and 53.5% achieved clinical remission and response by W8 after transitioning to QW. Higher rates of remission and response were noted in VDZ completers than non-randomised responders. No new long-term safety signals were noted with VDZ SC vs IV, except for injection site reactions. Conclusion The clinical benefit of VDZ SC was maintained long-term during VISIBLE OLE. A subset of pts who escalated to QW dosing regained response. Findings support VDZ SC as a treatment option for patients with UC or CD who require long-term maintenance therapy.

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut selective, monoclonal anti-α4β7 integrin antibody approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD). The subcutaneous (SC) formulation of VDZ was evaluated during the Phase 3 VISIBLE 1 and 2 studies. This analysis reports hospitalisations and surgeries among patients (pts) with UC or CD treated with VDZ SC enrolled in the VISIBLE open-label extension (OLE) study. Methods Pts who participated in VISIBLE 1 or VISIBLE 2 were eligible to enrol in VISIBLE OLE (NCT02620046) and received VDZ SC 108mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or weekly. Patients were grouped according to their scenario in VISIBLE 1/2: Pts who withdrew between week (W) 6 and W52 (Scenario 1); pts who completed 52 weeks of treatment with VDZ or placebo (Scenario 2); pts without a clinical response at W6 but who responded at W14 and were not randomised (Scenario 3). The proportions of patients who experienced UC or CD related hospitalisation and/or surgery during VISIBLE OLE were assessed by scenario and treatment received during VISIBLE 1/2. Results A total of 288 pts with UC and 458 with CD enrolled in the VISIBLE OLE. The mean (min., max.) duration of VDZ exposure during VISIBLE OLE was 1276.7 days (127, 2577 days) among pts with UC and 1110.0 days (127, 2770 days) among pts with CD. The proportions of pts who had a UC or CD related hospitalisation or surgery during VISIBLE OLE are displayed in Table 1. Across all scenarios, a total of 8.3% (24/288) of pts with UC had a related hospitalisation. In total, 3/288 pts (1.0%) with UC (from Scenarios 1 and 3) had a colectomy. No pts with UC from Scenario 2 had a colectomy. Among pts with CD, a total of 13.1% (60/458) had a related hospitalisation. A total of 19 pts (4.1%) with CD had bowel surgery. Higher rates of IBD related hospitalisations and surgeries were observed in Scenario 1, both in pts with UC and with CD. Conclusion Findings from VISIBLE OLE showed that few pts with UC and CD treated with long-term VDZ SC required IBD related hospitalisations over the course of the study. Notably, very few patients with UC or CD required colectomies or bowel surgery.

Abstract Background Use of inflammatory biomarkers is common practice in ulcerative colitis (UC) management1. This study examined the utility of faecal calprotectin (FCP), C-reactive protein (CRP), and albumin biomarkers and their combination, for predicting outcomes of clinical remission and disease control (composite of clinical, endoscopic and histologic disease activity measures2) in patients (pts) with UC under therapy with vedolizumab (VDZ) or adalimumab (ADA) in the VARSITY study. Methods VARSITY was a phase 3b, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control trial evaluating VDZ (anti-α 4β 7 integrin) vs ADA (anti-tumour necrosis factor-α) treatment in pts aged 18–85 years with moderate-to-severe UC (NCT02497469; EudraCT:2015-000939-33). Pts received either VDZ IV infusions (300 mg) on Day 1 and at Weeks (WKs) 2, 6, 14, 22, 30, 38, and 46 or ADA SC injections (40 mg), total dose 160 mg at WK1, 80 mg at WK2, and 40 mg every 2 weeks thereafter until WK50. In this post hoc analysis of data from 769 pts, the probability of clinical remission (total Mayo score ≤2, no subscore >1) and disease control (pt-reported outcome-2 [PRO2, Mayo subscores of stool frequency and rectal bleeding]; Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1 [endoscopic improvement], and Robarts Histopathology Index score <5, [absence of histologic active disease]) were assessed at WK52 based on baseline and WK14 levels of dichotomized FCP (high-risk: ≥100 µg/g), CRP (high-risk: ≥5mg/L), and albumin (high-risk: <45 g/L) including the composite of high-risk CRP and FCP termed ‘inflammatory burden’ (IB). Results In comparison with biomarkers measured at baseline, FCP at WK14 was the most predictive of WK52 clinical remission after VDZ or ADA treatment3; WK14 FCP was also predictive of disease control using a combined endpoint of PRO2, endoscopy and histologic remission/response. VDZ-treated pts with low-risk FCP (<100 µg/g) at WK14 had a 76% chance of achieving WK52 clinical remission vs 35% for pts with high-risk FCP (70% vs 33% for ADA-treated pts with low and high-risk FCP, respectively). VDZ-treated pts with IB (high-risk levels of FCP and CRP) at WK14 had a 16% chance of clinical remission at WK52 vs a 57% probability for this endpoint in pts without IB at WK14; the risk difference for this composite biomarker was 42% (Table). Conclusion The addition of CRP to FCP as a composite biomarker of IB at WK14 after treatment initiation can be a useful negative predictor of pts who are likely to achieve significant long-term benefits, including remission and disease control, with VDZ or ADA treatment. References 1. Turner D, et al. Gastroenterology 2021;160(5):1570-38. 2. Danese S, et al. J Crohn’s Colitis 2021;15(Suppl1):S305–S305. 3. Dulai PS, et al. Gastroenterology 2021;160(6):S-46–7.

Abstract Background and Aims To report results from VISIBLE 2, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial evaluating a new subcutaneous [SC] vedolizumab formulation as maintenance treatment in adults with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease [CD]. Methods Following open-label vedolizumab 300 mg intravenous induction therapy at Weeks 0 and 2, Week 6 clinical responders (≥70-point decrease in CD Activity Index [CDAI] score from baseline) were randomised 2:1 to receive double-blind maintenance vedolizumab 108 mg SC or placebo every 2 weeks until Week 50. Assessments at Week 52 included clinical remission [primary endpoint; CDAI ≤150], enhanced clinical response [≥100-point decrease in CDAI from baseline], corticosteroid-free clinical remission among patients using a corticosteroid at baseline, clinical remission in anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF]-naïve patients, and safety. Results Following vedolizumab intravenous induction, 275 patients were randomised to vedolizumab SC and 135 to placebo maintenance. At Week 52, 48.0% of patients receiving vedolizumab SC versus 34.3% receiving placebo were in clinical remission [p = 0.008]. Enhanced clinical response at Week 52 was achieved by 52.0% versus 44.8% of patients receiving vedolizumab SC versus placebo, respectively [p = 0.167]. At Week 52, 45.3% and 18.2% of patients receiving vedolizumab SC and placebo, respectively, were in corticosteroid-free clinical remission, and 48.6% of anti-TNF-naïve patients receiving vedolizumab SC and 42.9% receiving placebo were in clinical remission. Injection site reaction was the only new safety finding observed for vedolizumab SC [2.9%]. Conclusions Vedolizumab SC is an effective and safe maintenance therapy in patients with CD who responded to two infusions of vedolizumab intravenous induction therapy.

Abstract Background In VARSITY, the first head-to-head randomized controlled trial of biologics, vedolizumab (VDZ) was superior vs adalimumab (ADA) in achieving clinical remission (CR) at Week 52 in patients (pts) with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC).1 Current treatment goals in UC are based on clinical symptoms and endoscopy, with histologic improvement considered an aspirational goal.2-4 In pts with CR in VARSITY, greater treatment differences between VDZ and ADA at Week 52 were seen in endoscopic improvement and histologic response. Here, data from VARSITY were used to define disease clearance: a novel composite outcome in UC comprising clinical and endoscopic remission plus minimal histologic disease activity. Methods VARSITY was a phase 3b, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control trial of treatment with VDZ (300mg IV Q8W) vs ADA (40mg SC Q2W) maintenance after induction. Pts were randomized in a treat through design, and no dose escalation was allowed. For these analyses, based on pts who completed the study until Week 52, disease clearance was defined as a composite outcome based on 1) CR: partial Mayo score ≤2 and no individual subscore >1 (excluding sigmoidoscopy subscore); 2) endoscopic improvement: endoscopic subscore ≤1; and 3) absence of active histologic disease (minimum histological disease activity [MHDA]): Robarts Histology Index (RHI) <5. Treatment failure was defined as discontinuation from treatment or completion of treatment but failure to achieve any of CR, endoscopic improvement, or MHDA. The rates of disease clearance and failures were compared between treatment groups and stratified by presence of inflammatory burden at baseline: C-reactive protein ≥5 mg/L and fecal calprotectin >100 µg/g. Results More pts in the VDZ treatment group than the ADA group achieved disease clearance at Week 52 (VDZ: 112/383, 29.2%, 95% CI 24.7-34.1 vs ADA: 63/386, 16.3%, 95% CI 12.8-20.4). Compared with treatment failures (VDZ: 92/383, 24.0% vs ADA: 134/386, 34.7%, Table 1), disease clearers had lower C-reactive protein (CRP) baseline mean values (7.4mg/L and 6.4mg/L vs 13.6mg/L and 9.4mg/L for disease clearers vs treatment failures, for VDZ and ADA, respectively). Fewer pts with inflammatory burden at baseline (CRP ≥5 mg/L and fecal calprotectin >100 µg/g) achieved disease clearance (Fig 1). Baseline corticosteroid use was more frequent in ADA disease clearers (42.9%) compared with VDZ disease clearers (32.1%). Conclusion Disease clearance is a novel and achievable composite outcome that is achieved by almost one third of pts in the VDZ treatment group in VARSITY. Analyses are ongoing to further characterize the trajectory leading to disease clearance as well as the role of baseline characteristics.