Inwards, David J.

Abstract Abstract 684 Background. Obesity has been associated with an increased risk of developing of lymphoma, particularly DLBCL. Genetic variation in several energy balance genes, including leptin (LEP), its receptor LEPR, ghrelin (GHRL) and neuropeptide Y (NPY) have been shown to modulate risk of lymphoma, although their impact on survival is not known. In contrast, recent studies suggest that patients either overweight (Body Mass Index (BMI), 25 to<30 kg/m2) or obese (≥30 kg/m2) may have a superior prognosis in DLBCL, although its impact in FL and in the current treatment era is not known. We evaluated the association of BMI at the time of diagnosis, 2 years prior to diagnosis and at ages 18, 35 and 50 years, along with germline genetic variation in selected energy balance genes with event-free (EFS) and overall (OS) survival in DLBCL and FL. Methods. We evaluated these associations in a prospective cohort of newly diagnosed DLBCL (N=764) and FL (N=649) patients enrolled at the Mayo Clinic and University of Iowa from 2002–2009 as part of the Molecular Epidemiology Resource. Peripheral blood DNA, clinical data and self-reported historical weights were collected at enrollment. Patients received standard disease treatment strategies, and were systematically followed for disease progression, re-treatment, and death. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped as part of a custom Illumina iSelect panel. The most prevalent homozygous genotype was used as the reference group, and each SNP was modeled as having a log-additive effect in the regression model. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of the obesity measures and SNPs with outcome, adjusted for treatment class and subtype specific prognostic factors (IPI, FLIPI). Results. For DLBCL patients (median age 63 years, range 18–92) the median follow-up was 47 months (range 0–101); 58% had an IPI 0–1 risk disease; and 87% received immunochemotherapy. For FL patients (median age 60 years, range 25–94), the median follow-up was 60 months (range 11–110); 24% had FLIPI score 3–5; and main initial treatments were observation (32%), rituximab (R)-monotherapy (12%), CVP +/−R (19%), and anthracycline +/−R (22%). The main results for BMI and prognosis are reported in the Table. For DLBCL, obese patients at diagnosis had better EFS and OS; this association was weaker for BMI at age 50 and 35 years. In contrast, for FL, overweight and obese patients at diagnosis had a poorer EFS and OS, and this was also observed for BMIs two years before diagnosis and at ages 50 and 35 years. In FL, the LEP SNP rs2167270 was associated with inferior EFS (HR=1.25; 95%CI 1.05–1.49) and OS (HR=1.28; 95%CI 0.90–1.83). The NPYSNP rs16147 was associated with inferior FL OS (HR=1.50; 95%CI 1.03–2.17) but was not associated with EFS. None of the energy balance and metabolism SNPs were associated with DLBCL EFS or OS. Conclusions. Higher BMI prior to and at diagnosis, as well as SNPs in LEP and NPY,were significantly associated with FL prognosis, with inferior outcomes in overweight and obese patients. These novel findings in the modern treatment era suggest an important role of obesity pathways in FL prognosis. In DLBCL, we confirm the recent findings of improved survival in DLBCL in obese patients, and extend this to the modern treatment era and BMI earlier in life. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 1669 Poster Board I-695 Background The addition of rituximab to chemotherapy significantly improved the results of therapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin's B cell lymphoma (NHL). However, significant number of the patients relapse following initial therapy. Lenalidomide was shown to have significant single agent activity in relapsed aggressive B cell lymphoma (J Clin Oncol 26:4952-7, 2008) however the safety in combination with standard first line immunochemotherapy is unknown. We initiated a phase I/II trial of R2-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, prednisone rituximab and lenalidomide) to establish the safety and efficacy of this therapy in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed aggressive B cell NHL. Herein, we report the results of phase I portion of this study. Methods A phase I study was designed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of lenalidomide administered on days 1-10 with R-CHOP chemotherapy (rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2, all on day 1, prednisone 100 mg/m2 days 1-5 of 21 day cycle) utilizing 3+3 dose escalation design. Lenalidomide dose escalation levels were 15 mg, 20 mg and 25 mg. All patients received 6 mg pegfilgrastim injection on day 2. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade 3 or more non-hematological toxicity or a hematological toxicity requiring a delay of the next cycle of chemotherapy due to cytopenia. The latter criterion was to ensure maintenance of the dose intensity and schedule of RCHOP; a potentially curative therapy in this setting. Eligible patients were adults newly diagnosed with CD20 positive diffuse large cell or follicular grade III B cell lymphoma, ECOG PS 0-2 and good organ function. There was no upper age restriction to participate in this study. Results Twelve patients were enrolled in phase I of this study. The median age was 69 years (range, 49-82) and 58% (7/12) of patients were males. Ten patients (83%) had DLBCL and two (17%) patients had follicular grade 3B lymphoma. International prognostic index was intermediate, high- intermediate and high in 6, 4 and 2 patients respectively. Patients distribution by lenalidomide dose was: 3 patients received 15 mg/day, 3 received 20 mg/day and 6 received 25 mg/day on days 1-10. Non-hematological toxicities included: grade 3 toxicity - neuropathy in one patient (8.3%), grade 2 toxicities were: infection in 17% (2/12) patients (skin in one patient, otitis media, and urinary tract infection in one patient); nausea 8% (1/12), rash 8% (1/12) and alopecia 41% (5/12). The most common toxicity to R2-CHOP was myelosuppresion. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 17% (2/12) and 41% (5/12) of patients, respectively. The neutropenia was of short duration, and no patients developed neutropenic complications. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia was seen in 8% (1/12). Most importantly, there were no delays in chemotherapy due to cytopenias. No DLT was seen. The 25 mg/day days 1-10 dose of lenalidomide was taken forward to an ongoing phase 2 trial. Conclusion Lenalidomide at a dose of 25 mg/day for days 1- 10 combined with R-CHOP chemotherapy is well tolerated. The addition of lenalidomide did not affect hematological recovery and did not result in treatment delays. This dose and schedule is now being evaluated in the phase II part of the trial. Disclosures Zent: Genentech, Bayer, Genzyme, Novartis: Research Funding. Witzig:Novartis: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 443 Background: MYC translocations have been reported to have inferior outcome in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Here we present MYC translocation prevalence and outcome from two cohorts of newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated in the chemotherapy (C) and immunochemotherapy (IC) eras. Methods: Tissue microarrays were created from 302 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients evaluated at the Mayo Clinic with availabel paraffin tissue. 233 DLBCL patients first diagnosed from March 1986-July 2001 were retrospectively identified based on a diagnosis of DLBCL and treatment with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. 69 DLBCL patients diagnosed from March 2002-October 2005 and treated with immunochemotherapy were prospectively enrolled in the University of Iowa / Mayo Clinic Lymphoma SPORE Molecular Epidemiology Resource. Central pathology review was performed on all samples to confirm the diagnosis of DLBCL. Interphase FISH was performed using a breakapart strategy for MYC and BCL6 gene regions and a dual fusion strategy for t(14;18)(IGH&/BCL2). Results: Chemotherapy (C) era patients were primarily treated with CHOP (88%); immunochemotherapy (IC) era patients were all treated with an R-CHOP based regimen. The median age at diagnosis was 65 years (range, 22-92) for C patients and 65 years (range, 20-82) for IC patients. Median follow-up for C patients was 11.3 years (range, 2.7-21.3) with 145 (62%) deaths; for IC patients, the median follow-up was 5.0 years (range, 2.1-6.4) with 17 deaths (25%). FISH was successful in 195 of 302 patients (65%). MYC translocations were identified in 6 of 141 C patients (4%) and 3 of 54 IC patients (6%). MYC translocations were associated with inferior overall survival in the C patients (p=0.001), the IC patients (p=0.04), and in the combined group (p≤0.001). Median survival of patients with MYC translocations was 19 months and 16 months for C and IC respectively, compared to 112 months (C) and unreached (IC) for DLBCL patients without MYC translocations. 4 of the 9 MYC translocation patients had a double hit (2 with both MYC and BCL2 translocations and 2 with translocations of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6). Associations of MYC and outcome remained significant in all patients after adjusting for treatment and IPI (p<0.05). Conclusions: MYC translocations are present in approximately 5% of DLBCL patients and are associated with poor outcome in patients treated with C or IC. New treatment approaches are needed for DLBCL patients with MYC translocations. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 1665 Poster Board I-691 Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive, incurable B-cell malignancy that represents approximately 6% of lymphoma cases. Patients with MCL who relapse after conventional therapy or stem cell transplantation have a poor prognosis and are candidates for treatment with novel agents. The characteristic feature of MCL is overexpression of cyclin D1. Cyclin D1 is under the control of the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase signal-transduction pathway and is downstream of the mammalian target of rapamycin kinase (mTOR). We have previously shown that temsirolimus (CCI-779), a dihydroester of the selective mTOR inhibitor rapamycin, is an active antitumor agent in MCL. In previous phase 2 trials of temsirolimus as a single agent, we observed a 40% overall response rate (ORR) with a median duration of response (DR) of 6 months in patients with relapsed or refractory disease (J Clin Oncol 23:5347-56, 2005; Cancer 113:508-514, 2008). Due to the fact that rituximab has improved the response rate and overall outcome of lymphoma patients when combined with chemotherapy, we tested the efficacy and toxicity of temsirolimus in combination with rituximab in patients with MCL. Eligible patients with confirmed relapsed or refractory MCL based on morphologic and phenotypic features received temsirolimus 25 mg intravenously every week and four weekly doses of rituximab with the first cycle and then one dose of rituximab every other cycle. Patients with a tumor response after six cycles were eligible to continue treatment for a total of 12 cycles or two cycles after complete remission, and were then observed without maintenance. Seventy-one patients were enrolled between May 2005 and March 2009. The median age was 67 years (range, 44 to 86 years), with 51 males and 20 females enrolled. Patients had received a median of two prior therapies (range, 1-9), 31% had received a prior stem cell transplant and 28% were rituximab refractory. The ORR was 48% (34/71 patients) with 20% (14/71) complete responses and 28% (20/71) partial responses. The median DR was 9.5 months (95% CI, 4.5 to 11.3 months). The median DR in the rituximab sensitive patients was 9.5 months (CI: 4.5-11.6) and 7.15 months (CI: 4.1-11.3) in the rituximab refractory patients (p= 0.73). While the combination was generally well tolerated, 12 patients experienced grade 4 toxicity and 2 patients died while on therapy – both from progressive disease. Hematologic toxicities were the most common, with 5 patients having grade 4 thrombocytopenia and 3 having grade 4 neutropenia. This study demonstrates that temsirolimus in combination with rituximab is well tolerated and has substantial antitumor activity in relapsed MCL. Further comparative studies of this combination in MCL are therefore warranted. Disclosures Witzig: Wyeth: Patents & Royalties.

SummaryIbrutinib‐related data in Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM) remain sparse, particularly outside of trials. We report on 80 patients [previously treated, n = 67 (84%), treatment‐naïve, n = 13 (16%)] with WM, evaluated consecutively at Mayo Clinic, who received ibrutinib off‐study after its approval in 2015 for WM. Overall response rate (ORR) was 91%; major‐response rate (MRR) was 78%. The median time to first response and best response was 2·9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2–4] and 5·7 (95% CI: 4–12) months, respectively. The median follow‐up was 19 (95% CI: 14–21) months; 18‐month progression‐free survival (PFS) was 82%. The median time on therapy was 12·5 (95% CI: 9·3–16·7) months, and the median duration‐of‐response was 32 (range: 23–32) months. Twenty‐five patients (31%) had discontinued therapy at last follow‐up (68% due to treatment‐related toxicities) and 18% of patients required dose reduction. Fatigue (12%) and atrial‐fibrillation (11%) were common non‐haematological toxicities. IgM rebound occurred in 36% of patients who abruptly discontinued ibrutinib. Following ibrutinib discontinuation, 84% of patients received subsequent treatment, achieving an ORR of 57% and MRR of 50%. The median PFS from commencement of subsequent salvage therapy was 18 months. Ibrutinib therapy, outside of clinical trials, is effective in WM, but is associated with toxicities and challenges, including IgM rebound and a high drug discontinuation rate for reasons other than disease progression.