Go, Ronald S.

Introduction The discovery of MAPK/ERK pathway mutations has revolutionized the care for patients with histiocytic neoplasms. However, mutational analysis on biopsy specimens is often limited by low tumor cellularity leading to testing failure or disease involvement of difficult-to-reach sites (e.g., central nervous system). Recently, molecular analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has shown promise as a viable tool for discovering driver mutations in multiple cancers. A recent study of mainly BRAF-mutated non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) showed 50% concordance between tumor and plasma cfDNA analysis for BRAF-V600E. However, it is unknown whether cfDNA has a role in the evaluation of cases that harbor mutations beyond BRAF-V600E. We conducted this study to address this unanswered question using a large cohort of individuals with diverse histiocytic neoplasms from a tertiary-care institution. Methods We included 40 cases with histiocytic neoplasms with stored plasma and germline DNA in this study. Tissue molecular analysis was conducted using a targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) using commercial assays or whole exome sequencing (WES) using an in-house assay. A custom panel of 226 genes, including exonic and intronic regions, was used for the cfDNA assay in this study. To avoid cfDNA false positives, germline mutations identified from normal DNA sequencing were filtered using a BostonGene ®-developed error reduction algorithm.The total length of the analyzed genomic regions was 1.56 MB. For samples with an input greater than 30 ng, a 0.2% variant allele frequency (VAF) limit of detection (LOD) was used; a 0.4% VAF LOD was used for samples less than 30 ng. Results The final analysis cohort included 38 patients with histiocytic neoplasms after exclusion of 2 cases (failure of germline DNA library preparation and mismatch of germline and somatic DNA, respectively). Disease types included Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD; n=13, 34%), Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH; n=13, 34%), and Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD; n=12, 32%). 24 cases were multisystem (63%), and the remaining were single-system. Commonly involved organs included bone (n=25, 66%), kidney (n=12, 32%), skin (n=8, 21%), central nervous system (n=7, 18%), and pituitary (n=7, 18%). Most cases (n=31, 82%) underwent plasma collection pre-treatment, 5 cases underwent collection after histiocytosis-directed therapy, and 2 while on treatment. Tissue NGS/WES data were available for 28 (74%) cases; 5 cases (13%) had insufficient tissue cellularity, and 5 (13%) did not undergo any tissue sequencing. Among those who underwent successful tissue sequencing assays, the most common common driver alterations was BRAF V600E (n=5, 26%). Other alterations included those in MAP2K1 (n=4, 21%), BRAF-fusions (n=3, 10%; partners UBDT2, RNF11, and LMTK2, respectively), and single cases of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF indel, respectively. cfDNA analysis showed at least one variant in 23 cases (60%). Correlation between tissue and cfDNA for known driver mutations was poor and concordant findings were only seen in one case with ECD harboring BRAF V600E in tissue as well as plasma (VAF 0.5%). Among the 5 cases where tissue mutational analysis had failed, cfDNA showed mutations in MUTYH, PTCH2, NOTCH3 SDHD, and TMEM127, respectively (Figure 1). Among the 5 cases where tissue molecular assessment could not be undertaken due to various reasons, cfDNA showed alterations in 4 cases, encompassing NOTCH1, TET2, BRCA1, MSH6, PIK3CD, and FUS genes. Conclusions In a large cohort of adults with diverse histiocytic neoplasms, we found poor correlation between tumor and plasma cfDNA molecular findings. The reason for the lack of correlation may be related to low tumor shedding especially among non- BRAF V600E cases. cfDNA analysis may have a role to identify potential drivers of pathogenesis among cases that are unable to successfully undergo tissue molecular analysis. Further studies are underway to characterize other novel alterations that were discovered in the cfDNA analysis.

Introduction: Patients with liver injury have hemostatic defects including reduced ADAMTS13 (A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13). Severe deficiency of ADAMTS13 (ADMS13) activity (< 10%) is pathognomonic for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), a rare thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Differentiating TTP from severe liver injury is complex for multiple reasons including 1) low baseline ADMS13 2) concomitant coagulopathies complicating differentiation from disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) 3) ADMS13 activity (ADMS13:AC) assay interference (hyperbilirubinemia (>30mg/dL) can cause artifactual reduction of ADMS13:AC). Here we sought to characterize the clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with liver injury presenting with thrombocytopenia (TCP), microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) and low ADMS13:AC at our institution. Methods: In this retrospective study, after IRB approval, electronic medical records (EMR) of institutional patients who had ADMS13:AC and inhibitor profile performed in our special coagulation laboratory between 2018 and July 17, 2023, were reviewed. Eligible patients had ADMS13:AC ≤20% were ≥ 18 years and had evidence of liver injury at time of ADMS13. Liver injury was defined as ALT or AST elevations greater than two times the upper level of normal within one month prior to ADMS13:AC testing, history of end stage liver disease or cirrhosis, or liver transplant with evidence of graft dysfunction. Details regarding clinical presentation, management and outcomes were extracted from the EMR. PLASMIC and ISTH DIC scores were retrospectively calculated. Results: 70 patients had at least one ADMS13:AC < 20% during the study period. 28/70 patients met liver injury inclusion criteria and 20/28 had TCP and MAHA. Of those 20 patients, median age at initial ADMS13:AC was 56.5 years (29-85). Most patients (n=14) had ADMS13:AC of 10-20%. ADMS13:AC was < 5% and 5-10% in 3 patients each. Eleven patients had a positive inhibitor with a median Bethesda titer of 1.85 BU (0.5-3.9). Etiology of liver included: ischemic hepatopathy (n=8), liver graft failure (n=4), liver metastasis (n=3), cirrhosis (n=2), alcoholic hepatitis (n=1), unknown (n=2). Median hemoglobin and platelet (plt) count at time of ADMS13 was 7 g/dL (6.4-13.2) and 30 x10 9/L (3-98), respectively. 7/20 patients had a PLASMIC score of ≥5; PLASMIC score was ≥5, in 2/6 patients with ADMS13:AC <10%. 16/18 patients had an ISTH DIC score ≥5. 18/20 patients had a creatinine > 2 mg/dL or were receiving renal replacement therapy the time of ADMS13: AC. 7/20 patients had total or direct bilirubin of >30mg/dL. Eight/20 patients were treated with plasma exchange (PEX) for a median duration of 7 days (2-13). 66.7% of pts with ADMS13:AC <10% received PEX. Glucocorticoids and Rituximab were used with the intent to treat TTP in 7 and 3 patients, respectively. Caplacizumab was used in 2 patients. 3/8 (37.5%) patients receiving PEX demonstrated normalization of MAHA. One of these patients demonstrated improvement but not normalization of plts (Table 1B, case 5). All patients had recurrence of hematologic abnormalities after PEX was stopped. One patient was treated with plasma infusion with stabilization in plt count. There were 13 and 15 deaths within 1 and 6 months of first ADMTS13:AC, respectively. One death was potentially attributable to management of TTP (Table 1B, case 1). There was no difference in time to death or mortality with the use of PEX. Repeat ADMS13:AC remote from PEX, TCP and MAHA was available for 1/5 surviving patients. This patient (Table1, case 2) had normalization of ADMS:AC after undergoing liver transplant. Conclusion: The differential diagnosis of TCP and MAHA in patients with liver injury includes hepatic dysfunction, DIC and TMA. In the current cohort, 89% of evaluable patients met criteria for overt DIC per ISTH criteria. Due to a low ADMTS13:AC, 40% of patients underwent a trial of PEX with 37.5% demonstrating improvement in MAHA that was not sustained upon discontinuation of PEX due to persistent liver dysfunction. Six-month mortality was 75% and use of PEX did not affect mortality. Given the high mortality, further studies evaluating which patients with TMA and liver injury are more likely to benefit from therapies typically used to treat TTP are necessary.

Purpose: The discovery of MAPK/ERK pathway mutations has led to the approval of MEK-inhibitor (MEKi) cobimetinib in histiocytic neoplasms. However, the pivotal clinical trial that led to the approval of cobimetinib included only 4 patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH). Therefore, there is a need to define outcomes with MEKi therapy in patients with LCH. We undertook a multi-center collaboration through the Adult LCH Working Group for the Histiocyte Society to address this gap in knowledge. Methods: Adults with LCH who received MEKi therapy were included from five institutions. Objective response rate (ORR) was evaluated using PET/CT criteria, and CT/MRI if PET scan was not available; response categories were categorized into complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the time of targeted therapy initiation. Risk organ disease was defined as liver, spleen, or bone marrow involvement. Results: 25 adults with LCH were included in this study; median age at MEKi initiation 43y (range, 18-85). Most common systems involved at diagnosis were bone (52%), pituitary (44%), and lung (36%). Risk organ involvement was observed in 7 (28%, 6 liver, 1 liver and spleen) and 2 (8%) patients had intra-axial CNS involvement. Median lines of prior therapy received were 2 (range: 1-5), and 4 (16%) patients received MEKi in first-line. MAPK/ERK pathway status was assessed via target capture next generation sequencing (NGS) in 22 (96%) cases. Amongst those who underwent NGS, alterations identified included: BRAF V600E (2/22, 9%), BRAF deletions (11/22 50%), MAP2K1 or MEK mutations (4/22, 18%), and MAPK1 or ERK2 (n=1, 5%). Overall, 5 patients also received BRAF inhibitors (4 patients as first therapy prior to MEKi and 1 concomitantly due to BRAF V600E positive melanoma). Specific MEKi agents utilized included cobimetinib (n=13) and trametinib (n=12). Among the response evaluable patients (n=23), ORR to MEKi treatment was 78% (9 CR, 9 PR, 4 SD, 1 PD). Among the 7 patients with liver involvement, responses were seen in 2 (29%) cases. ORR did not significantly differ according to mutation status among those with NGS data (78% MAPK mutated vs. 100% unmutated; p=1.0). In this subcohort, all of the 4 cases that did not respond to MEKi had liver involvement; 3 had BRAF deletions (2 SD and 1 PD), and one had MAPK1 mutation (SD). Median follow-up duration after MEKi initiation in the entire cohort was 18 months (95% CI 6 - 30). The median PFS and OS were not reached; 2-year PFS and OS were 78.1% and 79.9%, respectively (Figure 1A). The median PFS was much shorter in those with liver involvement (7 months [95% CI 0 - 14]) compared with those without liver disease (not reached [95% CI 19-not reached] P=0.047; Figure 1B). PFS did not differ significantly between MAPK pathway mutated and unmutated patients (p=0.34) Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 36% (n=9) and most commonly included rash (n=5) and fatigue (n=3). Four patients experienced grade 3-4 AEs including rash, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia. Common causes of MEKi discontinuation included AEs (n=3), progression (n=2), and drug holiday (n=2). At last follow-up, 5 patients died and 18 remained on MEKi. Death was attributable to LCH (n=3), concomitant malignancy (n=1), or unknown causes (n=1). Conclusions: In our multi-institutional study of adults with LCH, we found MEKi therapy to be highly efficacious. However, liver involvement correlated with a lack of response and worse PFS, while mutational status did not. Future studies are needed to evaluate optimum treatment for high-risk subgroups of LCH like liver disease.

Classical hematological disorders encompass a broad array of congenital and acquired blood conditions, ranging from thrombotic and hemorrhagic disorders, hemoglobinopathies such as sickle cell disease/thalassemia, abnormalities in blood counts, disorders of iron metabolism, obstetric hematologic conditions, and rare genetic hematologic diseases. The past decade has seen a revolution in research and therapeutic development for these disorders. It has led to FDA approval of novel therapies such as gene therapies for hemophilia and hemoglobinopathies, targeted therapies for coagulation and complement disorders, factor VIII mimetics, new immunotherapeutic targets for cytopenia and genomic-directed diagnosis and therapy for a wide range of blood disorders. Between January 2018 and July 2023, 34 new drugs have been approved for different classical hematological disorders, and several more have received approval for new or expanded indications. This is changing how we treat patients with classical hematological conditions. Most classical hematological disorders have an impact on patients' quality of life as well as life span, and for decades, many of these disorders were managed with limited therapy options with variable efficacy. Rare hemolytic disorders such as cold agglutinin disease, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, sickle cell disease, thalassemia, porphyria all have expanded options. Newer agents for the management of anemia, thrombocytopenia and leukopenia in different clinical settings are available. Lastly, management of hemophilia is being revolutionized by extended half-life products, non-factor options and gene therapy. Hemophilia care has always been deemed to be costly, but gene therapy is getting additional attention due to the high price tag. We have compiled the list of all new drugs that got FDA approval for classical hematological disorders over past 5 years and plan to present this in the form of an infographic providing details on the drug along with its indication, trial leading to approval and cost implications of each therapy. Our intention is to summarize the drug development for classical hematology and highlight “not so benign” nature of these disorders and related therapy particularly in terms of financial toxicity for the patients.

Purpose: The understanding of cardiac-involved ECD (ECD-CV) and how this affects outcomes and pre-existing diseases remains limited. We aimed to determine the association, burden, and severity of pre-existing and de novo cardiovascular (CV) comorbidities with ECD-CV compared to patients (pts) without cardiac-involved ECD (ECD-noCV). Methods: Records of pts with ECD diagnosed from Jan-1990 to Dec-2021, consecutively seen at Mayo Clinic, AZ, FL, and MN were reviewed. Cardiac involvement was diagnosed by imaging. CV comorbidities were captured before and after ECD diagnosis. CTCAE v3.0 based grading system was used to assess CV comorbidities which graded the conditions as mild (grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe (grade 3), and life-threatening or disabling (grade 4). Chi-square test was used to determine if having ECD-CV worsens pre-existing CV comorbidities in pts with ECD. As per the established methods, the cumulative CV disease burden was defined after considering 8 CV morbidities that are known to have direct structural and functional implications on the heart, including hypertension (HTN), coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation (afib), pericardial effusion, valvular disease, and conduction disorders. A composite CV morbidity grade was assigned based on the highest grade in one of the 8 CV comorbidities (Oeffinger, NEJM, 2006). Lastly, a multivariant analysis was conducted using the presence of BRAFV600E mutation, smoking, age ≥ 60 years (yr), conventional vs targeted therapy, and ECD-CV in pts with a composite grade of 4. Results: Among 106 ECD pts, 38% (n=40) had cardiac involvement. The median age at diagnosis of ECD was 57 yr (range: 49-67); 61% were males. The median follow-up was 5 yr (95% CI: 3.5-6.1), and 4.1 yr (95% CI: 3.2-6.5) for ECD-CV and ECD-noCV pts, respectively p=0.92. The median time of CV diagnoses for the entire cohort before and after ECD diagnosis was 4.8 yr (range: 0.06-42.5) and 3.4 yr (range: 0.05-18.7), respectively. BRAFV600E mutation was present in 65% (n=26) of ECD-CV vs 42% (n=28) of ECD-noCV, p=0.02. Eight pts with ECD-CV died; one from sudden cardiac death, while 9 ECD-noCV pts died, p=0.39. Smoking was present in 43% (n=18) of ECD-CV pts compared to 24% with ECD-noCV (n=16), p=0.05. In comparison to ECD-noCV pts, increased prevalence of pre-existing HTN [59% (n=23) vs 35% (n=23), p=0.016] and MI [10% (n=4) vs 2% (n=1), p=0.046] was seen in ECD-CV. There was no difference in hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, CAD, CHF, valvular disease, afib, and conduction disorders among the two cohorts. After ECD diagnosis, de novo diagnosis of hyperlipidemia [67% (n=26) vs 38% (n=25); p=0.004] and CHF [35% (n=14) vs 7% (n=5); p=<0.001] was seen more frequently in ECD-CV pts compared to ECD-noCV. Following the diagnosis of ECD, the severity of pre-existing conditions did not change in pts with or without ECD-CV. ECD-CV pts had a greater cumulative CV disease burden as the total number of CV morbidities was greater in ECD-CV pts both before and after ECD diagnosis (Table 1). Additionally, pts with ECD-CV had greater severity of CV morbidity (composite grade ≥4) than ECD-noCV before (35% v 3%; p=<0.001) and after (42.5% vs 7.6%; p=<0.001) ECD diagnosis. The composite grade of 4 before ECD diagnosis was most attributable to pericardial effusion (42% in pts with ECD-CV vs 0% in pts with ECD-noCV) and CAD (50% in pts with ECD-CV vs 100% in pts with ECD-noCV); after ECD diagnosis pericardial effusion (42% in pts with ECD-CV vs 0% in pts with ECD-noCV) and CAD (41% in pts with ECD-CV vs 100% in pts with ECD-noCV). After considering BRAFV600E mutation, age ≥60, smoking, ECD-CV, and first-line therapy (conventional vs targeted therapy), ECD-CV was the only factor independently associated with a composite grade of ≥4, before (OR 25.6, 95% CI: 4.8-137) and after (OR 9.7, 95% CI: 3.0-30.8) ECD diagnosis. Nonetheless, smoking, age >60, and ECD-CV were independent factors associated when considered a composite grade of ≥3, before and after ECD diagnosis. Conclusion: ECD-CV did not prognosticate pts and did not worsen the pre-existing CV conditions compared to pts with ECD-noCV. However, ECD-CV pts had a higher cumulative CV disease burden and a higher grade of pre-existing and de novo CV morbidities compared to ECD-noCV. The presence of cardiac involvement in ECD was independently associated with a severe cumulative CV disease burden grade.

Introduction: Intravenous (IV) iron is routinely used throughout various medical specialties in addition to hematology, including nephrology, cardiology, obstetrics, gastroenterology, and neurology. While all formulations are considered safe, those with iron dextran (ID) are reported to have a relatively higher incidence of anaphylaxis, often prompting a test-dose prior to full administration. Recently, there has been an ongoing national shortage of ID, leading to higher usage of alternate formulations and need for further characterization of usage and safety. Methods: The Epic electronic health record was searched using the Slicer Dicer function to obtain information regarding intravenous iron administrations from 01/01/2021 to 08/31/2022 at the various Mayo Clinic sites throughout the United States. Adverse events were evaluated through the internal patient safety reporting system for adverse drug reactions. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were defined as those events requiring epinephrine administration, anaphylaxis, hypotension, tachycardia, or an allergic reaction (hives, rash, chest tightness, eye swelling) within 24 hours of IV iron infusion. Non-serious adverse events (NSAEs) were defined as those events requiring administration of an antihistamine, steroid, or reported gastrointestinal disturbance within 24 hours of IV iron infusion. Results: A total of 49,310 infusions were administered during the analyzed period and included the use of five formulations: ID, iron sucrose (IS), ferumoxytol (FM), ferric carboxymaltose (FC), and ferric gluconate (FG). Infusions were distributed amongst Rochester (n=23,899; 16%ID, 77%IS, 5%FM, 2%FC, 0%FG), Florida (n=5,755; 6%ID, 43%IS, 34%FM, 9%FC, 8%FG), Arizona (n=5,123; 4%ID, 81%IS, 3%FM, 11%FC, 1%FG), and the Health System (n=14,533; 3%ID, 85%IS, 9%FM, 2%FC, 1%FG). A total of 49 AEs were reported (59% SAEs; 41% NSAEs), representing 0.099% of all infusions. Most AEs were from IS (n=20; 41%), with ID (19; 39%), FM (9; 18%), and FC (1; 2%) accounting for the remainder. Both SAEs (n=13) and NSAEs (n=7) were reported with IS, with most SAEs occurring on the first dose (85%) and classified as hypotension (39%), allergic (31%), anaphylaxis requiring epinephrine (15%), and tachycardia (15%); no pre-medications were given. These IS AEs were dose independent (Table 1). The incidence of AEs for all IV iron formulations was less than 0.01% (Table 2). Conclusions: While ID was found to have a relatively higher incidence of AEs, all IV iron formulations were found to be safe. The most frequently used formulation was IS, which had a low incidence of AEs even at higher doses, suggesting feasibility for minimizing the number of infusions required to achieve therapeutic levels. Although all formulations demonstrated safety, each institution will likely individualize formulary preferences based upon location of administration (inpatient vs. outpatient), input from the various medical specialties, patient comorbidities, reimbursement patterns, and logistical constraints such as infusion chair time.

Background: Recent data from the field of autoimmune platelet antibodies in vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) suggests that antibodies with restricted clonality may be associated with more severe outcomes. Warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (WAIHA) is an IgG-mediated red blood cell (RBC) disorder. The goal of this study was to investigate the clonality of anti-RBC IgG antibodies in WAIHA, and to assess if clonal restriction was associated with more severe disease course and outcomes. Methods: 15 patients with WAIHA were evaluated. All patients had proven IgG positivity in direct antiglobulin testing (DAT, or “Coombs” test). RBC eluates were prepared and both the patient plasma sample, as well as the RBC eluate, were subject to liquid chromatography electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-QTOF MS). Based on the number of antibodies seen in the RBC eluate, patients were classified into mono/oligoclonal vs. polyclonal antibody WAIHA groups Assessment of response to treatment was based on international consensus criteria: complete (CR; normal Hb or Hb ≥12 g/dL, with resolution of hemolysis); partial (PR; Hb >10 but <12 g/dL or Hgb >12 g/dL without resolution of hemolysis); or no response (neither CR nor PR). Results: Eleven of the 15 patients (73%) were found to have polyclonal antibodies, while four patients (27%) had mono/oligoclonal WAIHA antibodies. Of these four patients with restricted clonality, two patients had monoclonal antibodies (Figure 1 shows one of the monoclonal WAIHA antibodies identified). There was no significant difference in demographic composition, clinical findings, or treatment received in both groups (Table 1). 66.7% (n=10) of patients were male, and the mean age (SD) was 62.5 years (24.5). Two pediatric patients, ages 10 and 16, were included. Concomitant lymphoproliferative disease was present in 46.7% of the patients. The three most common treatments were steroids (100%), rituximab (93.3%), and splenectomy (13.3%). 40.0% of patients had died at the time of this analysis with no difference between the groups. The number of treatments received were similar between the mono/oligoclonal and polyclonal groups. After the first line of treatment, 100% and 77.8% of the mono/oligoclonal and polyclonal groups respectively achieved PR or CR (P=0.31). Additionally, 100% of the mono/oligoclonal group and 54.5% of the polyclonal group were in PR or CR by their most recent CBC (P=0.10). 50.0% and 54.5% of the mono/oligoclonal group and polyclonal groups respectively relapsed at least once (P=0.25). In those who relapsed, there was an average of 1.0 relapse events in the mono/oligoclonal group compared to 1.7 relapse events in the polyclonal group (P=0.32). Conclusion: This study demonstrates, for the first time, that monoclonal and oligoclonal antibodies can mediate warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia. While these data suggest no difference in clinical outcomes or disease course between patients with mono/oligoclonal vs. polyclonal anti-RBC antibodies, a key limitation is the small sample size.

Introduction: Romiplostim is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved by the US FDA for chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in patients who have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy. The recommended dose is 1 mcg/kg/week subcutaneously, escalated weekly by increments of 1 mcg/kg to achieve and maintain a platelet count of 50 x 10 9 /L g ( Kuter et al 2021). It has been postulated that starting at the maximum recommended dose of 10 mcg/kg/week in patients with severe bleeding may swiftly increase platelets and minimize bleeding ( Roumier et al 2021). However, this approach may also increase the risk of major thrombotic events (TE). It is unclear if the more aggressive dosing strategy results in more rapid, robust responses and a tolerable safety profile compared to the FDA approved approach. Methods: This retrospective chart review included adult patients who initiated romiplostim while admitted for ITP at a Mayo Clinic Enterprise site from May 2018 to May 2022. Outcomes included rate of TE at 30 days and 90 days and time to first TE in patients receiving initial romiplostim doses of < 5 mcg/kg (low dose, LD) and > 5 mcg/kg (high dose, HD), median time to platelet response (defined as platelets > 30 x10 9/L and > 50 x10 9/L on 2 separate checks) in LD vs HD, and cost to the institution comparing LD to HD. Outcomes were summarized using descriptive statistics. Statistical analysis was done using BlueSky. Fischer's exact test and chi-squared were performed for categorical data, and Wilcoxon rank sum test were done for continuous variables. Results: Forty-five patients met eligibility criteria: 33 (73%) received initial romiplostim doses < 5 mcg/kg and 12 (27%) received doses > 5 mcg/kg. The majority of patients (43/45 (96%)) presented with platelets < 50 x 10 9/L. The median age was 65 years (68 in LD vs 57 HD). There were 24 (73%) males in the LD group vs five (42%) in the HD group. At baseline, 64% (n = 21) of LD patients and 75% (n = 9) of HD patients presented with bleeding. Major bleeding (defined by 2019 ASH ITP guidelines) was present in 21% (n= 7) vs 17% (n = 2) of patients, LD versus HD, respectively ( Neunert et al 2019). The overall incidence of TE in this study was 24% (n = 11): LD 5 (15%) and HD 6 (50%) (p = 0.044) at 90 days. Median days to TE was 21 days, 12 days in LD group (range 5-21) vs 24.5 days (range 14-58) in HD group (p = 0.067). TE included deep vein thrombosis (DVT, n = 6), DVT with pulmonary embolism (n = 1), portal vein thrombus (n = 1), multiple brain infarcts (n = 1), splenic vein thrombus (n = 1), and left atrial appendage thrombus (n = 1). The median platelet count at the time of TE was 304 x 10 9/L, 415 x 10 9/L (range 58-900) in the LD group vs 323 x 10 8/L (range 33-1427) in the HD group (p = 0.79). Thirty-two (71%) out of 45 patients had a response to romiplostim: 22 in the LD group (71%) vs 10 (83.3%) in the HD group (p = 0.698). Of the patients that responded, the median time to response was 6 days in the LD group vs 11.5 days in the HD group (p = 0.09) The median dose at time of initial response was 2 mcg/kg in the LD group and 6 mcg/kg in the HD group. Wholesale Acquisition Cost (WAC) was used to determine the cost per dose, rounded to the nearest vial size. The average WAC for the initial dose in LD patients was $1806.80 compared to $6061.79 in HD patients. Conclusion:There was a significantly increased incidence of thrombosis in patients admitted with ITP that received initial romiplostim doses > 5 mcg/kg, with no differences in the time to platelet response. Careful consideration of risks versus benefits should be given prior to initiating romiplostim at doses higher than recommended doses.