Witzig, Thomas E.

7547 Background: E1412 statistical design is based on results of lenalidomide/RCHOP (R2CHOP) vs RCHOP in ABC-DLBCL as determined by NanoString gene expression profiling (GEP). Central pathology review (CPR) was conducted to confirm diagnosis and to ensure adequate tissue for GEP. Initially, CPR occurred after randomization and treatment initiation. Due to high ineligibility rate (IR), the protocol was amended to include real-time CPR to determine patient eligibility prior to study enrollment. We describe the revision and how it affected the IR. Methods: Pre-amendment, CPR was done retrospectively. Post-amendment, CPR was done prior to enrollment, in real time, on a submitted tissue block, H&E, and CD20 slides. Based on CPR, if a diagnosis of DLBCL was confirmed, and sufficient tissue remained for GEP, a patient was deemed eligible and the submitter was notified by fax. Protocol goal was notification within 2 working days (WD) of receipt of materials at the CPR site. Results: Pre-amendment, 219 patients were enrolled. Material was typically received at the CPR site 6-9 months after patient registration. The IR with CPR was 36% for all those enrolled, and 26% for patients with adequate tissue for GEP. Post-amendment, 218 patients were submitted for CPR: 145 (67%) were eligible; 73 (33%) were ineligible. Reasons for ineligibility included insufficient tissue (n=27) or a diagnosis other than de novo DLBCL (n=46). Notification of eligibility occurred in a median of 2 WD (Mean 2 WD; Range 1-5 WD). 90% were notified within the protocol goal of 2 WD. GEP for all enrolled was completed within 6 weeks of CPR. Conclusions: The success of this novel, real-time CPR serves as a model for the future of NCTN DLBCL trials. When CPR is performed rapidly prior to enrollment, study slots may more accurately reflect the target population and eliminate excess costs. In the precision medicine era, rapid collection of relevant pathology and biomarker data is essential to trial success. Study Coordinated by ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (Robert L. Comis, MD and Mitchell D. Schnall, MD, PhD, Group Co-Chairs), supported by NCI grant # CA180820, CA180794, CA180790, CA180799, CA180833.

7516 Background: PCNSL is a diffuse large B cell lymphoma confined to the CNS. Pomalidomide (POM) is a novel immunomodulatory agent with excellent CNS penetration (~40%) based on CNS PK analysis in rats and pre-clinical therapeutic activity against CNS lymphoma. Methods: A Phase I clinical trial was undertaken to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of POM, safety profile and overall response rate (ORR). Treatment consists of POM daily for 21 days every 28 days in combination with dexamethasone 40 mg PO weekly for two cycles followed by POM alone in subsequent cycles until progression or intolerance. 4 dose escalation levels of POM (3mg, 5mg, 7mg, and 10 mg) were planned. Thromboprophylaxis with oral anticoagulant or aspirin was required. MTD determination has been completed and expansion of the MTD cohort is ongoing. Therapeutic responses were evaluated per the international PCNSL collaborative group (IPCG) criteria after 2 cycles of treatment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT01722305). Results: 21 of 25 patients accrued were eligible for assessment. The MTD was determined to be 5 mg qd for 21 days every 28 days. Two DLTs were seen at dose level 3 (Grade 3 dyspnea and grade 4 thrombocytopenia). One DLT was seen in the expanded MTD cohort (Grade 4 neutropenia and lymphocytopenia). ORR for the study (9/21) was 43% (95% CI- 22%, 66%) with 4 CR, 1 CRu and 4 PR. 3 responders completed 2, 4, and 6 cycles before progression. 6 responders have completed 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, and 32 cycles and remain on treatment. ORR for the MTD dose level was (5/12) 42% (95% CI- 15%, 72%) with 3 CR and 2 PR. 2 patients had stable disease (SD). Pseudo-progression was seen in 1 patient. Overall, grade 3/4 toxicity was hematologic (neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia) in 38.1% and non-hematologic in 33.3% (fatigue, pneumonia, sepsis, syncope, dyspnea, hypoxia, respiratory failure and maculo-papular rash). Percent CSF/blood ratio of POM was determined to be 19% in 1 patient. Conclusions: Pomalidomide treatment is feasible with therapeutic activity against relapsed/refractory PCNSL and should be further developed. Clinical trial information: NCT01722305.

e13073 Background: We observed several patients with a personal history of both RCC and myeloid malignancy, and aimed to explore a possible association, especially given the similarity in their epigenetic landscape, with both being characterized by widespread aberrant hypermethylation (Hu C et al, CCR 2014; Jiang Y et al, Blood 2009). Methods: Mayo Clinic’s ‘Advanced Cohort Explorer’ database was used to identify patients with a history of both RCC and a myeloid malignancy - Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML), Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN), Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) - and to determine the clinical characteristics. The incidence of MDS in patients ≥65 years with a history of RCC was compared to that in the general population ≥65 years (SEER- Medicare database) as well as the general patient population at Mayo Clinic, using one sample test of proportions. Results: A total of 59 patients were identified, with both biopsy proven RCC and a myeloid malignancy during their life time (12 AML, 9 MPN, 9 low risk MDS and 29 intermediate- high risk MDS). The cohort was characterized by marked male predominance (4.4: 1). Median age at RCC diagnosis was 64 years (range 37-87) and myeloid malignancy was 75 years (range 44-90). 46/59 patients had the RCC antecedent, 10/59 concurrent and 3/59 subsequent to the myeloid malignancy with a median time of myeloid malignancy diagnosis after RCC diagnosis of 7.7 years. For patients ≥65 years, the risk of developing MDS with a history of stage I/II RCC and nephrectomy was 5.26 times that of the general population based on the SEER-Medicare database (Cogle, Blood 2011)(395/100,000 vs 75/100,000; p value < 0.001), and 3.07 times that of the general population at Mayo Clinic (395/100,000 vs 128.4/100,000; p value < 0. 001). Conclusions: We observed an association between RCC and myeloid malignancies, particularly MDS; with a history of RCC conferring a substantially increased risk of developing MDS. We hypothesize that the perturbation of epigenetic landscape in the form of widespread hypermethylation may explain, in part, the association between the two malignancies; and aim to explore the potential aberrancy of epigenetic regulators in our patient cohort with a genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic analysis.