Witzig, Thomas E.

Abstract Abstract 140 Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) have poor outcomes, and there is a lack of prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets to guide treatment. We recently proposed that the transcription factor, interferon regulatory factor-4 (IRF4, also called multiple myeloma oncogene-1 [MUM1]), might be oncogenic in PTCLs based on its expression in association with translocations between IRF4 and the T-cell receptor gene, TRA@. IRF4 is a therapeutic target in multiple myeloma, where high expression is a poor prognostic factor. In addition, at least two germline IRF4 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), rs12203592 and rs872071, are associated with IRF4 expression and disease risk and progression in various lymphoid neoplasms. However, the prognostic effects of IRF4/MUM1 expression and IRF4 SNPs in PTCLs are unknown. Methods: Forty seven newly diagnosed PTCL patients with available tissue were identified from the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma SPORE Molecular Epidemiology Resource. There were 5 anaplastic large cell lymphomas, 14 cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs), 6 cytotoxic T-cell lymphomas (cytTCLs: 4 extranodal NK/T-cell and 2 enteropathy type), and 22 PTCLs, not otherwise specified (NOS). Patients were diagnosed between September 2002 and February 2008 and systematically followed through March 2010 for overall survival (OS). Tumor cell IRF4/MUM1 expression was examined by immunohistochemistry on paraffin tissue sections (MUM1p clone; Dako). Positivity was defined as >30% of tumor cells with nuclear staining, as in previous studies. rs12203592 and rs872071 were genotyped in peripheral blood DNA. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for both IRF4/MUM1 expression and SNPs with OS. Chi-squared tests were used to assess the relationship between IRF4/MUM1 expression and IRF4 SNPs. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 60 years (range, 24–88). At a median follow-up of 62 months (range, 29–89), 22 (47%) of the patients had died. Fifteen (32%) of the 47 T-cell patients had IRF4/MUM1 positive tumors. IRF4/MUM1 positivity was associated with poorer overall survival (HR=4.3; 95% CI: 1.8–10.2; p=0.0008). This association was seen across PTCL subtypes, including PTCL, NOS (HR= 6.5; 95% CI: 1.5–27.7; p=0.01), CTCL (HR=13.4; 95% CI: 1.2–150.1; p=0.03), and cytTCL (HR=5.8; CI: 0.5–65.9; p=0.15). The minor allele (T) in SNP rs12203592 was positively associated with IRF4/MUM1 positivity in a dominant model, with IRF4/MUM1 expression in 60% of patients with CT or TT genotypes compared to 19% of patients with CC genotype (p=0.01). Patients with the CT/TT genotype at rs12203592 also had inferior overall survival (HR=3.7; 95% CI: 1.4–9.5; p=0.007). The rs872071 SNP showed no significant association with either IRF4/MUM1 expression (p=0.38) or overall survival (p=0.71). Conclusions: This study is the first to demonstrate that IRF4/MUM1 expression is poor prognostic factor in PTCLs. This association was observed across PTCL subtypes, including the most common subtype, PTCL, NOS. IRF4/MUM1 expression and poor survival in our patients also were associated with the minor allele (T) in the IRF4 SNP rs12203592; these findings are consistent with previous in vitro data showing the major allele (C) represses IRF4 promoter activity. Interestingly, rs872071 was not associated with IRF4/MUM1 expression or prognosis, similar to findings in multiple myeloma. In contrast, rs872071 is a risk and prognostic factor in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and classical Hodgkin lymphoma, diseases in which IRF4/MUM1 expression has been associated with favorable prognosis. IRF4/MUM1 expression is a poor prognostic factor in PTCLs. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

SummaryIbrutinib‐related data in Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM) remain sparse, particularly outside of trials. We report on 80 patients [previously treated, n = 67 (84%), treatment‐naïve, n = 13 (16%)] with WM, evaluated consecutively at Mayo Clinic, who received ibrutinib off‐study after its approval in 2015 for WM. Overall response rate (ORR) was 91%; major‐response rate (MRR) was 78%. The median time to first response and best response was 2·9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2–4] and 5·7 (95% CI: 4–12) months, respectively. The median follow‐up was 19 (95% CI: 14–21) months; 18‐month progression‐free survival (PFS) was 82%. The median time on therapy was 12·5 (95% CI: 9·3–16·7) months, and the median duration‐of‐response was 32 (range: 23–32) months. Twenty‐five patients (31%) had discontinued therapy at last follow‐up (68% due to treatment‐related toxicities) and 18% of patients required dose reduction. Fatigue (12%) and atrial‐fibrillation (11%) were common non‐haematological toxicities. IgM rebound occurred in 36% of patients who abruptly discontinued ibrutinib. Following ibrutinib discontinuation, 84% of patients received subsequent treatment, achieving an ORR of 57% and MRR of 50%. The median PFS from commencement of subsequent salvage therapy was 18 months. Ibrutinib therapy, outside of clinical trials, is effective in WM, but is associated with toxicities and challenges, including IgM rebound and a high drug discontinuation rate for reasons other than disease progression.

Abstract Background: CXCL12 is a negative prognostic factor for head & neck (HNSCC) and pancreatic (PDCA) cancers, among others. Its receptor, CXCR4, is a negative prognostic factor in lymphoma/leukemia. CXCR4 signals in part through RAS species, and the expression of CXCL12 and CXCR4 appears to be itself regulated by farnesylated proteins. We provide evidence that targeting the CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway with the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib translates to long term clinical benefit. Methods: Next generation sequencing and analyses of gene expression were conducted in tumor samples from squamous cell carcinoma, lymphoma, and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients treated in tipifarnib trials (studies KO-TIP-001, KO-TIP-002, CTEP20), and complemented with analyses of related tumor gene expression databases in TCGA and GEO. Results: Activating HRAS mutations in HNSCC and KRAS mutations in PDCA were mutually exclusive with CXCL12 expression, consistent with a role for RAS downstream from CXCR4. Contrary to KRAS and NRAS, HRAS is exclusively farnesylated, and treatment with tipifarnib in patients (pts) with advanced HNSCC tumors with a HRAS mutation variant allele frequency (VAF) >20% resulted in 8 partial responses (PR) in 14 pts. Two complete responses (CR), 3 PRs and 4 disease stabilizations (90% clinical benefit) were observed in 10 pts with relapsed/refractory peripheral T cell lymphoma overexpressing CXCL12. Decreases in plasma CXCL12 levels during treatment were observed. Seven CRs were observed in 11 elderly/unfit AML pts overexpressing CXCL12 in bone marrow (NRAS wt or unknown). Ex vivo treatment of bone marrow stromal cell cultures with tipifarnib decreased secretion of CXCL12. Finally, based on the reported relationship between CXCL12 expression and the suppression of pain in PDCA, we conducted a retrospective analysis of a phase 3 study of gemcitabine plus tipifarnib (GT) in advanced PDCA. Notably, absence of abdominal pain at study entry was associated with higher median survival in the GT arm (no pain, pain): 10.2 vs 5.9 months, HR=0.52, p<0.0001, whereas no significant effect was observed in the control arm: 6.1 vs 6.1 months. PDCA with <7% VAF of KRAS mutation (~30% PDCA pts) overexpressed CXCL12. Conclusions: The mechanism of action of tipifarnib appears to involve targeting the CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway and demonstrates a crucial association with the tumor microenvironment and objective clinical responses. Citation Format: Antonio Gualberto, Catherine Scholz, Vishnu Mishra, Matthew R. Janes, Linda Kessler, Eric Van Cutsem, Alan L. Ho, Thomas Witzig. Mechanism of action of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor, tipifarnib, and its clinical applications [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT191.

Abstract In this month's CME article, an analysis of over 1300 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), Wang et al demonstrate that the approximately 13% of patients with concurrent indolent lymphoma at diagnosis had the same prognosis as those patients with isolated DLBCL.

Background:With an expanding array of novel treatment options in follicular lymphoma (FL), we largely lack effective biomarkers to predict response in this molecularly heterogeneous disease. Activating mutations focused on components of the nutrient‐sensing arm of the mTORC1 pathway (RRAGC, ATP6V1B2, ATP6AP1), are particularly enriched in FL, occurring in ∼30% of cases. Meanwhile, clinical mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) have shown some promise, with response rates of 50–60% in relapsed/refractory FL.Aims:We therefore sought to determine whether gene mutation status ‐ particularly in genes regulating the mTOR pathway – may represent biomarkers of mTORi‐response in FL.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed pre‐treatment tumor samples from relapsed/refractory FL patients treated on two phase II clinical trials with single agent mTOR inhibitors, everolimus (NCT00436618) or temsirolimus (NCT00290472), with well characterized clinical outcomes. In total, 21 patients had available biopsies, consisting of 15 everolimus‐ and 6 temsirolimus‐treated cases.Tumor DNA extracted from formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue was subjected to targeted sequencing using a 22 gene panel comprising genes recurrently mutated in FL, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway genes mutated in germinal center lymphomas. Libraries were prepared using capture‐based target enrichment (Nonacus), and sequenced on the NextSeq550 (Illumina) with a mean coverage depth of x700. A stringent bioinformatic pipeline was adopted with variants called with VarScan2, and a 10% variant allele frequency (VAF) threshold was employed to filter out sequencing artefacts due to the FFPE material. 100% (15/15) of a selection of variants were validated by Sanger sequencing. Staining for pS6 was undertaken on tissue slides to examine downstream mTOR activation by immunohistochemistry.Results:Overall response rate (CR and PR) was 48% (10/21). Mutational analysis showed no significant association between clinical response and mTORC1‐pathway mutations (mut) taken individually or collectively; although, absolute numbers of mutations in these genes were low, including RRAGC (responder: 0/10 mut vs non‐responder: 1/11 mut), ATP6AP1 (responder: 1/10 vs non‐responder: 1/11), and ATP6V1B2 (responder: 1/10 vs non‐responder 3/11). Notably, no difference in pS6 staining was seen between responders and non‐responders.However, we found mutations in the epigenetic regulator CREBBP to be enriched in the responder group (100% (10/10) responders vs 54.5% (6/11) non‐responders, p = 0.04). This effect was more pronounced when considering only mutations within the catalytic histone acetyltransferase (HAT) domain of CREBBP, with HAT mutations seen in 100% (10/10) responders, and 27.3% (3/11) non‐responders (p = 0.001).Summary/Conclusion:Mutations in the mTOR pathway did not predict for response to mTOR inhibition in our study. The enrichment of CREBBP mutations in responders, and particularly those affecting the catalytic HAT domain, points to CREBBP as a potential biomarker of response which warrants validation in trials of drugs modulating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis. More broadly our data may lend support to a distinct clinical and biological behavior of CREBBP HAT domain‐mutant disease that also warrants further evaluation. Taken together, our findings highlight the potential opportunities afforded by undertaking correlative studies, and underlines the need to incorporate prospective biomarker discovery into clinical trials in order to help focus future therapeutic strategies more rationally.