Feldman, Andrew L.

Abstract Objectives Translational research in laboratory medicine and pathology is transforming health care based on recent quantum advances in omics technologies, computational science, and precision medicine. However, high-volume clinical settings where this research may be most effective often have significant constraints on faculty time that challenge productivity. The objective of this study was to assess our experience with a new resource designed to address this challenge. Methods In September 2016, we established the Research and Innovation Office (RIO) in the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic–Rochester. The goal was to provide infrastructure to unburden faculty from performing administrative, organizational, and operational tasks related to research. Over 30 months, we solicited faculty input into desired services, conducted surveys on utility and ease of use, and tracked metrics, including faculty participation, numbers of projects, and publications. Results Faculty members were highly satisfied with the range of services, ease of use, and service-oriented approach of RIO. Initial services included project organization, institutional process support (eg, IRB protocol management), biospecimen requests and handling, and data management. Based on early feedback, patient consenting, budget support, and manuscript assistance were added as additional services. Total RIO staff increased from 6 to 10 during in the first 30 months. Over this time, 97 of 160 faculty members (60%) utilized RIO services in over 1,000 discrete project requests. Annual departmental publications increased by 50% during this time. Conclusion Faculty time is a critical element for translational research productivity in laboratory medicine and pathology departments. Numerous tasks previously performed by faculty could be managed effectively by a team of research facilitators that unburdened constraints on research time and led to high levels of faculty engagement, satisfaction, and productivity. This model may promote advances in transformative laboratory medicine and pathology research in high-volume clinical settings.

Abstract In this month's CME article, an analysis of over 1300 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), Wang et al demonstrate that the approximately 13% of patients with concurrent indolent lymphoma at diagnosis had the same prognosis as those patients with isolated DLBCL.

The 2017 World Health Organization update introduced a new category of nodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma with T-follicular helper phenotype (PTCL-TFH) defined by expression of at least 2 or 3 TFH markers. Our study assesses the utility of an immunohistochemical panel of 5 TFH markers (CD10, BCL6, PD-1, CXCL13, and ICOS) for identification of TFH phenotype in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) and PTCL not otherwise specified (NOS). Immunohistochemical for the 5 markers was performed on 22 cases of AITL and 29 cases of PTCL-NOS. Cases were reviewed for morphologic features characteristic of AITL. All AITL cases showed expression of ≥2 TFH markers. This panel resulted in reclassification of 41% PTCL-NOS cases to PTCL-TFH. Positive percent agreement for the TFH phenotype is 97% for PD1, 94% for ICOS, 44% for CD10 and CXCL13, and 29% for BCL6. Negative percent agreement for TFH phenotype is 100% for CD10, BCL6, and CXCL13, 82% for ICOS and 71% for PD1. AITL cases were more likely than PTCL-TFH cases to contain expanded CD21-positive follicular dendritic cell meshworks, clear cell cytology and polymorphous inflammatory background; however, there was a significant (P<0.005) Kruskal-Wallis trend in all morphologic variables between the 3 groups suggesting a continuum from PTCL-NOS to PTCL-TFH to AITL. The median number of morphologic features of AITL also correlated significantly with number of TFH markers positive (Spearman coefficient ρ=0.759). In summary, the stain panel chosen will have an impact on cases classified as PTCL-TFH. This entity may exist along a spectrum between PTCL-NOS and AITL.

Background:Recent large next generation sequencing studies have redefined the genomic landscape of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). While many of the more common genetic variants, primarily mutations, have been biologically characterized, little is known about newly emerging genetic aberrations. In particular, somatic copy number alterations remain poorly studied due to the large genomic regions they cover and the number of genes involved. This, in combination with lack of remission or early relapse in a portion of DLBCL, opens new opportunities to explore yet unidentified genetic contributions to lymphomagenesis.Aims:The goal of this study was to identify variants associated with failure to achieve event free survival at 24 months (EFS24) and define their biologic significance in DLBCL.Methods:Newly diagnosed DLBCL treated with standard immunochemotherapy were included in this study (n = 246). Copy number data was generated by using the molecular inversion probe OncoScan™ FFPE Assay Kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). OncoScan OSCHP files were analyzed using Nexus Copy Number 9.0 software (Biodiscovery, El Segundo, USA). Data interpretation and copy number calling was done using the human reference genome GRCh37/hg19. Files were analyzed using the Nexus FASST2‐Segmentation algorithm, which is based on a Hidden Markov Model approach for calling genetic events. For functional analysis, SOCS6 was overexpressed and studied in GCB‐DLBCL cell lines.Results:Upon review of genomic copy number data from DLBCL cases (n = 246), loss of 18q22.1‐q23 was a significant event in our cohort (p = 0.018), is found in 11% (n = 27) of DLBCL, and is enriched in germinal center DLBCL (GCB‐DLBCL) patients (18/107, 17%, p < 0.05) compared to activated B‐cell (ABC)/non‐GCB DLBCL patients (1/93, 1%). Furthermore, GCB‐DLBCL patients with a loss of 18q22.1‐q23 were significantly more likely to fail EFS24 (50%, p < 0.05) compared to GCB‐DLBCL patients without the loss (29%). Genes located at 18q22.1‐q23 include, TMX3, DOK6 and SOCS6. SOCS family proteins have been shown to play an important role in tumor biology, although little is known about SOCS6. SOCS6 gene expression is downregulated in a variety of solid tumors and is hypermethylated in some hematological malignancies. RNASeq data from DLBCL suggest variable expression across tumors. Using a panel of GCB cell lines we found that SOCS6 expression was low to negative, and publically available cell line data suggests this region is hypermethylated. Expression of SOCS6 was higher in a panel of mantle cell lymphoma and ABC‐DLBCL cell lines and this again correlated with their cell line methylation data, where no hypermethylation was found in those cell lines. Together, this data suggests that downregulation of SOCS6 through genomic loss or hypermethylation may have biologic importance. To explore the role of SOCS6, we restored expression in GCB cell lines and immuno‐fluorescence staining suggest localization to the nucleus and cytoplasm, as previously reported in other cell types. Studies to explore the role of SOCS6 in cytokine signaling and STAT family protein regulation are ongoing.Summary/Conclusion:Using genome copy number data from 246 DLBCL, we have found that loss of 18q22.1‐q23 (p = 0.018) is associated with GCB‐DLBCL and failure to achieve EFS24. Furthermore, we have identified that SOCS6 may have clinical and biologic significance in GCB‐DLBCL.

SummaryThe diabetes mellitus (DM) drug metformin targets mechanistic/mammalian target of rapamycin and inhibits lymphoma growth in vitro. We investigated whether metformin affected outcomes of newly diagnosed diffuse large B‐cell (DLBCL, n = 869) and follicular lymphoma (FL, n = 895) patients enrolled in the Mayo component of the Molecular Epidemiology Resource cohort study between 2002 and 2015. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, prognostic index and treatment were used to estimate the association of metformin exposure (No DM/No metformin; DM/No metformin; DM/Metformin) with event‐free (EFS), lymphoma‐specific (LSS) and overall (OS) survival. Compared to No DM/No metformin DLBCL patients, there was no association of DM/Metformin (n = 48; HR = 1·05, 95% CI 0·59–1·89) or DM/No metformin(n = 54; HR = 1·41, 95% CI 0·88–2·26) with EFS; results were similar for LSS and OS. Compared to No DM/No metformin FL patients, there was no association of DM/Metformin (n = 37; HR = 1·16, 95% CI 0·71–1·89) or DM/No metformin (n = 19; HR = 1·16, 95% CI 0·66–2·04) with EFS; results were similar for LSS. However, DM/Metformin was associated with inferior OS (HR = 2·17; 95% CI 1·19–3·95) compared to No DM/No metformin. In conclusion, we found no evidence that metformin use was associated with improved outcomes in newly diagnosed DLBCL and FL.

AbstractAnaplastic large cell lymphomas (ALCLs) represent a relatively common group of T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (T-NHLs) that are unified by similar pathologic features but demonstrate marked genetic heterogeneity. ALCLs are broadly classified as being anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)+ or ALK−, based on the presence or absence of ALK rearrangements. Exome sequencing of 62 T-NHLs identified a previously unreported recurrent mutation in the musculin gene, MSCE116K, exclusively in ALK− ALCLs. Additional sequencing for a total of 238 T-NHLs confirmed the specificity of MSCE116K for ALK− ALCL and further demonstrated that 14 of 15 mutated cases (93%) had coexisting DUSP22 rearrangements. Musculin is a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor that heterodimerizes with other bHLH proteins to regulate lymphocyte development. The E116K mutation localized to the DNA binding domain of musculin and permitted formation of musculin–bHLH heterodimers but prevented their binding to authentic target sequence. Functional analysis showed MSCE116K acted in a dominant-negative fashion, reversing wild-type musculin-induced repression of MYC and cell cycle inhibition. Chromatin immunoprecipitation–sequencing and transcriptome analysis identified the cell cycle regulatory gene E2F2 as a direct transcriptional target of musculin. MSCE116K reversed E2F2-induced cell cycle arrest and promoted expression of the CD30–IRF4–MYC axis, whereas its expression was reciprocally induced by binding of IRF4 to the MSC promoter. Finally, ALCL cells expressing MSCE116K were preferentially targeted by the BET inhibitor JQ1. These findings identify a novel recurrent MSC mutation as a key driver of the CD30–IRF4–MYC axis and cell cycle progression in a unique subset of ALCLs.

AbstractBackgroundAngioimmunoblastic T‐cell lymphoma (AITL) is a systemic peripheral T‐cell lymphoma with a follicular helper T‐cell (TFH) immunophenotype that frequently involves the skin. However, the histopathology of cutaneous involvement by AITL has not been fully established.MethodsWe reviewed the clinicopathological features of 19 patients seen at our institution with AITL involving the skin. Pan‐T‐cell and TFH marker expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) was detected using in situ hybridization (ISH) for Epstein‐Barr virus‐encoded small RNA (EBER). T‐cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangement was evaluated by PCR.ResultsAITL affected both trunk and extremities in 15/19 cases (79%). Perivascular infiltration by small and/or medium‐sized lymphocytes was seen in 18/19 (95%). Granulomatous inflammation was identified in 4/19 (21%). Aberrant loss of CD2, CD5, or CD7 was identified in 1/18 (6%), 2/18 (11%), or 7/19 (37%) cases, respectively. Seventeen of eighteen evaluable cases (95%) expressed 2 to 3 TFH markers: PD‐1 in 19/19 (100%), BCL6 in 94% (17/18), and CD10 in 37% (7/19). EBV‐positive cells were detected in 3/18 (17%) with varying density. Clonal TCR gene rearrangement was identified in 9/11 (82%).ConclusionsCutaneous involvement by AITL shows relatively non‐specific histopathological features. However, an immunohistochemical panel including TFH markers and EBER ISH is useful in differential diagnosis.