Chan, Onyee

Background. The inclusion of gene mutations and chromosomal abnormalities in the 2022 WHO and ICC Classifications of MDS has enhanced diagnostic precision and is expected to improve clinical decision-making process. Although these two systems share similarities, clinically relevant discrepancies still exist and potentially cause inconsistency in their adoption in a clinical setting. In this study on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS), we adopted a data-driven approach to provide a harmonization roadmap between the 2022 WHO and ICC classification for MDS. A modified Delphi Process consensus approach is currently ongoing among icMDS experts to finalize a harmonized MDS classification scheme. Methods. We analyzed retrospective international cohorts of patients with a diagnosis of MDS (n=7017) and AML (n=1002) according to WHO 2016 criteria. Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes were applied to define clusters capturing broad dependencies among all gene mutations and cytogenetic abnormalities. To investigate the features of importance and their impact on the clustering process, we employed the SHapley Additive exPlanations approach (SHAP). This allowed to define harmonized labels for each clinical entity. The clinical relevance of the unsupervised clustering was assessed through the analysis of phenotypic features and outcomes among each group. ( Blood 2022;140: 9828-9830) Results. Patients' characteristics are summarized in Table 1. We identified 9 clusters, defined by specific genomic features. The cluster of highest hierarchical importance was characterized by biallelic inactivation of TP53 (biTP53). According to SHAP analysis, bi TP53 was defined as 2 or more TP53 mutations, or 1 mutation with copy number loss or cnLOH. Most patients assigned to bi TP53 cluster had TP53 VAF>10% (77.9%) and complex karyotype (70.1%). Assignment to bi TP53 cluster was irrespective of blast count. Patients with monoallelic TP53 mutation segregated into other clusters. Hierarchically, the second cluster included patients with del(5q). SHAP analysis highlighted 5q deletion alone, or with one other chromosomal abnormality other than -7, and absence of bi TP53, as the most relevant features. Most of these patients had blast counts <5% (88.1%). The third distinct cluster included patients with SF3B1 mutations (in the absence of concurrent del(7q), abn3q26.2, complex karyotype or RUNX1 mutation). Most patients with MDS and SF3B1 mutation had <5% blasts (94.2%). Common co-mutated variants in the SF3B1 cluster included mutant DNMT3A (25.2%) and TET2 (38.3%). Morphologically defined MDS cases (i.e., not meeting criteria for bi TP53, del(5q) or SF3B1) were preferentially assigned to the following additional clusters: SF3B1 and concurrent higher-risk mutations (e.g., RUNX1 and ASXL1); SRSF2 and concomitant TET2 mutations; U2AF1 mutations with del(20q), del(7q) or -7; SRSF2 with TET2 mutations and co-mutational patterns including RUNX1 and ASXL1; and AML-like genomic signatures. Our analyses suggest that morphologically defined MDS is characterized by a large heterogeneity in terms of mutation profiles, not entirely captured by the presence of unilineage versus multilineage dysplasia, percentage of bone marrow blasts, and presence of hypocellularity and fibrosis. To better investigate the continuum between high risk MDS (i.e., patients with ≥10% blasts) and AML, an exploratory comparison was made using a cohort of AML (defined according to WHO 2016) patients analyzed using the same statistical methods. Only a partial overlap in genetic signatures was observed between MDS with ≥10% blasts and AML. However, similarities were observed between the AML-like MDS clusters (characterized by mutant NPM1, bZIP CEBPA, and Core Binding Factor abnormalities) and AML clusters defined by the same genetic signature, thus supporting the classification of these entities as AML, irrespective of blast count. Conclusion. Our study demonstrated the utility of a data-driven approach based on advanced statistical methods to generate a harmonized classification for MDS. Table 2 shows a provisional, hierarchical classification algorithm. Further refinement of entity labels and classification criteria is the subject of the ongoing modified Delphi Process consensus approach among icMDS experts.

Background In unfit patients (pts) with newly diagnosed (ND) AML, long-term survival remains short (mOS 14.7 months) despite improved responses (CR 37% and CR/CRi 66%) with azacitidine (AZA) and venetoclax (VEN) (VIALE-A, DiNardo NEJM 2020). In a pooled analysis of AZA-VEN in ND AML pts with poor risk cytogenetics the response rates were higher in TP53wt pts (CR/CRi 70%) compared with TP53mut pts (CR/CRi 41%) (Pollyea Clin Cancer Res 2022). The measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative rate was 41% in AZA-VEN treated pts in VIALE-A which was associated with improved survival (Pratz JCO 2022). Pivekimab sunirine (PVEK, IMGN632) is a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) comprising a high-affinity CD123 antibody, cleavable linker, and an indolinobenzodiazepine pseudodimer (IGN) payload. The novel IGN payload alkylates DNA and causes single strand breaks without crosslinking (Kovtun Blood Adv 2018). Methods This is an ongoing, open-label, multicenter, Phase 1b/2 study of PVEK in combination with AZA +VEN in adults with ND CD123-positive AML (any CD123+ expression by local flow cytometry or IHC). Pts received the recommended phase 2 dose of PVEK 0.045 mg/kg IV on D7 + AZA 75 mg/m 2 SC or IV daily on D1-7 + VEN up to 400 mg PO daily for 14 to 28 days (based on cohort assignment) in a 28-day cycle. Bone marrow assessment was performed at D14 (cohort 1) or D21 (cohort 2) of cycle 1 to determine VEN duration. The primary endpoints are composite CR rate (CCR [CR+CRh+CRp+CRi]), MRD rate (assessed centrally [Hematologics, Inc.] by flow cytometry; <0.1% defined as negative) and duration of remission. Key secondary endpoints are safety, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. Responses were determined using ELN 2017 criteria (with the addition of CRh) and a 14-day post-marrow count recovery window. Results As of July 17, 2023, data is available for 50 ND pts (n=25 per cohort) treated with PVEK+AZA+VEN and are aggregately reported here. The median age was 74 years (range, 46-83), 42% were ≥ 75 years old, 26% had secondary AML, 64% were ELN 2017 adverse risk, and 38% had a TP53mut. The most common non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) (all grades [grade 3+]) seen in > 20% of all pts were febrile neutropenia (44% [38%]), constipation (42% [2%]), peripheral edema (36% [4%]), diarrhea (36% [2%]), hypophosphatemia (32% [0%], nausea (28% [4%]), and hypokalemia (24% [2%]). No veno-occlusive disease (VOD) events were reported. In responders, the median time to achieve absolute neutrophil count ≥500/µL and platelet count ≥50,000/µL was 35.5 days (range, 20-55) and 22 days (range, 20-55), respectively. The median post-remission cycle delay (beyond cycle day 28) was 14 days. Two pts discontinued PVEK due to a TEAE (edema; marrow aplasia). The 60-day mortality was 4%. In the ITT population (N=50) the CR rate was 52% (26/50), and the CCR rate was 66% (33/50). In pts ≥ 75 years old, the CCR rate was 76% (16/21). In pts known to be TP53wt, both the CR and CCR rate was 88% (22/25). Additional response subsets in Table 1. Twenty-one pts received 9-14 days of VEN, 9 pts received 15-21 days of VEN and 20 pts received ≥ 22 days of VEN in cycle 1; of those who received ≤ 14 days of VEN the CR rate was 71% (15/21) and the CCR rate was 76% (16/21). Of the 26 pts who achieved CCR and had an MRD-evaluable sample, 73% (19/26) achieved MRD negativity (CCR MRD-, <0.1% residual blasts); notably all had undetectable MRD levels (lower level of detection is 0.02%). MRD-negativity was achieved rapidly with a median of 1.7 months (range, 0.8-4.5). CCR MRD- rates were high across major molecular subsets, including FLT3 (ITD/TKD) at 100% (7/7), IDH1/2 at 89% (8/9), and NPM1 at 89% (8/9), as well as ELN risk groups (intermediate 80% [8/10]; adverse 64% [9/14]). Conclusion With a manageable safety profile in pts with ND AML, the PVEK+AZA+VEN triplet demonstrated anti-leukemia activity with robust CR rates and early MRD negative responses in a cohort enriched for adverse disease characteristics (64% ELN adverse risk; 38% TP53mut). Encouraging CCR MRD- rates were observed across cytogenetic/molecular subsets, and the majority of responding pts achieved early and deep remissions, which may translate to improved clinical outcomes. The regimen was well tolerated with no new safety signals, and the addition of PVEK to the AZA-VEN backbone did not appear to meaningfully prolong count recovery.

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare hematologic malignancy with dismal clinical outcomes. Conventional chemotherapies were previously shown to have some clinical efficacy, however, long-term outcomes of BPDCN patients remain poor. In a recent clinical trial, SL-401 demonstrated an overall response rate (ORR) of 90% in previously untreated BPDCN patients. Despite promising outcomes observed in SL-401 studies, there remains a lack of data regarding the optimal first-line therapy. In this single institution retrospective study, we explored the survival outcomes based on front-line treatment and allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT). A total of 49 patients with confirmed diagnosis of BPDCN were included in the study. Median age at diagnosis was 71.4 (32.0-91.4) years with a male predominance (82%). Among these, 11 (22%) patients had concurrent hematologic neoplasms at the time of BPDCN diagnosis. The most common site of disease involvement was skin (n=42, 86%) followed by bone marrow (BM) (n=32, 65%), lymph node (LN) (n=13, 27%), and nasopharynx (n=2, 4%) with 14 (29%) and 5 (10%) patients having skin and BM involvement only, respectively. Of note, 17 (35%) patients had both skin and BM disease and 8 (16%) had simultaneous skin, BM, and LN involvement. In the front-line setting, CHOP-based regimens, hyper-CVAD, and SL-401 were used in 10 (20%), 11 (22%), and 12 (24%) patients, respectively. The median cycle number of SL-401 treatment was 6 (1-73). Allo-SCT was performed in 10 (20%) patients and 4 (8%) patients received autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT). Transplant was performed following first-line therapy in 11 patients (CR, n=10; PR, n=1) and second-line therapy in 3 patients (CR, n=3). Among 21 vs. 12 patients who received chemotherapy vs. SL-401 as their first-line therapy, a total of 11 (52%) and 3 (25%) patients underwent transplant. A total of 23 (55%), 13 (31%), and 6 (14%) patients achieved a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and progressive disease (PD), respectively. CR rate was higher in patients who were treated with hyper-CVAD compared to others, however, it was not statistically significant (50% in CHOP-based regimens vs. 91% in hyper-CVAD, P=0.064; 50% in SL-401 vs. 91% in hyper-CVAD, P=0.069). The median PFS was 9.9 months and the median OS was not reached when all patients were included for the analyses. In the subgroup analyses, patients who were treated with hyper-CVAD had longest PFS compared to patients treated with CHOP-based regimens (HR=0.217, 95%CI=0.050-0.933, P=0.003) or SL-401 (HR=0.385, 95%CI=0.126-1.179, P=0.075) although the PFS difference between hyper-CVAD and SL-401 did not reach the statistical significance. There was no PFS difference between SL-401 and CHOP-based regimen treated groups (HR=0.931, 95%CI=0.321-2.70, P=0.894). In the OS analysis based on first-line therapy, there was no difference between patients treated with SL-401 compared to patients treated with chemotherapy regimens (HR=1.597, 95%CI=0.460-5.548, P=0.431). Further, there was no OS difference between individual types of front-line therapies (P=0.678). In contrast, patients who received allo-SCT showed significantly longer OS outcomes compared to patients with no transplant (HR=0.160, 95%CI=0.0453-0.56, P=0.041). Additional OS analyses based on age (<60 vs. ≥60) (HR=0.481, 95%CI=0.146-1.582, P=0.258), ASXL1 mutation (HR=1.705, 95%CI=0.2773-10.48, P=0.5649), or presence of previous or concurrent hematologic malignancy (HR=2.97, 95%CI=0.65-13.57, P=0.1602) did not show any statistical difference. In a multivariate Cox model (adjusting for age, front-line therapy, gender, and transplant) allo-SCT was significant factor for OS (HR=0.137, 95%CI=0.020-0.959, P=0.045). In conclusion, our study supports current recommendations of using SL-401 or hyper-CVAD as the first-line treatments followed by consolidation with allo-SCT in the eligible responders to induction therapy to further improve survival outcomes in BPDCN patients. Disclosures Lancet: Abbvie: Consultancy; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; ElevateBio Management: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. kharfan-Dabaja:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Sokol:Kyowa/Kirin Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kymera Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare hematologic malignancy with dismal clinical outcomes. Conventional chemotherapies such cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) and hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone alternating with high-dose cytarabine and methotrexate (CVAD) have been commonly used for the BPDCN treatment until a recent study showed promising outcomes in patients treated with SL-401 (Tagraxofusp). In this single-institution retrospective study, we identified a total of 49 consecutive BPDCN patients. Among 42 patients who received treatment, hyper-CVAD regimen was associated with higher complete response rate compared with CHOP-based regimens or SL-401 (91% vs 50% vs 50%), although the difference did not achieve statistical significance. Furthermore, there was no significant overall survival (OS) difference between patients treated with SL-401 vs other chemotherapies as their first-line treatment (hazard ratio = 1.597; 95% CI, 0.460-5.548; P = .431). Of note, patients who received allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) had significantly longer OS (hazard ratio = 0.160; 95% CI, 0.0453-0.56; P = .041). Extent of disease (skin vs bone marrow vs both) or younger age (<60 years old) did not have significant prognostic impact on OS. Collectively, our study confirmed the survival benefit of allo-SCT and suggests that conventional and intensive chemotherapies such as CHOP and hyper-CVAD as well as SL-401 would be comparable first-line choice for the BPDCN patients.