Ward, Robert C.

Background: Left atrial appendage occlusion with the Watchman device is an alternative strategy for stroke risk reduction in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. There are rare case reports of Watchman associated infection. Currently, there is no formal study that evaluated the incidence and outcomes of Watchman-related infections. Methods: All patients who underwent Watchman implantation over a 14 year study period (July 2004 through December 2018) comprised our cohort. Baseline characteristics, procedural data, and post-implantation events were identified. Primary study outcomes included Watchman related infection, other cardiovascular device related infection, bacteremia, and mortality. Results: A total of 181 patients with an average age of 75, and a median CHA2DS2-VASc Score of 4 (interquartile range 2) and a median HAS-BLED Score of 3 (interquartile range 1), were included for analysis. A total of 534.7 patient years of follow up was accrued with an average of 2.9 years per patient. The most common indications for implantation included gastrointestinal bleeding (56 patients; 30.9%) and intracerebral bleeding (51 patients; 28.2%). During follow up, 38 patients (21%) died. Six developed evidence of bacteremia. Only one developed an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) infection that required complete system extraction. None of the cohort developed Watchman-related device infection during the study period. Conclusion: In a single center study spanning a 14 year period, we report no Watchman-related devices infections. This is despite the presence of patients with bacteremia, as well as an ICD infection requiring extraction. These data suggest that Watchman devices are extremely unlikely to become infected.

Background Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) risk is higher in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation on antithrombotic therapy as well as those with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). We investigated if mortality among patients with atrial fibrillation on antithrombotic therapy presenting with non‐traumatic ICH was influenced by underlying CAA. Methods and Results We used the Rochester Epidemiology Project to identify 6045 patients with atrial fibrillation aged >55 years on anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy from 1995 to 2016. Seventy‐four patients in this cohort presented with non‐traumatic ICH. Medical records including imaging data were reviewed to identify those with CAA and record baseline variables and outcomes of interest; 38 of our 74 patients (51.4%) (mean age 81.5 years) met Modified Boston Criteria for possible or probable CAA. Twenty‐six of 74 patients (35%) died during the first 30 days while 56 of the 74 (76%) patients died by 10 years follow‐up after index ICH. Overall mortality was not significantly different between the CAA and non‐CAA groups at any point of time during follow‐up ( P =0.89) even amongst patients restarted on anticoagulation +/− antiplatelet (n=19) ( P =0.46) or those patients restarted only on antiplatelet therapy (n=22) ( P =0.66). Three of the 41 patients who restarted on antithrombotic therapy had a recurrent ICH; these 3 patients met criteria for possible or probable CAA. Conclusions Although more than half of our patients with atrial fibrillation on antithrombotic therapy and non‐traumatic ICH met Modified Boston Criteria for CAA, CAA did not significantly influence the high mortality seen in this cohort.