AuthorCitation

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Audit of the autoantibody test, EarlyCDT®-lung, in 1600 patients: an evaluation of its performance in routine clinical practice.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature | April 12, 2016 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.3410/f.718233720.793516651

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature | April 12, 2016 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.3410/f.726277093.793516648

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Clinical utility of a plasma-based miRNA signature classifier within computed tomography lung cancer screening: a correlative MILD trial study.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature | April 12, 2016 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.3410/f.718234601.793516649

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Projected Clinical, Resource Use, and Fiscal Impacts of Implementing Low-Dose Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening in Medicare.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature | April 12, 2016 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.3410/f.725470060.793516647

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Cost-effectiveness of CT screening in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature | April 12, 2016 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.3410/f.725225954.793516645

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Projected outcomes using different nodule sizes to define a positive CT lung cancer screening examination.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature | April 12, 2016 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.3410/f.722818030.793516643

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Diagnostic performance of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer over five years.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature | April 12, 2016 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.3410/f.718447501.793516644

Faculty Opinions recommendation of An actuarial analysis shows that offering lung cancer screening as an insurance benefit would save lives at relatively low cost.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature | April 12, 2016 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.3410/f.717965016.793516646

Faculty Opinions recommendation of UK Lung Cancer RCT Pilot Screening Trial: baseline findings from the screening arm provide evidence for the potential implementation of lung cancer screening.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature | April 12, 2016 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.3410/f.726000925.793516640

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Results of the Randomized Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial with Focus on High-Risk Profiling.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature | April 12, 2016 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.3410/f.725860460.793516639

Midthun, David E.

Citations 80

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Audit of the autoantibody test, EarlyCDT®-lung, in 1600 patients: an evaluation of its performance in routine clinical practice.

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer.

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Clinical utility of a plasma-based miRNA signature classifier within computed tomography lung cancer screening: a correlative MILD trial study.

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Projected Clinical, Resource Use, and Fiscal Impacts of Implementing Low-Dose Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening in Medicare.

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Cost-effectiveness of CT screening in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Projected outcomes using different nodule sizes to define a positive CT lung cancer screening examination.

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Diagnostic performance of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer over five years.

Faculty Opinions recommendation of An actuarial analysis shows that offering lung cancer screening as an insurance benefit would save lives at relatively low cost.

Faculty Opinions recommendation of UK Lung Cancer RCT Pilot Screening Trial: baseline findings from the screening arm provide evidence for the potential implementation of lung cancer screening.

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Results of the Randomized Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial with Focus on High-Risk Profiling.