Dispenzieri, Angela

BackgroundThere exist insufficient data characterizing patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who experienced prolonged survival. A population‐based analysis of long‐term survivors was conducted to investigate the roles of sociodemographic factors and upfront stem cell transplantation (SCT).MethodsThe National Cancer Data Base is a US cancer database of approximately 34 million patients from >1500 cancer centers. Patients with MM were identified using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD‐O) code 9732 from January 2004 to December 2006 and were divided into 4 groups based on overall survival (OS). Sociodemographic characteristics, treatment facility, and use of SCT were recorded. The univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using multiple logistic regression and Pearson chi‐square tests.ResultsA total of 26,986 patients with MM were identified. The median OS was 2.74 years. The majority of patients were male (54%), white (77%), insured (93%) and otherwise healthy (78%), lived in a metropolitan area (82%), were of high income (66%) and educational (58%) levels, and received treatment at nonacademic facilities (63%). Upfront SCT was used in 10% of patients. One in 6 patients (16%) were long‐term survivors (group 4). When comparing group 4 (OS of ≥8.22 years) with the other groups (OS of <8.22 years), young age, female sex, high income and educational levels, residence in a rural area, insured status, no comorbidity, receipt of upfront SCT, and treatment at high‐volume facilities were associated with long‐term survival.ConclusionsKey differences in sociodemographic characteristics, patient volume at treatment facilities, and upfront SCT were associated with long‐term survival. Improvements in health care access and health literacy, upfront SCT, and treatment at high‐volume facilities might prolong patient survival.

Abstract The high-risk abnormality del(17p) can be detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization on malignant plasma cells (PCs) and has an adverse prognostic impact in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Patients with del(17p) have reduced overall survival (OS). Patients who acquire del(17p) later during the disease course are not well described. The disease characteristics at diagnosis predicting for acquired del(17p) and its overall impact on patient survival is not known. We compared 76 patients with MM who were negative for del(17p) at diagnosis and acquired it later with 152 control MM patients who did not acquire del(17p) at a comparable time point. Patients acquired del(17p) at a median of 35.6 months (range, 4.6-116.1 months) from diagnosis of MM after a median of 2 lines of therapy (range, 1-10 lines of therapy). When compared with controls, patients with acquired del(17p) had shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) (30.1 vs 23.0 months; P = .032) and OS (106.1 vs 68.2 months; P &lt; .001) from diagnosis. After the detection of del(17p), the median PFS was 5.4 months and the median OS was 18.1 months. High lactate dehydrogenase level (odds ratio [OR], 3.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-12.24) and presence of t(4;14) (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.09-6.48) or any high-risk translocation (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.00-4.95) at diagnosis predicted acquisition of del(17p). High PC proliferative rate predicted shorter OS from detection of del(17p) (hazard ratio, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.31-3.96; P = .004). Our study shows that acquisition of del(17p) is an important molecular event associated with reduction in OS in MM. Certain baseline factors may predict acquisition of del(17p). This needs validation in prospective data sets.

Background:Venetoclax is a B cell lymphoma 2 (BCL‐2) inhibitor that has shown activity as a single agent and in combination with other therapies in patients with multiple myeloma, particularly those harboring t(11;14) associated with high BCL‐2 expression. Although early clinical trial data is encouraging (monotherapy response rate of 21% and 40% amongst t(11;14) and a response rate of 97% when used in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone), data on outcomes in patients treated outside of clinical trial setting are sparse.Aims:We aimed to identify the efficacy of venetoclax in patients with multiple myeloma treated outside clinical trial.Methods:We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with multiple myeloma treated with venetoclax between December 2016 and February of 2019 at the Mayo Clinic outside of a clinical trial setting.Results:A total of 29 patients that were treated with venetoclax for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma were identified. Characteristics of the cohort are reported in Table 1. Two thirds of the cohort had t(11;14) detected on cytogenetic studies and 48% (n = 14) had presence of high risk abnormalities. Median number of prior therapies was 6 (range 1–15) and 21% (n = 6) of patients had received ≥10 prior lines of therapy. Eighty three percent (n = 24) of patients had received prior autologous transplant and 76% (n = 22) were penta refractory or exposed. Median time from diagnosis of myeloma to initiation of venetoclax therapy was 5.3 years (range 0.8–23.6 years).Venetoclax used as monotherapy or a doublet in combination with dexamethasone in 59% (n = 17) of patients and a triplet or quadruplet in 41% (n = 12) given at 800 mg (55%) or 400 mg (35%) daily. Triplet and quadruplet regimens combined venetoclax with a variety of proteasome inhibitors or daratumumab. One patient had a quadruplet of venetoclax, carfilzomib, pomalidomide and dexamethasone. 93% (n = 27) patients were refractory to at least on proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug. Dose titration and escalation was used in 31% (n = 9) of patients. None of the patients experienced tumor lysis syndrome. At last follow‐up 55% (n = 16) of patients remain on venetoclax therapy. Overall response rate in the 24 patients evaluable for response was 46% (21% CR, 8% VGPR, 17% PR). Patients with t(11;14) had a numerically higher response rate than those without (50% vs 33%, p = 0.64). Patients with high risk cytogenetic abnormalities were less likely to respond (ORR 69% for standard risk vs 18% for high risk, p = 0.019). Median time to response was 2.6 months (range 1.1–6.9 months). Median duration of response was 5.2 months (range 2.2–12.9 months). After a median follow‐up time of 7.2 months for the cohort, the median PFS and OS are 5.8 and 14.6 months, respectively, Figure 1A/B. High risk cytogenetic abnormalities were associated with a shorter PFS (median PFS 3 months vs 14 months for standard risk, p = 0.002). The outcomes with venetoclax monotherapy and combination therapies are reported separately in the Table.Summary/Conclusion:Venetoclax is an effective oral agent in relapsed and/or refractory myeloma and can produce deep and durable responses in heavily pretreated patients. Further studies are needed to elucidate its role earlier in the disease and its effectiveness in combination with other anti‐myeloma therapies.image

Background:Previous literature has established “long‐term survivors” as patients who survive greater than 10 years from diagnosis of active multiple myeloma (MM). With the rapid discovery and evolving use of novel therapeutic agents, a greater proportion of patients are reaching this milestone. Although these patients share in their extended survival, they also constitute a heterogeneous group in terms of treatments and outcomes.Aims:The aim of this study is to examine a large cohort of long‐term survivors with protracted follow‐up as an attempt to identify a subset of patients within ten‐year survivors who have longstanding disease remission, and examine the predictors of their especially exceptional prognosis.Methods:All patients with active MM evaluated at Mayo Clinic, Rochester between January 1, 1999 and July 1, 2008 were included in the study. Patients with MGUS, smoldering MM, and solitary plasmacytoma were excluded. The overall survival (OS) was calculated from time of symptomatic disease requiring treatment. Patients with greater than 10 year survival from diagnosis were then divided into three cohorts based upon treatment and remission status: Cohort 1 included patients off therapy ≥ 5 years and in sustained remission, Cohort 2 included patients on maintenance therapy ≥ 5 years and in sustained remission, and Cohort 3 included patients who had relapsed within the past 5 years. Differences between the groups were compared using Wilcoxon, Chi‐square, and Fisher's exact test as applicable. “Early” stem cell transplant was defined as patients who received a stem cell transplant within one year of diagnosis.Results:During the time frame of the study, 2,125 patients were identified who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for active MM. Three‐hundred ninety nine (19%) had survived at least 10 years from diagnosis. Among these patients, based on the available data regarding remission and ongoing treatment status, 332 patients were categorized into three cohorts, seen in Table 1. Sixty patients (18% of long‐term survivors) comprised Cohort 1, 48 patients (14% of long‐term survivors) comprised Cohort 2, and 224 patients (68% of long‐term survivors) comprised Cohort 3. Sex difference was statistically significant between the groups, with more females constituting Cohorts 1 and 2 (p = 0.03). Within Cohort 1, 77% of patients underwent an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). The median progression free survival following ASCT in this cohort was not reached (95% CI 15–NR, p < 0.001). In addition, patients in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 were more likely to undergo an early ASCT as compared to patients in Cohort 3 (p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in high or intermediate risk FISH/cytogenetics at diagnosis, ISS at diagnosis, or induction therapies used at diagnosis among the three groups.Summary/Conclusion:Our study identified a small subset (3% of all patients diagnosed with active MM) of long‐term survivors who are off of therapy and remain in sustained longstanding remission. Female sex, progression free survival following ASCT, and receiving an early ASCT were factors that portended a positive prognosis amongst long term survivors.image

Background:The pivotal FIRST trial, the largest study conducted in transplant‐ineligible (TNE) patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), examined lenalidomide plus low‐dose dexamethasone until disease progression (Rd continuous), Rd for 18 cycles (Rd18), and melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (MPT). The study, conducted in 18 countries in Europe, North America, and Asia Pacific, demonstrated that Rd continuous significantly improved progression‐free survival (PFS) vs MPT (median 26.0 vs 21.9 mos; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.59‐0.79; P < .00001). PFS was similarly extended for Rd continuous vs Rd18 (median 21.0 mos; HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60‐0.81). Furthermore, median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer with Rd continuous vs MPT (median 59.1 vs 49.1 mos; HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67‐0.92; P = .0023). These results support the use of frontline oral, alkylator‐free continuous therapy for TNE NDMM pts and established Rd continuous as a standard of care as reflected by clinical guidelines in Canada, the US, and Europe.Aims:To report outcomes in the subset of patients from Canada and the US.MethodsPts with TNE NDMM were randomized 1:1:1 to Rd continuous (with lenalidomide given on days 1‐21 of 28‐day cycles until disease progression), Rd18 (with lenalidomide given on days 1‐21 of eighteen 28‐day cycles), or MPT (twelve 42‐day cycles). Rd18 and MPT were both 72 weeks in duration. Stratification factors included country and Rd continuous vs MPT was the primary comparison. The primary endpoint was PFS and secondary endpoints included OS, time to next therapy (TTNT) and safety. Time from randomization to second progression or death (PFS2) was an exploratory analysis. Response assessment used for PFS and PFS2 analysis was determined by investigators based on International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Data is presented as of the January 21, 2016 cutoff used for the final OS analysis.Results:A total of 312 pts from Canada (n = 252) and the US (n = 60) were enrolled (104 in each arm). Consistent with results from the intent‐to‐treat (ITT) analysis, the Canada/US subgroup also demonstrated a significant improvement in PFS with Rd continuous vs MPT (median 29.3 vs 20.2 mos; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49‐0.97; P = .03326) and an improvement vs Rd18 (median 21.9 mos; HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51‐1.02; Table). Median OS was 56.9 vs 46.8 mos for Rd continuous vs MPT (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.53‐1.11; P = .15346). Median PFS2 was longer for Rd continuous vs MPT (median 39.3 vs 35.1 mos; HR, 0.69; 95% CI 0.50‐0.95) as was TTNT (median 39.1 vs 24.6 mos; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37‐0.78). Additional details, including safety data, will be presented at the meeting.Summary/Conclusion:In the Canada/US subpopulation of pts from FIRST, Rd continuous extended median PFS by 9 mos vs MPT and > 7 mos vs Rd18. Rd continuous also delayed median TTNT > 14 mos and resulted in a longer PFS2 vs MPT, suggesting that the benefit from frontline Rd continuous is maintained at relapse. These results are consistent with that from the ITT population confirming the advantage of Rd continuous vs MPT in the Canada/US subgroup and supporting the role of Rd continuous as a standard of care for TNE pts with NDMM. The efficacy observed with Rd continuous raises the question on the role of immunostimulatory effects by the immunomodulatory agents in NDMM.image

Abstract BACKGROUND Free light chain (FLC) quantification is the most analytically sensitive blood-based method commercially available to diagnose and monitor patients with plasma cell disorders (PCDs). However, instead of directly detecting monoclonal FLCs (mFLCs), FLC assays indirectly assess clonality based on quantifying κ and λ FLCs and determination of the к/λ FLC ratio. Often an abnormal FLC ratio is the only indication of a PCD, and confirmation by a direct method increases diagnostic confidence. The aim of this study was to develop an analytically sensitive method for direct detection of mFLCs. METHODS Patient sera (n = 167) previously assessed by nephelometric FLC quantification and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) were affinity enriched for IgG, IgA, and total and free κ and λ light chains and subjected to MALDI-TOF MS. Relative analytical sensitivity of these methods was determined using serially diluted sera containing mFLCs. RESULTS In sera with abnormal FLC ratios (n = 127), 43% of monoclonal proteins were confirmed by IFE, 57% by MALDI-TOF MS without FLC enrichment, and 87% with FLC enrichment MALDI-TOF MS. In sera with normal FLC ratios (n = 40), the FLC MALDI-TOF MS method identified 1 patient with an mFLC. Serial dilution and analysis of mFLC containing sera by IFE, nephelometry, and FLC MALDI-TOF MS demonstrated that FLC MALDI-TOF MS analysis had the highest analytical sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS FLC immunoenrichment coupled to MALDI-TOF MS enables direct detection of mFLCs and significantly increases the confirmation of abnormal serum FLC ratios over IFE and MALDI-TOF MS without FLC enrichment, thereby providing added confidence for diagnosing FLC PCDs.

6594 Background: Given the significant short-term adverse effects of CAR-T cell therapy, it is important to evaluate its impact on QOL of patients in addition to efficacy, compared with established forms of cellular therapy like SCT. Methods: QOL was evaluated prospectively in patients undergoing CAR-T therapy, autoSCT & alloSCT for hematologic malignancies. QOL was assessed with FACT-G at baseline, 2 weeks and monthly for 6 months thereafter. Functional well-being (FWB), physical WB (PWB) emotional WB (EWB) & social WB (SWB) and change over time were compared across groups. Results: 45 patients were recruited (CAR-T: 10; Auto SCT: 22; Allo SCT: 13) with follow up for 2 weeks & 1 month available for 23 &15 patients, respectively (Table). There was no statistically significant difference in baseline total QOL scores (p=0.13), though scores were lower in the alloSCT group (85,84,68). EWB &FWB were numerically higher in the CAR-T group, followed by autoSCT group. At 2 weeks, overall QOL decreased by only 2 points in CAR-T group vs. 22 & 18 points in auto & alloSCT groups (p=0.09). Change in PWB vs. baseline was less pronounced in the CAR-T group (-1, -9, -13, p=0.03). At 1 month, overall QOL was 6 points lower than baseline in CAR-T group vs. 3 and 14 points lower in auto & alloSCT groups, respectively (p=0.34). Importantly, PWB had at least returned to baseline in the CAR-T group. Conclusions: Preliminary data show that patients undergoing CAR-T cell therapy do not experience a more significant decline in QOL compared with auto & allo SCT, and may experience fewer physical side effects in the short-term. Accrual & follow-up are ongoing. [Table: see text]

In this paper, we present our preliminary findings regarding magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) on the livers of 10 patients with systemic amyloidosis. Mean liver stiffness measurements (LSM) and spleen stiffness measurements (SSM) were obtained. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images were analyzed for the distribution pattern of amyloid deposition. Pearson correlation analysis was performed in order to study the correlation between LSM, SSM, liver span, liver volume, spleen span, spleen volume, serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT pro BNP), and the kappa and lambda free light chains. An increase in mean LSM was seen in all patients. Pearson correlation analysis showed a statistically significant correlation between LSM and liver volume (r = 0.78, p = 0.007) and kappa chain level (r = 0.65, p = 0.04). Interestingly, LSM did not correlate significantly with SSM (r = 0.45, p = 0.18), liver span (r = 0.57, p = 0.08), or serum ALP (r = 0.60, p = 0.07). However, LSM correlated significantly with serum ALP when corrected for liver volume (partial correlation, r = 0.71, p = 0.03) and NT pro BNP levels (partial correlation, r = 0.68, p = 0.04). MRI review revealed that amyloid deposition in the liver can be diffuse, lobar, or focal. MRE is useful for the evaluation of hepatic amyloidosis and shows increased stiffness in hepatic amyloidosis. MRE has the potential to be a non-invasive quantitative imaging marker for hepatic amyloidosis.

AbstractDisease OverviewPolyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M‐protein, skin changes (POEMS) syndrome is a paraneoplastic syndrome due to an underlying plasma cell neoplasm. The major criteria for the syndrome are polyradiculoneuropathy, clonal plasma cell disorder (PCD), sclerotic bone lesions, elevated vascular endothelial growth factor, and the presence of Castleman disease. Minor features include organomegaly, endocrinopathy, characteristic skin changes, papilledema, extravascular volume overload, and thrombocytosis. Diagnoses are often delayed because the syndrome is rare and can be mistaken for other neurologic disorders, most commonly chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. POEMS syndrome should be distinguished from the Castleman disease variant of POEMS syndrome, which has no clonal PCD and typically little to no peripheral neuropathy but has several of the minor diagnostic criteria for POEMS syndrome.DiagnosisThe diagnosis of POEMS syndrome is made with three of the major criteria, two of which must include polyradiculoneuropathy and clonal PCD, and at least one of the minor criteria.Risk StratificationBecause the pathogenesis of the syndrome is not well understood, risk stratification is limited to clinical phenotype rather than specific molecular markers. Risk factors include low serum albumin, age, pleural effusion, pulmonary hypertension, and reduced eGFR.Risk‐Adapted TherapyFor those patients with a dominant sclerotic plasmacytoma, first line therapy is irradiation. Patients with diffuse sclerotic lesions or disseminated bone marrow involvement and for those who have progression of their disease 3 to 6 months after completing radiation therapy should receive systemic therapy. Corticosteroids are temporizing, but alkylators are the mainstay of treatment, either in the form of low dose conventional therapy or high dose with stem cell transplantation. Lenalidomide shows promise with manageable toxicity. Thalidomide and bortezomib also have activity, but their benefit needs to be weighed against their risk of exacerbating the peripheral neuropathy. Prompt recognition and institution of both supportive care measures and therapy directed against the plasma cell result in the best outcomes.