Asirvatham, Samuel J.

Introduction: Although most patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) have a benign prognosis, there is a subgroup with bileaflet MVP syndrome (biMVPS) at increased risk of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (VF). The phenotypic features of this syndrome include myxomatous bileaflet prolapse, complex ventricular ectopy (VE), T-wave inversion in inferolateral ECG leads, and female predominance. The mechanism of ventricular arrhythmia in these patients is unknown. Methods: We reviewed our center’s ablation experience of 14 consecutive patients with biMVPS patients between February 2007 and October 2013 (n=13 female, median [range] age at index ablation 33.8 [21.0 - 58.7] years, left ventricular ejection fraction [EF] 60 [45-67] %, all ≤ moderate mitral regurgitation [MR]). We compared findings from 6 with prior sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) and recurrent ICD shocks for drug refractory VF with 8 who had symptomatic drug-refractory complex VE but without prior SCA. Results: All patients with prior SCA had a predominant VE trigger for the VF. There was no difference between the two groups in EF, MR severity, VE burden, and number of different VE morphologies or foci ablated. Sites of successful VE ablation at index procedure were the LV papillary muscles (PM, n=6 anterior, 6 posterior), fascicular system (n=5 anterior, 4 posterior), mitral annulus (n=2), outflow tracts (3 RVOT, 1 LVOT), and coronary sinus (n=1). All patients had at least one LV papillary or fascicular VE focus. Purkinje origin VE was identified as the VF trigger in 6/6 SCA patients (3 from PM, 3 from LV fascicles) and only 4/8 (none from PM) non-SCA patients (p=0.04). Acute success was seen in 17/19 procedures with no complications. VF storm occurred within 24 hours of ablation in a single patient. At 310 (39 - 2099) days follow-up, 1 SCA patient received a single shock (p=0.031 compared to pre-ablation), and symptoms from VE were reduced in 12/14. Conclusions: BiMVPS is characterized by VE from the LV fascicles and papillary muscles that trigger VF. The VE is invariably multifocal and may also involve the outflow tracts and mitral annulus. Ablation of clinically dominant VE foci alleviates symptoms and reduces the number of VF-terminating ICD shocks.

Introduction: The efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) has not been assessed in subjects with renal impairment. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of RCTs comparing NOACs with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), in relation to renal function estimated by glomerular filtration rate (GFR): normal (GFR>80 ml/min/1.73m2), mild (50-80 mL/min/1.73m2), and moderate (<50 mL/min/1.73m2) impairment. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify articles published up to the third week of January 2015. Data were supplemented with FDA data. Data on stroke or systemic embolism (S/SE) and major bleeding according to renal function were collected and extracted. We estimated the pooled relative risk (RR) of S/SE and major bleeding, for NOACs compared to warfarin. Results: We retrieved four randomized clinical trials (each randomizing dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or endoxaban versus warfarin) enrolling a total of 58338 subjects, 29123 randomized to NOACs and 29123 randomized to warfarin; 21132 had normal renal function, 13126 had mild and 11027 had moderate renal impairment. In subjects with moderate renal impairment, compared to warfarin, NOACs reduced the risk of S/SE (RR 0.8; 95% CI 0.68-0.94) and major bleeding (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.71-0.91). In subjects with mild renal impairment NOACs were associated with a reduced risk of S/SE (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.66-0.85) and major bleeding (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.79-0.95). In subjects with normal renal function no difference in the risk of S/SE was observed, while the risk of major bleeding was slightly less for subjects taking NOACs (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.76-0.99). The test for interaction among groups of renal function was borderline significant for S/SE, but not for major bleeding. Conclusions: The use of NOACs was associated with a reduced risk of S/SE in subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment; while the risk of bleeding was reduced by NOACs compared to warfarin.

Introduction: Mobile thrombi are commonly observed on endovascular leads at the time of catheter ablation. Transseptal puncture poses a risk of paradoxical embolism. We sought to examine the risk of stroke or systemic embolism after transseptal ablation in patients with and without cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Methods: Using a large, national administrative claims database we identified 31,720 patients who underwent a catheter ablation requiring transseptal puncture between 1/1/2004 and 9/30/2014. We created two propensity-matched cohorts, matching on age, gender, race, household income, region, Charlson index, CHADS-Vasc score, and year and indication for ablation (5,533 patients with CIEDs and 11,300 patients without devices). Incidence rates (events/100 patient-years) and propensity score-matched cox proportional hazards models (with 95% confidence intervals) were used to estimate risk of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism for patients with or without CIEDs. We also examined the impact of presence of a CIED and oral anticoagulation (OAC) use on risk of stroke or systemic embolism within the matched cohort. Average follow up was 2.1 years. Results: The event rate was 1.5 per 100 person years in patients without device, and 1.9 per 100 person years in patients with device. Among patients not on OAC, presence of a cardiac device was associated with an increased risk of stroke or systemic embolism (HR 1.71 [1.24-2.35], P<0.01) whereas there was no association among patients treated with OAC (0.98 [0.75_1.28], p=ns) (Figure). Conclusions: Cardiac devices are associated with an increased risk of stroke or systemic embolism after transseptal ablation, but this risk is attenuated with post ablation OAC use. Anticoagulation should be considered for all patients with CIEDs post transseptal ablation, regardless of the presence of another compelling indication for anticoagulation.

AbstractAimsThe MicraTM transcatheter pacing system (TPS) (Medtronic) is the only leadless pacemaker that promotes atrioventricular (AV) synchrony via accelerometer‐based atrial sensing. Data regarding the real‐world experience with this novel system are scarce. We sought to characterize patients undergoing MicraTM‐AV implants, describe percentage AV synchrony achieved, and analyze the causes for suboptimal AV synchrony.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, electronic medical records from 56 consecutive patients undergoing MicraTM‐AV implants at the Mayo Clinic sites in Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona with a minimum follow‐up of 3 months were reviewed. Demographic data, comorbidities, echocardiographic data, and clinical outcomes were compared among patients with and without atrial synchronous ventricular pacing (AsVP) ≥ 70%.ResultsSixty‐five percent of patients achieved AsVP ≥ 70%. Patients with adequate AsVP had smaller body mass indices, a lower proportion of congestive heart failure, and prior cardiac surgery. Echocardiographic parameters and procedural characteristics were similar across the two groups. Active device troubleshooting was associated with higher AsVP. The likely reasons for low AsVP were small A4‐wave amplitude, high ventricular pacing burden, and inadequate device reprogramming. Importantly, in patients with low AsVP, subjective clinical worsening was not noted during follow‐up.ConclusionWith the increasing popularity of leadless pacemakers, it is paramount for device implanting teams to be familiar with common predictors of AV synchrony and troubleshooting with MicraTM‐AV devices.

Abstract Pulsed electric fields (PEFs) have emerged as an ideal cardiac ablation modality. At present numerous clinical trials in humans are exploring PEF as an ablation strategy for both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, with early data showing significant promise. As this is a relatively new technology there is limited understanding of its principles and biophysics. Importantly, PEF biophysics and principles are starkly different to current energy modalities (radiofrequency and cryoballoon). Given the relatively novel nature of PEFs, this review aims to provide an understanding of the principles and biophysics of PEF ablation. The goal is to enhance academic research and ultimately enable optimization of ablation parameters to maximize procedure success and minimize risk.

This study presents gastric ablation as a novel tool for modulating gastric bioelectrical activation, including eliminating the normal gastric pacemaker site as well as abnormal ectopic pacemaker sites underlying gastric dysrhythmias. Targeted application of radiofrequency ablation was able to eliminate these pacemaker sites without disrupting surrounding conduction capability or tissue structure. Gastric ablation presents a powerful new research tool for modulating gastric electrical activation and may likely hold therapeutic potential for disorders of gastric function.

AbstractBackgroundData regarding ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular complex (PVC) ablation following mitral valve surgery (MVS) is limited. Catheter ablation (CA) can be challenging given perivalvular substrate in the setting of mitral annuloplasty or prosthetic valves.ObjectiveTo investigate the characteristics, safety, and outcomes of radiofrequency CA in patients with prior MVS and ventricular arrhythmias (VA).MethodsWe identified consecutive patients with prior MVS who underwent CA for VT or PVC between January 2013 and December 2018. We investigated the mechanism of arrhythmia, ablation approach, peri‐operative complications, and outcomes.ResultsIn our cohort, 31 patients (77% men, mean age 62.3 ± 10.8 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 39.2 ± 13.9%) with prior MVS underwent CA (16 VT; 15 PVC). Access to the left ventricle was via transseptal approach in 17 patients, and a retrograde aortic approach was used in 13 patients. A combined transseptal and retrograde aortic approach was used in one patient, and a percutaneous epicardial approach was combined with trans‐septal approach in one patient. Heterogenous scar regions were present in 94% of VT patients and scar‐related reentry was the dominant mechanism of VT. Forty‐seven percent of PVC patients had abnormal substrate at the site targeted for ablation. Clinical VA substrates involved the peri‐mitral area in six patients with VT and five patients with PVC ablation. No procedure‐related complications were reported. The overall recurrence‐free rate at 1‐year was 72.2%; 67% in the VT group and 78% in the PVC group. No arrhythmia‐related death was documented on long‐term follow‐up.ConclusionCA of VAs can be performed safely and effectively in patients with MVS.

Aims: The MicraTM transcatheter pacing system (TPS) (Medtronic) is the only leadless pacemaker that promotes atrioventricular (AV) synchrony via accelerometer-based atrial sensing. Data regarding the real-world experience with this novel system are currently lacking. We sought to characterize patients undergoing MicraTM -AV implants, describe percentage AV synchrony achieved, and analyze the causes for suboptimal AV synchrony. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, electronic medical records from 56 consecutive patients undergoing MicraTM -AV implants at the Mayo Clinic sites in Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona with a minimum follow-up of 3 months were reviewed. Demographic data, comorbidities, echocardiographic data, and clinical outcomes were compared among patients with and without atrial synchronous-ventricular pacing (AsVP) ≥70%. Results: Fifty-six percent of patients achieved AsVP ≥70%. Patients with adequate AsVP had smaller body mass indices, a lower proportion of congestive heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. Echocardiographic parameters and procedural characteristics were similar across the two groups. Active device troubleshooting was associated with higher AsVP. The likely reasons for low AsVP were persistent atrial arrhythmias, small A4-wave amplitude, and inadequate device reprogramming. Importantly, in patients with low AsVP, subjective clinical worsening was not noted during follow-up. Conclusion: With the increasing popularity of leadless PM, it is paramount for device implanting teams to be familiar with common predictors of AV synchrony and troubleshooting with MicraTM -AV devices.

AbstractBackgroundWhile ventricular tachycardia (VT) in the setting of postmyocardial infarction left ventricular aneurysms (LVA) is not uncommonly encountered, there is a scarcity of data regarding the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of ablation of VT in this subset of patients.MethodsOur study included consecutive patients aged 18 years or older with postmyocardial infarction LVA who presented to Mayo Clinic for catheter ablation of VT between 2002 and 2018.ResultsOf 34 patients, the mean age was 70.4 ± 9.1 years; 91% were male. Mean LVEF was 29 ± 9.7% and left ventricular end‐diastolic dimension was 64.9 ± 6.6 mm. The site of the LVA was apical in 21 patients (62%). Fifteen patients (44%) presented with electrical storm or incessant VT. Nine patients (26%) had a history of intracardiac thrombus. All except for one patient had at least one VT originating from the aneurysm. The mean number of VTs was 2.9 ± 1.7. All patients underwent ablation at the site of the aneurysm. Ablation outside the aneurysm was performed in 13 patients (38%). Low‐voltage fractionated potentials and/or late potentials at the aneurysmal site were present in all cases. Complete elimination of all VTs was achieved in 18 (53%), while the elimination of the clinical VT with continued inducibility of nonclinical VTs was achieved in a further 11 patients (32%). Two patients developed cardiac tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis. During a mean follow‐up period of 2.3 ± 2.4 years, 11 patients (32%) experienced VT recurrence. Freedom from all‐cause mortality at 1‐year follow‐up was 94%.ConclusionRadiofrequency catheter ablation targeting the aneurysmal site is a feasible and reasonably effective management strategy for clinical VTs in patients with postinfarction LVA.