Hagen, Catherine E.

200 Background: We developed and validated a quantitative segmentation algorithm (QuantCRC) to predict disease recurrence in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients (pts) based on the analysis of digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H+E) stained pathology slides. In this study, we aim to determine if QuantCRC analysis on pre-treated RC biopsies can predict pathological complete response (pCR) after NAT which include total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), chemoradiation (CRT) and others. Methods: Stage II-IV RC pts treated with curative intent modalities between 2005-2023 at Mayo Clinic and University of Pittsburgh were evaluated. Eligible pts had pre and post-treatment tissue available for analysis. Clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcome data were extracted from the medical record. QuantCRC extracted 15 features: %tumor, %stroma, tumor:stroma ratio, %TB/PDC, %mucin, %necrosis, %high-grade, %signet ring cells, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) per cm2 of a tumor, %immature stroma (tumor bed), %inflammatory stroma (tumor bed), %mature stroma (tumor bed), %immature (stromal region), %inflammatory (stromal region), and %mature (stromal region). The associations between the QuantCRC features and pCR were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and logistic regression models while adjusting for primary tumor location and NAT. Results: The identified 288 pts had the following demographics: median age 60, 59% male, 52% distal tumor, 42% TNT. Pts who achieved pCR had smaller pre-treatment tumors (p=0.03), higher TILS, and lower %immature (stroma) (Table 1). After multivariable adjustment, higher TILS and lower %immature (stroma) remain to be significantly associated with a higher likelihood of pCR. A higher %mature (stroma) and %mature stroma (tumor bed) were also identified, in multivariable models, to be associated with a higher rate of pCR. NAT protocol and tumor location (proximal vs. distal) were not associated with pCR. Conclusions: The ability to integrate pathological features with AI may allow for personalized treatment. Using this technology, we recognize that patients who harbor a more mature stromal archetype and inflammatory tumor predisposition, are more likely to achieve pCR to conventional NAT. These pathological features are not currently incorporated into risk stratification in RC. Additional validation and integration into current risk stratification methods is warranted. [Table: see text]

162 Background: There is a need to improve current risk stratification of stage II and III colorectal cancer (CRC) to better inform risk of recurrence and guide adjuvant chemotherapy. The purpose of this study is to examine whether integration of QuantCRC, an AI-based digital pathology biomarker utilizing hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides, provides improved risk stratification over current American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines. Methods: ASCO and QuantCRC-integrated risk schemes were applied to an observational cohort of 1,068 stage II and III CRCs. The stage II integrated scheme utilizes pT3 vs. pT4 and QuantCRC-derived risk groups. The stage III integrated scheme utilizes pT1-3 vs. pT4, pN1 vs. pN2, and QuantCRC-derived risk groups. Performance metrics included log-rank test, hazard ratios and Somers’ Dxy rank correlation. Results: Integration of QuantCRC provides improved risk stratification compared to the ASCO scheme for stage II and III CRC. The QuantCRC-integrated scheme placed more stage II tumors in the low-risk group compared to the ASCO scheme (69.3% vs. 60.4%) without decreased 3-year RFS. The QuantCRC-integrated scheme provided larger hazard ratios (HR) for both intermediate-risk (3.04, 95%CI 1.81-5.10, P=2.8x10-5) and high-risk (4.62, 95%CI 2.02-10.61, P=0.0003) groups compared to ASCO intermediate-risk (2.09, 95%CI 1.21-3.63, P=0.008) and high-risk (3.08, 95%CI 1.57-6.01, P=0.001) groups. The QuantCRC-integrated scheme for stage III tumors identified a small group of 80/518 (15.4%) CRCs at very high risk of recurrence with HR of 4.08 (95%CI 2.68-6.23, P=6.5x10-11) compared to a HR of 2.42 (95%CI 1.72-3.38, P=3.1x10-7) for 228/518 (44.0%) high-risk CRCs in the ASCO scheme. QuantCRC-integrated risk groups remained prognostic in stage III CRCs when stratified by presence or absence of any adjuvant chemotherapy. No difference in RFS were seen in QuantCRC-integrated low-risk and intermediate-risk stage III CRCs stratified by 3 vs. 6-months of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy suggesting that these two groups can be treated with 3-months of adjuvant therapy. Conclusions: Incorporation of QuantCRC into risk stratification provides a powerful predictor of RFS that has potential to guide subsequent treatment and surveillance.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) is standard of care for T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). However, data on outcomes in high-risk T1a EAC are limited. We assessed and compared outcomes after EET of low-risk and high-risk T1a EAC, including intraluminal EAC recurrence, extraesophageal metastases, and overall survival. METHODS: Patients who underwent EET for T1a EAC at 3 referral Barrett's esophagus endotherapy units between 1996 and 2022 were included. Patients with submucosal invasion, positive deep margins, or metastases at initial diagnosis were excluded. High-risk T1a EAC was defined as T1a EAC with poor differentiation and/or lymphovascular invasion, with low-risk disease being defined without these features. All pathology was systematically assessed by expert gastrointestinal pathologists. Baseline and follow-up endoscopy and pathology data were abstracted. Time-to-event analyses were performed to compare outcomes between groups. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-eight patients with T1a EAC were included (high risk, n = 45; low risk, n = 143) with a median age of 70 years, and 84% were men. Groups were comparable for age, sex, Barrett's esophagus length, lesion size, and EET technique. Rates of delayed extraesophageal metastases (11.1% vs 1.4%) were significantly higher in the high-risk group ( P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the rates of intraluminal EAC recurrence ( P = 0.79) and overall survival ( P = 0.73) between the 2 groups. DISCUSSION: Patients with high-risk T1a EAC undergoing successful EET had a substantially higher rate of extraesophageal metastases compared with those with low-risk T1a EAC on long-term follow-up. These data should be factored into discussions with patients while selecting treatment approaches. Additional prospective data in this area are critical.

GLI1 encodes a transcription factor that targets cell cycle regulators affecting stem cell proliferation. GLI1 gene fusions were initially described in pericytomas with a t[7;12] translocation and more recently in gastric plexiform fibromyxomas and gastroblastomas. This study describes the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of three intestinal-based neoplasms harboring GLI1 gene fusions. We studied three unique mesenchymal small bowel tumors. Paraffin embedded tumor tissues from these cases and 62 additional tumor samples that included a plexiform fibromyxoma were sequenced using a targeted RNAseq method to detect fusion events. The study patients included two women and one man who were 52, 80, and 22 years of age at the time of diagnosis. The tumors involved the submucosa and muscularis propria of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum. All 3 tumors contained a proliferation of monotonous oval or spindle cells with scattered, somewhat dilated vessels. Two cases showed epithelioid structures such as glands, tubules, or nests. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed cytokeratin expression in the epithelioid components of both tumors displaying these features, and variable numbers of mesenchymal cells. Diffuse CD56 positivity was seen in the mesenchymal component of 2 tumors and desmin and smooth muscle actin staining in the other tumor. Immunostains for S-100 protein, DOG-1, and CD117 were negative in all cases. GLI1 fusions with different partner genes were detected in all tumors, and in the plexiform fibromyxoma, used as a control. Validation by fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed. None of the tumors have recurred or metastasize after surgery. We describe novel GLI1 fusions in 3 mesenchymal neoplasms of the small intestine, including 2 with biphenotypic features. Thus far, all cases have pursued indolent clinical courses. We propose the term “ GLI1 -rearranged enteric tumor” to encompass this group of unique neoplasms of the small intestine that harbor GLI1 gene fusions and expand the spectrum of gastrointestinal neoplasms with these alterations.

Background: Histological changes induced by gluten in the duodenal mucosa of patients with non-coeliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) are poorly defined. Objectives: To evaluate the structural and inflammatory features of NCGS compared to controls and coeliac disease (CeD) with milder enteropathy (Marsh I-II). Methods: Well-oriented biopsies of 262 control cases with normal gastroscopy and histologic findings, 261 CeD, and 175 NCGS biopsies from 9 contributing countries were examined. Villus height (VH, in μm), crypt depth (CrD, in μm), villus-to-crypt ratios (VCR), IELs (intraepithelial lymphocytes/100 enterocytes), and other relevant histological, serologic, and demographic parameters were quantified. Results: The median VH in NCGS was significantly shorter (600, IQR: 400–705) than controls (900, IQR: 667–1112) (p < 0.001). NCGS patients with Marsh I-II had similar VH and VCR to CeD [465 µm (IQR: 390–620) vs. 427 µm (IQR: 348–569, p = 0·176)]. The VCR in NCGS with Marsh 0 was lower than controls (p < 0.001). The median IEL in NCGS with Marsh 0 was higher than controls (23.0 vs. 13.7, p < 0.001). To distinguish Marsh 0 NCGS from controls, an IEL cut-off of 14 showed 79% sensitivity and 55% specificity. IEL densities in Marsh I-II NCGS and CeD groups were similar. Conclusion: NCGS duodenal mucosa exhibits distinctive changes consistent with an intestinal response to luminal antigens, even at the Marsh 0 stage of villus architecture.

Abstract Introduction: The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has increased more than any other cancer in our lifetime. Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is the only known precursor to EAC. At present, HER-2 and anti-PD-L1 therapies are FDA-approved for EAC, and off-label use of EGFR-directed therapy has been reported. Our study aims to use liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC/MS) to measure the expression of oncoproteins that are currently approved-drug targets in EAC and explore new promising targets for drug development and diagnostic applications for EAC and BE. Methods: EAC patients who underwent esophagectomy without chemo-radiation were identified. BE patients with subsequent progression to EAC and those without progression for &gt;10 years were identified. Normal esophageal mucosa tissues with no history of progression were analyzed for baseline expression. Tissue sections were microdissected to isolate pure EAC, BE and normal mucosal cells from stroma. These biopsies were solubilized for LC/MS-based quantification of 80+ clinically relevant tumor markers including novel markers which are believed to play a role in the disease progression from BE to EAC. The expression trends of these markers were scrutinized by immunofluorescence (IF) in a subset of specimens/biomarkers to confirm mass spec results. Results: A total of 159 tissues were analyzed via LC-MS. In 55 EAC tissues - HER2, PD-L1 and EGFR were overexpressed in 16.3%, 0%, and 0% of patients, respectively. New markers DAD1 and S100P were noted to have high (7,634.0 and 27,222.6 attomoles/ug) and consistent (98.1% and 94.5%) overexpression in EAC samples. Expression of HER2, S100P and DAD1 were significantly higher in EAC compared to 23 normal esophageal mucosa specimens. There was no statistical difference in the expression of PD-L1 and EGFR between EAC and healthy mucosal samples. 45 BE biopsies progressed to EAC within a mean of 380 days, while the remaining 36 BE specimens did not progress over a 10-year period. 8 novel biomarkers were expressed at a higher level in BE tissue that progressed to cancer when compared to esophageal tissue that remained stable over 10 years. The expression trends observed via LC/MS were confirmed via IF in DAD1, S100P and two other novel markers. Discussion: LC-MS revealed low prevalence of target proteins in currently approved EAC therapies and high levels of newly discovered disease drivers that should be explored as possible therapy targets or diagnostic markers. The differential overexpression of the novel markers in progressive and non-progressive BE tissues, as well as the consistent overexpression of these markers in EAC tumors, demonstrates the potential for early detection of esophageal carcinogenesis and/or reveals potential therapeutic programs for an indication that lacks highly efficacious targeted therapy options. Citation Format: Christopher Hartley, Ajay Bansal, Catherine Hagen, Olivia Driscoll, Seyun Oh, Joe Abdo, Sumeet K. Mittal. Mass spectrometry detects lower frequency of routine markers and consistent overexpression of novel disease drivers in Barrett's-related esophageal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2805.

INTRODUCTION: To describe the clinical, endoscopic, and histopathology features of esophageal graft-vs-host disease (GVHD). Methods: Patients with biopsy-proven esophageal GVHD diagnosed at Mayo Clinic between 2000 and 2021 were included. Results: In 43 esophageal patients, other organ GVHD was present in 58% before and 86% at esophageal GVHD diagnosis. Esophageal specific symptoms were uncommon (dysphagia 26% and odynophagia/heartburn 5%). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was abnormal in 72% patients demonstrating erosive esophagitis, ulceration, desquamation, or rings/furrows in a diffuse or focal pattern. DISCUSSION: There should be a low threshold for esophageal biopsies for GVHD because esophageal symptoms and endoscopic findings may be nonspecific or absent.

343 Background: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) continues to have extremely poor prognosis despite advances in surgical and oncological regimens. Targeted and immune therapy hold promise to improve outcomes in solid tumors including EAC. At present HER-2 and anti-PD-L1 therapies are approved by the FDA for EAC. Additionally, off-label use of EGFR directed therapy has been reported. The aim of this study is to measure expression of 80+ oncoproteins in EAC using multiplexed mass spectrometry to elucidate expression of currently approved-drug targets and explore promising new targets for drug development. Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval (Mayo Clinic and KUMC), EAC patients whose tumors were resected via esophagectomy before chemotherapy and/or radiation were identified. Normal esophageal mucosa samples with no history of EAC were also retrieved for analysis. Tissue sections were microdissected to exclude stroma from adenocarcinoma cells. Isolated EAC cells were solubilized for mass spectrometry-based quantitation of more than 80 clinically relevant tumor markers. Results: 55 EAC tissues were analyzed. HER2, PD-L1 and EGFR were overexpressed only in 16.3%, 0%, and 0% of patients, respectively. New oncoproteins #2 and #6 were noted to have high (7,634.0 and 27,222.6 attomoles/ug) and consistent (98.1% and 94.5%) overexpression in EAC samples. Expression of HER2, oncoproteins #2 and #6 were significantly higher in EAC compared to normal esophageal mucosa. There was no statistical difference in the expression of PD-L1 and EGFR between EAC and normal samples. Conclusions: Mass spectrometry revealed a very low prevalence of target oncoproteins in EAC for currently used drugs. Our study potentially reveals alternate markers which are near universally present at high levels and should be further explored for targeted treatment.[Table: see text]

249 Background: Since 1975, Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) incidence has increased more than any other cancer (̃700%). Pre-malignant metaplastic tissue, or Barrett's Esophagus (BE), is the only known precursor for EAC. Periodic histological assessment of endoscopic biopsy along dysplasia-carcinoma sequence is used to assess progression risk. Current surveillance protocols have clinical limitations as 80% of patients still present with stage II-IV EAC. The aim of this study is to compare novel proteomic expression patterns to distinguish stable BE patients from those who developed EAC using the STLA101 assay. Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval patients with BE/GERD were identified. Two cohorts were selected: progressors (progressed to EAC at subsequent interval of 0.5-3 years) and non–progressors (̃10 yrs of f/u surveillance without progression along dysplasia/carcinoma path). 24 normal esophageal mucosa samples with no h/o of BE were also retrieved for baseline expression levels. Tissue sections were microdissected to isolate pure BE cells from surrounding stromal cells. BE cells underwent a multi-step process where tissue was heated and digested to produce a liquid biopsy for mass spec. Isotopically labeled control peptides representing the STLA101 panel were spiked in with digested tissue samples to quantify all of the markers simultaneously using a Triple-quad mass spectrometer. Results: A total of 95 tissues were analyzed. 29 BE biopsies progressed to EAC within a mean of 380 days while the remaining 28 BE and 14 GERD specimens did not progress over a 10-yr period. All 8 biomarkers were expressed at a higher level in BE tissue that progressed to cancer when compared to BE/GERD tissue that remained stable over 10 years. The assay had a 100% technical success rate as no samples yielded “non-detectable” data points. Conclusions: The differential overexpression of the STLA101 panel on progressive and non-progressive BE tissues demonstrates the clinical utility of STLA101 as a predictive biomarker panel for early detection of esophageal carcinogenesis. Non-progressive BE tissues were similar to normal mucosa, therefore, patients whose BE tissue samples resemble this profile may receive a reduced screening cadence. On the other hand, patients with overexpression of the STLA101 panel may be eligible to receive more frequent screening or therapeutic intervention.