Saliba, Antoine N.

Background Venetoclax (Ven) in combination with hypomethylating agent (HMA) is the standard treatment for newly diagnosed elderly/unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) disease following Ven-HMA are limited in the absence of targetable mutations. In a recent phase 2 study, the addition of Ven to cladribine (CDA) plus low-dose cytarabine (LDAC), in newly-diagnosed elderly/unfit AML, resulted in complete remission with (CR) or without (CRi) count recovery rate of 93% ( J Clin Oncol 20;40(33)). In the current study, we share our experience with this regimen in patients relapsed or refractory to Ven-HMA, treated outside of clinical trials. Methods Under an institutional review board approved minimum risk protocol, the Mayo Clinic (MN, AZ, FL) database was searched to identify patients with AML who failed treatment with Ven-HMA and subsequently received at least one cycle of salvage therapy with Ven-CDA-LDAC: Ven 100-400 mg, dose adjusted, d1-21, CDA 5 mg/m 2 d1-5, LDAC 20 mg twice daily d1-10, outside of clinical trials. Cytogenetic and molecular studies were performed at the time of Ven-CDA-LDAC initiation in most cases, by conventional karyotype and next-generation sequencing, respectively. The 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria were applied to define risk and response. Survival was calculated from the time of Ven-CDA-LDAC treatment start to last follow-up or death. Results Patient characteristics A total of 39 RR AML patients (median age 65 years, 67% male, 64% de novo), with prior exposure to Ven-HMA, received Ven-CDA-LDAC (median 1 cycle; range 1-5). Study patients had received one ( n=16), two ( n=14), three ( n=5), four ( n=2), five ( n=1) or nine ( n=1) prior therapies, including Ven-HMA. Nine (23%) patients had relapsed following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT). ELN cytogenetic risk included intermediate (46%, n=18), and adverse (54%, n=21). Mutations involved TP53 in 9 patients (23%), K/ NRAS in 8 (21%), RUNX1 in 7 (18%), TET2 in 6 (15%), ASXL1 in 5 (13%), and STAG2 in 5 (13%). Response and toxicity Eleven (28%) patients achieved CR ( n=2; 5%) or CRi ( n=9; 23%); median time to response was 1 month and median response duration 3.4 months. In addition, 2 (5%) patients each experienced partial remission (PR) and bone marrow aplasia without fulfilling criteria for morphologic leukemia free state. Measurable residual disease (MRD) was negative by multiparametric flow cytometry in 2 of 7 (29%) informative CR/CRi cases. CR/CRi rates were higher in females (54% vs 15%; p=0.01), de novo vssecondary AML (40% vs 7%; p=0.02), and absence of adverse karyotype (50% vs 9%; p<0.01), K/NRAS (35% vs 0%, p=0.01), ASXL1 (32% vs 0%, p=0.05), or STAG2 mutations (32% vs 0%, p=0.05) (Table 1). Multivariable analysis confirmed superior response in de novo AML (p<0.01), absence of adverse karyotype, (p<0.01), and absence of K/NRAS mutations (p=0.02). CR/CRi rates were not significantly affected by relapsed vs refractory setting ( p=0.95), number of prior therapies ( p=0.51), prior AHSCT ( p=0.64), or TP53 mutations ( p=0.64) (Table 1). Treatment-emergent toxicities included infections (49%, n=19), comprising bacteremia ( n=11), pneumonia ( n=10), peri-rectal abscess ( n=6), and laboratory evidence of tumor lysis syndrome (3%, n=1). Survival At a median follow-up of 3.9 months, from initiation of Ven-CDA-LDAC, 31 deaths (79%), 6 relapses (15%), and 7 AHSCT (18%; including 5 in CR/CRi, 1 in aplasia) were documented. Median survival following Ven-CDA-LDAC was 4.6 months, and superior in the presence vs absence of CR/CRi (8.1 vs 2.9 months; p=0.01), and in patients receiving AHSCT (10.5 vs 3.4 months; p=0.02). Absence of adverse karyotype was also associated with superior survival (6 vs 3.4 months; p=0.05). Multivariable analysis confirmed the favorable survival impact of CR/CRi ( p=0.03) and AHSCT ( p=0.05); survival impact was not apparent for secondary AML ( p=0.29) or K/NRAS ( p=0.70) or TP53 ( p=0.10) mutations. Conclusions The current study suggests transplant bridging value for Ven-CDA-LDAC in AML patients relapsed or refractory to Ven-HMA, especially in the absence of adverse karyotype or K/NRAS mutation. AHSCT and achievement of CR/CRi appear to be indispensable for favorable post-Ven-CDA-LDAC survival.

INTRODUCTION: The Stromal Antigen 2 ( STAG2), on Xq25, is the most common cohesin complex gene mutated in myeloid neoplasms (MN) (5-10%). STAG2 mutations ( STAG2m) were incorporated in the ELN2022 as AML-MDS defining genetic mutations inferring poor prognosis and is a genetic marker in IPSS-M risk stratification. The PHD-finger protein 6 ( PHF6) gene, on Xq26.3, is a tumor suppressor gene, mutated in 3% of MN, and is more common in T-ALL. PHF6m is believed to be a late event in MN with little data on its prognostic implications in MN. Both STAG2m and PHF6m are more prevalent in males, but their implications on the clinical presentation of MN have not been compared prior. METHOD: Our study is a multicenter study at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Florida, Arizona). After IRB approval, we retrospectively analyzed charts of 7935 patients who had NGS between 2016-2022. STAG2m was found in 96 patients, and PHF6m in 116 (including 3 with concurrent STAG2m and PHF6m). We excluded 4 PHF6m patients who had T-ALL. Data was captured at time of NGS. MDS risk stratification was by IPSS-M and AML by ELN2022. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from date of NGS to date of last follow-up. BlueSky Software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Characteristics: We compared 96 STAG2m vs 112 PHF6m MN patients. Of STAG2m cases, 78% were male vs 76% in PHF6m MN. Median age was 72 vs 73 years, respectively. Diagnoses included AML (29% of STAG2m vs 34% of PHF6m MN), MDS (54% vs 28%), MDS/MPN (10% vs 21%) and MPN (3% vs 9%). MDS was more common among STAG2m MN (p<.001) while MDS/MPN was more common among PHF6m MN (=.05). MDS-IB was the most common subtype in both (69% vs 52% in STAG2m vs PHF6m MDS). MDS-LB and 5q subtypes were only found in PHF6m MDS, and there was more PHF6m MDS-RS (13% vs 2%). Median IPSS-M score was 0.9 vs 0.8 in STAG2m vs PHF6m MDS (both high-risk). Majority of STAG2m AML were adverse risk (96%) while PHF6m AML were intermediate (79%) (p<.001). AML cases included 43% vs 30% secondary AML (sAML) in STAG2m vs PHF6m AML. Among STAG2m and PHF6m MN, 17% of each were tMN. Cytogenetic abnormalities were more common in PHF6m MN (50% vs 31%, p=.005). The median bone marrow (BM) blasts count among STAG2m MN was 7% vs 4% in PHF6m MN (p=.03). Genetic characteristics: STAG2m were nonsense, frameshift and splice site (54%, 36% and 11%). PHF6m were nonsense, frameshift, splice site, missense and start loss variant mutations (44%, 33%, 12%, 10% and 1%). The median variant allele frequency (VAF) of STAG2m MN was 50% compared to 32% in PHF6m MN (p=.008). Co-mutations: The median number of co-mutations was 3 in STAG2m and 4 in PHF6m MN (p=.04). The most common were TET2m (37% in STAG2m MN vs 45% in PHF6m MN), RUNX1m (31% in both), SRSF2m (39% vs 20%), ASXL1m (66% vs 38%), BCORm (19% vs 6%), U2AF1m (13% vs 14%) and IDH2m (18% vs 7%). ASXL1m, SRSF2m, BCORm, IDH2m and SF3B1m were more common among STAG2m MN (p=<.001, .003, .006, .02, .09). JAK2m, IDH1m are more common among PHF6m MN (p=.02, .06). Survival: Of STAG2m and PHF6m MN, 70% and 72% of patients received treatment. HSCT was performed in 23 (24%) and 23 (21%) of STAG2m and PHF6m patients, including AML (n=9, n=10), MDS (n=12, n=8), MDS/MPN (n=2, n=2). OS among STAG2m and PHF6m MN was 20.5 and 22.1 months, respectively. OS among AML cases was 13.5 vs 21 months (p=.6) in STAG2m vs PHF6m, was NR vs 22 months (p=.4) in MDS, 11.7 vs 17.6 months in MDS/MPN (p=.4), and 10.4 vs 27.4 months (p=.5) in MPN. There was no difference between males and females in either STAG2m or PHF6m MN. HSCT led to longer OS among both STAG2m (NR vs 19.9 months, p=.01) and PHF6m MN patients (NR vs 17.6 months, p=.07). Among AML patients, HSCT did not significantly impact OS (18 vs 9.6 months, p=.3 and 25.1 vs 21 months, p=.2, in STAG2m and PHF6m). HSCT improved OS in STAG2m MDS (NR vs 20.5 months, p=.03). In PHF6m MDS, OS was 22.1 vs 13.1 months in HSCT vs non-HSCT (p=.3). CONCLUSION: STAG2m and PHF6m are 2 X-linked mutations that occur in MN. Both commonly occur in elderly males. MDS was the most common diagnosis in STAG2m MN. STAG2m co-occurred particularly with SRSF2m ASXL1m and BCORm, which are associated with poor prognosis. In our cohort, STAG2m AML carried a poorer prognosis than PHF6m AML. Our study confirms the ELN2022 AML risk stratification. MDS risk classification and OS did not differ between STAG2m and PHF6m in our cohort. A larger cohort is required to confirm our findings and may provide stronger validation.

Background and Significance Dysregulation of alternative splicing, caused by abnormal expression or mutation of splicing factors, has been identified as an important contributor to the genesis and progression of cancer, and suggested as a novel target for anticancer treatment. CDC2-like kinases (CLK) represent a family of dual-specificity tyrosine and serine-threonine kinases that are involved in the regulation of splicing by phosphorylation of serine/arginine-rich splicing factors (SRSFs) which play a central role in exon recognition. CTX-712 is an orally available, potent, selective, and a first-in-class pan-CLK inhibitor (CLK 1-4), that inhibits phosphorylation of SRSFs resulting in significant antitumor activity in vitro and multiple xenograft models in vivo. CTX-712 formulated in capsules is currently being evaluated in an ongoing first-in-man study in Japan, evaluating tolerability and early efficacy in patients with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies (JapicCTI-184188). Preliminary data from the Japanese study were presented during ASCO 2022 and ASH 2022, and showed an acceptable safety profile (doses up to 175 mg (MTD 140 mg) twice a week in 28-day cycles, observed DLTs included dehydration, decreased platelets, hypokalemia, and pneumonia) with early signs of clinical antitumor activity (2 partial responses / 26 treated solid tumor patients, 5 complete remissions and complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery/ 8 treated patients with AML or MDS), warranting further clinical investigations.. (J Clin Oncol (2022) 40(16_suppl):3080. Blood (2022) 140(Supplement 1):6211-2.). This abstract details a second study with CTX-712 that has just been initiated. Study Design and Methods A new film-coated tablet formulation will be evaluated in this phase 1/2 multicenter, open-label study of CTX-712 in patients with (mutated or wild type spliceosomes genes) relapsed/refractory AML, higher risk MDS (IPSS-R intermediate, high, or very high), or high marrow blast (≥5 %) MDS/MPN (including CMML). The phase 1 part of the study will be conducted at 4 US sites, and all sites are currently open for enrolment. The study allows patients with performance status 0, 1, or 2, adequate organ function, and up to four prior lines of therapy. Due to potential risk of interactions (in vitro studies suggest CYP3A4 as main metabolic pathway for CTX-712), concomitant use of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors is prohibited. Use of azole antifungals that are not strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (e.g., isavuconazole) is permitted. The phase 1 part of the study consists of dose-escalation (sequential standard 3 + 3 design), where cohorts of 3 (or 6) patients will receive ascending doses of CTX-712 once weekly in a 28-day cycle with continuous monitoring of emerging clinical PK, PD, safety, and efficacy data, to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) based on the suggestion by the Safety Review Committee (SRC). The protocol defines five different dose levels (20-140 mg, once weekly) but also authorizes the SRC to suggest up to two interim dose levels or alternate schedules (e.g., dosing two times a week) if supported by emerging data. The suggested RP2D will be used in a confirmatory phase 1 expansion cohort where an additional 10 patients (total n = 16; 8 patients with AML and 8 patients with MDS) will be treated to gain further confidence in the selected dose level. The phase 2 part of the study will commence after the RP2D has been identified and confirmed and aims at evaluating therapeutic activity in R/R AML (Cohort 2a) or R/R HR-MDS (Cohort 2b), in addition to confirmation of the safety profile. Clinical trial registry number: NCT05732103

Background TP53-mutated (m) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an adverse risk disease, which continues to have dismal outcome in the contemporary era of novel therapies. Venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMA; azacitidine or decitabine) have shown to improve complete remission (CR) rates compared to HMA alone, however no significant differences in overall survival (OS) have been observed. Methods We conducted a retrospective study through the COMMAND consortium (a collaboration of acute leukemia experts from 10 US academic institutions) to analyze the impact on survival outcomes of HMA plus (+) VEN compared to HMA-based therapies in adult (≥18 years) pts with TP53m AML. The AML Database of 381 pts with TP53m AML diagnosed between 2012-2022 was queried and 154 (40%) (HMA [n=50] and HMA +VEN [n=104]) pts were identified eligible for this analysis. Continuous variables were summarized as median (range) while categorical variables were reported as frequency (percentage). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS, defined as time from diagnosis to death or last follow-up. Logistic regression models were used to determine the univariate and multivariate of OS. Multivariable models included all significant univariate predictors. All tests were two-sided with a p value <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results Baseline characteristics and responses The median age (years [yrs]) was 74 (range [R], 38-87) and 71 (R,29-88) yrs in the HMAand HMA + VEN groups (gps) (p= 0.23), respectively ( Table 1). Thirty-four (68%) and 57 (55%) patients (pts) were ≥ 70 yrs in the HMA and HMA + VEN gps, respectively (p= 0.16). Twenty-six percent vs 31% ( p=0.57), 86% vs 90% ( p=0.58) and 68% vs 73% ( p=0.56) of pts had secondary AML, had complex cytogenetics (CG), and had multi-hit TP53m in the HMA and HMA + VEN gps, respectively. The proportion of pts with most frequently occurring (> 5%) myeloid co-mutations ( RUNX1, ASXL1, TET2, DNMT3A, RAS, PTPN11 and JAK2) were not significantly (NS) different between the HMA and HMA + VEN gps, as shown in Table 1. The early treatment related mortality in first 30 days of induction was higher in the HMA+VEN gp (25%) when compared with the HMA gp (6%), p=0.004. The complete remission rates (CR/CRi) were higher in the HMA + VEN gp compared to the HMA gp (35% vs 18%, p=0.05). Similarly, the proportion of pts receiving allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) after induction was higher in the HMA + VEN gp when compared with the HMA gp (13% vs 4%; p=0.14). Duration of response and overall survival The median follow up was 9.8 months (mo) (R, 1-56) and 5.80 mo (R, 1-30.4) in the HMA and HMA + VEN gps, respectively ( p=0.12). The median duration of response (DOR) was higher in the HMA +VEN gp (15.6 mo) when compared with the HMA gp (7.93 mo), but NS ( p=0.26). The median OS was NS different when comparing the HMA and HMA + VEN gps (9.23 vs 7.3 mo, p=0.80 [ Figure 1]). Multivariable analysis for duration of response and overall survival We did multivariable analysis (MVA) for DOR and OS using baseline variables ( Table 1) that showed significance/trend towards significance in univariate analysis ( p<0.1). Allo-HCT (HR; 0.11, 95% CI: 0.02-0.52, p=0.005) retained significance for better DOR, whereas age ≥ 70 yrs (HR; 1.7, 95% CI: 0.63-4.65, p=0.28) and complex CG (HR; 3.05, 95% CI: 0.79-11.73, p=0.10) did not retain significance in MVA. In MVA for OS, achievement of CR/CRi (HR; 0.35, 95% CI; 0.20-0.59, p=<0.001) and allo-HCT after induction (HR; 0.06, 95% CI; 0.09-0.46, p=0.007) retained favorable significance for OS, whereas complex CG (HR; 2.36, 95% CI: 1.11-4.99, p=0.02) retained significance for shorter OS. PTPN11m (HR; 1.57, 95%CI: 0.75-3.28, p=0.23) and TET2m (HR; 1.02, 95% CI: 0.56-1.87, p= 0.92) did not retain significance in MVA. Conclusion In this multi-center real-world study, while HMA+VEN led to improvement in CR rates and a higher proportion of pts were bridged to allo-HCT, it did not associate with an improvement in OS when compared with HMA monotherapy. More effective treatment strategies are warranted to improve outcome of pts with TP53m AML.

Background: Venetoclax (Ven) in combination with hypomethylating agent (HMA) is the preferred treatment for elderly/unfit patients with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Current prognostication for AML is based on European LeukemiaNet (ELN) genetic risk stratification which has limited applicability in patients treated with Ven-HMA ( Blood, 2022). Accordingly, our primary objective was to determine predictors of treatment response and survival outcomes in treatment-naïve AML patients receiving Ven-HMA. Methods: Our study population was recruited from Mayo Clinic (MN, FL, AZ), after institutional review board approval and based on documentation of newly-diagnosed AML treated with Ven-HMA outside of clinical trials between November 2018 and April 2023. Cytogenetic and molecular studies were performed by conventional karyotype, and next-generation sequencing, respectively. Response was assessed according to the 2022 ELN criteria Results: Patient characteristics A total of 301 newly-diagnosed AML patients (median age 73 years, 66% male, 62% de novo) received a median of 3 cycles (range 1-48) of azacitidine 75 mg/m2 days 1-7 ( n=100) or decitabine 20 mg/m2 days 1-5 ( n=201) with Ven. ELN 2022 cytogenetic risk included favorable (1%, n=4), intermediate (61%, n=184) or adverse (38%, n=113). Mutations involved TP53 in 77/301 (25%), ASXL1 in 54/279 (19%), RUNX1 in 54/296 (18%), NPM1 in 44/299 (15%), DNMT3A in 40/296 (13%), K/NRAS in 41/296 (14%), IDH1 in 20/301 (6%), IDH2 in 30/301 (10%), FLT3-ITD in 25/301 (8%) and DDX41 in 9/247 (4%) of informative cases. Predictors of response Complete remission, with (CR) or without (CRi), count recovery, was documented in 182 (60%) patients, including CR in 36% and measurable residual disease (MRD) negative by flow cytometry in 77% of 105 informative cases that achieved CR/CRi. Median time to CR/CRi was 1.4 months. In univariate analysis, CR/CRi was more likely to occur in the presence of NPM1 mutation, (86% vs. 56%; p < .01), IDH2 mutation, (80% vs. 58%; p = .02), DNMT3A mutation, (78% vs. 57%; p = .01), or DDX41 mutation, (100% vs. 58%; p <.01), and in the absence of adverse karyotype, (71% vs. 42%; p < .01), TP53 mutation, (67% vs. 40%; p <.01), FLT3-ITD mutation, (63% vs. 36%; p = .01), or RUNX1 mutation, (64% vs. 44%; p = .01); in multivariable analysis, adverse karyotype, ( p < .01), FLT3-ITD ( p < .01), RUNX1 ( p < .01), NPM1 ( p = .03), IDH2 ( p = .04), and DDX41, ( p = .01) mutations remained significant. Predictors of survival After a median follow-up of 8.5 months (range 0.5-56), 13.2 months for living patients, 174 (58%) deaths, 73 relapses (40% of those achieving CR/CRi), and 41 (14%; including 35 in CR/CRi) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell tranplants (AHSCT) were documented. In univariate analysis of pre-treatment variables, thrombocytopenia < 100 x 10 9/l, (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.03-2.2; p = .03), adverse karyotype, (HR 2.8, 95% CI 2.1-3.8; p < .01) TP53 mutation, (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.8-3.5; p < .01), or absence of IDH2 mutation, (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.7-7.6; p < .01) predicted inferior survival. Failure to achieve CR/CRi (HR 4.5, 95% CI 3.3-6.1; p < .01) was also associated with inferior survival and in multivariable analysis, failure to achieve CR/CRi, (HR 3.4, 95% CI 2.5-4.8; p< .01), presence of adverse karyotype, (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.6; p = .02), TP53 mutation, (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.002-2.4; p = .04), and absence of IDH2 mutation (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.004-4.7; p = .04) were identified as risk factors for survival. Subsequent HR-weighted scoring resulted in three-tiered risk stratification: low (0-1 point; n= 130), intermediate (2-3 points; n= 105), and high (4-5 points; n= 66), with respective median survival (3-year rate) of 28.9 (48%), 9.6 (6%), and 3.1 (0%) months ( p < .01) (Figure). AHSCT had an independent favorable impact on survival (HR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.6; p < .01), most apparent in low ( p =0.04), and intermediate ( p <.01), as opposed to high ( p = .06) risk. Conclusions: In the current single institutional series of Ven-HMA treated newly-diagnosed AML, response to Ven-HMA was the foremost predictor of survival. Additional risk factors for survival included adverse karyotype, presence of TP53 and absence of IDH2 mutations. These observations allowed for a three-tiered genetics-enhanced survival model with CR/CRi as a backbone, and also confirmed survival advantage from AHSCT, regardless of risk category.

Introduction HMAs are the only approved therapy for CMML. In order to improve response rates and survival, the addition of VEN has been utilized in both CMML and after blast transformation (CMML-BT) with conflicting results in small single center studies. To clarify the role of upfront HMA+VEN in CMML and CMML-BT, we performed a large multicenter analysis. Methods We included patients with HMA-naïve CMML and CMML-BT treated with combination HMA and VEN from 4 academic centers. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) with secondary outcomes including overall response rate (ORR) by 2015 MDS/MPN IWG criteria for CMML and 2022 ELN criteria for CMML-BT. To better appreciate the benefit of adding VEN to HMA treatment, we also performed 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM) analysis of patients treated with HMA alone as upfront therapy for CMML or CMML-BT. Matching was based on age, sex, ECOG performance status, CPSS-Mol, blood counts, peripheral and bone marrow blasts. Results Eighty-nine patients were treated with frontline HMA+VEN, 51 CMML and 38 CMML-BT (5 had received HMA alone for prior CMML). The median age was 71 years, 70% were male, and 83% had ECOG 0-1. Among CMML patients, 55% had MP-CMML subtype, 65% had CMML-2 and 12%, 30%, 58% were CPSS-mol intermediate-1, intermediate-2 and high risk, respectively. In the entire cohort, ASXL1 (63%), TET2 (47%), SRSF2 (39%) and RUNX1 (27%) were the most commonly mutated genes and 55% of patients harbored a RAS mutation ( KRAS [20%], NRAS [18%], CBL [13%], NF1 [11%], PTPN11 [9%]). For HMA combination partner, 46 (52%) were treated with azacitidine, 35 (39%) with decitabine, and 8 (9%) with both during their VEN course. During a median follow-up time of 15.8 months (mos) 52 patients (58%) died: 23 (45%) with CMML and 29 (76%) with CMML-BT. Among CMML patients, the ORR was 90%, including complete remission (CR) in 22%, complete cytogenic remission (CCR) in 4%, optimal marrow response (CMR) in 50%, and partial marrow response (PMR) in 6%. The OS of CMML patients was 25.1 mo (95% CI 15.7 - NR). A PSM population of HMA patients matched to HMA+VEN treated patients showing similar baseline characteristics. ORR was significantly higher with HMA+VEN (95%) as compared those treated with HMA alone (46%), p < 0.001. However, there was no significant OS difference between HMA+VEN vs HMA alone (19.1 mos vs 19.1 mos, p = 0.85, Figure 1). For CMML-BT patients, the ORR of HMA+VEN was 81% including CR in 17%, CR with partial hematologic recover (CRh) in 3%, CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) in 28%, morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) in 22% and partial response (PR) in 11%. The OS of CMML-BT patients was 8 mos (95% CI 4.6 - 26.2). A PSM population of CMML-BT patients treated with HMA alone showed a significantly increased ORR with HMA+VEN (82% vs 40%, p = 0.039). However, there was no difference in OS (7.49 mos vs 9.26 mos, p = 0.83, Figure 2). Among HMA-VEN treated patients, achievement of a CR was associated with an improved OS in the CMML (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13 - 0.75) and CMML-BT (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19 - 0.74). No predictors of response were identified, including the presence of a RAS mutation. In terms of safety, 7 patients (7.9%) had a grade 3/4 (G3/4) neutropenic infection and 2 patients (2.2%) had a G3/4 hemorrhagic event while being treated with HMA+VEN. A total of 29 patients went on to receive allogeneic transplant (alloSCT): 22 (43%) with CMML and 7 (18%) with CMML-BT. CMML patients who underwent alloSCT after HMA+VEN were younger as compared to non-transplanted patients (64 vs 74 years, p < 0.0001), but had otherwise similar baseline characteristics including stage, CPSS-mol category and prevalence of RAS mutations. Similarly, CMML-BT patients bridged to alloSCT were younger (66 vs 74 years, p < 0.002) and had a better ECOG performance status (p = 0.047). Of patients who received alloSCT, 10 patients (34%) died, 5 with CMML and 5 with CMML-BT. The median OS after alloSCT was 26.7 mo. Conclusions Although the use of VEN with HMA in the upfront treatment of CMML and AML secondary to CMML results in higher response rates compared to HMA alone, this combination does not improve survival based on this multi-center PSM analysis. The current sample size of CMML-BT may limit detection of OS differences between treatment groups. The role of VEN to reduce blasts and serve as a bridge to alloSCT, particularly after HMA failure, requires further investigation in larger studies in both the CMML and CMML-BT populations.