Visram, Alissa

Abstract Gastrointestinal complications of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment are common and include nausea, constipation, and diarrhea. However, acute gastrointestinal events like perforations are rare. We aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with MM that had colonic perforations during their treatment. This is a retrospective study that included patients from all three Mayo Clinic sites who had MM and developed a colonic perforation. All patients were diagnosed with colonic perforations based on CT scans and were surgically treated. Patients diagnosed with AL amyloidosis, a perforated colon complicating neutropenic colitis during ASCT and those with perforation due to colonic cancer were excluded. A high dose of dexamethasone was defined as ≥40 mg dexamethasone once a week. Thirty patients met inclusion criteria. All patients received steroids at doses ≥10 mg once weekly prior to the perforation, while four (11%) were on high‐dose dexamethasone without chemotherapy. Fourteen patients were given high doses of dexamethasone. Twenty‐five patients required ostomies with all surviving surgery. Twenty‐four perforations (80%) were associated with diverticulitis. Treatment with steroids was resumed in 23 patients with no further gastrointestinal complications. The median OS was 20 months following perforation (IQR 8–59). Within the same timeframe 5854 patients were treated at Mayo Clinic for MM, making the risk of bowel perforation 0.5%. Intestinal perforations in MM are rare and, in our series, always occurred with dexamethasone ≥10 mg per week. Urgent surgery is lifesaving and resumption of anti‐myeloma treatment appears to be safe.

e20515 Background: IgA monoclonal proteins (MCPs), unlike IgG MCPs, often migrate in the beta region on serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) which can lead to underestimation of their size due to the co-migration with physiologic proteins. In IgA multiple myeloma (MM), the utility of quantitative IgA levels in assessing disease response in comparison to SPEP is not well studied. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 304 IgA MM patients, diagnosed between 2004 and 2018, with available serial MCP and quantitative IgA levels. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to estimate the median progression free survival (mPFS) using the IMWG criteria and our study definition of IgA progression (2 consecutive IgA values that are > 25% above the nadir IgA value and above upper limit of normal (ULN) of 356 mg/dL, and a detectable IgA MCP on serum immunofixation). The mPFS was defined as the time from treatment initiation until disease progression or death. Results: IgA MCP migrated in the beta region in 134 (44%) patients, and in the gamma region in 150 (56%) patients. At diagnosis the median MCP was 3 (IQR 1.9-4) g/dL and the median IgA was 3240 (IQR 2008-4420) mg/dL. The median time from treatment initiation to MCP nadir was 80 (IQR 42-144) days and median time to IgA nadir was 154 (IQR 90-238) days. At MCP nadir 40% of patients had an IgA above the ULN. All complete responders (n = 104) had normal IgA levels, with a median IgA of 54 (IQR 27-88) g/dL. A ≥90% decrease in IgA between treatment initiation and IgA nadir, compared to a < 90% decrease, was associated with a longer mPFS (34 vs. 20 months, p = 0.006) and overall survival (97 vs. 33 months, p = 0.003). Patients with serial MCP and IgA levels available prior to progression (n = 195) were used to compare the mPFS using the IMWG and IgA progression criteria. The mPFS using the IgA criteria was 32 (95% CI 29-39) months, versus 39 (95% CI 33-45) months using IMWG criteria. Overall, 92 (47%) patients progressed by both IMWG and IgA criteria. At the time of progression using the IgA criteria compared to at IMWG progression, the median hemoglobin was higher (13.3 vs. 11.6 g/dL, respectively, p < 0.001) and fewer patients had new symptomatic bone lesions (2% vs. 33%, respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In IgA MM patients, monitoring quantitative IgA levels predicts disease response and allows for earlier detection of disease progression, prior to the development of end organ damage.

8549 Background: Proteinuria evaluation is essential for diagnosing and monitoring of renal involvement in light chain (AL) amyloidosis. A 24 hour protein collection (24h UP) is the gold standard for proteinuria assessment however it is cumbersome and can be inaccurate. A spot urine albumin to creatinine ratio (uACR) has been proposed as a convenient method to estimate 24hUP. We aimed to validate the correlation between uACR and 24hUP in a large cohort of patients. Methods: We retrospectively studied systemic AL amyloidosis patients evaluated between 2010 and 2019 at Mayo Clinic, with a uACR and 24hUP collected less than 7 days apart. Linear regression analysis was used to construct a prediction model for 24hUP with uACR as the primary predictor. Possible confounders (age, gender, body mass index, morning versus afternoon spot urine collection, estimated glomerular filtration rate) for the primary relationship between uACR and 24h UP were evaluated in the model. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to identify the best uACR cutoff to predict significant proteinuria (defined as a 24hUP > 500mg). Results: We included 665 patients, with a median age of 66 years (IQR 59-72). The spot urine was collected in the morning (before 1200 hours) in 382 (57%) patients, and in the afternoon in 283 (43%) patients. The median 24hUP was 321 (IQR 129-2512.5) mg, median uACR was 107 (IQR 13.5-1845) mg/g, and median serum creatinine was 1.2 (IQR 1-1.8) mg/dL. The uACR correlated well with 24h UP (Pearson’s r= 0.83, 95% CI 0.80-0.85). Linear regression showed that E (24h UPi) = 362 + 1.05(uACRi), and this model was statistically and clinically significant (p < 0.001 and R2 of 0.68, respectively). Age, gender, body mass index, eGFR, and time of day of spot urine collection did not confound the primary relationship between uACR and 24hUP, and no collinearity was observed. A uACR cutoff of > 280 mg/g was the best predictor of a 24hUP > 500 mg (area under the ROC curve 0.98, sensitivity 92%, specificity 97%). For simplicity, we assessed the predictive value of uACR > 300 mg/g for 24h UP > 500 mg. Among patients with 24huACR > 300 mg/g 264 (96%) had a 24hUP > 500 mg, and 31 (7%) of patients with uACR < 300 mg/g had a 24h UP > 500 mg (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In systemic AL amyloid patients, we showed that uACR on a random urine sample correlated well with 24h UP, and can be used to estimate proteinuria with a linear regression model. Based on these findings, and the convenience of uACR testing for patients, we propose that uACR should be used to monitor renal response to AL amyloidosis therapy.