Krych, Aaron J.

Abstract The all‐inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique has gained popularity because of its ability to preserve bone stock, accommodate shorter graft lengths, and reduce postoperative pain. Traditionally, this technique uses metallic cortical suspensory buttons for graft fixation, which are reliable but may cause soft‐tissue irritation and hardware prominence. A recent modification to traditional all‐inside suspensory fixation uses all‐suture cortical buttons, eliminating the need for metallic or screw‐based implants while maintaining secure fixation. This Technical Note describes an all‐inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique that uses an all–soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft, secured with only suture‐based buttons (no metal, no plastic) on both the femoral and tibial sides. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Background: Chronic hamstring tears can result in challenging surgical repairs. Allografts may be used to augment the repair; however, there is limited clinical evidence supporting their use. Purposes: To (1) evaluate clinical outcomes of patients who underwent proximal hamstring repair with allograft augmentation or interposition and (2) compare them to matched controls who underwent primary hamstring repair. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 117 patients who underwent proximal hamstring repair were included, consisting of 19 allograft augmentations, 20 allograft interpositions, and 78 primary repairs. Allograft cohorts were propensity-matched with those who underwent primary repair in a 1 to 2 ratio. Clinical outcomes were obtained at the final follow-up. Data were extracted using continuous variables, with normality reported as mean values ± standard deviation, and non-normality reported as median values with interquartile ranges (IQR). Results: The median follow-up of the augmentation cohort was 1.9 [IQR, 0.8-3.9] years, while it was 3.2 [IQR, 1.6-5.1] years ( P = .182) for the primary repair cohort. The mean follow-up for the interposition cohort was 3.5 ± 2.4 years, while it was 4.2 ± 2.5 years for the primary repair cohort ( P = .227). Forty-two percent of the augmentation cohort had undergone previous surgery, compared with 5% of the interposition cohort. The time from injury to surgery for the augmentation and primary repair cohorts was 6.4 and 1.3 months, respectively ( P < .001). For the interposition and primary repair cohorts, the durations were 17.8 and 1 months, respectively ( P < .001). Clinical outcomes, including the Tegner Activity Scale (3 vs 3), pain with activity (47.4% vs 23.7%), and muscle spasms (36.8% vs 26.3%), did not show significant differences between the augmentation and primary repair cohorts. The augmentation cohort had a significantly worse Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) score (64 vs 75; P < .001) and were more likely to experience pain with sitting (52.6% vs 21.1%; P = .034) than the primary repair cohort. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the interposition and primary repair cohorts (LEFS: 69 vs 75.5, Tegner Activity Scale: 4 vs 4; pain with sitting: 26.3% vs 27.5%; pain with activity: 42.1% vs 30%; muscle spasms: 26.3% vs 30%). Revision rates were similar between cohorts ( P ≥ .255). Conclusion: Proximal hamstring repair for chronic tears with allograft augmentation or interposition is a reproducible procedure that results in satisfactory, yet poorer clinical outcomes compared with patients who underwent primary hamstring repair. These procedures should be considered in symptomatic patients with chronic tears that are not amenable to primary repair.

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common cause of hip pain in female athletes. There are limited data on midterm outcomes for female athletes undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery. Purpose: To evaluate return-to-sport rates and clinical outcomes in female athletes with FAI after primary hip arthroscopic surgery with labral repair and femoral osteochondroplasty. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a single institution’s database was performed to identify female athletes who underwent primary hip arthroscopic surgery with labral repair and femoral osteochondroplasty from July 2011 to October 2019 with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Preoperative radiographs were evaluated for the lateral center-edge angle, Tonnis angle, Tonnis grade, and alpha angle. Patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores, including those for the modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score, Tegner Activity Scale, and visual analog scale for pain, as well as patient satisfaction with surgery were analyzed postoperatively. Results: A total of 63 hips (27 left, 36 right) in 56 female patients (mean age, 21.6 ± 8.0 years; mean body mass index, 24.7 ± 4.8 kg/m 2 ) were included and followed for a mean of 8.4 ± 2.1 years (range, 5.0-13.2 years). Preoperatively, patients participated in basketball (n = 18), dance (n = 21), hockey (n = 8), and soccer (n = 12). Of the 56 patients, 41 attempted to return to sport. There were 28 (68%) female athletes who successfully returned to their preoperative sport. Of the total cohort, 21 (38%) patients cited non–hip-related factors for discontinuing their sport. All postoperative PROM scores improved significantly compared with preoperatively ( P ≤ .002) for patients with available preoperative data. Those who returned to sport had significantly improved Hip Outcome Score values compared with those who did not return to sport ( P ≤ .010). Conclusion: Female athletes who underwent primary hip arthroscopic surgery for FAI had significant improvements in PROM scores and moderate return-to-sport rates at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Most athletes discontinued sports because of non–hip-related factors, although hip-related issues were also cited. Our analysis highlights the need for thorough perioperative counseling and establishing appropriate patient expectations for female athletes before hip arthroscopic surgery.

Background: Arthrofibrosis is seen in 1.7% to 38% of patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and has been associated with worse postoperative patient-reported outcomes. There are limited data regarding the optimal time to intervene in cases of arthrofibrosis after ACLR. Purpose: To assess if timing of arthrofibrosis treatment after ACLR affects final knee range of motion (ROM) and to help establish guidelines with regard to timing of intervention for arthrofibrosis after ACLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Databases were retrospectively screened at 2 high-volume practices for patients who underwent lysis of adhesions (LOA; Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 29884 and 29875) with or without manipulation under anesthesia (CPT 27570) after ACLR (CPT 29888). Clinical ROM assessments were collected at multiple time points. Patients were grouped into cohorts based on timing of LOA. Comparative analysis was performed to assess for relationships between ROM and timing of intervention. Results: Seventy-nine patients underwent LOA after ACLR: 25 patients who had a time from ACLR to LOA <3 months, 23 patients between 3 and 6 months, and 31 patients >6 months. Earlier LOA was associated with greater total loss of motion before LOA. The final total arc of motion was 132.7°, 133.7°, and 131.8° for patients who had a time from ACLR to LOA <3 months, between 3 and 6 months, and >6 months, respectively. There were no significant differences among groups in final flexion ( P = .8), extension ( P = .746), or total arc of motion ( P = .781). Linear regression modeling did not identify time from ACLR to LOA as a predictive variable ( P = .982) in final ROM. Conclusion: This study failed to demonstrate a linear relationship between the timing of LOA and final ROM. Regardless of the time to intervention, ROM improved significantly; however, patients with more severe arthrofibrosis underwent LOA at earlier time points.

Background: Optimized surgical fixation and meniscal stabilization during rehabilitation increase healing success. However, the latest generation of all-inside devices has not yet been biomechanically compared with inside-out suture tape (IO-ST) repair. Hypothesis: (1) The contact area of a suture anchor (SA) would compensate for a meniscal defect better than polyether ether ketone anchors (PA); (2) adjustable tensioning for all-inside meniscal repair fixation would result in higher initial load than IO-ST repair; and (3) stiffer constructs would decrease secondary displacement. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: This study investigates human menisci (N = 39) via microscopic imaging and a biomechanical testing protocol. For the imaging protocol, needles of an all-inside SA or PA device and an IO-ST device were inserted after staining to measure the iatrogenic defect created by the needle insertion (n = 20) and the length, width, and meniscus contact area of deployed all-inside anchors (n = 6). For biomechanical testing, menisci with longitudinal bucket handle tears were prepared, and single stitches were repaired (each n = 9). After suture tensioning (50 N) and fixation, initial load, initial stiffness, and relief displacement were measured. Constructs underwent cyclic loading between 2 and 20 N, with 10,000 cycles (0.75 Hz), and stiffness and displacement were measured. Ultimate stiffness and load-to-failure were analyzed at 3.15 mm/sec. Results: All-inside needles created greater iatrogenic meniscal defects ( P < .001) than IO-ST repair. While PAs were longer ( P < .001), SAs were wider with a greater meniscal contact area (both P < .001). IO-ST repair resulted in the lowest initial load ( P < .001) and relief displacement ( P < .001), whereas SA repair resulted in a higher initial load ( P < .007) and stiffness ( P < .023) than PA repair. The overall stiffer SA fixation ( P < 001) significantly reduced cyclic displacement compared with other repairs ( P < .044). The PA group failed due to an anchor fracture at a significantly lower load (84.3 ± 10.7 N; P < .001) than the IO-ST (136.4 ± 10.5 N) and the SA repair (122.1 ± 17.5 N), with a suture-based failure mode. The ultimate stiffness of SA constructs was higher ( P < .045) than that of other repairs. Conclusion: While all-inside devices showed improved primary stability, the IO-ST construct demonstrated the highest load-to-failure. In a human cadaveric model, meniscal repair with a more compact and conforming SA was stiffer and reduced cyclic displacement compared with PA and IO-ST repair. Clinical Relevance: All-inside SA repair improved primary stability. Future clinical series will define the overall significance of healing rates.

Abstract The acetabular labrum is a fibrocartilaginous structure that deepens the acetabular socket and helps maintain a suction seal. In patients with hip dysplasia, a distinct labral tear pattern called an inside‐out labral tear is often seen. This tear pattern is particularly challenging to correct via conventional techniques since the labrum can potentially remain everted and insufficiently restore the native hip labral suction seal after repair. An inverted hip labral repair technique is performed for this pathology at our institution and focuses on achieving optimal labral orientation to enhance the suction seal and joint stability, particularly in dysplastic hips. This Technical Note aims to describe the key surgical principles and clinical considerations of inverted hip labral repair. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Objectives: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is utilized for the treatment of hip dysplasia, with a growing trend towards hip arthroscopy at the time of PAO or in a planned, staged manner prior to PAO in order to address intra-articular pathology such as labral tears. For patients with persistent or new pain following isolated PAO, a subset undergo unplanned, primary hip arthroscopy. To date, there is a paucity of available evidence regarding the risk factors for and outcomes of unplanned hip arthroscopy for persistent or new pain after PAO. The purpose of this study was to determine demographic and radiographic characteristics of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for persistent pain after PAO and also to compare radiographic parameters, surgical characteristics, and postoperative PROMs between patients that underwent hip arthroscopy following PAO and a demographically similar group of controls without acetabular dysplasia that underwent primary hip arthroscopy. Methods: An institutional database of 3014 hip arthroscopies performed between 1988 and 2022 was reviewed for patients having undergone unplanned (i.e. non-staged) first-time hip arthroscopy after PAO. These patients were propensity-matched on a 1:2 ratio with demographically similar, non-dysplastic patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair. All patients were contacted at final-follow-up to collect outcomes including subsequent procedures, progression to THA, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score (HOS), International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT), Tegner Activity Scores, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, and surgery satisfaction. Demographics, radiographic characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were compared. All statistical analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis was performed using R software (version 4.4.1). Results: We identified 22 hips in 21 patients (17 female, 4 male; age: 24.6 ± 8.5 years; BMI: 29.3 ± 7.4 kg/m²) who underwent first-time arthroscopy after ipsilateral PAO and were followed for a mean of 7.2 ± 2.8 years (Table 1). The median post-PAO LCEA was 28° (IQR: 24.6 – 31.7) and the mean Tönnis angle was 4.2° ± 5.9. The median time from the date of PAO to date of subsequent hip arthroscopy was 1.6 years (IQR: 1.1 - 3.4). Compared to the control group, there was a significantly lower rate of femoral osteochondroplasty (50% vs, 86%, p < 0.01), as well as trends towards lower rate of labral repair (77% vs. 95% p = 0.11), and higher rate of capsular repair (64% vs. 75%, p = 0.34). No differences were found between the PAO and control groups in any of the postoperative PROMs (Table 2). Among the PAO patients, 3 (20%) progressed to total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared to 1 (9%) in the control group (p=0.62). Conclusions: Hip arthroscopy after prior PAO was associated with postoperative improvements in pain and moderate rates of conversion to THA. When patients undergoing hip arthroscopy following PAO were compared to a demographically similar matched cohort of nondysplastic hips who underwent primary hip arthroscopy without a prior PAO, similar postoperative outcome scores were observed. This data provides valuable counselling information for clinicians discussing hip arthroscopy in the setting of patients with persistent pain following PAO.

Objectives: The role of femoral version (FV[MOU1] ) in the pre-arthritic hip pain remains increasingly recognized, including in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Increased femoral version or decreased femoral version may play a role in hip biomechanics contributing to hip instability or impingement, respectively. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of hip arthroscopy for FAI across different femoral version groups in a multicenter prospective cohort study. Methods: A prospective multicenter cohort study of 677 FAI patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy was performed. The current study included 603 patients with low-dose CT performed preoperatively for measurement of femoral version from the larger cohort. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 14-45 years with idiopathic FAI. Exclusion criteria were previous ipsilateral hip procedures, associated disorders, or Tönnis 2 or greater osteoarthritis. Femoral version was measured on low-dose computed tomography (CT) utilizing the Yoshioka oblique method and was broken into five subgroups: <5° (decreased FV), 6-15° (normal FV), 16-25° (mildly increased FV), 26-35° (moderately increased FV), 35°+ (severely increased FV). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were measured at a minimum one-year follow-up. The modified Harris hip score (mHHS) was assessed relative to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 8 and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) of 74. Additional PROs included the HOOS Pain and Sports/Recreation subscores and the iHOT-12 score. Composite failure was defined as a reoperation for persistent symptoms or a failure to achieve either the mHHS MCID or PASS. Independent t-test (Mann-Whitney U) and ANOVA were utilized to compare groups. Results: Males had statistically lower femoral version than females (14.0° vs 18.0°; p<0.001). In females, 38.0% had mildly increased FV, 17.9% had moderately increased FV, and 3.6% had severely elevated FV. This is compared to 27.6%, 9.2%, and 1.8% in males, respectively (all p<0.001). Decreased FV was present in 7.1% of males, compared to 5.9% of females. Increased or decreased femoral versions appear to have similar outcomes to normal version when evaluated by PROs or outcome states. In fact, mildly increased and moderate increased FV group demonstrated the best outcomes. Changes in HOOS pain and sports subscores were significantly higher for these groups. Severely increased FV, >35°, was only present in 2.8% of patients but did demonstrate a higher rate of composite failure (15.4%) compared to moderately increased FV (3.1%). The decreased FV group had a composite failure of 10.4% compared to normal femoral version, 16-25° (10.2%). Conclusions: In a patient cohort undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI, significant differences in FV between males and females were present. Overall, in a multicenter prospective cohort study, the outcomes of hip arthroscopy for FAI did not seem to differ between increased or decreased femoral versions but were superior in mild to moderately increased FV. Future research with longer-term follow-up is still needed to definitively establish the longevity of outcomes of hip arthroscopy relative to FV.

Background: Patellofemoral instability (PFI) is a condition that leads to recurrent dislocation events and is typically secondary to extensor mechanism malalignment and rotational deformities. To correct malalignment, a tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) can be performed; however, an understanding of the associated complications, recurrence rates, and potential for reoperation is necessary. Purpose: To systematically review the literature to determine the incidence of postoperative complications, rate of recurrent instability, and all-cause reoperation rate after TTO for PFI. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence 4. Methods: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were queried for studies that reported complications after TTO. No date limits were applied. A total of 1050 studies were identified. Complications were categorized into “minor” and “major” groups using a modified Clavien-Dindo Classification. A meta-analysis was conducted to examine complication rates, recurrent instability, and all-cause reoperation, utilizing a DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. A meta-analysis for recurrent instability was subgrouped according to follow-up periods of ≤2 years and >2 years. Results: A total of 38 studies were included, comprising 1546 patients, representing 1733 knees. The study dates ranged from 1989 to 2024, and the level of evidence ranged from 2 to 4. The weighted mean age at surgery was 24.1 years (range, 20-54 years), and 67% of patients were women. The weighted mean follow-up of all studies was 4.2 years. Overall, 197 minor complications, 39 major complications, 90 recurrent instability events, and 275 reoperations were identified. The minor complication rate was 9% (range, 0%-65% [95% CI, 6%-13%]). The major complication rate was 3% (range, 0%-10% [95% CI, 3%-4%]). Seven studies had a ≤2-year follow-up, and the remaining 31 studies had a >2-year follow-up. The recurrent instability rate was 3% in studies with ≤2 years of follow-ups (range, 0%-26% [95% CI, 1%-13%]). In studies with >2 years of follow-up, the recurrent instability rate was 8% (range, 0%-31% [95% CI, 6%-12%]). The all-cause reoperation rate was 16% (range, 0%-54% [95% CI, 11%-21%]). Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis identified the incidence of complications (17%), the rate of recurrent instability (3%-8%), and the all-cause reoperation rate (16%) after TTO. TTO, performed alone or in combination with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for the treatment of PFI, reliably improved clinical outcome scores in the setting of variable complication rates. Interestingly, rates of recurrent instability increased over time, and most reoperations were undertaken for hardware removal rather than revision patellar stabilization surgery.

Purpose To compare clinical and functional outcomes (including range of motion, clinical laxity, reoperation/revision rates, and patient‐reported outcome measures) of combined anterior cruciate ligament/posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR/PCLR) with and without suture tape (ST) augmentation via a propensity‐matched cohort analysis. Methods A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients who underwent simultaneous primary ACLR/PCLR between 2001 and 2022. A 1:1 propensity match was performed using patient sex, Schenck classification grade, age ±8 years, and body mass index ±10 to produce 2 cohorts: ACLR/PCLR with and without (control) ST augmentation. Clinical outcomes (visual analog scale [VAS], range of motion, Tegner activity scale, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score) were analyzed. Results The propensity match produced a final cohort of 50 ACLR/PCLR patients: 25 with ST augmentation and 25 nonaugmented controls. Most patients had a KD3M injury (12 in each cohort), and no significant differences were noted in concomitant neurovascular, meniscal, or chondral injuries between the groups. Forty patients (80%) completed follow‐up at a mean of 4.7 years for the ST cohort and 8.5 years for the control cohort ( P > .05). Postoperative ST versus control values for outcome measures including VAS at rest (0.9 vs 1.5; P = .71), VAS with use (3.0 vs 2.2; P = .24), International Knee Documentation Committee (75.7 vs 76.3; P = .37), Lysholm (81.8 vs 77.6; P = .91), and Tegner activity (4.8 vs 5.4; P = .37) scores showed no differences ( P > .05 for all). There were no differences in excessive postoperative clinical laxity between ST and control cohorts (ST n = 1 vs control n = 2, Lachman 2+, P = .140; ST n = 3 vs control n = 1, posterior drawer 2+, P = .122). The total number of patients who underwent reoperation was 7 of 25 (28%) for the ST cohort and 8 of 25 (32%) for the control cohort ( P = .76). Conclusions Concomitant ACLR/PCLR utilizing ST augmentation showed similarly satisfactory postoperative clinical outcomes at a minimum 2‐year follow‐up compared to a matched cohort without ST. The use of an independent ST did not limit motion or increase the incidence of complications or revision surgery. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative case series.