Krych, Aaron J.

Background: Hip arthroscopy is becoming more advanced and commonly performed. However, significant controversy exists regarding whether high-grade acetabular cartilage lesions should be treated with debridement/abrasion or microfracture. In addition, patients treated with microfracture are subject to extended protected weightbearing rehabilitation to mitigate risk of subchondral plate fracture and to protect fibrocartilage tissue formation. Purpose: To determine the midterm patient-reported outcomes and failure rate of patients with grade 3 and 4 acetabular labrum articular disruption (ALAD) lesions managed with debridement/abrasion or microfracture. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Primary arthroscopic labral repair cases at 2 centers from November 2008 to April 2016 were reviewed for patients aged <55 years with unipolar ALAD grade 3 and 4 chondrolabral acetabular delamination. Patients undergoing microfracture and debridement/abrasion were compared using the visual analog pain scale (VAS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and Hip Outcome Score–Sports-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS) to determine predictors of outcomes and failure. Results: A total of 113 hips in 110 patients (66 males, 44 females; mean age, 34.5 ± 1.1 years) undergoing debridement/abrasion (n = 82) or microfracture (n = 31) were followed for a mean of 4.9 years (range, 2.0-8.5 years). Lesion size was not statistically different between the debridement/abrasion (1.3 ± 1.0 cm 2 ) and microfracture cohorts (1.4 ± 1.0 cm 2 ) ( P = .47). Patients undergoing debridement/abrasion achieved 3.6-point mean improvements in VAS ( P < .01), 21.2-point improvements in mHHS ( P < .01), and 25.4-point improvements in HOS-SSS ( P < .01), which were not significantly different from those observed in microfracture patients ( P≥ .20). The 5-year rate of survival free of revision surgery was 84.0% in the debridement/abrasion group and 85.6% in the microfracture group ( P = .78). The cartilage treatment technique was found not to be predictive of revision risk during both univariate (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; P = .98) and multivariate (HR, 0.93; P = .90) analysis accounting for patient age, lesion grade, and acetabular coverage. Conclusion: Patients undergoing debridement/abrasion of high-grade unipolar acetabular cartilage lesions demonstrate similar outcome scores and revision rates compared with those of patients undergoing microfracture. These outcomes support the consideration of preferential debridement/abrasion at the discretion of the treating surgeon to optimize recovery while maintaining established positive outcomes after hip arthroscopy.

AbstractThere is limited evidence guiding management of medial collateral ligament (MCL) avulsions or functional disruptions distal to the medial joint line. This study aims to determine outcomes of a series of patients with grade III distal MCL injuries managed with acute surgical repair. Patients with grade III, distal MCL injuries, with or without multiligament involvement were identified. Demographic, clinical examination, and midterm patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data were collected. Clinical follow-up included physical examination and ligamentous stress testing at a minimum of 6 months. PROs included Lysholm's knee scoring scale, Tegner's activity score, and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores at minimum of 2 years follow-up. Of the 24 eligible patients, outcomes data were available for 20 (83%). Of the 20 included patients, 16 had a concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, 3 had ACL and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries, and 1 had an isolated MCL injury. Mean time from injury to surgery was 5 weeks. At mean clinical follow-up of 20.3 months, all patients showed valgus stability and satisfactory range of motion (ROM). Anteroposterior stability was normal in all but one patient who demonstrated a 2+ posterior drawer but with firm end points. At a mean follow-up of 5.7 years for PROs, mean Lysholm's score was 91.5 (standard deviation [SD] = 12.2), median Tegner's activity score was 7 (range, 4–9), and mean subjective IKDC score was 88.8 (SD: 9.9). The surgical repair of grade III distal MCL injuries delivered satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes. Future comparative studies with larger patient samples are needed.

Abstract Double radial tears of the lateral meniscus are rare injuries that typically occur in the setting of an acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Full‐thickness radial tears of the meniscus body and root render the meniscus nonfunctional from a loss of hoop stress resistance. Repair of these tears can normalize contact pressures in the lateral compartment and delay arthritic changes. We describe our technique for repairing a lateral meniscus body radial tear and concomitant posterior root tear, via inside‐out suture repair and transtibial suture repair, respectively. This investigation was performed at Mayo Clinic. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Purpose To compare patellar bone socket and cortical surface fixation techniques for isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and determine whether there was a difference in (1) complication rates, including fracture of the patella; (2) redislocation rates; or (3) patient‐reported outcomes. Methods A literature search was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included patients who underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. Patients with confirmed concomitant or prior ipsilateral knee procedures, multiligament injury, or less than 3 months of follow‐up were excluded. Risk‐of‐bias assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non‐randomized Studies (MINORS) system. Studies were classified by surgical technique (patellar bone socket group [group S] vs cortical fixation group [group F]), and complications, redislocations, and patient‐reported outcomes were collected. Results A total of 29 studies yielded 981 patients with MPFL reconstruction for inclusion. Of the patients, 620 underwent a patellar bone socket technique and 361 underwent a cortical fixation technique. Patients ranged in age from 11 to 68 years. Patellar fracture rates ranged from 0% to 17% in group S and were 0% in all group F studies. Mean Kujala scores ranged from 83.5 to 93.6 in group S and from 84.4 to 94.5 in group F. Mean Lysholm scores ranged from 84.6 to 91.7 in group S and from 83.5 to 95 in group F. Redislocation rates ranged from 0% to 21% in group S and from 0% to 13% in group F. Although heterogeneous in nature, complication rates ranged from 0% to 28% in group S and from 0% to 4% in group F. Conclusions MPFL reconstruction techniques with patellar bone sockets showed a larger range of complication rates than cortical fixation techniques, although overall, complications remained uncommon. Clinically, the bone socket group had comparable postoperative redislocation rates and patient outcomes to the group treated with cortical fixation techniques. Level of Evidence Level IV, systematic review of Level I through IV studies.

ABSTRACTThe mechanism underlying non‐contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is multi‐factorial and still an object of debate. Computational models, in combination with in vivo and cadaveric studies, can provide valuable insight into the contribution of the different factors involved. The goal of this study was to validate four knee finite element models (two males and two females) to kinematic and strain data collected in vitro with an impact‐driven simulator and use them to assess how secondary external knee loads (knee abduction moment [KAM], anterior shear force, and internal rotation torque [ITR]) affect tibiofemoral contact forces and ACL force during impact. Four subject‐specific knee models were developed from specimen computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Patellofemoral and tibiofemoral ligament properties were calibrated to match experimentally measured kinematics and ligament strain. Average root mean square errors and correlations between experimental and model‐predicted knee kinematics were below 1.5 mm and 2°, and above 0.75, respectively. Similar errors and correlations were obtained for ACL strain (< 2% and > 0.9). Model‐predicted ACL forces were highly correlated with the anterior component of the tibiofemoral contact force on the lateral plateau occurring during impact (r = 0.99), which was increased by larger KAM and ITR through the posterior tibial slope and a larger contact force on the lateral side. This study provides a better understanding of the mechanism through which secondary external knee loads increase ACL injury risk during landing. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:1730–1742, 2019

Purpose To determine the degree of correlation of radiographic measurements, degree of correlation of intraoperative pathology, and difference in outcomes between sides of patients requiring staged bilateral hip arthroscopy. Methods Two high‐volume hip preservation centers retrospectively reviewed hip preservation databases for staged bilateral hip arthroscopies conducted between 2008 and 2015. Patients were separated into those who presented with bilateral hip pain and those that presented with unilateral pain and developed contralateral pain >2 years later. Patients were analyzed for radiographic correlation (alpha angle, lateral center edge angle, anterior center edge angle, magnetic resonance imaging alpha angle, Tönnis grade) and correlation of intraoperative pathology (acetabular labrum articular disruption grade, Outerbridge grade/location, Villar class ligamentum teres tears, labral tear location, symmetry of Seldes tear types, and the differences between operative procedures). Patient‐reported outcomes were analyzed (modified Harris Hip Score, Non‐Arthritic Hip Score, International Hip Outcome Tool‐12, hip outcome score‐sport specific subscale, visual analog scale, patient satisfaction). Correlative tests included Pearson and Spearman; univariate and multivariate analysis for differences included χ‐square test and Student t tests for ordinal and continuous variables respectively. Results A total of 133 of 2,705 patients (4.6%) underwent bilateral hip arthroscopy. Radiographic alpha angle, magnetic resonance imaging alpha angle, lateral center edge angle, and anterior center edge angle demonstrated strong correlation (Pearson's coefficients 0.651, 0.648, 0.644, 0.667, respectively, P < .0001). Tönnis grade was weakly correlated (Pearson's coefficient 0.286, P = .001). Intraoperative pathology was moderately correlated (Pearson's coefficients for acetabular Outerbridge location, 0.300, P = .0170; acetabular labrum articular disruption, 0.490, P < .0001; acetabular Outerbridge; 0.530; P < .0001; femoral head Outerbridge, 0.459, P < .0001; Villar class, 0.393, P < .0001; and labral tear location, 0.468, P < .0001). Labral tear Seldes type was compared with Bowker's symmetry test and there was no significant difference between sides. There were no significant differences in surgical interventions performed between sides. Patients with bilateral hip arthroscopies significantly improved in all measured patient‐reported outcomes and had a high patient satisfaction after both procedures. Final patient‐reported outcomes and change in patient‐reported outcomes were not different between procedures; follow up ranged from 3 months to 8 years. Conclusions This study demonstrated an incidence of 4.6% of patients who require bilateral hip arthroscopy. These patients can expect significant improvement after surgical intervention. Patients that had 1 side done gained similar improvement when the contralateral side was performed. Preoperative radiographic, intraoperative pathology, and procedures performed were similar between hips. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Background: Participation in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) football is at an all-time high. This population of athletes experiences a substantial injury burden, with many injuries affecting the upper extremities. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to describe the epidemiology of hand and wrist injuries in college football players from the academic years 2009–2010 to 2013–2014. We hypothesized that variables such as event type (practice vs game), mechanism of injury, and player position would have an effect on the injury incidence. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiological study. Methods: An epidemiological study utilizing the NCAA Injury Surveillance Program was performed to investigate rates and patterns of hand and wrist injuries in participating varsity football teams from 2009–2010 to 2013–2014. Results: A total of 725 hand and wrist injuries were captured in 899,225 athlete-exposures. The observed practice injury rate was 0.51 injuries per 1000 athlete-exposures, compared with a game injury rate of 3.60 ( P < .01). Player-on-player contact was the most common injury mechanism reported, with blocking being the most common activity at the time of injury. Offensive linemen were most likely to experience an injury. Of all injuries sustained, 71.4% resulted in no time loss from competition, whereas 9.8% of injuries resulted in longer than 7 days of time loss. A fracture resulted in the greatest time loss from competition (mean ± SD, 8.3 ± 24.0 days; median, 0 days [range, 0-148 days] for injuries sustained in a practice setting) (mean ± SD, 7.7 ± 15.8 days; median, 0 days [range, 0-87 days] for injuries sustained in a game setting). Conclusion: Hand and wrist injuries were found to be significantly more common in games when compared with practices. This study provides valuable prognostic data regarding expected time loss on a per-injury pattern basis. Further investigation on specific injury subtypes and expected time loss as a result of these injures would provide trainers, players, and coaches with useful information on an expected postinjury recovery and rehabilitation timeline.

Background: Avulsion fractures involving the tibial eminence are considered equivalent in etiology to anterior cruciate ligament tears, however there is limited data comparing outcomes of adolescent patients undergoing surgical fixation of tibial eminence fractures to those undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes, subsequent ACL injury rates, and activity levels between adolescent patients who underwent tibial eminence fracture fixation to patients with mid-substance ACL tears who required acute ligament reconstruction. Methods: This study included a group of patients with tibial eminence fractures treated with surgical fixation matched to a group of similar patients with ACL tears treated with reconstruction between the years of 2001 and 2015. Data regarding initial injury, surgical intervention, ACL/ACL graft injury rates, and physical examination findings were recorded. Clinical and functional outcomes were obtained using physical examination, IKDC subjective scores, Lysholm scores, and Tegner Activity levels. Results: Sixty patients with a mean follow-up of 57.7 (24-206) months were included. 20 patients (11 M:9 F) who underwent surgical fixation for tibial eminence fractures (TEF) with a mean age of 11.9 (7-15) years were matched to a group of 40 patients (23 M:17 F) who underwent ACL reconstruction for ACL tears with a mean age of 12.5 (8-15) years. The TEF group demonstrated significantly lower postoperative IKDC (TEF group: 94.0, ACL group: 97.2 (p=0.04)) and Lysholm scores (TEF group: 92.4, ACL group: 96.9 (p=0.02)). The TEF group returned to sport 121 days sooner (p<0.01), but there was no difference in postoperative Tegner scores (TEF group: 7.3, ACL group: 7.6 (p=0.16)). The TEF group demonstrated increased postoperative anterior laxity (p=0.02) and a higher rate of postoperative arthrofibrosis (p=0.04). There was no difference in subsequent ACL injury (p=0.41). Conclusion: Patients with tibial eminence fractures demonstrated lower mean clinical outcome scores compared to patients with ACL tears at minimum 2-year follow up. Additionally, they experienced more postoperative anterior laxity and had a higher rate of postoperative arthrofibrosis. There was no difference in subsequent ACL injury rate. The TEF group returned to sport sooner than the ACL group, but the postoperative activity level was similar.

Purpose: The goal of this study was to evaluate patient and surgical factors predictive of excellent functional and isokinetic test results 6-months following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in a group of pediatric patients with open physes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients 14 years of age or younger that underwent ACL reconstruction from 2000 to 2015. An excellent 6-month outcome was defined as greater than 85% in isokinetic strength and greater than 90% in functional tests when compared to the non-operative extremity. We then utilized univariate and multivariate statistical models to identify patient and/or surgical factors associated with excellent 6-month outcomes. Results: Eighty-six patients (46 male, 42 female) with open physes on preoperative radiographs were included in the study, with a mean age of 13.6 (range, 8.4-14.9), body mass index (BMI) of 22.1 (range, 15.6-36.0), Tegner activity score of 8.8 (6.0-9.0). Thirty-four patients (40%) met the criteria for the excellent 6-month group, which left 52 (60%) in the delayed 6-month group. In univariate analysis, no single preoperative factor correlated with excellent 6-month outcome. The two groups were statistically similar in terms of age, BMI, time to surgery, preoperative arc of motion, presence of concomitant meniscal tear, cartilage damage, graft size, use of a nerve block or tourniquet, operative time, and tourniquet time. Use of a nerve block trended towards delayed outcomes (p = 0.051). Conclusion: Children undergoing ACL reconstruction only have a 40% chance of achieving an excellent rehabilitation result at 6 months. We found no statistically significant patient or surgical characteristics that could predict this outcome. Utilizing a nerve block is a factor which will need to be further evaluated. Significance: Studies in the adult population have identified preoperative patient and surgical factors associated with excellent 6-month isokinetic and functional test results. This pediatric cohort did not find similar results as many of these children were young, healthy and fit. However, the variability of the outcome casts doubts on applying adult rehabilitation protocols to children.

Introduction: It is unknown whether functional and isokinetic testing at 6 months following ACL reconstruction in patients with open-physes correlates with longer term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare subsequent ACL rupture risk, knee function, and activity level in patients with open-physes who had excellent 6-month testing to those who did not. Methods: Between the years of 2000 and 2015, 86 patients with open-physes underwent ACL reconstruction and had functional and isokinetic testing performed at 6-months post-operatively. Thirty-four (40%) tested in the excellent range in all categories of both functional and isokinetic testing and were labeled the excellent group. The remaining 52 (60%) patients were labeled the delayed testing group. Data regarding patient, injury, and surgical characteristics were retrospectively collected. The rate of second ACL injury as well as clinical outcome scores were collected postoperatively. Results: Graft rupture rate was 23.4% (n = 8) in the excellent group and 15.4% (n = 8) in the delayed group (p = 0.51). In the excellent group, 20.5% (n = 7) had a contralateral ACL tear versus 11.5% (n = 6) in the delayed group (p = 0.40). Five patients in the excellent group and 4 patients in the delayed group sustained both graft failure and contralateral ACL tear. The overall prevalence of second ACL injury was 29% in the excellent group and 23% in the delayed group. The delayed group returned to sport at an average of 8.8 months whereas the excellent group returned at an average of 6.6 months (p < 0.01). At mean follow up of 3.59 years, the excellent group had a higher Tegner activity level (8.9 versus 8.3) than the delayed group (p < 0.02). Conclusion: Pediatric patients with open-physes who had excellent isokinetic strength and functional testing 6-months postoperatively returned to sport sooner than those who did not. There was no statistical difference in either graft failure or contralateral ACL disruption between these groups. However, both groups had unacceptably high rates of second ACL injury (29% for the excellent group and 23% for the delayed group). Significance: Excellent 6 month return of strength and function was not protective of subsequent ACL disruption, the rate of which remains dismal within this pediatric population. Development of more sensitive functional measures for children could help to change these poor outcomes and guide clinicians when to allow return to sport.