Wiste, Heather J.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease biomarkers of tau pathology may be assessed by both CSF and PET. Cross‐sectional associations between CSF phosphorylated tau (p‐tau) and tau PET have been studied and regional tau PET SUVR has been shown to have similar diagnostic performance as CSF p‐tau. The association between CSF p‐tau and longitudinal tau PET has not been studied. CSF measures may be thought of as a result of the imbalance of influx vs efflux of soluble tau, whereas, tau PET reflects total tau accumulation into insoluble aggregates to date. We therefore hypothesize that baseline CSF p‐tau may be a leading indicator of future tau PET accumulation.MethodWe identified Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) and Mayo Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC) participants with diagnoses of cognitively unimpaired, mild cognitive impairment, and amnestic dementia who had CSF p‐tau (Elecsys p‐tau [181P]) and subsequent serial tau PET (flortaucipir) exams. The first tau PET scan was within 3 years of the CSF p‐tau collection. A longitudinal pipeline with two‐compartment partial volume correction was used to measure change in tau PET in a temporal‐lobe meta‐ROI (amygdala, fusiform, middle/inferior temporal, entorhinal, and parahippocampal regions) with a composite reference region (eroded supratentorial white matter, pons, and whole cerebellum). Spearman correlation was used to assess the association between CSF p‐tau and annual percent change in tau PET. A linear mixed effects model was fit to assess the association adjusting for age and sex.ResultThe study included 143 participants (76% cognitively unimpaired) (). CSF p‐tau was significantly associated with annual percent change in tau PET overall (Spearman R=0.19, p=0.023) () and after adjusting for age and sex (p<0.001) (). There was nonlinearity in the CSF p‐tau effect, with higher values (>20 pg/mL) having a greater association with annual change in tau PET than lower values.ConclusionIn a group of cognitively unimpaired and impaired participants, CSF p‐tau predicted subsequent tau PET accumulation rate. A threshold effect is suggested with subsequent tau PET accumulation primarily in participants with elevated CSF p‐tau levels near the Mayo threshold of 22 pg/mL.

Abstract Dementia and mortality rates rise inexorably with age and consequently interact. However, because of the major logistical difficulties in accounting for both outcomes in a defined population, very little work has examined how risk factors and biomarkers for incident dementia are influenced by competing mortality. The objective of this study was to examine long-term associations between amyloid PET, APOE ɛ4, sex, education and cardiovascular/metabolic conditions, and hazard and absolute risk of dementia and mortality in individuals without dementia at enrolment. Participants were enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, a population-based study of cognitive ageing in Olmsted County, MN, USA. All were without dementia and were age 55–92 years at enrolment and were followed longitudinally. Predictor variables were amyloid PET, APOE ɛ4 status, sex, education, cardiovascular/metabolic conditions and age. The main outcomes were incident dementia and mortality. Multivariable, multi-state models were used to estimate mortality and incident dementia rates and absolute risk of dementia and mortality by predictor variable group. Of the 4984 participants in the study, 4336 (87%) were cognitively unimpaired and 648 (13%) had mild cognitive impairment at enrolment. The median age at enrolment was 75 years; 2463 (49%) were women. The median follow-up time was 9.4 years (7.5 years after PET). High versus normal amyloid (hazard ratio 2.11, 95% confidence interval 1.43–2.79), APOE ɛ4 (women: hazard ratio 2.24, 95% confidence interval 1.80–2.77; men: hazard ratio 1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.09–1.71), older age and two additional cardiovascular/metabolic conditions (hazard ratio 1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.22–1.53) were associated with the increased hazard of dementia (all P &lt; 0.001). Among APOE ɛ4 carriers with elevated amyloid, remaining lifetime risk of dementia at age 65 years was greater in women [74% (95% confidence interval 65–84%) high and 58% (95% confidence interval 52–65%) moderate amyloid], than men [62% (95% confidence interval 52–73%) high and 44% (95% confidence interval 35–53%) moderate amyloid]. Overall, the hazard and absolute risk of dementia varied considerably by predictor group. The absolute risk of dementia associated with predictors characteristic of Alzheimer’s disease was greater in women than men while at the same time the combination of APOE ɛ4 non-carrier with normal amyloid was more protective in women than men. This set of findings may be attributed in part to different biological effects and in part to lower mortality rates in women.

AbstractBackgroundThe Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center used GE scanners exclusively for MRI from 2005‐2017, employing consistent imaging parameters throughout. In 2017 the MRI protocol was updated and migrated to Siemens Prisma scanners; 113 participants were scanned with each configuration. The GE protocol included a 2D FLAIR. The Siemens protocol includes 3D FLAIR and T2‐weighted images. Both vendor protocols included a 3D T1. Experience with multi‐center trials suggests such changes may introduce systematic variations.MethodsGE scanning was carried out on 3T scanners with 12 channel phased array head coils. Siemens Prisma scanning was carried out with 64 channel head/neck coils. Imaging sequences and parameters are given in Table 1. We used the MCALT template and priors to perform standard six‐class segmentation on T1‐weighted (T1w) images. SPM12 unified segmentation supports the simultaneous use of multiple input contrasts; segmentation of multi‐contrast inputs was done using eight tissue classes including deep grey and white matter hyperintensity (WMH) priors. For a given MRI study (either GE or Siemens) all images were registered and resampled to the study’s T1w image. Two‐channel (T1+FLAIR) segmentation was performed on GE scans. Two and three‐channel segmentations were performed on Siemens scans. Comparisons included total intracranial volume, total tissue volume and total grey matter volumes, as well as hippocampal volumes and grey matter volume in a temporal lobe meta‐ROI.ResultsFour participants were excluded for poor image quality: one poor GE T1w quality, one poor Siemens T1, T2 and FLAIR quality, and two poor Siemens T2 quality. Comparisons were made among 109 participants aged 34–97 (Table 2). By visual assessment, adding T2‐weighted images always improved intracranial volume correctness. Using the combination of single‐channel GE and three‐channel Siemens generally improved cross‐vendor agreement on grey matter volumes with the exceptions of hippocampal and intracranial volume estimates.ConclusionRequiring multiple input channels increases the likelihood that the result of a study being excluded. Combining T1w, FLAIR and T2w images allows the delineation of WMH and deep grey matter probability outputs but may introduce differences in GM volumes.

Abstract Introduction We aimed to provide cut points for the automated Elecsys Alzheimer's disease (AD) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. Methods Cut points for Elecsys amyloid beta 42 (Aβ42), total tau (t‐tau), hyperphosphorylated tau (p‐tau), and t‐tau/Aβ42 and p‐tau/Aβ42 ratios were evaluated in Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (n = 804) and Mayo Clinic Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (n = 70) participants. Results The t‐tau/Aβ42 and p‐tau/Aβ42 ratios had a higher percent agreement with normal/abnormal amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) than the individual CSF markers. Reciever Operating Characteristic (ROC)‐based cut points were 0.26 (0.24–0.27) for t‐tau/Aβ42 and 0.023 (0.020–0.025) for p‐tau/Aβ42. Ratio cut points derived from other cohorts performed as well in our cohort as our own did. Individual biomarkers had worse diagnostic properties and more variable results in terms of positive and negative percent agreement (PPA and NPA). Conclusion CSF t‐tau/Aβ42 and p‐tau/Aβ42 ratios are very robust indicators of AD. For individual biomarkers, the intended use should determine which cut point is chosen.

BackgroundTo operationalize the National Institute on Aging – Alzheimer's Association (NIA‐AA) Research Framework for Alzheimer's Disease 6‐stage continuum of clinical progression for persons with abnormal amyloid.MethodsThe Mayo Clinic Study of Aging is a population‐based longitudinal study of aging and cognitive impairment in Olmsted County, Minnesota. We evaluated persons without dementia having 3 consecutive clinical visits. Measures for cross‐sectional categories included objective cognitive impairment (OBJ) and function (FXN). Measures for change included subjective cognitive impairment (SCD), objective cognitive change (ΔOBJ), and new onset of neurobehavioral symptoms (ΔNBS). We calculated frequencies of the stages using different cutoff points and assessed stability of the stages over 15 months.ResultsAmong 243 abnormal amyloid participants, the frequencies of the stages varied with age: 66 to 90% were classified as stage 1 at age 50 but at age 80, 24 to 36% were stage 1, 32 to 47% were stage 2, 18 to 27% were stage 3, 1 to 3% were stage 4 to 6, and 3 to 9% were indeterminate. Most stage 2 participants were classified as stage 2 because of abnormal ΔOBJ only (44–59%), whereas 11 to 21% had SCD only, and 9 to 13% had ΔNBS only. Short‐term stability varied by stage and OBJ cutoff points but the most notable changes were seen in stage 2 with 38 to 63% remaining stable, 4 to 13% worsening, and 24 to 41% improving (moving to stage 1).InterpretationThe frequency of the stages varied by age and the precise membership fluctuated by the parameters used to define the stages. The staging framework may require revisions before it can be adopted for clinical trials. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:1145–1156

AbstractBackgroundRecent evidence has implicated brain networks in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, the phenotypic variability in AD, inter‐individual differences in tau PET uptake patterns, and dynamic nature of functional connectivity have been relatively neglected. In this talk, I will discuss our recent work linking measures of dynamic brain organization to spatially independent tau PET patterns defined in a phenotypically diverse cohort.MethodsWe identified all Mayo Clinic participants with concurrent amyloid PET (PiB), tau PET (AV1451) and task‐free fMRI (impaired participants were all Aβ+). We used independent component analysis (ICA) to identify spatially independent patterns of tau PET uptake. For the fMRI data, we used a Hidden‐Markov Model (HMM) design to identify distinct patterns of activity/connectivity (‘states’). The ICA and HMM parameters were used to project/segment an independent cohort (ADNI) and subsequent longitudinal timepoints for the Mayo cohort. Multilevel Bayesian regression models were fit in Stan to explore the association between phenotype, component load and brain state.ResultsThe optimal HMM model identified 10 brain states (Figure 1). The optimal ICA decomposition identified 42 tau PET components, of which 13 were potentially related to AD pathobiology (Figure 1). Component loads and brain state dwell time differed between diagnostic groups in both Mayo and ADNI cohorts. One state was much more likely to occur in AD in both cohorts (State 8). Cross‐sectionally, State 8 dwell time was associated with higher tau loads, while higher baseline dwell‐time was predictive of ∆tau in participants with at least 2 timepoints (Figure 2).ConclusionWe found links between dynamics of functional connectivity, tau deposition, and cognitive impairment across the AD spectrum using two different cohorts and longitudinal data. Specifically: 1) our method for characterizing tau PET uptake was able to capture the magnitude and spatial pattern of binding across diverse phenotypes; 2) Our data supports a role for dynamic brain connectivity in cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease; 3) Dynamic connectivity appears to be directly related to AD pathobiology as measured by tau PET. Incorporating the time‐varying nature of connectivity will be important in future studies of connectome‐based disease progression in AD.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is marked by selective disruptions to anatomically‐distinct brain regions and their connectivity which collectively support cognition. Based on a variation of pattern‐recognition analysis of FDG‐PET images, we previously developed a framework, the global functional state space (GFSS), which captures this macroscale architecture by assigning each individual a series of weightings on 10 independent patterns (eigenbrains=EBs). In this study, we applied the GFSS as a quantitative endophenotype to test whether known AD genetic risk factors were associated with variability in large‐scale neurodynamics represented by the GFSS.MethodThe study sample included 410 participants from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) with evidence of cognitive impairment (CDR‐global>0) and amyloidosis (positive amyloid‐PET). The GFSS was estimated for each individual using the set of 10 EBs to describe global patterns of variation in glucose metabolism. AD genetic risk variants identified in prior large consortium case‐control studies were included for analysis if the variant (or a proxy by linkage disequilibrium r 2>0.7) was assayed on both genotyping platforms used in the sample and if the minor allele frequency exceeded 1%. Genetic associations with the collective set of EBs were tested using multivariate linear regression under a dominant genetic model.ResultSignificant multivariate associations were identified for CD33 (p=7.04x10‐4), MEF2C (p=0.001), and SORL1 (p=0.02). These findings remained significant after covarying for age and sex. The strongest component loadings for CD33 (p=9.09x10‐4; std. β=‐0.16) and MEF2C (p=1.59x10‐4; std. β=‐0.18) were for EB1, with the minor allele in each case associated with a negative axis deviation in the direction of the GFSS area representing episodic memory dysfunction. SORL1 displayed its strongest loading onto EB4 (p=0.03, std. β=‐0.11). The association of APOE ɛ4 with the GFSS was marginally nonsignificant (p=0.09).ConclusionWe identified associations of risk variants in CD33, MEF2C, and SORL1 with differences in patterns of FDG hypometabolism in persons with symptomatic AD. These findings establish the GFSS as a useful endophenotype for genetic analyses, particularly as an avenue toward a mechanistic understanding of how heritable factors may influence inter‐individual variability and syndromic diversity in AD. Further investigation in larger and independent cohorts is warranted.

AbstractBackgroundThe Network Failure Quotient (NFQ) metric summarizes functional MRI network integrity. We wanted to investigate the stability of the NFQ results across time, hardware, software and protocol changes during the last decade in ADNI Resting State (RS‐) fMRI.MethodIn ADNI‐2 (2009‐2016) RS‐fMRI was acquired on Philips scanners. In ADNI‐3 (2017‐present) RS‐fMRI is acquired on GE, Philips, and Siemens systems with “Basic” and “Advanced” variants based on the availability of simultaneous multi‐slice (SMS, multi‐band) imaging. (Table 1.) Resting state images were preprocessed by performing slice timing correction, trimming volumes from the first 10 seconds of acquired data, despiking and within‐series alignment. Simultaneous bandpass and regression was performed using spatial registration parameters and their first temporal derivatives, mean WM signal, mean CSF signal and global signal. Dual regression via GIFT was applied creating regional time courses. The NFQ is calculated as NFQ=(pDMN_to_vDMN + pDMN_to_adDMN) / (pDMN +vDMN) where pDMN_to_vDMN and pDMN_to_adDMN are correlations between time courses in the posterior DMN, ventral DMN and anterior‐dorsal DMN. pDMN and vDMN are the within‐region correlations. NFQ values from 1447 scans of 739 individual study participants (Table 1) were analyzed using linear mixed effects models to account for age, clinical diagnosis, vendor, and time trends.ResultBox plots of NFQ values by diagnosis within ADNI‐phase and protocol are shown in Figure 2 and suggest important differences among clinical diagnoses and between ADNI‐2 and ADNI‐3. The mixed model analysis indicates that a 10‐year increase in age is associated with a 0.05±0.01 (mean±SD) increase in NFQ; individuals with MCI average roughly 0.05±0.01 higher than unimpaired and individuals with dementia average 0.14±0.02 higher. Differences by vendor for ADNI‐2 and ADNI‐3 are summarized in Figures 2 and 3 with effect sizes on par with these clinical factors. Mean NFQ for Phillips ADNI‐2 were highest (0.54±0.02); somewhat lower were Philips ADNI‐3 (0.51±0.02) and Siemens ADNI‐3 advanced (0.49±0.03); Siemens ADNI‐3 basic (0.40±0.02) and GE ADNI‐3 were the lowest (0.38±0.02).ConclusionNFQ values consistently increase with impairment. Vendor‐specific differences are observed and vendor changes over the life of a study introduce variability on the scale of disease‐related changes in NFQ.

AbstractBackgroundThe NIA‐AA Research Framework for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) includes consideration of two clinical schemes for staging AD: (1) traditional cognitively unimpaired (CU) to MCI to dementia and (2) a new numeric staging (1‐6) for individuals who are on the Alzheimer’s continuum.MethodThe Mayo Clinic Study of Aging is a population‐based longitudinal study of aging and cognitive impairment in Olmsted County, Minnesota. We analyzed CU persons who had completed three consecutive clinical visits and calculated measures for cross‐sectional categories: objective cognitive impairment and function and measures for change including subjective cognitive impairment (SCD), objective cognitive change (ΔOBJ), and new onset of neurobehavioral symptoms (NBS). We calculated the frequencies for Stage 2 by varying the cutoffs for each of the measures above and assessed stability of this stage over 15 months.ResultThe frequency of Stage 2 varied from 5‐48% depending upon the age of the participants and the cutoff scores used. Membership in Stage 2 required abnormal SCD, ΔOBJ, or ΔNBS and having only ΔOBJ abnormal was the primary reason for inclusion in Stage 2 (45‐62%) followed by 10‐21% having only SCD abnormal. The stability of Stage 2 over 15 months ranged from 31‐65% with 5‐13% progressing to Stage 3 or higher and 22‐43% percent reverting to Stage 1.ConclusionStage 2 was characterized as a transitional period between CU and MCI and could be operationalized with a variety of measures. The staging scheme performed well considering the variables evaluated and cutoff scores employed.

Abstract Clinical trials with anti-tau drugs will need to target individuals at risk of accumulating tau. Our objective was to identify variables available in a research setting that predict future rates of tau PET accumulation separately among individuals who were either cognitively unimpaired or cognitively impaired. All 337 participants had: a baseline study visit with MRI, amyloid PET, and tau PET exams, at least one follow-up tau PET exam; and met clinical criteria for membership in one of two clinical diagnostic groups: cognitively unimpaired (n = 203); or cognitively impaired (n = 134, a combined group of participants with either mild cognitive impairment or dementia with Alzheimer’s clinical syndrome). Our primary analyses were in these two clinical groups; however, we also evaluated subgroups dividing the unimpaired group by normal/abnormal amyloid PET and the impaired group by clinical phenotype (mild cognitive impairment, amnestic dementia, and non-amnestic dementia). Linear mixed effects models were used to estimate associations between age, sex, education, APOE genotype, amyloid and tau PET standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR), cognitive performance, cortical thickness, and white matter hyperintensity volume at baseline, and the rate of subsequent tau PET accumulation. Log-transformed tau PET SUVR was used as the response and rates were summarized as annual per cent change. A temporal lobe tau PET meta-region of interest was used. In the cognitively unimpaired group, only higher baseline amyloid PET was a significant independent predictor of higher tau accumulation rates (P &lt; 0.001). Higher rates of tau accumulation were associated with faster rates of cognitive decline in the cognitively unimpaired subgroup with abnormal amyloid PET (P = 0.03), but among the subgroup with normal amyloid PET. In the cognitively impaired group, younger age (P = 0.02), higher baseline amyloid PET (P = 0.05), APOE ε4 (P = 0.05), and better cognitive performance (P = 0.05) were significant independent predictors of higher tau accumulation rates. Among impaired individuals, faster cognitive decline was associated with faster rates of tau accumulation (P = 0.01). While we examined many possible predictor variables, our results indicate that screening of unimpaired individuals for potential inclusion in anti-tau trials may be straightforward because the only independent predictor of high tau rates was amyloidosis. In cognitively impaired individuals, imaging and clinical variables consistent with early onset Alzheimer’s disease phenotype were associated with higher rates of tau PET accumulation suggesting this may be a highly advantageous group in which to conduct proof-of-concept clinical trials that target tau-related mechanisms. The nature of the dementia phenotype (amnestic versus non-amnestic) did not affect this conclusion.