e20510 Background: pPCL is a rare and aggressive form of multiple myeloma (MM) with dismal survival outcomes compared to the remainder of MM patients. Several studies have validated the optimal cutoff for defining pPCL to be >5% circulating plasma cells (cPCs) on a peripheral blood smear due to equally poor outcomes in this less restrictive cohort. We evaluated the clinical outcomes and cytogenetic features of patients diagnosed with pPCL at our institution that were treated with novel agent induction therapies. Methods: We evaluated patients with pPCL diagnosed between 2000 – 2018 (using the 5% cut off) at Mayo Clinic, Minnesota. Data was extracted from a prospectively maintained database and from the review of electronic medical records. Patients were categorized as having high risk (HR) cytogenetics if any of the following abnormalities were present: del 17p, t(4;14), t(14;16) or t(14;20). Chi-square tests and Fisher exact tests were used to compare differences between sub-groups. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and differences assessed using the log rank test. Results: This cohort consisted of 67 patients with pPCL with a median age of 62 years (range: 34-91) of which 33 (46%) were male. The median follow up was 46 months (95% CI: 41 – 90). The median bone marrow plasma cell involvement was 84% (Range: 10 – 100) and the median cPCs percentage on the peripheral blood was 23% (range: 5 - 93). Data on primary cytogenetic abnormalities were available in 60 (85%) patients and the distribution was as follows: t(11;14) – 27 (45%), t(4;14) – 5 (8%), t(14;16) – 8 (13%), t(14;20)- 3(5%) and del 17p- 15(25%). All patients received novel agent induction therapy with 36 (54%) having received autologous stem cell transplant and 4 undergoing an allogeneic stem cell transplant. The median time to next therapy (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) for all patients was 13 months (95% CI: 9 – 17) and 24 months (95% CI: 19 – 40) respectively; 16 months and 51 months for standard risk (SR) vs. 10 months and 19 months for HR (P = 0.005 for OS), when stratified by cytogenetic risk. There were only 17 (31%) patients who were alive for ≥48 months since diagnosis (i.e. twice the median OS of this cohort); The absence of high risk cytogenetics (P = 0.049) and non-elevated LDH level (P = 0.047) at diagnosis predicted for achieving this survival goal. Conclusions: The outcomes of patients diagnosed with pPCL remain poor despite the use of novel agent induction therapy. However, some patients appear to do better than expected and this phenomenon may be influenced by the presence of HR cytogenetics.
Prognostic role of beta-2 microglobulin in patients with light chain amyloidosis treated with autologous stem cell transplantation.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 25, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e20506-e20506
e20506 Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) prolongs survival in patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis. Mayo 2012 stage and increased plasma cell percentage (%PC) are known predictors for survival. Increased beta-2 microglobulin (B2M) predicts survival in patients with multiple myeloma. However, its prognostic effect in patients with AL amyloidosis undergoing ASCT is not known. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who had a diagnosis of AL amyloidosis and were treated with ASCT between July-1996 and September-2017. Patients with creatinine > 1.2 mg/dL were excluded, as that affects B2M levels. The receiver operator curve was used to determine the best cutoff for B2M in predicting survival and was 2.5 mcg/mL. Baseline characteristics were compared between patients with B2M > 2.5 and ≤2.5. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from ASCT to relapse or death, whichever occurred first. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from ASCT to death of any cause. Univariate and multivariate analysis were done for OS. Results: Five-hundred patients were identified and 222 (44%) had a B2M > 2.5. These patients were more likely to be > 65 years old (32% vs. 17%, P = 0.0001), have Mayo 2012 stage III/IV (33% vs. 8%, P < 0.0001), have ≥3 organs involved (25% vs. 14%, P = 0.001), and have ≥10% PCs (56% vs. 40%, P = 0.0002) compared to patients with B2M ≤2.5. The median PFS and OS were shorter in patients with B2M > 2.5 (median PFS: 64 vs. 80 months, P = 0.03); (median OS: 104.9 vs. 175.5 months, P < 0.0001). On univariate analysis, predictors for OS included age > 65 (HR: 1.6, P = 0.001), Mayo 2012 stage III/IV (HR: 3.3, P < 0.0001), ≥3 organs involved (HR: 1.3, P = 0.06), ≥10% PC (HR: 1.5, P = 0.004), melphalan conditioning 200mg/m2 (HR: 0.28, P < 0.0001), and B2M > 2.5 (HR: 1.8, P < 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, only Mayo 2012 stage III/IV (HR: 1.8, P = 0.006), melphalan conditioning 200mg/m2 (HR: 0.35, P < 0.0001), and B2M > 2.5 (HR: 1.7, P = 0.01) remained independent predictive of OS. Conclusions: Beta-2 microglobulin > 2.5 is an independent predictor for OS in AL amyloidosis patients undergoing ASCT and should be routinely measured.
Correlation between 24-hour proteinuria and spot urine albumin to creatinine ratio in systemic light chain amyloidosis.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 25, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 8549-8549
8549 Background: Proteinuria evaluation is essential for diagnosing and monitoring of renal involvement in light chain (AL) amyloidosis. A 24 hour protein collection (24h UP) is the gold standard for proteinuria assessment however it is cumbersome and can be inaccurate. A spot urine albumin to creatinine ratio (uACR) has been proposed as a convenient method to estimate 24hUP. We aimed to validate the correlation between uACR and 24hUP in a large cohort of patients. Methods: We retrospectively studied systemic AL amyloidosis patients evaluated between 2010 and 2019 at Mayo Clinic, with a uACR and 24hUP collected less than 7 days apart. Linear regression analysis was used to construct a prediction model for 24hUP with uACR as the primary predictor. Possible confounders (age, gender, body mass index, morning versus afternoon spot urine collection, estimated glomerular filtration rate) for the primary relationship between uACR and 24h UP were evaluated in the model. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to identify the best uACR cutoff to predict significant proteinuria (defined as a 24hUP > 500mg). Results: We included 665 patients, with a median age of 66 years (IQR 59-72). The spot urine was collected in the morning (before 1200 hours) in 382 (57%) patients, and in the afternoon in 283 (43%) patients. The median 24hUP was 321 (IQR 129-2512.5) mg, median uACR was 107 (IQR 13.5-1845) mg/g, and median serum creatinine was 1.2 (IQR 1-1.8) mg/dL. The uACR correlated well with 24h UP (Pearson’s r= 0.83, 95% CI 0.80-0.85). Linear regression showed that E (24h UPi) = 362 + 1.05(uACRi), and this model was statistically and clinically significant (p < 0.001 and R2 of 0.68, respectively). Age, gender, body mass index, eGFR, and time of day of spot urine collection did not confound the primary relationship between uACR and 24hUP, and no collinearity was observed. A uACR cutoff of > 280 mg/g was the best predictor of a 24hUP > 500 mg (area under the ROC curve 0.98, sensitivity 92%, specificity 97%). For simplicity, we assessed the predictive value of uACR > 300 mg/g for 24h UP > 500 mg. Among patients with 24huACR > 300 mg/g 264 (96%) had a 24hUP > 500 mg, and 31 (7%) of patients with uACR < 300 mg/g had a 24h UP > 500 mg (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In systemic AL amyloid patients, we showed that uACR on a random urine sample correlated well with 24h UP, and can be used to estimate proteinuria with a linear regression model. Based on these findings, and the convenience of uACR testing for patients, we propose that uACR should be used to monitor renal response to AL amyloidosis therapy.
Sporadic late-onset nemaline myopathy with monoclonal paraprotein as a malignancy rather than disimmunity and treatment with chemotherapy-based approach.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 25, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 8545-8545
8545 Background: A subset of sporadic late-onset nemaline myopathy (SLONM) associated with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) has more aggressive course, often fatal. Whether SLONM+MGUS is a malignancy or dysimmunity is unclear. Two approaches are used to treat SLONM+MGUS: 1) immunosuppression (IS) ± plasmapheresis/exchange; 2) chemotherapy (ChT) ± autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Due to the rare occurrence of the disease the best treatment modality is not known. Methods: We conducted a literature search to identify previous treatment for patients with SLONM+MGUS using PubMed, Elsevier, Medline, and CINAHL databases from 1975 to 2019. All publications were carefully reviewed to remove “duplicate” patients. Overall, 28 reports were included for the final analysis. Results: 38 unique patients with SLONM+MGUS received either IS (n = 19) or ChT ± ASCT (n = 19). The median age was 48 years [24-75]. In the IT group 74% (n = 14) were males vs 53% (n = 10) in the ChT group. All patients had IgG monoclonal protein (MP): kappa in 57% (n = 11) in the IT, 42% (n = 8) in the ChT group. In the IT group MP values were 0.42 & 0.2 g/L (n = 2); in the ChT group median MP was 2.7 g/L [0.1-14, n = 14]. In the IT group 84% (n = 16) received steroids, 26% (n = 5) plasmapheresis, 53% (n = 10) non-steroid immunosuppressants, 11% (n = 2) rituximab, and 53% (n = 10) IVIG. Six patients (32%) had one IT modality; 13 (68%) had 2 or 3. In the ChT group 10 patients (53%) had ASCT; 6 patients (31%) had CyBorD or Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone + ASCT; 3 patients (16%) had chemotherapy without ASCT. 10 patients in IT group had neurological improvement (NI): 53% overall response (OR) with 16% (n = 3) complete remission (CR), and 37% (n = 7) partial response (PR). No improvement/progression had 9 patients (47%). In 2 patients (10%), neurological CR was associated with resolution of MP. Mean time to best response was 19 months. In ChT group 18 patients achieved NI: 94.7% OR with CR in 73.7% (n = 14) and PR in 21.0% (n = 4). Only one patient had no response to therapy. The best NI correlated with resolution of MP. Mean time to best response was 10 months. Conclusions: Our study with the most extensive cohort of patients with SLOMN+MGUS supports ChT ± consolidative ASCT aimed at complete elimination of the malignant plasma cell clone as the preferred treatment. Superior clinical benefits of ChT suggest that the presence of MP has clinical rather than undetermined significance, and SLOAN + MP should be considered as a malignancy rather than dysimmunity.
Depth of response prior to autologous stem cell transplantation to predict survival in light chain amyloidosis.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 25, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 8516-8516
8516 Background: The role of induction therapy prior to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis remains controversial. Data on the prognostic impact of response to induction in a transplanted cohort are lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of response to induction therapy on survival in patients undergoing ASCT for AL amyloidosis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients who received induction prior to ASCT between January 2007 and August 2017 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Patients receiving only corticosteroids prior to transplant were excluded as were those with an involved light chain of less than 5 mg/dL (not measurable for response). Results: 134 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age at diagnosis was 60 (range 36-74) and 85 (63%) were men. The most commonly used induction regimen was proteasome inhibitor-based (73.1%, n=98). The overall response rate to induction was 83% (complete response 17%, very good partial response 30% and partial response 36%). With a median follow up of 56.5 months, the median PFS and OS was 48.5 months and not reached, respectively. Response depth to induction therapy was associated with improved PFS and OS and was independent of the bone marrow plasma cell percentage. The median PFS was not reached for patients achieving ≥VGPR prior to ASCT and 33.8 months for patient achieving PR or less (P=0.001). The median OS was longer in patients with deeper responses (not reached for patients achieving ≥VGPR vs. 128 months for patients achieving PR or less (P=0.02). On multivariable analysis, independent predictors of OS were melphalan conditioning dose (RR= 0.38; P=0.018) and depth of response prior to transplant (RR 2.52; P=0.039). Conclusions: Hematologic response prior to transplant predicts post-transplant outcomes in patients with AL amyloidosis. [Table: see text]
Metaphase cytogenetics and plasma cell proliferation index for risk stratification in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
AbstractMetaphase cytogenetic abnormalities, plasma cell proliferation index (PCPro), and gain 1q by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are associated with inferior survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) treated with novel agents; however, their role in risk stratification is unclear in the era of the revised International Staging System (R-ISS). The objective of this study was to determine if these predictors improve risk stratification in newly diagnosed MM when accounting for R-ISS and age. We studied a retrospective cohort of 483 patients with newly diagnosed MM treated with proteasome inhibitors and/or immunomodulators. On multivariable analysis, R-ISS, age, metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities (both in aggregate and for specific abnormalities), PCPro, and FISH gain 1q were associated with inferior progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We devised a risk scoring system based on hazard ratios from multivariable analyses and assigned patients to low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups based on their cumulative scores. The addition of metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities, PCPro, and FISH gain 1q to a risk scoring system accounting for R-ISS and age did not improve risk discrimination of Kaplan-Meier estimates for PFS or OS. Moreover, they did not improve prognostic performance when evaluated by Uno’s censoring-adjusted C-statistic. Lastly, we performed a paired analysis of metaphase cytogenetic and interphase FISH abnormalities, which revealed the former to be insensitive for the detection of prognostic chromosomal abnormalities. Ultimately, metaphase cytogenetics lack sensitivity for important chromosomal aberrations and, along with PCPro and FISH gain 1q, do not improve risk stratification in MM when accounting for R-ISS and age.
Clinical Outcome of Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis Affecting the Kidney
Abstract Introduction: The kidney is affected by immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) in more than 50% of patients who present with the disease, but long-term predictors for and outcomes after renal replacement therapy have not been well described in this patient group Patients: 145 patients with AL who participated in Mayo Clinic treatment trials and were monitored for at least 11 years. No patient was lost to follow-up Results: Among patients presenting with renal AL, 42% ultimately received renal replacement therapy compared with 5% of patients who did not have an initial presentation involving the kidney. Table 1. Monoclonal Protein Studies in 145 Patients With Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosisa Patients, No. (%) Monoclonal Protein Renal Amyloid at Presentation (n=84) Nonrenal Amyloid at Presentation (n=61) a P=.02 l more likely to cause renal presentation None 7 (8) 2 (3) k 6 (7) 12 (20) l 71 (85) 47 (77) Table 2. Characteristics of All 145 Patients With Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis Amyloid Renal (n=84) Nonrenal (n=61) P Value Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; NA, not applicable. a included in the definition of renal amyloidosis Patients with l immunoglobulin light chain amyloid were significantly more likely to have renal involvement and had significantly greater urinary protein loss than patients with κ or no monoclonal light chain amyloid Age, median (IQR), y 61 (52–67) 62 (55–68) .47 Sex, male/female 52/32 40/21 .72 24-hr urine protein loss, median (IQR), g/d 7.0 (4.4–11.7) 0.3 (0.1–6.4) NAa Creatinine, median (IQR), mg/dL 1.1 (0.9–2.2) 1.1 (0.9–1.3) .22 Cardiac involvement (yes/no) 35/48 48/16 .0001 Table 3 Distribution of Urinary Protein and Creatinine Based on Monoclonal Protein Monoclonal Protein Test k (n=18) l (n=118) None (n=9) P Value Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range. Patients with renal amyloid who ultimately received dialysis support had significantly higher serum creatinine and 24-hour urine protein levels at presentation. Absence of cardiac involvement at diagnosis predicted an increased likelihood of dialysis All patients (N=145) 24-hr urine protein loss, median (IQR), g/d 0.73 (0.16–2.37) 3.61 (0.35–7.8) 5.68 (0.3–12.2) .001 Creatinine, median (IQR), mg/dL 1.1 (0.9–1.3) 1.1 (0.9–1.3) 1.5 (1.2–1.6) NS Patients with renal amyloid at presentation (n=84) 24-hr urine protein loss, median (IQR), g/d 2.93 (1.1–5.0) 7.2 (4.8–11.8) 7.8 (3.8–12.6) .04 Creatinine, median (IQR), mg/dL 1.0 (0.8–2.6) 1.1 (0.9–2.2) 1.5 (1.1–1.6) NS Table 4 Characteristics of 84 Patients Presenting With Renal Amyloidosis Dialysis Subsequently Not Required Characteristic Required (n=35) (n=49) P Value Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range. The median time from diagnosis to dialysis was 29.5 months for those that went into renal failure.). However, the actuarial risk reached 50% at 12 years Kaplan-Meier failure curve demonstrating the actuarial time from diagnosis to the start of dialysis therapy N=145 For 38 patients who received dialysis, median survival from day 1 of dialysis was 10.4 months Kaplan-Meier survival of 38 patients from the start of dialysis therapy Age, median (IQR), y 60 (52–67) 62 (52–67) .90 Sex, male/female 21/14 31/18 .76 24-hr urine protein loss, median (IQR), g/d 7.4 (5.0–14.8) 5.9 (3.7–9.1) .03 Creatinine, median (IQR), mg/dL 1.4 (0.9–2.8) 1.1 (0.9–1.5) .01 Cardiac involvement (yes/no) 9/26 26/23 .01 Conclusion: In our study, 26% of all patients with AL ultimately received renal replacement therapy compared with 42% of patients who presented with renal AL specifically. The presenting 24-hour urine protein loss and creatinine values predict which patients will require dialysis. Median survival for patients starting dialysis is less than 1 year. Presence of l light chain amyloid predicts an increased likelihood of renal involvement and, when the kidney is affected, increased proteinuria.
A Multidisciplinary Quality Initiative for Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: Outpatient Transplant with Low Therapy Related Mortality
Abstract Introduction: The Bone Marrow Transplant Program at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) developed a multidisciplinary approach (involving physicians, nurses, pharmacists, dietitians, and financial specialists) for outpatient management of patients undergoing stem cell transplantation. This approach uses an electronic ordering system for diagnostic tests and chemotherapy to minimize medical errors. Table. Patient Characteristics (N=716) Characteristic Value Male, no. of patients (%) 426 (59) Age, median (IQR), y 59 (53–65) Creatinine, median (IQR), mg/dL 1.0 (0.9–1.2) b2-Microglobulin, median (IQR), mcg/mL 2.5 (1.9–3.7) Gammopathies, no. of patients (%) Measured by serum immunofixation or immunoelectrophoresis IgA 148 (21) IgG 414 (58) IgM 6 (1) IgD 12 (2) Light chain 83 (12) Biclonal 6 (1) None 47 (7) Measured by urine immunofixation or immunoelectrophoresis k light chain 402 (56) l light chain 226 (32) Biclonal 1 (0) None 79 (11) Not performed (anuric) 8 (1) Status at stem cell transplant, no. of patients (%) Untreated 4 (1) Plateau 436 (61) Primary refractory 113 (16) Relapse after therapy 93 (13) Relapse during therapy 70 (10) Characteristic Value CD34+ cells, median (IQR), ×106/kg Collected, no. 10.0 (7.6–12.6) Infused, no. 4.7 (3.9–6.2) Sessions of apheresis, median (IQR) 3 (2–5) Engraftment, median (IQR), days after transplantation Neutrophils, 0.5×109/L 13 (12–15) Platelets, 50×109/L 16 (14–22) Duration of hospitalization, median (IQR), d 4 (0–10) Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range. Results: During a 45-month period after implementation of the program (2005-Sept 2007), the day-100 survival rate was 99.5% for low-risk myeloma patients (transplantation during first plateau; n=202) and 97% for high-risk myeloma patients (refractory, relapsing or second or greater plateau; n=71). The overall day-100 survival rate was 99%(270/273). Analysis of hospitalization trends since inception of the program showed that 39% of patients completed the transplant procedure as outpatients. The median duration of hospitalization for all patients was 4 days; age and serum creatinine levels were predictive of the need for and duration of hospitalization Conclusion: Outpatient stem cell transplantation is feasible for patients with multiple myeloma with a therapy mortality of 1%. Nearly 40% of our patients completed the procedure without hospitalization. Age and serum creatinine levels predicted a higher likelihood of hospitalization. Implementation of out patient transplant requires affordable housing in the community since many third party payers do not support hotel costs despite the reduction of hospital days. The hospital physical plant and patient registration process has to support use of designated hospital rooms for purely out patient practice. The transplant team must have process owners to standardize across all disease categories collection protocols, conditioning regimens, infusion SOP’s and post infusion supportive care guidelines for standard antibiotics, narcotics, laboratory work and transfusion thresholds. A care team meeting between physicians, nursing, dietary, pharmacy, business office, data base and appointment coordinators is essential to coordinate all the multidisciplinary efforts. Kaplan-Meier curve shows the percentage of patients remaining in the hospital through time t, stratified on the basis of age greater than or less than or equal to 65 years Kaplan-Meier curve shows the percentage of patients remaining in the hospital through time t, stratified on the basis of age greater than or less than or equal to 65 years Kaplan-Meier curve shows the percentage of patients remaining in the hospital through time t, stratified on the basis of creatinine greater than or equal to or less than 1.5mg/dL Kaplan-Meier curve shows the percentage of patients remaining in the hospital through time t, stratified on the basis of creatinine greater than or equal to or less than 1.5mg/dL
Melphalan and Dexamethasone Is Less Effective for Patients with Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis (AL) with High Bone Marrow Plasmacytosis.
Abstract Introduction: Currently, the most extensively tested treatments for immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) are high dose melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and melphalan and dexamethasone (MDex). A recent randomized controlled trial comparing the two regimens showed MDex is at least equivalent if not superior to ASCT. Most patients with symptomatic systemic AL have a low plasma cell load; however, approximately 30% have bone marrow plasmacytosis greater than 20% but do not meet criteria for multiple myeloma with significant anemia or lytic bone disease. This leads to the speculation that the plasma cell biology (and therefore outcomes) might differ between low and high plasma cell burden AL. We undertook this study to address whether these two standard regimens are equally effective in AL patients with low and high plasma cell burden. Methods: Patients with confirmed AL treated with MDex were recruited for this study. Some of the patients treated were not ASCT candidates while others were eligible but favored MDex. Hematologic response was defined as 50% reduction in serum M-protein or 90% reduction in urine M-protein if one was present, otherwise a 50% reduction in serum free light chain levels was used. Organ involvement was defined according to the Consensus Opinion from the 10th International Symposium on Amyloid and Amyloidosis. Patients were separated into a high and a low marrow plasma cells (PC) group based on their percentage of bone marrow plasma cells. Cutoff for the bone marrow plasmacytosis was calculated using receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier method. OS was also calculated for 342 AL patients treated with ASCT for comparison. Results: Seventy-three patients with AL received MDex between 05/01 and 05/07. Median follow-up was 16.8 months. At the time of the study, 42.5% had died. Calculating for OS and PFS, the best cutoff for bone marrow plasmacytosis was found to be 20%. In our cohort, 28.8% had >20% bone marrow plasmacytosis. Age (64.8 yr vs 61.0 yr, p = 0.61) and sex (81% male vs 63.4% male, p = 0.13) were similarly distributed between patients with high and low PC. Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) was also comparable between the 2 groups (0.03 ng/ml (high) vs 0.06 ng/ml (low), p = 0.41). Cardiac involvement were similar between high and low PC groups (78.9% vs 85.7% respectively, p = 0.49) but renal involvement was less common in the high PC group (70.6% vs 38.1%, p = 0.01). No differences were noted in the gastrointestinal and neurological involvement. Patients with high PC received a median of 4 cycles of MDex vs 5 in the low PC group (p = 0.68). Hematologic response was achieved in 75% of patients with high PC and 54.9% of the low’s (p = 0.11). A significant difference was noted in the PFS and OS between the 2 groups. The PFS and OS were 13.5m and 15.3m, respectively for patients with high PC but neither was reached in those with < 20% plasmacytosis (p=0.02 and p = 0.03 respectively). In the multivariate analysis, hematologic response, cardiac involvement and plasmacytosis >20% were independent predictors of PFS and OS. To determine if plasmacytosis had the same affect on survival of ASCT treated patients, 342 patients were analyzed. No relationship between OS and % of plasmacytosis was found. Conclusion: Our study suggests that ASCT and MDex may not be equivalent for all AL patients. Even though hematologic response rates were similar, patients with plasmacytosis >20% had a worse OS and PFS when treated with MDex. This disparity in survival was not evident in patients treated with ASCT. This effect was independent of cardiac involvement. If confirmed, this could have a significant impact on the choice of therapy for AL patients. The best therapy may be determined by the extent of marrow plasmacytosis, with higher plasma cells favoring high dose therapy.
The Prevalence of Abnormal Coagulation Parameters in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Primary Systemic Amyloidosis and Its Impact on Outcome
Abstract Background: Primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) is an incurable plasma cell disorder associated with varying degree of organ infiltration with light chain derived amyloid protein and consequent organ dysfunction. Various acquired coagulopathies, predominantly Factor X (FX) deficiency have been previously described in AL. The factor deficiencies are thought to be due to the direct binding of blood coagulation proteins to amyloid fibrils. Little is known regarding the prognostic significance of abnormal coagulation parameters in AL patients (pts). Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval, we performed a retrospective review of the medical records of 625 consecutive pts who had presented within 3 months of a diagnosis of AL to be evaluated at Mayo Clinic from June 2001 to June 2006. 540 pts had coagulation studies performed within 2 months of presentation. 51 of those pts were on oral anticoagulation and were excluded from the analysis. Results: Of the 489 pts included in the analysis, the median age was 62 years and 61% were male. The median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 26.8 months. Table 1 lists the prevalence of abnormal coagulation tests in the remaining 489 patients. Prothrombin time (PT) was available in the majority of pts. 61 pts (12.6%) had elevated PT, and 63 pts (20.4%) had a decreased FX. 37 of the 61 pts with elevated PT had available FX levels, of which 31 (84%) of those had a decreased FX, suggesting that the cause of elevated PT was mostly due to a low FX. Indicators of hepatic involvement such as alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin levels were higher among the patients with prolonged PT and low FX. An elevated PT (more than 12.4 seconds) was strongly predictive of an adverse outcome, with a median OS of 8.7 months compared to a median OS of 29 months (p<0.0001) in pts with normal PT (Figure 1). Similarly, pts with decreased FX (less than 60% activity), was associated with significantly worse outcomes with a median OS of 14.9 months versus a median OS of 33 months (p<0.0001) in pts with normal FX (Figure 2). In a Cox proportional hazards model containing cardiac troponin (cTnT), NT-Pro BNP, serum alkaline phosphatase, and free light chain difference (involved minus uninvolved), prolonged PT or FX deficiency were independently prognostic for overall survival. Conclusion: Abnormalities of PT and FX are seen in a sizable proportion of pts with newly diagnosed AL. An elevated PT and or FX deficiency appear to adversely affect the outcome of these patients. It is likely that the elevated PT in these patients relate to FX deficiency in the majority which in turn may reflect the amyloid ‘burden’. The effect of other organ involvement like the hepatic involvement may also have an impact on FX and PT. Table 1. Prevalence of abnormal coagulation testing in patients with newly diagnosed primary systemic amyloidosis. Coagulation study N (Test results available) N of abnormal results (%) Elevated prothrombin time 486 61 12.6 Elevated activated partial thromboplastin time 312 48 15.4 Elevated thrombin time 315 84 26.7 Elevated fibrinogen 140 118 84.3 Decreased Factor II activity 62 26 41.9 Decreased Factor V activity 63 9 14.3 Decreased Factor VII activity 63 17 27 Decreased Factor X activity 309 63 20.4 Elevated D-dimer 130 72 55.4 Figure 1. Survival grouped by normal versus elevated Prothrombin time. Figure 1. Survival grouped by normal versus elevated Prothrombin time. Figure 2. Survival grouped by normal versus low Factor X levels. Figure 2. Survival grouped by normal versus low Factor X levels.