Algeciras‐Schimnich, Alicia

Abstract Purpose: Germ cell tumors (GCTs) pose significant diagnostic challenges due to the limited sensitivity and specificity of current tumor markers. Hereby we utilize phage immunoprecipitation sequencing (PhIP-Seq) technique to develop a unique immunosignature panel (iSIGN) with high sensitivity and specificity to improve the diagnosis and differentiation of GCTs. Patients and Methods: Serum samples from patients with confirmed gonadal or extragonadal GCTs and controls were collected from Mayo Clinic repositories. Controls included benign testicular lesions, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative disorders, and other cancers. Samples were randomized into development and validation cohorts. PhIP-Seq identified antigen-autoantibody interactions, and enrichment scores were calculated to develop a biomarker panel distinguishing GCT from non-GCT cases. A second biomarker panel was developed to predict seminoma from nonseminoma cases. Results: A total of 427 serum samples were analyzed, including 150 from GCT patients and 277 controls. For our primary model to distinguish GCT cases (GCT-iSIGN), 24 peptides from 16 antigens were identified based on significant differential autoantibody binding enrichment in GCT patients (p < 0.05), ≥2 peptides per antigen, and enrichment scores ≥ 2.5-fold. GCT-iSIGN was highly sensitive (93%) and specific (99%) for identifying GCT cases from controls with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.93 and 9% Unknown Case Rate (UCR). The secondary panel (Sem-iSIGN) included 17 peptides corresponding to 5 unique proteins with high specificity (93%), moderate sensitivity (65%) and AUC of 0.77 to distinguish seminoma from nonseminoma GCT cases. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the potential use of PhIP-Seq to identify unique immunosignature panels that can serve as reliable biomarkers for GCT. These panels address the limitations of traditional markers and other proteomic techniques. This immunosignature model represents a cost-effective, stable, and scalable approach to enhancing GCT diagnosis and management. Citation Format: M Bakri Hammami, Andrew Knight, Haidara Kherbek, Brian Costello, Silvana De Lorenzo, Bradley C. Leibovich, John C. Cheville, Yong Guo, Jessica Sagen, Janet E. Olson, Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich, Sean J. Pittock, John R. Mills, Surendra Dasari, Divyanshu Dubey. iSIGN panel identifies germ cell tumors via whole-proteome phage immunoprecipitation sequencing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Mechanisms of Cancer Immunity and Cancer-related Autoimmunity; 2025 Sep 24-27; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2025;13(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B027.

Objective The objective of this study was to determine the predictive value of amyloid‐positron emission tomography (PET) versus the plasma ratio of phosphorylated tau at threonine 217 (p‐tau217) to non‐phosphorylated tau217 (%p‐tau217) for tau‐PET transitions (T− to T+). The added value of combining plasma amyloid‐β 42 and amyloid‐β 40 (Aβ42/40) and %p‐tau217 into an amyloid probability score (APS2) was also assessed. Methods Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) participants had plasma markers measured at via mass spectrometry (MS), an amyloid‐PET scan, and a tau‐PET (meta‐temporal region of interest [ROI]) negative scan (standardized uptake value ratio [SUVR] <1.29) at the index (baseline) date, along with one or more follow‐up tau‐PET scans. The BioFINDER‐2 cohort was used for validation. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, and apolipoprotein ( APOE ) ε4 were used to assess predictors, with scaling to the interquartile range (IQR) for comparability of hazard ratios (HR). Results Among 255 tau‐PET negative MCSA participants (median age: 71.9 years), 37 converted to tau‐PET positive (median follow‐up time: 3.81 years). Higher %p‐tau217 (HR: 1.52 [95% CI: 1.28–1.80]), amyloid‐PET centiloid (HR: 1.47 [95% CI: 1.20–1.79]), and APS2 (HR: 1.62 [95% CI: 1.22–2.16]) predicted tau‐PET conversion. However, Aβ42/40 (HR: 0.94 [95% CI: 0.54–1.66]) was not associated with tau‐PET conversion. In the BioFINDER‐2 cohort (605 tau‐negative, median age: 70.2), 33 converted to tau‐positive (median follow‐up time: 2 years), with higher %p‐tau217 (HR: 1.80 [95% CI: 1.50–2.17]), amyloid‐PET centiloid (HR: 2.29 [95% CI: 1.77–2.97]), and lower Aβ42/40 (HR: 2.38 [95% CI: 1.17–4.83]) predicting conversion. Interpretation In two cohorts, %p‐tau217 was associated with tau‐PET conversion, comparable to amyloid‐PET. APS2 also predicted conversion in the MCSA cohort, whereas Aβ42/40 predicted conversion in the BioFINDER‐2 cohort, which had more individuals with cognitive impairment. ANN NEUROL 2025;98:1249–1260

Abstract INTRODUCTION Plasma biomarkers’ utility for predicting incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains unclear. We evaluated associations of plasma Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers and amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) with transitions from cognitively unimpaired (CU) to MCI in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) and BioFINDER‐2 studies. METHODS Associations of continuous baseline plasma biomarker levels and amyloid PET Centiloid with progression to MCI, adjusting for age, sex, and education, were evaluated with Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS The study included 381 MCSA and 584 BioFINDER‐2 participants. Amyloid PET and percent phosphorylated to non‐phosphorylated tau217 (%p‐tau217) were strong predictors of progression to MCI in both cohorts: hazard ratios of 1.49 and 1.23 in the MCSA and 1.72 and 1.65 in BioFINDER, respectively. Amyloid beta 42/40 was a significant predictor in BioFINDER‐2 only (hazard ratio 2.20). DISCUSSION Plasma %p‐tau217 was associated with progression from CU to MCI in both cohorts, although differences in biomarker associations may be related to differences in the two cohorts. Highlights Mass‐spectrometry‐based plasma phosphorylated tau217 was associated with cognitively unimpaired to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) progression. Plasma amyloid beta 42/40 was a significant predictor in BioFINDER but not the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA). Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) was the strongest predictor of progression to MCI in the MCSA. Plasma had added value to amyloid PET in BioFINDER but not the MCSA. Biomarker performance may vary with cohort and biomarker measurement differences.

Abstract The landscape of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias (ADRD) diagnosis is evolving rapidly, driven by advances in disease understanding, biomarker tools, and disease‐modifying therapies. Modern diagnostic approaches emphasize biological precision, early detection, and dynamic frameworks that adapt to treatment‐induced changes in disease biology. These frameworks enable opportunities for personalized interventions—encompassing pharmacological and non‐pharmacological strategies—and for enhanced clinical trial design. However, implementing these advancements globally is influenced by diverse cultural, infrastructural, and regulatory factors. The 2024 Alzheimer's Association International Conference Advancements: Modernizing Diagnosis, held in Japan, provided a unique platform to explore these global dynamics, particularly from an Asian perspective. This article highlights key discussions from the conference, exploring the role of biomarker‐based diagnostic frameworks in shaping the future of AD/ADRD research, diagnosis, and treatment. We highlight regional challenges and successes and emphasize ethical considerations and practical strategies needed to ensure equitable access to diagnostic and therapeutic innovations. Highlights Advances in biomarkers are reshaping Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and treatment. Modern diagnostic frameworks highlight biological precision, early detection, and dynamic frameworks. The 2024 Alzheimer's Association International Conference Advancements: Modernizing Diagnosis explored challenges and opportunities in global biomarker implementation. The conference explored geographic‐specific impacts, focusing on Asia.

Abstract INTRODUCTION When cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) measurements for amyloid‐beta‐peptide (Aβ) related pathology are discordant, therapeutic decision‐making becomes uncertain. METHODS Using data from patients with mild cognitive impairment ( n = 541) from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, we examined baseline characteristics and longitudinal clinical outcomes in persons grouped according to normal/abnormal Aβ via concurrent CSF and PET determinations using standard cutpoints. RESULTS Discordant groups for brain Aβ status (CSF+/PET− and CSF−/PET+) each represented about 5% of the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) population. Longitudinally, neither discordant group declined more than the CSF−/PET− group on either a memory measure or the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes scores over a median 4 years of observation, while the CSF+/PET+ group exhibited worsening on both measures. DISCUSSION In contrast to the clinical decline observed in the CSF+/PET+ group, persons with MCI and CSF+/PET− or CSF−/PET+ brain amyloid patterns did not exhibit incipient decline. Highlights Discrepant abnormal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) brain amyloid indicators are uncommon in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). CSF‐PET discrepant persons with MCI tend to have less abnormal values initially. CSF‐PET discrepant persons with MCI have a benign prognosis at 4 years.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONWe investigated the usefulness of plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) for capturing vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) in the context of amyloidosis.METHODSUsing two independent cohorts (n = 1810), we assessed the relationship of plasma NfL and GFAP with (1) vascular brain indices; (2) diagnostic states using the following definitions: vascular versus not (white matter hyperintensity/total intracranial volume ≥ 1.3%), and cognitively impaired (CI) versus cognitively unimpaired (CU) using Clinical Dementia Rating ([CDR] scale ≥ 0.5); and (3) their upstream predictors using structural equation models (SEMs).RESULTSPlasma NfL and GFAP were associated with vascular brain damage and differed across states (VCI > vascular CU > non‐vascular CI > non‐vascular CU). In a population‐based sample, these biomarkers distinguished vascular CU and VCI from non‐vascular CU groups with greater separation in amyloid negative participants. Pathway analyses showed NfL was primarily influenced by systemic/brain vascular health, whereas amyloid contributed to GFAP variability.DISCUSSIONPlasma biomarkers, particularly NfL, capture vascular brain changes and show promise for VCI identification.Highlights Plasma NfL and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were associated with vascular brain indices. Plasma biomarkers differed across diagnostic states (VCI > vascular CU > non‐vascular CI > non‐vascular CU). Plasma markers discriminated vascular from non‐vascular states with greater separation in Aβ− participants. NfL was linked to vascular health, while amyloid influenced GFAP variability in the population‐based sample. Future longitudinal frameworks should consider systemic inflammation markers along with these plasma markers to better understand VCID‐related brain changes and cognitive decline.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Neurofilament light chain (NfL) quantification aids in diagnosing and predicting neurological disorders, but clinical and laboratory practices vary across centers. Differences in result interpretation and reporting further challenge test commutability. This study aimed to review the global analytical and post‐analytical methods used for NfL measurement in routine clinical practice across different contexts. METHODS We established an international working group (WG) and distributed a survey to its members to gather information on context of use (COU), (pre) analytical methods, cutoff usage, as well as the interpretation and reporting of NfL measurements. RESULTS Among the centers, 63% measured NfL in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 87% in blood, and 53% in both. COU was widespread, with 50% defining pathological cutoffs based on publications and 42% considering age. Reporting was primarily done through numeric results (95%). DISCUSSION Harmonizing cutoffs, reporting, and interpretation across various clinical contexts will facilitate the incorporation of this biomarker into routine clinical practice. Highlights Unique international overview of current analytical and post‐analytical methods for neurofilament light chain (NfL) measurement in routine clinical practice. Tailored sheets for each neurological application. Strategies to harmonize cutoffs, reporting, and interpretation of NfL's measurement.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) represent accessible alternatives to positron emission tomography (PET) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)‐based biomarkers in well‐characterized cohorts. It remains to be determined whether performance is maintained in outpatient clinics comprised of patients with multiple causes of cognitive impairment. METHODS Plasma phosphorylated tau217 (p‐tau217) and amyloid beta (Aβ) 42/40 were measured in 509 patients evaluated in a tertiary‐care memory clinic. Biomarker performance was compared across diagnoses, referencing established cutpoints for positive and negative biomarkers. RESULTS Plasma p‐tau217 distinguished patients with diagnoses of symptomatic AD with 95% sensitivity and 82% specificity. Integration of Aβ42 measurements (p‐tau217/Aβ42) incrementally improved specificity (86%). Plasma p‐tau217 and p‐tau217/Aβ42 concentrations closely associated with established CSF biomarkers of AD (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.94 and 0.96, respectively). Reduced kidney function associated with elevated plasma p‐tau217 and p‐tau217/Aβ42 concentrations in patients without AD (referencing CSF biomarkers). DISCUSSION Plasma p‐tau217 and p‐tau217/Aβ42 concentrations demonstrated robust diagnostic performance in a heterogeneous clinical cohort; interpretation requires consideration of kidney function. Highlights Plasma phosphorylated tau217 (p‐tau217) reliably identified clinic patients with Alzheimer's disease. A two‐cutpoint strategy yielded definitive results in 86% of patients. Integration of plasma amyloid beta (Aβ; p‐tau217/Aβ42) minimally improved diagnostic performance. Plasma p‐tau217 levels were increased in patients with kidney dysfunction.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Clinicians’ views on the clinical readiness of Alzheimer's disease (AD) blood biomarkers (BBMs) are not well understood. METHODS The Alzheimer's Association International Society to Advance Alzheimer's Research and Treatment Biofluid‐Based Biomarkers Professional Interest Area conducted a survey to elicit clinician opinions on AD BBM implementation, including contexts of use, assay selection, reporting, and result interpretation. RESULTS Clinician respondents ( n = 212) practiced in Europe (56%), North America (24%), the Caribbean and Central/South America (11%), and other continents (9%). Most respondents were medical doctors (80%) practicing in secondary or tertiary care (88%). For 56%, cerebrospinal fluid AD biomarkers or amyloid positron emission tomography were accessible, but 48% agreed and 52% disagreed with the implementation of AD BBMs in any clinical context. Respondents emphasized the need for data from diverse populations and educational resources to support test interpretation. DISCUSSION Surveyed clinicians generally agreed with published appropriate use recommendations but were divided on AD BBM readiness for clinical use. Highlights A survey of clinicians was conducted regarding clinical readiness of Alzheimer's disease (AD) blood biomarkers (BBMs). Views were split on AD BBM clinical readiness: 48% agreed, 52% disagreed. Most responders supported AD BBM use for treatment decisions. Most responders opposed AD BBM testing in asymptomatic individuals. Test performance data and educational materials to aid interpretation were of high importance.