Rizzo, Marco

Summary: This article reviews the state of the art for arthroplasty of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints. Arthritis that affects these joints can result in significant pain and compromised function. The authors review indications for arthroplasty for each joint, types of implants to consider, technical considerations, patient expectations, and outcomes and complications.

Background: The aim of this study is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation versus closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of metacarpal fractures in relation to anatomic and surgical variables. Methods: Electronic medical records at two institutions were reviewed for patients who underwent surgical intervention for metacarpal fractures. Data were collected from those who underwent reduction and internal fixation with either plates or Kirschner wires (K-wires). Inclusion criteria included minimum postoperative follow-up of 60 days and age 18 years or older. Exclusion criteria included insufficient radiographic data, previously attempted closed reduction with immobilization, pathologic fracture mechanism, history of previous trauma or surgery to the affected bone, and fixation technique other than plate or K-wire. Results: We reviewed data for patients treated over a 22-year time period. Ultimately, 81 metacarpal shaft and neck fractures in 60 patients met inclusion criteria. Among all metacarpal fractures, complications were present in 39 (48.1%) cases. There were no significant associations between complication prevalence and hardware type. Revision surgery was required in 11 (13.6%) patients; there were no significant associations between revision procedures and hardware type. Postoperatively, all patients with imaging data had radiograph follow-up to assess union status. There was no significant association between time to union and hardware type. Conclusions: Outcomes showed no significant difference between plate and pin fixation for metacarpal shaft and neck fractures. These findings suggest that surgeons may have flexibility to decide on the type of operative intervention while considering patient-specific factors, such as the need for early mobilization.

AbstractIntroductionThe distal radius is a common location for giant cell tumors (GCTs) of bone. Management includes intralesional curettage or wide excision, however, long‐term comparisons of treatment options are limited. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate our institutions' outcomes of treatment of these tumors.MethodsWe reviewed 24 GCT of the distal radius in 23 patients (12 males: 11 females) with a mean age of 42 years at the time of surgery. Functional outcomes were collected including the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS), QuickDash, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). The mean follow‐up was 13 years.ResultsTumor grade included Campanacci Grade II (n = 14) and Grade III (n = 10). Treatment included extended intralesional curettage (n = 16) and wide excision (n = 8). Reconstruction mainly included bone grafting/cement (n = 16) or free vascularized fibula radiocarpal arthrodesis (n = 5). At most recent follow‐up, there was no difference in MSTS, VAS, and PRWE (p > 0.05) between patients undergoing a joint sparing or arthrodesis. Patients undergoing arthrodesis had a lower QuickDASH score (13.7 vs. 20.8, p = 0.04)ConclusionsTreatment for GCT of the distal radius is individualized however in the setting of articular surface involvement, arthrodesis can lead to superior functional results at long‐term follow‐up.

Background: When treating upper-extremity infections, clinicians frequently must decide whether to initiate antibiotics or delay them with the goal of optimizing culture yield at the time of surgical debridement. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the administration of preoperative antibiotics affects intraoperative culture yield and whether there is a “safe” interval prior to culture acquisition within which antibiotics can be administered without affecting culture yield. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 470 consecutive patients who underwent debridement for a presumed acute infection of the hand, wrist, or forearm at a single tertiary care center between January 2015 and May 2020. Data including patient demographics, mechanism of infection and affected body part(s), and details of antibiotic administration, including type and timing with respect to culture acquisition, were collected. Results: Three hundred and forty-one patients (73%) received preoperative antibiotics prior to debridement and culture acquisition. The rate of positive cultures among patients who received preoperative antibiotics was 81% compared with 95% among patients who did not receive preoperative antibiotics (p < 0.01; odds ratio, 4.73). Even a single dose of antibiotics imparted a significantly increased risk of obtaining negative intraoperative cultures, and an incremental increase in the likelihood of obtaining negative cultures was seen with each preoperative dose given up to 7 doses. We did not identify a “safe” interval of time between antibiotic administration and culture acquisition such that culture yield was not affected. Conclusions: Patients who received preoperative antibiotics for the treatment of upper-extremity infections were approximately 5 times more likely to have negative cultures at the time of debridement than those who did not receive preoperative antibiotics. This effect persisted regardless of the number of doses given or the interval between antibiotic administration and culture acquisition. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: There have been no formal studies of the use of collagenase clostridium histolyticum (Xiaflex; Endo Pharmaceuticals, Malvern, Pa.) in the anticoagulated patient. Previous study on its use excluded patients receiving anticoagulation therapy. This study reviewed the effects of anticoagulation use in patients undergoing collagenase clostridium histolyticum injection and cord rupture to determine safety and efficacy. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed patients receiving collagenase clostridium histolyticum injections for Dupuytren contracture between 2010 and 2017. Outcomes included type of anticoagulation, skin tear, tendon rupture, lymphadenopathy, sensory abnormality, hematoma, and bleeding. Results: A total of 388 injections were performed in 197 patients. The average clinical follow-up was 311 days. Fifty-two percent of patients (n = 201) were anticoagulated. The vast majority were taking aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) (n = 182), followed by warfarin (n = 27), clopidogrel (n = 9), apixaban (n = 8), rivaroxaban (n = 4), and dabigatran (n = 2). There were 42 skin tears, 21 in the anticoagulated group. One tendon rupture occurred in the anticoagulated group (acetylsalicylic acid) and none occurred in the nonanticoagulated group (p = 0.34). No patients experienced sensory abnormalities, a hematoma requiring intervention, or uncontrollable bleeding. Conclusions: Anticoagulation is commonly encountered by hand surgeons treating Dupuytren contracture. There is no significant difference in complications in the anticoagulated patient versus the nonanticoagulated patient. It is safe to perform collagenase clostridium histolyticum injections for Dupuytren contracture in the anticoagulated patient, regardless of the type of anticoagulation. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the functional outcome and complications following primary ulnar head or total distal radial ulnar joint (DRUJ) arthroplasty in patients who have a partial or total wrist fusion. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 33 primary DRUJ implants in 31 patients who had a partial or total wrist fusion. Follow-up time averaged 67 months. There were 11 partial and 22 total wrist fusions with 22 ulnar head prosthesis and 11 total DRUJ implants. The mean age of the patients was 49 years. Eighty-one percent had previous surgeries with an average number of 4.6 previous wrist procedures. Pre- and postoperative pain levels were recorded. Mayo Wrist Scores were calculated. Grip strength, range of motion (ROM), and post-operative complications were noted. Results The pain scores improved in 67% of the patients. The Mayo Wrist Score improved significantly from a mean of 39 preoperatively to 51 postoperatively. The grip strength and pro-supination remained stable. The wrist ROM also remained stable in the patients with partial wrist fusions. During the follow-up period, 10 (30%) of the DRUJ implants were explanted, with a trend toward higher explantation rates in total wrist fusions with one in the partial fusion group and nine in the total wrist fusion group. Four of the explantations happened in the first postoperative year. Nineteen (61%) of the patients required a second surgery for a DRUJ implant-related complication; this rate was similar between the partial and total fusion groups. Conclusions DRUJ replacement resulted in improved pain scores and Mayo wrist scores in the majority of patients; however, the combination of primary DRUJ arthroplasty and total wrist fusion was associated with high complication rates. Surgeons should be aware of the high complication rate seen with DRUJ arthroplasty when combined with total wrist fusion.

Background: Radioscapholunate (RSL) fusion is performed for painful radiocarpal arthritis that is typically posttraumatic or inflammatory in nature. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients with inflammatory conditions undergoing RSL fusion had comparable outcomes as those with posttraumatic arthritis and to determine factors impacting union. Methods: This was a retrospective review of all RSL fusions over a 25-year period. Demographic information, wrist range of motion, postoperative complications, and surgical technique, including presence or absence of resection of distal scaphoid pole, data were collected. Radiographs were examined for evidence of healing of the RSL fusion site as well as development of midcarpal arthritis. Results: Fifty-six patients underwent RSL fusion. Eight patients required revision of radiocarpal arthrodesis for painful nonunion. The fusion rate was 85.7%, and median 25 th to 75th percentile (time to healing was 4.0 3.2-5.2) months. There were no differences in time to or rate of union by inflammatory arthropathy status. Grip strength increased significantly and pain decreased significantly with surgery. Union rate was 90% with the use of K-wires, screws, or staples, which was significantly greater than plates, fusion cups, or multiple implant types. The use of autologous bone graft significantly decreased the rate of nonunion and significantly decreased time to union by 3 months compared to allograft alone. Extension was significantly improved with scaphoid distal pole resection versus without distal scaphoid pole resection. Conclusions: Radioscapholunate (RSL) fusion is an effective treatment for radiocarpal arthritis but has high nonunion rates. Fixation with K-wires, screws, or staples and use of autograft confers improved union rate.

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affecting the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint may warrant arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to investigate implant survivorship, complications, radiographic outcomes, and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing MCP arthroplasty with a pyrocarbon implant to treat RA. Methods: In all, 124 MCP joint pyrocarbon arthroplasties in 40 patients performed to treat RA were reviewed. Operations were at the index (n = 43, 35%), middle (n = 33, 27%), ring (n = 27, 22%), and small (n = 21, 17%) fingers from 1998 to 2009 in 105 (85%) female and 19 (15%) male joints with a mean age of 54 ± 11 years. Mean postoperative follow-up was 6 ± 3 years. All patients achieved at least 2 years of follow-up. Results: Rates of implant survivorship at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years were 98%, 98%, 90%, and 81%, respectively. Fifteen percent (n = 18) of arthroplasties underwent revision at a mean 5 ± 3 years postoperatively. The overall reoperation rate was 29% (n = 36). Rates of survival from reoperation at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years were 85%, 84%, 76%, and 68%, respectively. Complications occurred in 32% (n = 40). Pain ratings improved postoperatively ( P < .01). Arc of motion improved from 37 ± 21 to 43 ± 19 ( P = .03). Both appositional and oppositional strength improved after surgery; however, there was no improvement in grip strength ( P < .01). Conclusions: Metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty with a pyrocarbon implant demonstrated reliable improvement in pain and arc of motion in patients with RA. Complication and overall reoperation rates were high, while 1 in 10 undergo revision within 5 years postoperatively.

Background The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA) for noninflammatory arthritis of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint. Methods Records from 20 SRAs performed between 1995 and 2017 in 17 patients with noninflammatory arthritis affecting the MCP joint were retrospectively reviewed. The mean follow up was 6.6 years. Results Three arthroplasties (15%) underwent 4 revision operations. The 2-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year rates of survival from surface replacement implant revision were 90%, 90%, 79%, and 79%, respectively. Major complications occurring in revised joints included arthrodesis (n = 1) and amputation (n = 1). The overall reoperation rate was 35%. The 2-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year rates of overall reoperation-free survival were 75%, 69%, 60%, and 60%, respectively. Conclusions Pain ratings and MCP arc of motion significantly improved following arthroplasty. Metacarpophalangeal SRA for noninflammatory arthritis can improve arc of motion and pain. Revision is uncommon; however, 1 in 3 joints requires reoperation.

Background: Owing to the many unique disease characteristics of Parkinson disease (PD)—namely resting tremors, muscular rigidity, and poor bone quality—we hypothesized that this patient population would have inferior outcomes with surgical management of acute distal radius fractures (DRFs) compared with the literature available on the general population. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study performed at a single, level 1, academic center from 2001 to 2020 capturing all adult patients with an isolated, acute, and closed DRF that ultimately underwent operative treatment. International Classification of Diseases 10 codes were used to identify 30 patients for manual chart review. Several patient and fracture characteristics were accounted for and complications, reoperations, and failures of surgical intervention were recorded. Results: There was a total of 7/30 failures (23%), 6/30 reoperations (20%), and 12 complications in 9/30 wrists (complication rate, 30%) at a mean latest follow-up of 11 months (1.2-158 months). Of the 7 failures, 5 were due to loss of reduction, and 2 of them were deep infections with mean time to failure of 8.3 weeks (range, 11 days-5.2 months). Conclusions: This study found a high rate of complications, reoperations, and early failure despite a short follow-up period and a small cohort of patients with PD treated surgically for a DRF. We recommend locked plating if suitable for the fracture type and early involvement of a multidisciplinary team to assist with medical optimization of PD to increase chances of a successful outcome.