Thomas, Randal J.

Abstract Aims Nutritional counselling is a core component of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), yet the evidence base for specific dietary interventions within CR remains fragmented. This scoping review aimed to map the range of nutritional interventions evaluated in adult CR programmes, characterize their reported outcomes, and identify key gaps in current evidence and practice. Methods and results Following the Arksey and O’Malley framework and reporting according to PRISMA-ScR, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to June 2026. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, non-randomized trials, and observational studies evaluating an explicitly described nutritional intervention within a structured CR programme in adults with established cardiovascular disease. Of 2765 identified records, 35 studies met eligibility criteria. Interventions spanned Mediterranean and heart-healthy dietary patterns, calorie-restriction and weight-loss programmes, comprehensive lifestyle interventions, structured nutrition education and counselling, supplementation, functional foods, and individualized diet prescriptions. Across categories, improvements in body weight, central adiposity, and adherence to cardioprotective dietary recommendations were commonly reported, particularly when nutrition was delivered with repeated contact and individualized support. Effects on lipid profiles, inflammatory markers, blood pressure, functional capacity, and clinical outcomes were more variable. Conclusion Nutritional interventions within CR were most consistently associated with improvements in intermediate behavioural, anthropometric, and cardiometabolic outcomes, particularly when structured and reinforced over time. However, heterogeneity in study design, intervention delivery, comparator groups, outcome reporting, and follow-up duration precludes definitive conclusions about comparative efficacy, optimal intervention format, or the magnitude of benefit. Greater standardization, longer follow-up, and further evaluation of personalized nutritional strategies are needed to strengthen the nutritional component of CR.

Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) leads to increased exercise capacity (VO 2 peak) and risk reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Women exhibit blunted VO 2 peak improvements following CR. The purpose was to examine sex differences in the clinical predictors of VO 2 peak improvement and odds of MACEs following CR. Methods From 1999 to 2017, all consecutive patients undergoing cardiopulmonary exercise testing before and after CR were included. Sex differences in peak exercise metrics in response to CR were compared. Multiple logistic regression models were fit to assess clinical predictors of VO 2 peak improvement (defined as >0% from pre‐CR) and MACEs following CR for men and women. Results A total of 513 men and 158 women were included. Men had greater increases in VO 2 peak than women following CR ( P =0.001). For men, independent predictors of VO 2 peak improvement following CR included higher CR session attendance (odds ratio [OR], 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02–1.06]), peripheral artery disease (OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.25–0.86]), and pre‐CR VO 2 peak (OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97–0.99]) (all, P <0.02). Independent predictors of lower odds of MACEs following CR in men included higher number of CR sessions (OR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.95–0.99]), pre‐CR VO 2 peak (OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97–0.99]), surgical CR indication (OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.18–0.68]), and no history of peripheral artery disease (OR, 2.94 [95% CI, 1.60–5.38]) (all, P <0.02). For women, the selected clinical characteristics were not statistically significant independent predictors of VO 2 peak improvement or odds of MACEs (except for diabetes) following CR. Conclusions These findings suggest that clinical predictors of VO 2 peak improvement and odds of MACEs following CR are sex specific.

Purpose: Despite the 2022 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines recommending cardiac rehabilitation (CR) after aortic dissection repair, both patient participation in CR and the associated clinical outcomes remain poorly understood. Methods: Adults (≥18 years of age) discharged alive following thoracic aortic dissection surgery across the Mayo Clinic Enterprise (January 2012 to November 2022), with follow-up until May 2024, were included (IRB #24-001141). Data were presented using summary statistics and logistic regression modeling. Results: A total of 186 patients were referred; 37% were female, and the median age was 64 (51, 73) years. Dissections were classified as type A (43%), type B (18%), or a combination, and 55% had residual dissection. Over half (53%) did not start CR, with older age (aOR = 0.97: 95% CI, 0.94 - 0.99; P = .003), family history of aortic dissections and/or aneurysms (aOR = 0.17: 95% CI, 0.04 - 0.54; P = .005), and tobacco use (aOR = 0.35: 95% CI, 0.13 - 0.91; P = .037) being associated with lower odds of enrollment. Of the 87 who enrolled, 34 did so at a Mayo Clinic facility. There were no complications, with no difference in adverse outcomes. Among those with evaluations at graduation from CR (n = 21), quality of life (Dartmouth index 16 [14, 19] vs 25 [22, 30]; P = .002) and 6-minute walk distance (488 [375, 531] vs 302 [235, 398] m; P = .001) improved. Conclusions: Following thoracic aortic dissection repair, CR significantly improved quality of life and functional capacity without adverse events. Further work is needed to improve enrollment and establish data-driven safety margins for exercise.

Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is essential to secondary cardiovascular disease prevention and management of cardiac patients. Despite its proven benefits, CR remains underutilized with enrollment and completion rates ranging from 10-30% in the US. Yet, there is a scarcity of nationally representative data among diverse populations on socioeconomic differences in barriers and beliefs of CR participation and delivery mode preferences. Hypothesis: The perceptions (barriers, beliefs), CR delivery mode preferences, and CR utilization (prior enrollment) varies by socioeconomic status (SES) among CR-eligible individuals. Methods: We conducted an anonymous national electronic survey from March 2023 to January 2024 of individuals self-reporting a prior CR-eligible diagnosis. The 22-item CR Barriers Scale assessed perceived barriers to CR enrollment and participation using a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree). A 13-item, validated questionnaire assessed 4 subscales pertaining to patients’ beliefs about CR, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree): perceived necessity, concerns about exercise, practical barriers and perceived suitability. CR delivery mode preferences were ascertained (eg, virtual, at-home, etc.). Mean barriers and belief scores as well as delivery mode preferences were stratified by SES. Low SES was defined as ≤ high school education, Medicaid insurance, or uninsured. High SES was defined as > high school education and non-Medicaid health insurance. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics with R software. Results: A total of 466 participants completed the survey (38.1% women, 30.6% minoritized racial/ethnic group, 29.6% low SES, 95% response rate) ( Table 1 ). The majority indicated prior enrollment in CR (81.5%) with no difference by SES. CR barrier scores did not differ significantly by SES (p=0.331) ( Table 2 ). Beliefs about CR perceived necessity and perceived suitability differed by SES (p<0.001 and p=0.025), but beliefs regarding concerns about exercise and practical barriers did not. The low SES group reported a higher preference for completely at-home CR compared to the high SES group (33.6% vs 7.4%, p<0.001). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that CR beliefs varied by SES while utilization did not. For CR-eligible patients experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage, at-home CR may be a preferred alternative to center-based CR to increase CR participation and adherence.

Purpose: Subjects with normal weight obesity (NWO), defined as normal BMI but high body fat (BF)%, are at increased cardiovascular risk. Factors contributing to NWO are not well studied. We hypothesized that NWO is associated with reduced physical activity and unhealthy eating patterns. Methods: We analyzed 5942 people ≥18 years with normal BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 ) from the NHANES III survey (1988-1994), a representative sample of the US population. Subjects were classified as NWO based on BF% (>35% in women and >25% in men). Leisure-time physical activity was measured with a standard survey. Subjects were stratified as INACTIVE (no physical activity reported), ACTIVE (3-6 METs for ≥ 5 times/week or >6 METs, ≥3 times/week), or insufficiently active (those who were not INACTIVE but did not meet criteria for ACTIVE). Total activity was expressed in METs/hr/month, assuming an exercise duration of 30 minutes for each day reported. A Healthy Eating Index was based on 24-hour dietary recall data. Analyses were weighted for the complex study design. Results: Mean age was 43 years, 54.4% were men; 1170 people (19.7%) with normal BMI had NWO. Table shows demographics, physical activity and nutritional habits by group. After controlling for age, gender, poverty levels, smoking status and Healthy Eating Index, METs/hr/month was an independent predictor of NWO (OR per 100 MET/hours/month is 0.72(95%CI 0.60;0.88). People who were inactive and insufficiently active had higher odds of NWO as compared with active people (OR-1.47; 95%CI 1.10;1.96 and OR-1.60, 95% CI 1.25; 2.05, respectively). Also, strength training was independently associated with a decreased odds of NWO (0.63; 95%CI 0.44;0.89). Dietary pattern was not predictive of NWO. Conclusions: Physical activity, particularly resistance exercise, but not diet, was associated with NWO independently of potential confounders. Promoting physical activity may be an important interventional strategy in these patients.

Thais Coutinho, 2011 Finalist and Presenting Author

Background Innovative restructuring of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) delivery remains critical to reduce barriers and improve access to diverse populations. Destination Cardiac Rehab is a novel virtual world technology‐based CR program delivered through the virtual world platform, Second Life, which previously demonstrated high acceptability as an extension of traditional center‐based CR. This study aims to evaluate efficacy and adherence of the virtual world–based CR program compared with center‐based CR within a community‐informed, implementation science framework. Methods Using a noninferiority, hybrid type 1 effectiveness‐implementation, randomized controlled trial, 150 patients with an eligible cardiovascular event will be recruited from 6 geographically diverse CR centers across the United States. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either the 12‐week Destination Cardiac Rehab or the center‐based CR control groups. The primary efficacy outcome is a composite cardiovascular health score based on the American Heart Association Life's Essential 8 at 3 and 6 months. Adherence outcomes include CR session attendance and participation in exercise sessions. A diverse patient/caregiver/stakeholder advisory board was assembled to guide recruitment, implementation, and dissemination plans and to contextualize study findings. The institutional review board–approved randomized controlled trial will enroll and randomize patients to the intervention (or control group) in 3 consecutive waves/year over 3 years. The results will be published at data collection and analyses completion. Conclusions The Destination Cardiac Rehab randomized controlled trial tests an innovative and potentially scalable model to enhance CR participation and advance health equity. Our findings will inform the use of effective virtual CR programs to expand equitable access to diverse patient populations. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT05897710.