Back to Authors

Palmeri, Sebastian T.

A5088714406 | I2801825082

Mayo Clinic

From John Nasseff Heart Hospital, St Paul, Minn (K.W.B.); Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada (M.N.); Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI (G.R.M.); Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine (C.T.L.); Jane Phillips Medic

Citations 1

Double-Blind, Randomized Trial of an Anti-CD18 Antibody in Conjunction With Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Circulation | September 28, 2007 | Volume: 104 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 2778-2783

10.1161/hc4801.100236 | PMID 11733394

Background Inhibition of leukocyte adhesion can reduce myocardial infarct size in animals. This study was designed to define the safety and efficacy of a recombinant, humanized, monoclonal antibody to the CD18 subunit of the β2 integrin adhesion receptors (rhuMAb CD18), in reducing infarct size in patients treated with a thrombolytic agent. Methods and Results The Limitation of Myocardial Infarction following Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study (LIMIT AMI) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study conducted in 60 centers in the United States and Canada. A total of 394 subjects who presented within 12 hours of symptom onset with ECG findings (ST-segment elevation) consistent with AMI were treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and were also given an intravenous bolus of 0.5 or 2.0 mg/kg rhuMAb CD18 or placebo. Coronary angiography was performed at 90 minutes, 12-lead ECGs were obtained at baseline, 90, and 180 minutes, and resting sestamibi scans were performed at ≥120 hours. Adjunctive angioplasty and use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antiplatelet agents at the time of angiography were discretionary. There were no treatment effects on coronary blood flow, infarct size, or the rate of ECG ST-segment elevation resolution, despite the expected induction of peripheral leukocytosis. A slight trend toward an increase in bacterial infections was observed with rhuMAb CD18 ( P =0.33). Conclusions RhuMAb CD18 was well tolerated but not effective in modifying cardiac end points.