Citations 166

Orthopedic Surgery Among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population‐Based Study to Identify Risk Factors, Sex Differences, and Time Trends

Arthritis Care & Research | December 20, 2017 | Volume: 70 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1546-1550

10.1002/acr.23499 | PMID 29266862

ObjectiveTo identify risk factors for large‐joint surgery (LJS) versus small‐joint surgery (SJS) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and evaluate trends in surgery rates over time.MethodsA retrospective medical record review of all orthopedic surgeries following first fulfillment of the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria for adult‐onset RA among residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota between 1980 and 2013 was performed. Risk factors were examined using Cox models adjusted for age, sex, and calendar year of RA incidence. Trends in incidence of joint surgeries were examined using Poisson regression models.ResultsA total of 1,077 patients with RA (mean age 56 years, 69% female, 66% seropositive for rheumatoid factor [RF] and anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide [anti‐CCP] antibodies) were followed for a median of 10.7 years, during which 112 patients (90 women) underwent at least 1 SJS and 204 (141 women) underwent at least 1 LJS. Risk factors included advanced age, and RF and anti‐CCP antibody positivity for both SJS and LJS, and body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 for LJS. Risk factors for SJS and LJS at any time during followup included the presence of radiographic erosions, large‐joint swelling, and methotrexate use. SJS rates decreased by calendar year of incidence (hazard ratio 0.53, P = 0.001), with significant decline in the rates of SJS after 1995. The cumulative incidence of SJS was higher in women than men (P = 0.008).ConclusionIn recent years, there has been a significant decline in the rates of SJS but not LJS in patients with RA. The incidence of SJS is higher among women. Traditional RA risk factors are strong predictors for SJS and LJS. Increasing age and obesity are predictive of LJS.
“Like No One Is Listening to Me”: A Qualitative Study of Patient–Provider Discordance Between Global Assessments of Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Arthritis Care & Research | December 20, 2017 | Volume: 70 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1439-1447

10.1002/acr.23501 | PMID 29266857

ObjectiveTo explore the perspectives and experiences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) whose assessments of their disease differ from those of their rheumatology care provider.MethodsA total of 20 adult RA patients with patient‐provider discordance at their most recent rheumatology appointment (within 4 weeks) were recruited. Discordance was defined by an absolute difference of 25 or more between patient and provider global assessments on a visual analog scale (VAS) of disease activity. For descriptive purposes, participants completed the Health Assessment Questionnaire II, pain VAS, and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 depression scale. Interviews were conducted in person and individually with each patient with a semistructured interview guide. Topics ranged widely, including participants’ perspectives and experiences with living with RA, clinical disease assessments, patient‐provider communication, and psychosocial or other needs. Data from the interviews were analyzed using interpretive phenomenological analysis.ResultsSix major themes emerged from the patient interviews describing patient‐provider discordance and disease assessment: being misunderstood by others, limitations of provider assessments, discrepancy with provider findings, inadequate active listening on the part of health care providers, unmet psychosocial needs, and lack of patient empowerment.ConclusionPatients described discordance in terms of symptom assessment and understanding how RA affects everyday life. Typical clinical assessments did not capture their experience. The resulting conceptual framework should inform future interventional studies seeking to enhance concordance of patient‐physician communication and to optimize satisfaction with care and health‐related quality‐of‐life outcomes for patients with RA.
Clinical Characteristics of Ocular Sarcoidosis: A Population-Based Study 1976–2013

Ocular Immunology and Inflammation | October 12, 2017 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 389-395

10.1080/09273948.2017.1386791 | PMID 29023165

Immortal Time Bias: Comment on the Article by Gwinnutt et al

Arthritis & Rheumatology | September 7, 2017 | Volume: 69 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2402-2402

10.1002/art.40312 | PMID 28881499

The Epidemiology of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Autoantibody–Associated Vasculitis in Olmsted County, Minnesota

Arthritis & Rheumatology | September 7, 2017 | Volume: 69 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2338-2350

10.1002/art.40313 | PMID 28881446

ObjectiveTo estimate the annual incidence, prevalence, and mortality of antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis (AAV) and its subsets, granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's) (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg‐Strauss) (EGPA), in a US‐based adult population.MethodsAll medical records of patients with a diagnosis of, or suspicion of having, AAV in Olmsted County, Minnesota from January 1, 1996 to December 31, 2015 were reviewed. AAV incidence rates were age‐ and sex‐adjusted to the 2010 US white population. Age‐ and sex‐adjusted prevalence of AAV was calculated on January 1, 2015. Survival rates observed in the study cohort were compared with expected rates in the Minnesota population.ResultsOf the 58 incident cases of AAV in Olmsted County during the study period, 23 (40%) were cases of GPA, 28 (48%) were cases of MPA, and 7 (12%) were cases of EGPA. Overall, 28 (48%) of the patients with AAV were women and 57 (98%) were white. The mean ± SD age at diagnosis was 61.1 ± 16.5 years. Thirty‐four patients (61%) had myeloperoxidase (MPO)–ANCAs, and 17 (30%) were positive for proteinase 3 (PR3)–ANCAs; 5 (9%) were ANCA‐negative. The annual incidence of AAV was 3.3 per 100,000 population (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.4–4.1). The incidence rates of GPA, MPA, and EGPA were 1.3 (95% CI 0.8–1.8), 1.6 (95% CI 1.0–2.2), and 0.4 (95% CI 0.1–0.6), respectively. The overall prevalence of AAV was 42.1 per 100,000 (95% CI 29.6–54.6). The mortality rate among AAV patients overall, and among patients with EGPA, those with MPA, and those with MPO‐ANCAs, was increased in comparison to the Minnesota general population (each P < 0.05), whereas mortality rates among patients with GPA, those with PR3‐ANCAs, and ANCA‐negative patients did not differ from that in the general population.ConclusionThe annual incidence of AAV in Olmsted County, Minnesota over the 20 years of the study was 3.3 per 100,000, with a prevalence of 42.1 per 100,000, which is substantially higher than the rates reported in other areas worldwide. The incidence of GPA was similar to that of MPA. Patients with MPA and those with EGPA, but not patients with GPA, experienced higher rates of mortality than that in the Minnesota general population. MPO‐ANCAs were a marker of poor survival in this population of patients with AAV.
Progression rate of severity of aortic stenosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Echocardiography | August 25, 2017 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1410-1416

10.1111/echo.13652 | PMID 28840957

ObjectiveValvular heart disease is common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there is uncertainty about how often to perform echocardiographic surveillance in this population. The objective of this study was to assess the progression rate of mild and moderate aortic stenosis (AS) in patients with RA.MethodsA population‐based cohort of patients with RA and either mild (2.0–2.9 m/second) or moderate (3.0–3.9 m/second) AS was identified. Demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic data were collected. Annual progression rate of AS was then calculated for the study cohort and the impact of pertinent RA variables on progression rate determined.ResultsSixty‐eight patients with RA and mild or moderate AS met the inclusion requirements. Peak aortic valve (AV) velocity and mean AV gradient increased during the study period, whereas AV area decreased, consistent with progression of AS (P<.001). Mean (SD) annual increase in peak AV jet velocity was 0.05 m/second (0.01) and in mean AV gradient was 1.0 mm Hg (0.18). Mean annual decrease in AV area was 0.04 (0.01) cm2. The progression rate of AS was higher in patients with increased erythrocyte sedimentation rates (ESR) (P=.001).ConclusionsThe rate of AS progression in the RA population was higher in patients with increased ESR but less than that of the reported rate of AS progression in the general population. Although the cause for this finding is uncertain, these results suggest that patients with RA who have mild or moderate AS should undergo echocardiographic surveillance for disease progression similar to that of the general population.
Improved flare and remission pattern in rheumatoid arthritis over recent decades: a population-based study

Rheumatology | August 23, 2017 | Volume: 56 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2154-2161

10.1093/rheumatology/kex352 | PMID 28968703

Comparable Rates of Glucocorticoid‐Associated Adverse Events in Patients With Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Comorbidities in the General Population

Arthritis Care & Research | July 13, 2017 | Volume: 70 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 643-647

10.1002/acr.23320 | PMID 28704600

ObjectiveTo investigate the use of glucocorticoids (GCs) and related adverse events (AEs) in a long‐term, geographically defined cohort of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).MethodsUsing a population‐based inception cohort, details of GC therapy were abstracted from medical records of all patients diagnosed with PMR in 2000–2014. Age‐ and sex‐matched comparators without PMR were identified from the same underlying population. Cumulative and daily dosage of GC, rate of disease relapse, occurrence of GC‐related AEs, and rate of GC discontinuation were analyzed.ResultsThe study included 359 patients with PMR and 359 comparators. The median time to taper below 5 mg/day for 6 months was 1.44 years (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.36–1.62), while the median time to permanent discontinuation was 5.95 years (95% CI 3.37–8.88). The mean ± SD cumulative dose of GC at 2 and 5 years was 4.0 ± 3.5 grams and 6.3 ± 9.8 grams, respectively. The mean ± SD daily dose of GC at 2 and 5 years was 6.1 ± 7.6 mg/day and 7.2 ± 9.5 mg/day, respectively. There were no differences in rates of AEs between patients with PMR and comparators for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or hip, vertebral, or Colles fractures (P > 0.2 for all). Cataracts were more common in patients with PMR than comparators (hazard ratio 1.72 [95% CI 1.23–2.41]).ConclusionRelapse rates in PMR are highest in the early stages of therapy. Despite often protracted therapy, with the exception of cataracts, the rates of studied morbidities linked to GC are not more common in PMR than comparators.
The influence of treatment facility volume on the mortality of multiple myeloma patients.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 7_suppl | Pages: 284-284

10.1200/jco.2016.34.7_suppl.284

284 Background: MM is an uncommon cancer with annual incidence of only 27,000 cases in the US. Our study determined the extent to which the number of MM patients treated annually in a treatment facility affected all-cause mortality. Methods: We used the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) to identify adult patients with MM diagnosed from 2003-2011. NCDB is sourced from over 1,500 Commission on Cancer-accredited cancer registries representing 70% of cancer cases in the US. We classified treatment facilities by quartiles based on facility volume (mean patients/year): Quartile 1 (Q1: < 3.6), Quartile 2 (Q2: 3.6-6.1), Quartile 3 (Q3: 6.1-10.3) and Quartile 4 (Q4: > 10.3). We used hot deck imputation to account for missing data, Cox regression to analyze the association between facility volume and time-to-death, and random intercepts to adjust for multiple patients per facility. Results: There were 94,722 MM patients cared for at 1,333 facilities. Most patients (73.5%) were diagnosed and treated in the same facility. The median age at diagnosis was 67 years and 54.7% were males. The median annual facility volume was 6.1 patients/year (IQR: 3.6-10.3; range: 0.2-109.9). The distribution of patients according to facility volume was Q1 (5.2%), Q2 (12.6%), Q3 (21.9%) and Q4 (60.3%). The unadjusted median overall survival by facility volume was: Q1: 26.9 months, Q2: 29.1 months, Q3: 31.9 months and Q4: 49.1 months. After multivariable analysis adjusting for demographic (sex, age, race, ethnicity), socioeconomic (income, education, insurance type), geographic (area of residence, treatment facility location), co-morbidity (Charlson-Deyo score), and disease-specific (year of diagnosis) factors, we show that facility volume remains an independent predictor of all-cause mortality. Compared to patients treated at Q4 facilities, patients treated at lower quartile facilities had a higher risk of death (Q3 HR: 1.16 [95% CI, 1.12-1.20]; Q2: 1.21 [1.17-1.26]; Q1: 1.27 [1.22-1.34]). We observed an inverse volume-outcome relationship up to an annual facility volume of approximately 60 patients. Conclusions: MM patients treated at higher volume facilities had lower risk of mortality compared to those treated at lower volume facilities.
Reply

Arthritis Care & Research | February 19, 2017 | Volume: 70 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 953-954

10.1002/acr.23222 | PMID 28217854