Campian, Jian

Abstract INTRODUCTION First classified in 2000, pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) is an uncommon intracranial malignancy. Given recent codification and rarity, there is no consensus on management and treatment is often provider dependent. METHODS Within an institutional database, we identified 10 patients with PPTID diagnosed between 2009 and 2022. Medical records were reviewed for demographic data, presenting symptoms, extent of disease, surgical interventions, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. Progression free survival, overall survival, and neurocognitive outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS Median age at diagnosis was 36 (range 13-73), 40% women, 60% Caucasian. Nine patients had tumor involvement limited to the pineal region and one patient had multifocal intracranial tumor involvement with leptomeningeal disease. Two patients had gross total resection (GTR) alone, three had GTR followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), two had subtotal resection (STR) followed by craniospinal irradiation (CSI), two had biopsy followed by adjuvant RT, and one had biopsy with CSI and chemotherapy. At median follow up of 31 months (range 3-88 months), only one patient, who had received biopsy, CSI, and chemotherapy, had progression of disease and no patients are deceased. Two patients treated with CSI had adverse neurocognitive outcomes, which was not observed with focal RT. CONCLUSIONS Our limited case series suggests GTR followed by surveillance, GTR followed by focal RT, and any extent resection followed by CSI may all achieve durable disease control in patients with PPTID. Treatment selection should be individualized and potential neurocognitive toxicities should be considered.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Medulloblastomas (MB) are embryonal tumors arising in the cerebellum, predominantly affecting pediatric patients. Recognition of molecularly defined subgroups has advanced management. Factors influencing the prognosis and management of adult MB patients remain poorly understood. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed our experience with adult (> 18 years at initial diagnosis) MB patients, diagnosed between 1992-2020. Molecular subtyping corresponding to the 2021 WHO Classification was performed. Kaplan-Meier estimates (Log-rank test assessing for group differences) were performed for univariate survival analysis with cox regression used for multivariate (subgroup, age, gender, disseminated disease, extent of resection) analyses. RESULTS Our cohort included 76 adult MB patients (62% male), with a median age of 31.7 years (range: 18-66) at diagnosis, and median follow-up of 7.7 years (range: 0.6-26.9). 58 patients had sufficient tissue for molecular characterization by immunohistochemistry and corresponded to the SHH-activated (n=37; 64%), non-WNT/non-SHH (n=12; 21%), WNT-activated (n=9; 15%) subgroups. At initial diagnosis, all patients underwent radiotherapy, with 97% (n=66) receiving craniospinal irradiation with a boost either to the posterior fossa (75%) or tumor bed (22%); and underwent gross total resection (n=51; 67%) and chemotherapy (n=56; 75%). Median overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort was 14.8 years (93% 2-year OS; 86% 5-year OS; 64% 10-year OS) and was longer for younger patients (< 30: > 15.4 years, > 30: 9.9 years; Log-rank p< 0.001). No significant OS difference was identified by MB molecular subgroup (SHH, TP53-wt: 14 years, WNT: 11.4 years, non-WNT/non-SHH: > 14.8 years; Log-rank p=0.1167) or extent of resection. Only age at diagnosis remained significant in multivariate survival analyses. DISCUSSION We report one of the largest retrospective cohorts in adult MB patients with molecular subtyping. Survival and molecular subgroup frequencies were similar to previous reports. Survival was longer for younger patients and was not significantly different by MB molecular subgroup or extent of resection.

ImportanceCytokine storm due to COVID-19 can cause high morbidity and mortality and may be more common in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy (IO) due to immune system activation.ObjectiveTo determine the association of baseline immunosuppression and/or IO-based therapies with COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm in patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis registry-based retrospective cohort study included 12 046 patients reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from March 2020 to May 2022. The CCC19 registry is a centralized international multi-institutional registry of patients with COVID-19 with a current or past diagnosis of cancer. Records analyzed included patients with active or previous cancer who had a laboratory-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction and/or serologic findings.ExposuresImmunosuppression due to therapy; systemic anticancer therapy (IO or non-IO).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was a 5-level ordinal scale of COVID-19 severity: no complications; hospitalized without requiring oxygen; hospitalized and required oxygen; intensive care unit admission and/or mechanical ventilation; death. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of cytokine storm.ResultsThe median age of the entire cohort was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-74) years and 6359 patients were female (52.8%) and 6598 (54.8%) were non-Hispanic White. A total of 599 (5.0%) patients received IO, whereas 4327 (35.9%) received non-IO systemic anticancer therapies, and 7120 (59.1%) did not receive any antineoplastic regimen within 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. Although no difference in COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm was found in the IO group compared with the untreated group in the total cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13, and aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.41-1.93, respectively), patients with baseline immunosuppression treated with IO (vs untreated) had worse COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm (aOR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.38-8.01, and aOR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.71-11.38, respectively). Patients with immunosuppression receiving non-IO therapies (vs untreated) also had worse COVID-19 severity (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.36-2.35) and cytokine storm (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42-3.79).Conclusions and RelevanceThis cohort study found that in patients with cancer and COVID-19, administration of systemic anticancer therapies, especially IO, in the context of baseline immunosuppression was associated with severe clinical outcomes and the development of cytokine storm.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04354701

Abstract BACKGROUND Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers associated with brain metastases (BM). Up to 50% of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) develop BM which portends a poor prognosis, with a median survival of 4.4-7.3 months. There is a lack of effective systemic therapy. Irinotecan is a topoisomerase-1 inhibitor with a response rate of 5-23% in advanced breast cancer. Nal-IRI is an intravenous liposomal formulation of irinotecan, with greater efficacy in tumor growth inhibition and the ability to cross the blood brain barrier (BBB) than irinotecan, resulting in a prolonged survival in preclinical TNBC BM models. Additionally, Nal-IRI has demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity in patients with TNBC- BM in a phase-I trial (NCT01770353). Pembrolizumab is a humanized anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody which has shown efficacy in TNBC. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the combination of Nal-IRI and pembrolizumab can provide a synergic effect to control the CNS disease and prolong survival in TNBC with progressive BM. METHODS This is a phase II, single arm trial with a safety lead-in to evaluate the efficacy of nal-IRI (50-70mg/m2 IV Q2W) in combination with pembrolizumab (400mg IV Q6W). Simon’s 2-stage design is used, with 18 patients in the 1st stage and additional 24 at 2nd stage for a total of 42. The first 6 patients will serve as a safety lead-in. Key eligibilities include: histologically/cytologically confirmed TNBC with new or progressive BM; prior immunotherapy is allowed but not prior nal-IRI/irinotecan; prior sacituzumab-govitecan is permitted if disease stable for ≥16-week while on therapy and ≥24-week washout prior to starting trial; measurable disease; and ≤4 prior lines of therapy in the metastatic setting. The primary endpoint is CNS disease control rate (DCR) at 6 months using RANO-BM criteria. Secondary endpoints include CNS and non-CNS ORR, PFS and OS. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05255666)

Abstract INTRODUCTION High grade gliomas (HGG) are devastating diseases with largely unchanged survival outcomes despite decades of research. Recent studies suggest the interleukin 13 receptor subunit alpha 2 (IL-13Rα2) is selectively upregulated in up to 80% of HGG, including glioblastoma (GBM) and diffuse midline gliomas (DMG) harboring H3K27 alterations. Immunotoxins targeting IL-13Rα2 have been demonstrated as safe and have shown some benefit for patients with HGG in previous phase I/II and III clinical trials. We hypothesized that by using GB-13 (IL13.E13K-PE4E), a novel peptide-toxin that binds IL-13Rα2 with high specificity and possesses a Pseudomonas exotoxin moiety, we would enhance the anti-tumor effects of this immunotherapy for HGG in vitro and in vivo while decreasing off-target toxicity. METHODS We examined the pharmacological effects of GB-13 in multiple patient-derived cell lines and rodent models of HGG. GBM and DMG lines were used to confirm IL-13Rα2 expression and sensitivity towards GB-13. Tumor naïve rats were evaluated for toxicity, and orthotopic PDX mice were used to monitor tumor size and survival following loco-regional infusion of GB-13. RESULTS GB-13 induced a potent cytotoxic response strongly predicated on IL-13Rα2 expression in vitro. No treatment-related adverse effects were noted after 7-day continuous intracranial infusion of GB-13 in tumor naïve rats. Further, in IL-13Rα2-upregulated orthotopic PDX mice, direct intratumoral administration of GB-13 via convection-enhanced delivery abrogated tumor growth and prolonged survival. CONCLUSIONS Given these promising results as well as the critical need for novel therapies in CNS malignancies, we are progressing to human trials using GB-13 targeting recurrent HGG. Ongoing safety studies in tumor-bearing animals will be able to define dose levels for the initial adult study-arm and the following pediatric study-arm. In this Phase 1 clinical trial, we hypothesize that loco-regional infusion of GB-13 will safely enhance tumor clearance by causing selective killing of IL-13Rα2-upregulated HGG cells.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor. Despite multimodality treatment with surgical resection, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and tumor treating fields, recurrence is universal, median observed survival is low at 8 months and 5-year overall survival is poor at 7%. Immunotherapy aims to generate a tumor-specific immune response to selectively eliminate tumor cells. In treatment of GBM, immunotherapy approaches including use of checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-Cell therapy, vaccine-based approaches, viral vector therapies, and cytokine-based treatment has been studied. While there have been no major breakthroughs to date and broad implementation of immunotherapy for GBM remains elusive, multiple studies are underway. In this review, we discuss immunotherapy approaches to GBM with an emphasis on molecularly informed approaches.

2068 Background: There is a lack of effective therapy for recurrent high-grade meningiomas who relapsed after prior radiation therapy (RT). ETCTN 10186 is a phase I/II study to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary clinical efficacy of combining reirradiation using fractionated radiosurgery with nivolumab plus or minus ipilimumab for recurrent high-grade meningiomas. The preliminary results from the phase I portion are reported here. Methods: Recurrent grade II-III meningioma patients were treated with radiosurgery plus nivolumab with or without ipilimumab. Key eligibility criteria include age ≥ 18 years; ECOG score ≤ 2; tumor diameter 1-5 cm; prior radiation dose ≤ 70 Gy; normal organ function; no active autoimmunity. During the phase I portion, eligible patients were treated according to treatment-escalation schema following the modified 3+3 design (Table 1). The maximum tolerated combination (MTC) will be the regimen at which ≤ 1/6 patients experience dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) within 8 weeks of the start of study therapy. During the phase II portion, a total of 24 evaluable patients will be enrolled at the MTC using Simon’s MiniMax two-stage design. The primary endpoint of the phase I portion is to determine the MTC. Objective radiological responses (ORRs) are defined as per the Macdonald criteria. One cycle of immunotherapy is defined as 4 weeks of nivolumab with or without concurrent ipilimumab. Results: From 7/2019 to 3/2021, 13 patients were enrolled in the phase I, including 6 with regimen A and 7 with regimen B (Table). The median prior RT dose was 56 Gy (18-70) at a median interval of 2.8 years (1.3-13.3). There was no DLT in either cohort, so regimen B was deemed the MTC. The median cycles of immunotherapy completed were not significantly different between cohort A and B (11 vs. 6, p = 0.41, respectively). Three cohort A patients and 2 cohort B patients completed all planned doses of immunotherapy. Most patients stopped due to progression, and only one cohort B patient stopped due to treatment-related toxicity (grade 3 hypophysitis and encephalitis after 6 cycles of immunotherapy). After a median follow-up of 11.1 months, there have been 5 progressions and 4 deaths. The 6 month-PFS and 12 month-PFS rates are 62% and 54%, respectively. Two ORRs have been reported by institutional assessment, and central radiology review is ongoing and will be reported. Conclusions: Reirradiation using fractionated radiosurgery with nivolumab plus or minus ipilimumab are well tolerated for radiation-relapsed high-grade meningiomas. Phase II study of regimen B is currently enrolling. Clinical trial information: NCT03604978. [Table: see text]

2058 Background: Immunotherapies targeting the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) have failed. We hypothesize that combining therapies targeting multiple immunosuppressive pathways with cytotoxic and antiangiogenic therapies will improve survival. Here, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (retifanlimab), hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT), and bevacizumab, with or without an oral IDO1 inhibitor (epacadostat), in patients with rGBM in a nonrandomized, noncomparative sequential two-arm Phase II study. Methods: This is an open-label Phase II study of 2 sequential cohorts (Table). Cohort A first examines retifanlimab + bevacizumab + HFRT in patients with IDH1/2-WT rGBM. After a toxicity monitoring period, Cohort B, which adds epacadostat, starts enrolling. Key inclusion criteria includes dexamethasone ≤ 4 mg/day at registration and candidacy for reirradiation. Previous bevacizumab use for radiation necrosis is permitted. The primary endpoint is OS probability at 9 months (OS-9). Secondary endpoints include PFS, OS, and toxicity. Exploratory endpoints include immunological phenotyping of blood and tissue. An increase of OS-9 from 38% (bevacizumab alone) to 60% is considered clinically relevant. Results: From 6/2020 to 12/2021, we have completed accrual for cohort A and the interim analysis results are presented here: 25 patients with rGBM enrolled, with 23 evaluable. Median age is 64.3 years (42.1-81.8), 30.4% female, 30.4% MGMT promotor methylated, median KPS 90 (range 70-100), baseline dexamethasone 0 mg (range 0-4) with 52.2% of patients on dexamethasone during the first 3 cycles, median baseline ALC 1,000 cells/µl (range 300-3,700). Patients received a median of 6 cycles to date (range 2-20). Median follow-up is 11.97 months per the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. Interim analysis shows a median PFS of 9.9 months (95%CI: 5.5 to not reached (NR)) and median OS of 12.2 months (95%CI 7.3-NR). Notably, Cohort A met the primary endpoint with an OS-9 of 71.4% (95%CI: 46.7% -86.1%). No dose limiting toxicities have been yet observed. Two treatment-related grade 3 toxicities have occurred (myositis, hypertension). Cohort B enrollment is ongoing, and correlative studies pending. Conclusions: Interim analysis suggests retifanlimab combined with HFRT and bevacizumab in patients with rGBM is well-tolerated and had encouraging OS and PFS at the time of data cutoff. Cohort B, which adds epacadostat, is currently enrolling. Clinical trial information: NCT03532295. [Table: see text]

Abstract Background Treatment options for unresectable new and recurrent glioblastoma remain limited. Laser ablation has demonstrated safety as a surgical approach to treating primary brain tumors. The LAANTERN prospective multicenter registry (NCT02392078) data were analyzed to determine clinical outcomes for patients with new and recurrent IDH wild-type glioblastoma. Methods Demographics, intraprocedural data, adverse events, KPS, health economics, and survival data were prospectively collected and then analyzed on IDH wild-type newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma patients who were treated with laser ablation at 14 US centers between January 2016 and May 2019. Data were monitored for accuracy. Statistical analysis included individual variable summaries, multivariable differences in survival, and median survival numbers. Results A total of 29 new and 60 recurrent IDH wild-type WHO grade 4 glioblastoma patients were treated. Positive MGMT promoter methylation status was present in 5/29 of new and 23/60 of recurrent patients. Median physician-estimated extent of ablation was 91%-99%. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.73 months (95% confidence interval: 5.16, 15.91) for newly diagnosed patients and median post-procedure survival was 8.97 months (6.94, 12.36) for recurrent patients. Median OS for newly diagnosed patients receiving post-LITT chemo/radiation was 16.14 months (6.11, not reached). Factors associated with improved survival were MGMT promoter methylation, adjuvant chemotherapy within 12 weeks, and tumor volume <3 cc. Conclusions Laser ablation is a viable option for patients with new and recurrent glioblastoma. Median OS for IDH wild-type newly diagnosed glioblastoma is comparable to outcomes observed in other tumor resection studies when those patients undergo radiation and chemotherapy following LITT.