Fatunde, Olubadewa A.

ABSTRACT Background Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging non‐thermal ablation modality with proven safety in atrial arrhythmia ablation. However, data on its performance for ventricular arrhythmias (VA) remain limited. Objective To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of PFA for complex VA in a multicenter real‐world US registry. Methods This retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing PFA for ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) at three Mayo Clinic centers (April 2024 to July 2025). The primary feasibility outcome was the successful delivery of PFA lesions to the intended target substrate. Primary efficacy outcomes included acute procedural success; sustained VT recurrence requiring implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) shocks or multiple antitachycardia pacing therapies; and ≥ 80% reduction in PVC burden. Safety outcomes included procedural complications, valvular function, thromboembolic events, renal function, and conduction disturbances. Results Twenty‐six patients were included (13 PVC, 13 VT). Acute success was achieved in all VT ablations (69.2% complete; 30.8% partial) and in 92.3% of PVC ablations. Complications occurred in 11.5% of patients (transient LBBB [ n = 1] and vascular complications [ n = 2]). No thromboembolic events, intracardiac thrombus, or acute kidney injury were observed. Lesions near the mitral valve apparatus did not worsen mitral regurgitation, including in patients with pre‐existing valve disease. After a median follow‐up of 365 days, one patient experienced VT recurrence requiring ICD shocks. Estimated recurrence‐free survival after VT ablation was 61.5% at 12 months; 58.3% of PVC patients achieved ≥ 80% burden reduction. Conclusion PFA for VA appears feasible and acutely effective, with a low rate of procedure‐related complications. While acute success was high, long‐term outcomes were acceptable for VT ablation and relatively modest for PVC ablation, highlighting the need for continued refinement of technology and energy‐delivery strategies. Larger prospective studies are warranted.

Background: Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) has gained widespread adoption for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) due to its tissue selectivity and safety profile. However, its role in cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for typical atrial flutter is less defined. This study compares CTI ablation using PFA versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients undergoing PVI exclusively with PFA. Research Question: We hypothesized that in patients undergoing PFA-based PVI, CTI ablation using PFA would reduce procedure and fluoroscopy times without increasing complication or flutter recurrence rates compared to RFA. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent CTI ablation with either PFA or RFA alongside PFA PVI between 2024 – 2025 across all Mayo Clinic sites. Baseline characteristics, procedural parameters, acute success, and 12-month arrhythmia recurrence were compared between groups. All patients received standard follow-up, including ECGs and Holter monitoring. Results: A total of 350 patients were included (CTI PFA: n = 126; CTI RFA: n = 224). Patients in the PFA group were older (68.8 ± 8.5 vs. 65.7 ± 10.1 years; p <0.01) and had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores (2.84 ± 1.57 vs. 2.45 ± 1.45; p = 0.02). Fluoroscopy (18.9 ± 9.1 vs. 25.2 ± 23.3 min; p < 0.01 ) and procedure times (172.6 ± 22.4 vs. 224.7 ± 74.2 min; p < 0.01) were significantly lower in the PFA group. Complication rates (8.7% vs. 4.9%; p = 0.15) and typical flutter recurrence (3.1% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.46) were similar between groups during a mean follow-up of 125 days. Conclusion: In patients undergoing PVI with PFA, CTI ablation using PFA is associated with significantly reduced procedure and fluoroscopy times compared to RFA, without increased complications or arrhythmia recurrence. These findings support the feasibility and efficiency of PFA for typical flutter ablation when performed during PFA-based AF procedures.

Background: A blanking period allowing for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has historically been standardized to 90 days. With the recent introduction of pulsed field ablation (PFA) for PVI and emerging in vitro data suggesting a shorter inflammatory timeframe, it remains unclear whether recurrences during this 90-days period reflect incomplete procedural success or merely transient inflammatory changes. Research Question: In patients undergoing PVI with PFA, do early AF recurrences at 30, 60, and 90 days predict late AF recurrences beyond the standardized 90-day blanking period? Methods: Patients undergoing PFA for AF were retrospectively included. Procedures were performed under general anesthesia, and high-density (HD) mapping, with PVI and additional ablation lines applied at the operator’s discretion. PFA catheters included Farawave, PulseSelect, and Sphere-9. AF recurrences were defined as documented episodes on 12-lead ECG or cardiac monitoring devices, confirmed by interpretation from an experienced cardiologist. Survival analyses were conducted based on the occurrence of early recurrences at 30, 60, and 90 days post-ablation. Kaplan-Meier curves and hazard ratios were reported. This study was approved by our institutional review board. Results: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest real-world study reporting outcomes of PFA for AF in the United States. A total of 1,214 patients were included in the analysis. Mean age was 66.4 years; 31.9% were female, and 22.4% underwent redo PVI. Six-month AF recurrence-free survival was 79% (95% CI, 75–83%) for the overall cohort. Patients experiencing early recurrence at 30, 60, and 90 days had a significantly higher risk of AF recurrence beyond the standardized 90-day blanking period (HR 4.0, 95% CI 2.7–5.9, P < 0.01; HR 5.0, 95% CI 3.6–7.1, P < 0.01; and HR 6.9, 95% CI 4.9–9.6, P < 0.01, respectively). Conclusion: Early recurrences at 30, 60, and 90 days post-ablation are strongly associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence beyond the 90-day blanking period. These findings challenge the traditional concept of blanking period after PFA and suggest that early recurrence may indicate incomplete procedural success rather than transient inflammation.

Summary: Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) increases cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality, but remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Several trials support low-dose direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in PAD treatment, although this has yet to be widely adopted in clinical practice. Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent ankle-brachial index testing (ABI) from 1996 – 2020 at Mayo Clinic. We included patients with PAD defined by abnormal ABI (<1.0 or >/=1.4). Primary outcomes evaluated were myocardial infarcts (MI), ischemic strokes (IS), critical limb ischemia (CLI)/amputation, bleeding events and all-cause mortality. DOAC and warfarin use were each compared to no anticoagulant use for the outcomes using univariate analysis and multivariate analysis. Results: 22,162 patients had abnormal ABI readings; 1,266 were on warfarin and 269 were on DOAC for any indication. Both the DOAC and warfarin groups showed significant a decrease in all-cause mortality. The DOAC group showed superior mortality outcomes with HR 0.50 [95% CI 0.40–0.63], p-value <0.001 compared to warfarin with HR 0.88 [95% CI 0.81–0.96], p-value <0.004. There appeared to be a similar trend for MI and CLI/amputation however this was not statistically significant. IS was similar with only warfarin being statistically significant. The DOAC group had improved bleeding outcomes compared to the warfarin group, HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.24–0.85), p-value 0.007. Notably, the addition of ASA for both AC groups resulted in significant HR >1. Conclusions: Our study shows that anticoagulation use, particularly DOACs, is associated with decreased all-cause mortality in patients with PAD. There appears to be a favorable trend for DOACs in MI, IS and CLI/amputation. Lastly, DOACs were found to have superior outcomes with bleeding events.

Ebstein’s anomaly (EA) is a rare cyanotic form of congenital heart disease (CHD) characterized by apical displacement of the tricuspid valve, with resultant hemodynamic and electrical manifestations. The severity of symptoms is determined by the degree of apical displacement and deformity and incompetence of the tricuspid valve. As a result, patients with EA can be severely symptomatic during infancy and childhood or can be incidentally discovered in the sixth or seventh decade of life. Hallmarks of Ebstein’s anomaly include progressive cyanosis, right-sided heart failure, and tachyarrhythmias, among which tachyarrhythmias (most commonly atrial, but also ventricular) are the most common presenting symptoms in Ebstein’s anomaly patients during adulthood. This review aims to provide insight into the genetic and electrophysiological (EP) basis underlying the tachyarrhythmias encountered when managing patients with EA.

AbstractBackgroundThe real‐world data on the safety profile of ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation among elderly patients is not well‐established. This study aimed to evaluate the procedural outcomes among those aged 18–64 years versus those aged ≥65 years who underwent catheter ablation of VT.MethodUsing the Nationwide Readmissions Database, our study included patients aged ≥18 years who underwent VT catheter ablation between 2017 and 2020. We divided the patients into non‐elderly (18–64 years old) and elderly age groups (≥65 years old). We then analyzed the in‐hospital procedural outcome and 30‐day readmission between these two groups.ResultsOur study included 2075 (49.1%) non‐elderly patients and 2153 (50.9%) elderly patients who underwent VT ablation. Post‐procedurally, elderly patients had significantly higher rates of prolonged index hospitalization (≥7 days; 35.5% vs. 29.3%, p < .01), non‐home discharge (13.4% vs. 6.0%, p < .01), 30‐day readmission (17.0% vs. 11.4%, p < .01), and early mortality (5.5% vs. 2.4%, p < .01). There was no significant difference in the procedural complications between two groups, namely vascular complications, hemopericardium/cardiac tamponade, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), major bleeding requiring blood transfusion, and systemic embolization. Through multivariable analysis, the elderly group was associated with higher odds of early mortality (OR: 7.50; CI 1.86–30.31, p = .01), non‐home discharge (OR: 2.41; CI: 1.93–3.00, p < .01) and 30‐day readmission (OR: 1.58; CI 1.32–1.89, p < .01).ConclusionElderly patients have worse in‐hospital outcome, early mortality, non‐home discharge, and 30‐day readmission following catheter ablation for VT. There was no significant difference between elderly and non‐elderly groups in the procedural complications.

Introduction/Background: Cardiopulmonary arrest (Code Blue or CB) is a feared complication of severe medical illnesses. In-hospital CB events (CBE) have been estimated to have a mortality rate of only 30.4%. CBEsare difficult to prepare for and execute due many factors, including their low frequency, high complexity, and unpredictability. Research Questions/Hypothesis: Over 6 months (March - September 2019), we tested the effects of both adaptation of a Code Blue (CB) Team Leader (TL) checklist—aimed at improving resident leadership and communication—as well as implementation of an interdisciplinary in-hospital CB simulation to improve the performance of both resident physicians. Methods/Approach: Primary outcomes included change in resident confidence leading a CBE (i.e. Level of comfort as TL , confidence of diagnosis and management, confidence in code-related procedural skills), and familiarity with the institutional rapid response protocol. Secondary outcomes included self-reported confidence of nurses to execute their role, and both physician and nurse time to response. Confidence parameters were measured by a 10 point Likert scale. Pre-intervention, baseline cross-sectional survey values of the primary outcome were obtained from 24 internal medicine residents (12 PGY2s, 12 PGY3) over 6 months. Post-intervention, the cross-sectional survey was repeated. Results/Data (descriptive and inferential statistics): Statistics for residents displayed in table and figure 1. The level of nurse confidence increased from 7.5 to 8.25 over 5 months. The time to first response by residents has decreased by more than 50%. Conclusion(s) Our project improved the quality and resident level of comfort running Code Blue events among both residents and nurses.

Background: Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) has been increasingly performed over the past decades. However, the real-world data on the safety profile of this procedure among elderly patients is limited. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the procedural outcomes and 30-day readmission among those aged 18-64 years versus those aged ≥65 years who underwent catheter ablation of VT. Method: Using the all-payer, nationally representative Nationwide Readmissions Database, our study included patients aged 18 years or older who underwent VT catheter ablation between 2017 and 2020. We divided the patients into non-elderly (18-64 years old) and elderly age groups (≥65 years old). We then analyzed the in-hospital procedural outcome and 30-day readmission between these groups. Results: Our study included 2075 (49.1%) non-elderly patients and 2153 (50.9%) elderly patients who underwent VT ablation. Following the procedure, elderly patients had significantly higher rates of prolonged index hospitalization (≥7 days) (35.5% vs 29.3%, p<0.01), non-home discharge (13.4% vs 6.0%, p<0.01), 30-day readmission (17.0% vs 11.4%, p<0.01), and early mortality (5.5% v 2.4%, p<0.01). The median cumulative cost of hospitalization was significantly higher in the elder groups ($40,230 vs. $37,612, p ≤0.01). There was no significant difference in the procedural complications between the two groups. Through multivariable analysis, the elderly group was associated with significantly higher odds of early mortality (OR: 7.50; CI 1.86 - 30.31, p=0.01), non-home discharge (OR: 2.41; CI: 1.93 - 3.00, p<0.01) and 30-day readmissions (OR: 1.58; CI 1.32 - 1.89, p<0.01). Conclusion: Our study suggests that elderly patients have poorer in-hospital outcome in early mortality, non-home discharge and 30-day readmissions following catheter ablation for VT. There was no significant difference between elderly and non-elderly groups in the procedural complications.

Background: Coronary embolism (CE) is an uncommon (3%) cause of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and is often missed. Case Presentation: A 68-year-old woman with a h/o hypertension & breast cancer post lumpectomy 10 yrs ago, presented with generalized weakness, fever (101F), & vomiting without chest pain, dyspnea, or palpitations. She was afebrile, tachycardic (158 beats/min), tachypneic (26 breaths/min) with BP of 98/64 mmHg. Cardiac exam revealed irregularly irregular rhythm, 5 cm jugular venous distension & 3+ bilateral pretibial edema. Labs revealed thrombocytopenia, lactic acidosis, & hyponatremia. High sensitivity-Troponin was 1023 & NT-pro-BNP 19854. EKG showed atrial fibrillation (AF), diffuse ST elevations in the precordial leads & aVR, poor R wave progression & inferior Q waves. Her cardiac cath revealed a large thrombus from mid-left main extending into the LAD with minimal atherosclerotic burden. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram for emergent surgical resection of the thrombus revealed a highly mobile thrombus 2.32x0.6 cm on the aortic aspect originating between L and R coronary cusps and a left atrial appendage thrombus (1.1 cm) with marked spontaneous contrast in LA appendage & LA which was surgically resected. Blood cultures & of coronary thrombus grew Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus Aureus (MSSA) . Anticoagulation & appropriate antibiotics were initiated. but after a protracted, complicated ICU stay, patient was made comfort care. Discussion/Conclusion: CE should be considered in cases of recurrent coronary thrombus or in the setting of heavy thrombus burden despite a relatively normal coronary vessel. AF is the most common underlying cause of CE causing ACS. Aspiration or surgical thrombectomy should be performed with a high thrombus burden. Thrombus should be sent for pathology to further delineate the source of thrombus.