Issa, Meltiady

Background: Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is becoming an increasingly relevant tool in hospital medicine, but its effective application in inpatient perioperative medicine remains to be determined. Much of the POCUS literature describes its use by anesthesiologists to evaluate cardiac function, volume status, pulmonary findings, and gastric volume. Objective: To identify, evaluate, and synthesize all available literature investigating the use of point-of-care ultrasound and associated clinical outcomes in inpatient perioperative medical management. Patients and Methods: A systematic review was designed using the PRISMA guidelines with sources of literature including Ovid, PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science. Literature search was conducted for published works between 1 January 2002 to 8 February 2024. Results: Three hundred sixty-seven abstracts were identified in our search, and, ultimately, 24 studies were included in this review. Most studies were done by anesthesiology evaluating cardiopulmonary and gastric POCUS. Studies supported using POCUS to expedite cardiac examination, promptly diagnose postoperative pulmonary complications, and optimize surgical timing. Conclusions: POCUS is a versatile tool in the perioperative setting; however, few studies were powered to assess clinical outcomes, and even fewer showed conclusive evidence of improved clinical outcomes. Furthermore, only two studies evaluated the use of POCUS specifically by acute care providers; more extensive studies are needed from their perspective as they take on increasing perioperative responsibilities.

Abstract Background: Medical education commonly utilizes the “see one, do one” two-step approach for teaching psychomotor skills; however, recent evidence suggests that Peyton’s four-step method leads to superior learning. The effect of Peyton’s four-step method on long term skill retention is less apparent and has never been assessed for Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS). The purpose of this research project was to evaluate the effectiveness of Peyton’s four-step method on teaching the POCUS psychomotor skills of image acquisition to novice learners. Additionally, this research project assessed the influence of Peyton’s four-step method at three different points in time during the skill acquisition phase, in the setting of ongoing deliberate skill practice. Methods: A single-blinded, repeated measures interventional study based on experimental design was completed. PA students from one large academic medical center were randomized into a control group (using the two-step method) and intervention group (using Peyton’s four-step method). Students were taught POCUS of the aorta, bladder, heart, lungs, and kidneys. Students' POCUS skills were assessed during the immediate, intermediate, and delayed learning phases. At each assessment, an organ-specific score and a total score were obtained. Scores were compared using a Wilcoxon rank sum test. An ordinal logistic regression analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed model with a multinomial distribution and cumulative logit link function to assess overall effect of Peyton's four-step method. Results: Students who were taught using Peyton’s method were found to have an increased likelihood of higher total scores compared to those taught using usual instruction (OR = 4.2, p = 0.003). Peyton’s method was found to have increased likelihood of higher scores for cardiac (OR = 2.3, p = 0.032), lung (OR = 2.5, p = 0.034), and kidney (OR = 3.0, p = 0.015). Student performance statistically improved with Peyton’s four-step method during the immediate (p = 0.031) and delayed (p = 0.011) skill acquisition phases, but not in the intermediate phase. Conclusion: Peyton’s four-step method improves overall psychomotor skill acquisition for POCUS. Peyton’s four-step method specifically improved psychomotor skills in the immediate skill acquisition phase and the delayed skill acquisition phase. The benefit of Peyton’s four-step method was more prominent in higher complexity POCUS applications.

Abstract This article presents an updated framework from the Society of Hospital Medicine for individual learning objectives related to key procedures in hospital medicine. Building upon the 2017 framework, these objectives have been revised to reflect evolving clinical evidence, advancements, and shifts in hospital medicine practice patterns. The methodology included a comprehensive literature review, expert consensus panels, and feedback from practicing hospitalists across diverse clinical settings. The updated learning objectives address procedural competencies for the most common interventions in hospital medicine, including arthrocentesis, emergency procedures, interpretation of chest radiographs and electrocardiograms, lumbar puncture, paracentesis, thoracentesis, and vascular access. These revised learning objectives provide a framework to guide curricular development, continuing medical education, and hospital medicine practitioners in developing and maintaining procedural competence essential for high‐quality inpatient care.

Intracardiac masses are rare and potentially life-threatening entities with diverse clinical presentations. The prompt identification of cardiac masses is critical. However, even with the advancement we have in imaging modalities, diagnosing cardiac masses remains a formidable challenge. Herein, we present the case of a 62-year-old female who presented with a three-week history of dyspnea and chest pain. Further workup revealed elevated troponins, thrombocytosis, and ST-segment elevation in the anterolateral leads. Chest CT revealed a concerning lung mass, along with vertebral lesions and a large pleural effusion. The patient underwent treatment for suspected myocardial infarction. Additional imaging identified five intracardiac masses in the left ventricle suspicious for either malignancy or thrombi. High-intensity heparin drip was started, yet the patient developed neurological symptoms. Neuroimaging showed new cerebral infarcts. Based on the patient and her family’s wishes, the patient transitioned to comfort care and passed away from gastrointestinal bleeding. In our case, the patient's presentation raised questions about whether her intracardiac masses were malignant or thrombotic. The decision to initiate and maintain anticoagulation therapy constitutes a debate, emphasizing the need for an individualized approach and shared decision-making with the patient and the multidisciplinary team

Abstract Background We compared long-term mortality and readmission rates after COVID-19 hospitalization based on rural-urban status and assessed the impact of COVID-19 vaccination introduction on clinical outcomes by rurality. Methods The study comprised adults hospitalized for COVID-19 at 17 hospitals in 4 US states between March 2020 and July 2022, followed until May 2023. The main analysis included all patients, whereas a sensitivity analysis focused on residents from 4 states containing 17 hospitals. Additional analyses compared the pre- and postvaccination periods. Results The main analysis involved 9325 COVID-19 hospitalized patients: 31% were from 187 rural counties in 31 states; 69% from 234 urban counties in 44 states; the mean age was 65 years (rural, 66 years; urban, 64 years); 3894 women (rural, 41%; urban, 42%); 8007 Whites (rural, 87%; urban, 83%); 1738 deaths (rural, 21%; urban, 17%); and 2729 readmissions (rural, 30%; urban, 29%). During a median follow-up of 602 days, rural residence was associated with a 22% higher all-cause mortality (log-rank, P < .001; hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.34, P < .001), and a trend toward a higher readmission rate (log-rank, P = .038; hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, .98-1.15; P = .130). The results remained consistent in the sensitivity analysis and in both pre- and postvaccination time periods. Conclusions and Relevance Patients from rural counties experienced higher mortality and tended to be readmitted more frequently following COVID-19 hospitalization over the long term compared with those from urban counties, a difference that remained even after the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines.