Brinkman, Joseph C.

Background: Meniscal root repair can improve patient outcomes significantly; however, several contraindications exist, including arthritic change to the medial or lateral tibiofemoral compartments. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of meniscal root repair in patients with advanced patellofemoral chondromalacia (PFC). It was hypothesized that the presence of advanced PFC would not significantly affect the postoperative outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent meniscal root repair with at least 2 years of follow-up data. Patients with chondromalacia as determined by arthroscopic visualization (defined as Outerbridge grade 3 or 4) were placed in the PFC group; patients with Outerbridge grade 0 to 2 chondromalacia were placed in the non-PFC group. Outcomes were measured by the Lysholm knee scoring scale and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form. Clinical outcomes including complications were also recorded. Quantitative data between the groups were analyzed using the 2-tailed independent-samples t test. Results: Overall, this study included 81 patients (35 in the PFC group, 46 in the non-PFC group). The mean follow-up times were 25.1 months in the PFC group and 24.8 months in the non-PFC group. In both groups, Lysholm and IKDC scores improved significantly with 24-month Lysholm scores averaging 85.86 in the PFC group and 86.61 in the non-PFC group ( P = .62) and 24-month IKDC scores averaging 77.66 for the PFC group and 79.59 for the non-PFC group ( P = .45). The cohorts demonstrated similar rates of retear, arthrofibrosis, infection, and progression to total knee arthroplasty. Conclusion: The presence of advanced PFC was not associated with inferior outcomes in patients who underwent posterior meniscal root repair, and rates of recurrent tears, postoperative infection, arthrofibrosis, and conversion to total knee arthroplasty were similar between the study groups. These findings suggest that PFC may not significantly alter the results of meniscal root repair and should not be considered an absolute contraindication for this procedure.

Background: While previously used in other specialties, the preference signaling program (PSP) was implemented in the 2022 to 2023 orthopaedic surgery residency application process for the first time. The PSP allowed for 30 signaling tokens to be sent by applicants to programs of their choice to indicate particular interest in a program. It remains unknown how the PSP affects applicants and programs in the orthopaedic surgery residency match. Thus, this study's purpose was to assess the utility of preference signaling within the orthopaedic surgery residency application process in its inaugural year of use. Methods: An anonymous electronic survey was emailed to all orthopaedic surgery residency applicants who applied to the authors' institution during the 2022 to 2023 application cycle. The survey was sent after match lists were submitted and closed before the release of match results. The survey collected information regarding applicant demographics, preference signaling habits, and attitude toward preference signaling. Results: The survey was completed by 101 applicants. Applicants applied to a mean of 90 programs (range: 10-197) and received an average of 12 interview invitations (range: 0-39). Applicants almost uniformly used all 30 signals, with nearly two-thirds signaling their home programs (65%, 49/76), and nearly all applicants sending signals to programs at which they performed away rotations (95.7%, 88/92). Applicants received a mean of 9 invitations from programs they signaled, compared with 2 invitations from programs they did not signal. Applicants were significantly more likely to receive an interview invite at a program they signaled than one they did not (p < 0.01). Overall, 57% of applicants (57/101) found the PSP to be helpful, whereas 28% (28/101) found it to be unhelpful, and 16% (16/101) had a neutral opinion. Conclusions: This study reports that the PSP in the 2022 to 2023 orthopaedic surgery match was an effective method of expressing interest in a program because applicants were significantly more likely to receive interview invites to signaled programs. More than half of respondents felt PSP to be helpful; however, the effect on application numbers is still unclear. Level of Evidence: III

Abstract Background Patients often turn to online reviews as a source of information to inform their decisions regarding care. Existing literature has analyzed factors associated with positive online patient ratings among hand and wrist surgeons. However, there is limited in-depth analysis of factors associated with low patient satisfaction for hand and wrist surgeons. The focus of this study is to examine and characterize extremely negative reviews of hand and wrist surgeons on Yelp.com. Methods A search was performed using the keywords “hand surgery” on Yelp.com for eight major metropolitan areas including Washington DC, Dallas, New York, Phoenix, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Boston, and Seattle. Only single-star reviews (out of a possible 5 stars) of hand and wrist surgeons were included. The complaints in the 1-star reviews were then categorized into clinical and nonclinical categories. Result A total of 233 single-star reviews were included for analysis, which resulted in 468 total complaints. Of these complaints, 81 (18.8%) were clinically related and 351 (81.3%) were nonclinical in nature. The most common clinical complaints were for complication (24 complaints, 6%), misdiagnosis (16 complaints, 4%), unclear treatment plan (16 complaints, 4%), and uncontrolled pain (15 complaints, 3%). The most common nonclinical complaints were for physician bedside manner (93 complaints, 22%), financially related (80 complaints, 19%), unprofessional nonclinical staff (61 complaints, 14%), and wait time (46 complaints, 11%). The difference in the number of complaints for surgical and nonsurgical patients was statistically significant (p < 0.05) for complication and uncontrolled pain. Clinical Relevance Patient satisfaction is dependent on a multitude of clinical and nonclinical factors. An awareness of online physician ratings is essential for hand and wrist surgeons to maintain and improve patient care and patient satisfaction. We believe the results of our study could be used to further improve the quality of care provided by hand and wrist surgeons.

Objectives: Injuries to the foot and ankle are more common in National Basketball Association (NBA) basketball compared to other professional sports. The goal of this study is to report the incidence and associated risk factors of foot and ankle injuries in the NBA athletes. Methods: Foot and ankle injury data from the 2015-16 through 2020-21 NBA seasons was queried and verified using a publicly available database. The truncated 2019-20 season was omitted from this study due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary outcome was the incidence of foot and ankle injuries, reported per 1000 game exposures (GEs). Secondary analysis was performed to identify risk factors for ankle injuries through bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression of player demographics, performance statistics, injury characteristics, and previous lower extremity injuries. Additionally, factors influencing the length of absence were assessed via negative binomial regression. Results: There were 728 structural foot and ankle injuries (5.34 per 1000 GEs) sustained by NBA players over 5 NBA seasons, with sprain/strain as the most common injury type (4.27 per 1000 GEs) (Table 1). The majority of ankle injury events (55%) resulted in 2-10 game absences (Table 4). The likelihood of sustaining an ankle injury was significantly associated with a greater number of games played, previous upper leg injury, and more games missed due to injury (Table 2). Increased length of absence due to ankle injury was significantly associated with greater height, minutes per game, usage rate, points per game, total rebounds per game, and a prior history of foot, ankle, and knee injuries (Table 3). Conclusions: The incidence of foot and ankle injuries was 5.34 per 1000 GEs in professional basketball players. Games played and previous history of upper leg injuries were found to be risk factors for ankle injuries. Factors associated with physiologic burden such as minutes per game and usage rate were associated with an increased severity of injury. [Table: see text][Table: see text][Table: see text][Table: see text]

Objectives: Despite attaining satisfactory knee function following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, many athletes are unable to return to their pre-injury level of play. ACL tears are known to take a significant psychological toll on the injured athlete and an athlete’s “psychological readiness” may play a large role in their ability to return to sport. The Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale is the only questionnaire to specifically assess the psychological readiness to return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Several factors have been identified to affect an athlete’s psychological readiness to return to sport including age and sex. However, the effect of graft choice on psychological readiness to return to sport have not been studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of graft choice on the athlete’s psychological readiness to return to sport. We hypothesized that patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with quadriceps autograft (QA) would reach higher ACL-RSI scores earlier than patients using hamstring autograft (HA) and bone-patellar tendon- bone (BTB) autografts. Methods: The study was a prospective, non-randomized study involving high-level athletes undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with or without meniscal surgery. The participants were involved in varsity high-school, college or professional sports. Each athlete was placed in a group depending on if an all- soft-tissue quadriceps autograft (QA Group), bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (BTB Group) or hamstring autograft (HA Group) was used for their reconstruction. Graft choice was made by the athlete after the benefits and risks of each graft were discussed in detail. Over the study period, thirty consecutive athletes in each group undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with each specific graft were entered into the study. Athletes undergoing concomitant surgery other than meniscal surgery were excluded from the study. The athletes were asked to fill out the ACL-RSI scale 6-months following surgery, at the time of release to full sport and 2-years following surgery. Current literature shows an ACL-RSI score of 65 or higher as being the score that best predicts return to sport. In addition to comparing the ACL-RSI raw scores between groups, we also compared the percentage of patients reaching an ACL-RSI score of 65 (A-R 65) between the graft types. In addition, patient reported outcomes (PROs) including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm surveys were completed at the same time points as the ACL-RSI scores. Clinical outcomes included return to sport (RTS), RTS at the same or higher level, time to RTS and graft re-tear. All patients underwent the same rehabilitation protocol regardless of the graft used. RTS was allowed based on appropriate progression through the rehab program, quadriceps strength 90% that of the non-operated leg and triple-hop test 90% the non-operative leg. Return to sport was defined as participation in an official game within the chosen sport of the athlete. Results: The demographics between the three groups was homogenous with the overall average age of the group being 19.1 years. The study included 43.3% high school, 50% college and 6.7% professional athletes with no difference between the groups. The HA group had an ACL-RSI score of 49.2 at 6- months, 59.2 at RTP and 61.7 at the 2-year follow up. The BTB group had scores of 48.1, 64.7 and 63.1 at 6-month, RTP and 2-years postoperatively. The QA group had significantly higher scores than both the HA and BTB groups at the 6-month time period (65.3), and RTP time point (70.6) and similar scores compared to the other two groups at the 2-year follow up (72.7). The HA and BTB groups had similar ACL-RSI raw scores throughout the study. The QA group had a higher percentage of patients reaching the A-R 65 level (53.3%) compared to the HA group (23.3%) and the BTB group (13.3%) at the 6-month postoperative time point. At the RTS time point, the QA group again had a significantly higher rate of patients reaching the A-R 65 level (65.4%) than the other two groups (33.3% HA and 36% BTB group). At the 2-year time point, there was no difference between the three groups with regards to reaching the A- R 65 level. The percentage of athletes reaching the A-R 65 level was not different between the HA and BTB groups at any time point. The IKDC and Lysholm scores were similar between the three groups at all time points. The overall RTP for the study was 82.2% and RTP at the same or higher level was 62.2%. There was no significant difference in return to play between the three groups (HA group 77%, BTB group 83.3% and QA group 87%). Likewise, RTP at the same or higher level was similar between the groups at 57%, 63% and 67% for the HA, BTB and QA groups respectively. There was a significant difference between the QA group and the HA and BTB groups with respect to time to RTS. The average time to RTS for the QA group was 8.1 months compared to 10.5 months for the HA group and 9.6 months for the BTB group. All three groups showed a significant intragroup difference in the ACL-RSI score at all time points between the cohort of patients in each group who were able to return to sport at the same or higher level and those who could not. Clinically, graft re-tears occurred in 17% of the HA group, 10% of the BTB group and 0% of the QA group (p=.02). Conclusions: The QA lead to a higher ACL-RSI score and higher percentages of athletes reaching the A-R 65 level at the 6-month and RTS time points compared to both the hamstring and BTB groups. This fact may explain why the quad group was able to return to sport in significantly less time than the other two groups. The higher ACL-RSI score may be an indication of an athlete’s confidence in their reconstructed knee. This confidence after surgery may allow the athlete to break through the psychological barriers that can make return to sport difficult.

Objectives: To describe outcomes of posterior capsular release to treat knee extension deficits after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in athletes. Methods: A retrospective review was performed between January 2014 and December 2019 for patients undergoing arthroscopic posterior capsular release for knee extension loss following ACL reconstruction. Patients were indicated for the procedure if they had greater than 10° of extension loss at least three months after ACL reconstruction that was refractory to physical therapy. Patients were included in the study if they were involved in either high school or college athletics, had complete outcomes of interest, and had at least two years of follow up. Collected outcomes included preoperative and postoperative measurement of knee extension, international knee documentation committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, return to sport data, and complications. Results: Over the study period a total of 38 arthroscopic posterior capsular releases were performed. Of these, 20 were high school or college athletes. Two of these patients did not have 2-year follow up, leaving a total of 18 patients included in the analysis. Patients underwent surgery at an average of 16 weeks after ACL reconstruction. Knee extension improved an average of 13.8° at 2-years follow up (pre- release extension deficit 15.1°, post-release extension deficit 1.3°, p < 0.005). Improvements in the IKDC score averaged 21.7 at 6 months and 35.0 at 24 months, both of which were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Similarly, differences in Lysholm included a significant improvement of 23.0 and 34.2 at 6 months and 2 years, respectively (p < 0.001). In total, 77.8% returned to sport at an average of 9.8 months from their primary surgery and 6.5 months following posterior capsular release surgery. Complications included one patient that required revision capsular release for persistent extension loss, one ACL tear of the ipsilateral knee, and two ACL tears of the contralateral knee. No infections or neurovascular injuries occurred. Conclusions: Knee extension loss after ligamentous repair surgery can have significant consequences including diminished patient satisfaction, reduced return to sport, and an increased risk of osteoarthritis development. Although arthroscopic posterior capsular release is a recognized treatment for knee extension loss, outcomes have not been reported in athletes. In our series, arthroscopic posterior capsular release resulted in significant improvement of knee extension and patient reported outcome scores at 6 month and 2 years postoperatively. Additionally, the procedure appears to be safe with few complications and only 5.6% of patients requiring repeat arthroscopy for knee extension loss. Posterior capsular release appears to be a reliable and safe treatment for athletes with persistent knee extension loss after ACL reconstruction.

Objectives: Evidence is limited related to the effects of autograft type on functional performance during gait lab-based functional testing after ACL reconstruction (ACLR), especially the quadriceps autograft. The goal of this study was to compare biomechanical outcomes as measured by 3D motion analysis during the drop vertical test between quadriceps autograft with bone block (QB), quadriceps autograft without bone block (Q), hamstring autograft (HS), and bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (BTB) six-months postoperatively in an adolescent population. We hypothesized that the quadriceps groups would demonstrate decreased knee extension moments as compared to the hamstring autograft group without other significant differences. Methods: Patients aged 8-18 years who underwent primary ACLR were included. Patients with previous history of ipsilateral knee surgery were excluded. Kinematic and kinetic data collected during a drop vertical jump test in a formal gait lab using a computerized video-based system (Motion Analysis Corp. CORTEX software) was collected six months after ACLR and compared to the uninjured contralateral limb. The Kruskal Wallis test and subsequent pairwise comparisons were carried out for each studied parameter. Primary outcomes included transverse plane hip power, hip internal rotation moment, knee valgus angles, and knee extensor moments between the graft types. Secondary outcomes included hip abduction moment, knee valgus moment, and knee external rotation moment. Results: A total of 155 subjects’ charts were included for review, with 54, 40, 35, and 26 subjects in the HS, QB, Q, and BTB groups respectively. There were no significant differences in terms of age, sex, or affected leg (p > 0.1973). Athletic activity for each subject was also noted when appropriate, including soccer (37), basketball (34), and American football (30). The QB group had smaller knee extension moments maximums (-0.97 N*m/kg vs. -0.35 N*m/kg, p = 0.0323) and smaller knee extension moment averages (-0.12 N*m/kg vs. -0.03 N*m/kg, p = 0.0265) as compared to the HS group. The Q group demonstrated smaller knee extension moment averages (-0.13 N*m/kg vs. -0.03 N*m/kg, p = 0.459) as compared to the HS group. Analysis of secondary outcomes revealed that the HS group demonstrated larger knee valgus moments at initial contact (0.28 N*m/kg vs -0.35 N*m/kg, p = 0.0254) as compared to the Q group. The HS group demonstrated significantly larger hip adduction moment maximums (0.30 N*m/kg vs -0.04 N*m/kg, p = 0.0426) and smaller knee external rotation moment averages (-0.02 N*m/kg vs 0.02 N*m/kg, p = 0.0206) as compared to the QB group. No other secondary outcomes were statistically significant between any of the groups. Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that the quadriceps autograft may confer improved knee coronal plane biomechanics in regard to ACL reinjury rates when compared to a hamstring autograft at 6 months after ACLR in adolescent patients performing a drop vertical jump. The hamstring autograft group was significantly associated with larger knee valgus moments at initial contact as compared to the quadriceps autograft without bone block and significantly larger hip adduction moments compared to the quadriceps autograft with bone block. Both quadriceps grafts were shown to demonstrate significantly decreased knee extension moments as compared to a hamstring autograft. Further long-term clinical studies may be useful in determining whether the apparent biomechanical differences seen between autograft types are correlated with reinjury rates.

Objectives: ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft (HA) has been found to have a high re-tear rate in high risk patients including those with a Pivot shift of 2 or higher and those with generalized ligamentous laxity (GLL). Because of this, the use of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) has gained traction in the sports community. Several studies have shown lower ACL graft re-tears with the addition of LET and is felt by many to be necessary when using a HA in high risk patients. However, no study has compared hamstring autograft + LET versus other graft types. The purpose of our study was to compare the surgical outcomes of HA+LET vs an all-soft-tissue quadriceps autograft (QA) without LET. We hypothesized that a QA would lead to similar graft re-tear and rotational instability rates as HA+LET. Methods: This retrospective study compared high risk patients including those with a Pivot shift of 2 or more and GLL undergoing ACL reconstruction with either a HA, HA+LET and QA. In this study, GLL was defined as patients with a Beighton score of 4 or more. Patients were included in the study if they were undergoing a primary ACL reconstruction with either hamstring autograft (HA group), hamstring autograft with extra-articular tenodesis (HA+LET group) or all-soft-tissue quadriceps autograft (QA group) and no other procedures other than meniscal work. All surgeries were performed by the senior surgeon and followed the same rehabilitation protocol after surgery regardless of what type of graft was used during the surgery. Graft choice was dependent on the when during the study the procedure was performed. Early in the study period, HA were used on most patients regardless of whether they were high risk or not. Later, HA+LET was performed due to emerging studies showing higher failure rates in high risk patients undergoing HA alone compared to those undergoing HA+LET. Finally, the senior author transitioned to using QA for most cases. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) were obtained on each patient preoperatively, 3,6,12 and 24-months after surgery. The PROs used in this study included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores. Clinical failure was defined by a patient who had a graft re-tear or those with a residual pivot shift of 2 or more after surgery. Pivot shift was tested for at the 6,12 and 24-month follow up. Other complications associated with the procedure were documented. Results: A total of 166 high risk patients underwent ACL reconstruction over the 7 year study period. There were 63 patients in the HA group, 47 in the HA+LET and 56 in the QA group. The demographics between the three groups was similar with an overall age of the patients in the study being 17.8 years. The mean Beighton score was 3.2 for the group with 24% of the population having GLL. The overall rate of Grade 2 or higher pivot was 82%. There was no difference between the groups with regards to percentage GLL or 2+pivot shift. All three groups had a higher percentage of women than men (HA group 66%; HA+LET group 62% and QA group 56%), but there was no significant difference between the groups. The QA group had a significantly larger graft diameter (9.6mm) compared to the HA group (7.9mm) and the HA+LET group (8.1mm) (p<.001). The number of meniscal repair and partial meniscectomy was similar between all three groups with 21.1% of the population undergoing meniscectomy and 48% of the entire population undergoing meniscal repair. The study was made up of 68.4% athletes for the HA group, 62.4% for the HA+LET and 72.6% for the QA group (p=.32). A significant increase in both IKDC and Lysholm scores were seen at every timepoint compared to preoperative levels. There was no difference between the three groups at any time point for either the IKDC and Lysholm scores. The preoperative IKDC score for the HA group increased from 51.7 to 90.3 at the 2-year follow-up. The HA+LET IKDC scores increased from 53.1 preoperatively to 88.4 at the 2-year follow-up. The QA group had IKDC scores of 49.8 pre op and 90.6 at 2 years. The Lysholm scores increased from 53 to 91.9, 54.8 to 89.4 and 51.9 to 92.6 preoperatively to the 2-year follow-up for the HA, HA+LET and QA groups respectively. The graft re-tear rate of the HA group was significantly higher than the HA+LET and QA groups (14.3%, 2.1% and 1.8% respectively). Residual pivot shift of 2 or more was found in 36.5% of the HA group, 14.9% in the HA+LET group and 19.6% in the QA group. The residual pivot shift in the HA group was significantly higher than the HA+LET and QA groups, but no difference was identified between the HA+LET and QA groups. Return to sport (RTS) was similar between the three groups with 80% of athletes returning to sport with HA grafts, 81% with HA+LET and 86% with QA grafts. The use of a QA in this high-risk population lead to a significantly faster RTS (8.6 months) compared to the HA and HA+LET groups; however, the addition of a LET did not lead to a shorter time to return to sport (10.7 months for the HA group and 11.7 months for the HA+LET group). There was no difference between the three groups for contralateral ACL tears, arthrofibrosis or infection. Conclusions: The use of an all-soft-tissue QA or the addition of an LET to a HA both lead to significant decreases in graft re-tear rate and residual pivot shifts of 2 or greater compared to a HA graft alone in high risk patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction. However, the use of QA and LET do not improve the patient reported outcome scores at 2-year follow up compared to HA alone. RTS was significantly faster with QA compared to the HA and HA+LET; however, the addition of an LET to a HA did not increase the rate to which an athlete was able to return to play. In conclusion, high risk patients including those with GLL and pivot shifts greater than 2 should undergo ACL reconstruction with either a quadriceps autograft or have a LET added to a hamstring autograft.

Purpose To determine clinical and radiographic outcomes of medial collateral ligament (MCL) pie‐crusting during isolated medial meniscal root repair. Methods A retrospective review was conducted between August 2013 and December 2019 in patients undergoing isolated medial meniscal root repair. Outcomes, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, re‐tears, MCL laxity, and conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), were compared between pie crust (PC) and non‐pie crust (NPC) cohorts. Other assessments included subjective instability or stiffness, infection, and intra‐operative chondromalacia. Additionally, radiographic outcomes were compared to determine progression of medial compartment arthrosis. Results Final analysis included 97 knees, 45 in the PC, and 52 in the NPC group. IKDC and Lysholm scores were similar between both groups preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. However, at the 6,12, and 24‐month follow up, the PC group had a significantly higher measured IKDC and Lysholm scores than the NPC group. PASS percentages for the IKDC score were significantly higher in the PC group at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years (96.2%; P = .02) follow‐up compared to the NPC group. MCID percentages for the IKDC score were also significantly higher at the 1‐ and 2‐year (100%; P = .05) follow‐up in the PC group compared to the NPC group. There was also a significantly higher rate of recurrent medial meniscal root tears in the NPC group (4 [8.9%]) compared to the PC group (0 [ P = .03]). No MCL laxity was observed at 6 months follow‐up. Conclusions MCL pie‐crusting during isolated medial meniscal root repair can be used as an alternative surgical technique, as it leads to improved clinical and patient outcomes compared to patients who do not undergo MCL pie‐crusting in the short term. Additionally, those that underwent MCL pie‐crusting had a lower incidence of recurrent tears, and no patients experienced MCL laxity at 6 months. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort/comparative study.

Background: Ankle injuries are more common in the National Basketball Association (NBA) compared with other professional sports. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to report the incidence and associated risk factors of ankle injuries in NBA athletes. It was hypothesized that factors associated with an increased physiologic burden, such as minutes per game (MPG), usage rate, and associated lower extremity injury, would be associated with increased ankle injury risk and time loss. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: Ankle injury data from the 2015-2016 through 2020-2021 NBA seasons were evaluated. The truncated 2019-2020 season due to the COVID-19 pandemic was omitted. The primary outcome was the incidence of ankle injuries, reported per 1000 game-exposures (GEs). Secondary analysis was performed to identify risk factors for ankle injuries through bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression of player demographic characteristics, performance statistics, injury characteristics, and previous lower extremity injuries. Factors influencing the time loss after injury were assessed via a negative binomial regression analysis. Results: A total of 554 ankle injuries (4.06 injuries per 1000 GEs) were sustained by NBA players over 5 NBA seasons, with sprain/strain the most common injury type (3.71 injuries per 1000 GEs). The majority of ankle injury events (55%) resulted in 2 to 10 game absences. The likelihood of sustaining an ankle injury was significantly associated with a greater number of games played ( P = .029) and previous injury to the hip, hamstring, or quadriceps ( P = .004). Increased length of absence due to ankle injury was associated with greater height ( P = .019), MPG ( P < .001), usage rate ( P = .025), points per game ( P = .011), and a prior history of foot ( P = .003), ankle ( P < .001), and knee injuries ( P < .001). Conclusion: The incidence of ankle injuries was 4.06 per 1000 GEs in professional basketball players. Games played and prior history of hip, hamstring, or quadriceps injuries were found to be risk factors for ankle injuries. Factors associated with physiologic burden such as MPG and usage rate were associated with an increased time loss after injury.