Citations 26

Use of perceptual memory as a performance validity indicator: initial validation with simulated mild traumatic brain injury

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology | February 12, 2024 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 55-66

10.1080/13803395.2024.2314991 | PMID 38346160

The relationship between performance validity testing, external incentives, and cognitive functioning in long COVID

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology | February 1, 2024 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 6-15

10.1080/13803395.2024.2312625 | PMID 38299800

Emotional functioning in long COVID: Comparison to post-concussion syndrome using the Personality Assessment Inventory

The Clinical Neuropsychologist | October 15, 2023 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 963-983

10.1080/13854046.2023.2264546 | PMID 37838973

Examination of the relationship between symptom and performance validity measures across referral subtypes

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology | October 4, 2023 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 162-171

10.1080/13803395.2023.2261633 | PMID 37791494

Diagnosis of Coexistent Neurodegenerative Dementias in Multiple Sclerosis (P12-3.018)

Neurology | April 28, 2023 | Volume: 100 | Issue: 17_supplement_2 | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.0000000000203592

Cognitive sequelae in MOG antibody-associated disease (P13-5.025)

Neurology | April 28, 2023 | Volume: 100 | Issue: 17_supplement_2 | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.0000000000203034

Diagnosis of coexistent neurodegenerative dementias in multiple sclerosis

Brain Communications | June 22, 2022 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/braincomms/fcac167 | PMID 35822102

Abstract Among people with multiple sclerosis, cognitive impairment occurs commonly and is a potent predictor of disability. Some multiple sclerosis patients present with severe cognitive impairment, and distinguishing multiple sclerosis-related cognitive impairment from co-existent progressive neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer disease poses a diagnostic challenge. The use of biomarkers such as PET and CSF proteins may facilitate this distinction. The study was a retrospective, descriptive study on convenience samples of separate cohorts, one of cognitively impaired multiple sclerosis patients evaluated on autopsy to demonstrate coincidence of both multiple sclerosis and neurodegenerative cognitive diseases. The second cohort were cognitively impaired multiple sclerosis patients evaluated by biomarker to investigate possible additional neurodegenerative cognitive disorders contributing to the cognitive impairment. We investigated selected biomarkers among 31 severely impaired patients (biomarker cohort) and 12 severely impaired patients assessed at autopsy and selected 24 (23 biomarker cohort, 1 autopsy cohort) had comprehensive neurocognitive testing. Biomarker cohort investigations included 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET and/or CSF amyloid Aβ1-42, phospho-tau and total tau levels. The autopsy cohort was evaluated with comprehensive neuropathological assessment for aetiology of cognitive impairment. The cohorts shared similar sex, age at multiple sclerosis onset and multiple sclerosis clinical course. The autopsy-cohort patients were older at diagnosis (69.5 versus 57 years, P = 0.006), had longer disease duration [median (range) 20 years (3–59) versus 9 (1–32), P = 0.001] and had more impaired bedside mental status scores at last follow-up [Kokmen median (range) 23 (1–38) versus 31 (9–34) P = 0.01]. Autopsy-cohort patients confirmed, or excluded, coexistent neurogenerative disease by neuropathology gold standard. Most biomarker-cohort patients had informative results evaluating coexistent neurogenerative disease. Biomarkers may be useful in indicating a coexistent neurodegenerative disease earlier, and in life, in patients with multiple sclerosis and significant cognitive impairment.
Outcomes in post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) at 6 months post-infection Part 1: Cognitive functioning

The Clinical Neuropsychologist | February 8, 2022 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 806-828

10.1080/13854046.2022.2030412 | PMID 35130818

Outcomes in post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) at 6 months post-infection part 2: Psychological functioning

The Clinical Neuropsychologist | January 31, 2022 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 829-847

10.1080/13854046.2022.2030411 | PMID 35098861

The Alliance AMBUSH Trial: Rationale and Design

Cancers | January 14, 2022 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 414

10.3390/cancers14020414 | PMID 35053576

Unlike medulloblastoma (MB) in children, robust prospective trials have not taken place for older patients due to the low incidence of MB in adults and adolescent and young adults (AYA). Current MB treatment paradigms for older patients have been extrapolated from the pediatric experience even though questions exist about the applicability of these approaches. Clinical and molecular classification of MB now provides better prognostication and is being incorporated in pediatric therapeutic trials. It has been established that genomic alterations leading to activation of the sonic hedgehog (SHH) pathway occur in approximately 60% of MB in patients over the age of 16 years. Within this cohort, protein patched homolog (PTCH) and smoothened (SMO) mutations are commonly found. Among patients whose tumors harbor the SHH molecular signature, it is estimated that over 80% of patients could respond to SHH pathway inhibitors. Given the advances in the understanding of molecular subgroups and the lack of robust clinical data for adult/AYA MB, the Alliance for Clinical Trial in Oncology group developed the AMBUSH trial: Comprehensive Management of AYA and Adult Patients with Medulloblastoma or Pineal Embryonal Tumors with a Randomized Placebo Controlled Phase II Focusing on Sonic Hedgehog Pathway Inhibition in SHH Subgroup Patients (Adult & Adolescent MedulloBlastoma Using Sonic Hedgehog Trial). This trial will enroll patients 18 years of age or older with MB (any molecular subgroup and risk stratification) or pineal embryonal tumor. Patients will be assigned to one of three cohorts: (1) average risk non-SHH-MB, (2) average risk SHH-MB, and (3) high risk MB or pineal embryonal tumors. All patients will receive protocol-directed comprehensive treatment with radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Patients with SHH-MB in cohort 1 will be randomized to a smoothened inhibitor or placebo as maintenance therapy for one year.