DiGuardo, Margaret

Abstract Diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34-mutant (DHG_H3G34) is a novel tumor type in the 2021 WHO CNS classification. We describe a comprehensive sequencing and high-resolution genome-wide copy number analysis of a series of cases clinically tested by a single laboratory (2018-2022). Cases included tumors from 47 unique patients (1 reportedly recurrent) that had an H3-3A G34 mutation detected using an 187-gene mutation and fusion targeted neuro-oncology NGS panel (n=47). A subset (n=18) of cases was also tested Oncoscan chromosomal microarray. Median age at testing was 20 years (range, 12-50). H3-3A G34 mutations included G34R (n=44; 94%), G34V (n=2) and a novel G34E variant considered to be likely clinically relevant (n=1). All DHG_H3G34 were hemispheric tumors, and one tumor was multifocal with midline involvement. Concurrent mutations recurrently involved ATRX (n=38), TERT promoter (n=3; mutually exclusive with ATRX mutations), TP53 (n=43), PDGFRA (n=26), PTEN (n=5), NF1 (n=4, all patients over 20 years), PIK3CA (n=4) and CDKN2A (n=3). The single recurrent tumor also had an MSH6 mutation, and in addition to 3 other cases, had increased number of sequence variants suggestive of a high tumor mutational burden. A single case also showed an FGFR3::FAM184B (exon 17::exon 2) fusion. All cases with available chromosomal microarray data had unbalanced genomes with multiple chromosomal gains/losses, and regions of copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity. The most frequent recurrent (at least 50% of cases) abnormalities were losses involving 3q, 4q, 10q, 13q and 18q, and 17p copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity encompassing TP53 (all but one case had concomitant TP53 mutation), a pattern reminiscent of IDH-mutant astrocytomas. Oncogene amplifications (PDGFRA and PIK3CA) were detected in 3 (of 18) cases. CDKN2A/B deletion was observed in 8 cases (2 homozygous). In conclusion, we describe additional sequence and copy-number abnormalities in DHG_H3G34, expanding the spectrum of genetic changes associated with this novel tumor type.

AbstractBackgroundHigh titers of cold agglutinins jeopardize the quality of an apheresis product meant for autologous or allogeneic transplant. Management of transplant patients with cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is often experience‐based and under reported, yet decisions must be made quickly to optimize product management and patient outcomes. There remains a lack of data quantifying cell recovery and viability when using various warming methodologies.Study Design and MethodsTo expand the published experimental data on this subject, our human cellular therapy lab compared cellular recoveries and viabilities after manipulation of cryopreserved apheresis products through various warming methodologies: (1) extended warming in a water bath, (2) warming via blood warmer and infusion pump, and (3) warming in a water bath followed by infusion pump as a control to assess potential shear stress effects.ResultsThe presented studies demonstrate that all methods of product warming produce the same rates of recovery of total and viable cells across vital cell types prior to patient administration. Statistically, use of an extended water bath protocol provided a marginal benefit in recovery of total nucleated cells, though this effect is diminished when products are held for an extended period to simulate a delay in administration.DiscussionThese results can inform decisions to improve patient care and minimize product manipulation and loss. Centers are encouraged to use this information to guide proactive measures to establish a standard operating procedure to manage CAD cases.

AbstractBackgroundDaratumumab (Dara), an anti‐CD38 monoclonal antibody for hematologic malignancies, interferes with routine blood bank testing, specifically affecting the antibody screen and identification panels. In 2016, the AABB recommended performing a baseline phenotype or genotype before a patient (Pt) begins taking anti‐CD38 to avoid this interference and potential problems with transfusion. The objective of this study was to assess red blood cell (RBC) utilization and subsequent incidence of alloimmunization to the transfused RBCs in patients receiving Dara.Methods and MaterialsWe monitored 244 patients taking Dara to determine their red blood cell transfusions and incidence of clinically significant antibody formation before and following administration of Dara. Poisson generalized estimating equations with log link were used comparing the post‐Dara incidence and prevalence to those prior, with significance defined as p < .05.ResultsFrom September 1, 2015 to December 22, 2018, 244 patients on Dara were identified, of which 145 patients (59.4%) received a red blood cell transfusion. Antibody screens were performed on 97 of the 145 patients at least 2 weeks following RBC transfusion. Four of the total transfused patients (2.8% total, 4.1% patients with follow‐up antibody screen testing) formed new clinically significant alloantibodies, which was not significantly different from Asare's hematologic incidence (p = .98/p = .49).ConclusionsThis study showed our patients on Dara did not form alloantibodies following RBC transfusion at a higher incidence than similar patient populations.

Purpose: molecular testing is often indicated for recently transfused patients. However, there are no guidelines regarding the potential interference from donor DNA or whether it is necessary to wait for a period of time post-transfusion prior to genetic testing. While the majority of patients are transfused in the non-trauma setting using leukoreduced (LR) red blood cell products, the degree of leukoreduction varies among centers and is not universally practiced. Methods: whole blood units collected from anonymous donors were used in an in vitro transfusion model. One unit was split: half being leukoreduced simulating a leukopenic recipient and half left untreated. Donors were simulated by leukoreduced, partially leukoreduced (PLR), or non-leukoreduced units, transfused in 2, 5, or 16 unit equivalents. DNA from the combinations were subjected to short tandem repeat (STR) analysis for chimerism detection. Results: donor DNA was not detectable in any of the LR combinations, but detected in the PLR combinations, ranging from 0.1 to 1.5% donor DNA in the immunocompetent recipient and 6.3–27.8% in the leukopenic recipient. Non-LR donor DNA was also detected (13–95%). Conclusion: donor-derived DNA from leukoreduced blood products is unlikely to interfere with the interpretation of germline genetic testing in immunocompetent recipients but may interfere in immunocompromised recipients.

BackgroundProzone is a known phenomenon affecting immunoassays causing falsely low or negative results when excess target is present in the test system. For assays used to evaluate immune‐mediated platelet (PLT) transfusion refractoriness, prozone‐like phenomenon has been described in solid‐phase human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody testing and can be mitigated by diluting samples or pretreating samples with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or dithiothreitol. Prozone phenomenon has not yet been described in solid‐phase red blood cell (RBC) adherence PLT crossmatch assays.Case ReportA 40‐year‐old female with myeloid sarcoma and PLT transfusion refractoriness underwent repeated solid‐phase PLT crossmatches; however, crossmatch‐compatible PLTs units did not yield adequate PLT count responses. Class I HLA antibody testing with neat, diluted, and EDTA‐pretreated serum demonstrated significant prozone‐like effect and the presence of numerous high strength HLA antibodies. Based on this HLA antibody profile, HLA antigen–negative PLTs gave an adequate PLT count response. It was noted that the HLA types of her crossmatch‐compatible PLTs were incompatible with her HLA antibody profile (eg, HLA‐A2). With ABO‐identical, HLA‐A2–positive PLT units, a solid‐phase PLT crossmatch was repeated using undiluted and diluted EDTA plasma. Undiluted EDTA plasma demonstrated negative or weakly positive PLT crossmatches while the diluted EDTA plasma demonstrated strongly positive PLT crossmatches.ConclusionThe prozone phenomenon can cause false‐negative results in solid‐phase RBC adherence PLT crossmatch assays, which can be mitigated with sample dilution. In immune‐mediated PLT transfusion–refractory patients with high‐strength HLA antibodies, sample dilution should be considered to correctly identify compatible PLT inventory.